Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Protocol

Utilization of screening mammography in older women according to comorbidity and age: protocol for a systematic review

Authors: Joshua Demb, Isabel Allen, Dejana Braithwaite

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Approximately half of new invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed each year in the United States occur among women aged 65 years and older. The increasing life expectancy coupled with the attendant rise in breast cancer incidence and elimination of out-of-pocket expenses for screening mammography as a result of the Affordable Care Act could lead to higher utilization rates of screening mammography. Although research indicates that life expectancy should be a strong consideration when making screening decisions among older women, the extent to which screening mammography utilization is tailored to comorbidity and life expectancy is not well established.

Methods/design

To identify relevant studies, a systematic search of the literature will be conducted using PubMed and EMBASE between January 1, 1991, and March 1, 2016. Additional studies will be found through citation review or by contacting experts in the field. The inclusion criteria will be any study design comprised of women aged 65 and older, assessing women’s comorbidity, functional impairments, and/or health status, and reporting outcome measures that addressed mammography utilization within the last 1–5 years. For each study, two authors will independently abstract data regarding study eligibility and outcomes to determine relevance. Quantitative results will be extracted from text and tables, choosing preferably those adjusted for important confounders.

Discussion

The review will provide evidence on the impact of comorbidity, functional limitations, and health status on screening mammography utilization in older women and inform decision aids in this area.

Systematic review registration

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alteri R, Bertaut T, Brinton LA, et al. Breast cancer facts and figures: 2015–2016. Atlanta: American Cancer Society 2015. Alteri R, Bertaut T, Brinton LA, et al. Breast cancer facts and figures: 2015–2016. Atlanta: American Cancer Society 2015.
6.
go back to reference American Cancer Society: cancer facts & figures, 2016. American Cancer Society: cancer facts & figures, 2016.
13.
19.
go back to reference Braithwaite D, Walter LC, Izano M, Kerlikowske K. Benefits and harms of screening mammography by comorbidity and age: a qualitative synthesis of observational studies and decision analyses. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(5):561–72. doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3580-3.CrossRefPubMed Braithwaite D, Walter LC, Izano M, Kerlikowske K. Benefits and harms of screening mammography by comorbidity and age: a qualitative synthesis of observational studies and decision analyses. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(5):561–72. doi:10.​1007/​s11606-015-3580-3.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Braithwaite D, Demb J, Henderson LM. Optimal breast cancer screening strategies for the older woman: current perspectives. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;11:111–25. Braithwaite D, Demb J, Henderson LM. Optimal breast cancer screening strategies for the older woman: current perspectives. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;11:111–25.
25.
go back to reference Egger M, Smith G, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2001.CrossRef Egger M, Smith G, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2001.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Utilization of screening mammography in older women according to comorbidity and age: protocol for a systematic review
Authors
Joshua Demb
Isabel Allen
Dejana Braithwaite
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0345-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Systematic Reviews 1/2016 Go to the issue