Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Review Paper

Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography by Comorbidity and Age: A Qualitative Synthesis of Observational Studies and Decision Analyses

Authors: Dejana Braithwaite, PhD, Louise C. Walter, MD, Monika Izano, MSc, Karla Kerlikowske, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

We conducted a systematic review to assess the quality and limitations of published studies examining benefits and harms of screening mammography in relation to comorbidity and age.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1980 through June 2013 for studies that examined benefits or harms of screening mammography in women aged 65 years or older in relation to comorbidity. For each study, we extracted data regarding setting, design, quality, screening schedule, measure of comorbidity, and estimates of benefits and/or harms. We reviewed 1760 titles, identifying 7 articles that met the inclusion criteria: prospective cohort (two studies), retrospective cohort (two studies), and decision analyses (three studies). No randomized controlled trials were identified.

Results

At least one measure of life expectancy or reduction in the risk of breast cancer death as a marker of benefit was examined in four studies, whereas three studies addressed the harms of screening mammography, including false-positive results. Both cohort studies and decision analyses showed that screening benefits decreased with increasing age and comorbidity burden.

Conclusions

The limited evidence currently available suggests that, apart from older women with severe comorbidity, women 65 and older may experience improvements in life expectancy from screening. Given the potential for harm, it is unclear whether the magnitude of the benefit is sufficient to warrant regular screening. Women, clinicians and policymakers should consider these factors in deciding whether continue screening.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures, 2014. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures, 2014.
2.
go back to reference Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA. 2001;285:2750–6.CrossRefPubMed Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA. 2001;285:2750–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mandelblatt JS, Schechter CB, Yabroff KR, et al. Toward optimal screening strategies for older women. Costs, benefits, and harms of breast cancer screening by age, biology, and health status. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:487–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mandelblatt JS, Schechter CB, Yabroff KR, et al. Toward optimal screening strategies for older women. Costs, benefits, and harms of breast cancer screening by age, biology, and health status. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:487–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
5.
go back to reference Mandelblatt JS, Silliman R. Hanging in the balance: making decisions about the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening among the oldest old without a safety net of scientific evidence. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:487–90.CrossRefPubMed Mandelblatt JS, Silliman R. Hanging in the balance: making decisions about the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening among the oldest old without a safety net of scientific evidence. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:487–90.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Berry DA, Baines CJ, Baum M, et al. Flawed inferences about screening mammography's benefit based on observational data. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:639–40. author reply 641-632.CrossRefPubMed Berry DA, Baines CJ, Baum M, et al. Flawed inferences about screening mammography's benefit based on observational data. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:639–40. author reply 641-632.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zappa M, Visioli CB, Ciatto S. Mammography screening in elderly women: Efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;46:235–9.CrossRefPubMed Zappa M, Visioli CB, Ciatto S. Mammography screening in elderly women: Efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;46:235–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cobain EF, Hayes DF. Indications for prognostic gene expression profiling in early breast cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2015;16:340.CrossRef Cobain EF, Hayes DF. Indications for prognostic gene expression profiling in early breast cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2015;16:340.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Extermann M. Interaction between comorbidity and cancer. Cancer Control. 2007;14:13–22.PubMed Extermann M. Interaction between comorbidity and cancer. Cancer Control. 2007;14:13–22.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Extermann M. Measurement and impact of comorbidity in older cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2000;35:181–200.CrossRefPubMed Extermann M. Measurement and impact of comorbidity in older cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2000;35:181–200.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Satariano WA, Silliman RA. Comorbidity: Implications for research and practice in geriatric oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;48:239–48.CrossRefPubMed Satariano WA, Silliman RA. Comorbidity: Implications for research and practice in geriatric oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;48:239–48.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Etzioni R, Gulati R, Mallinger L, Mandelblatt J. Influence of study features and methods on overdiagnosis estimates in breast and prostate cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:831–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Etzioni R, Gulati R, Mallinger L, Mandelblatt J. Influence of study features and methods on overdiagnosis estimates in breast and prostate cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:831–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankaskas BC, Zhu W, Miglioretti DL. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:481–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankaskas BC, Zhu W, Miglioretti DL. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:481–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Braithwaite D, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, et al. Screening Outcomes in Older US Women Undergoing Multiple Mammograms in Community Practice: Does Interval, Age or Comorbidity Score Affect Tumor Characteristics or False Positive Rates? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(5):334–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Braithwaite D, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, et al. Screening Outcomes in Older US Women Undergoing Multiple Mammograms in Community Practice: Does Interval, Age or Comorbidity Score Affect Tumor Characteristics or False Positive Rates? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(5):334–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, et al. Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:738–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, et al. Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:738–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Walter LC, Lewis CL, Barton MB. Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: a review of the evidence. Am J Med. 2005;118:1078–86.CrossRefPubMed Walter LC, Lewis CL, Barton MB. Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: a review of the evidence. Am J Med. 2005;118:1078–86.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:727–37. W237-742.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:727–37. W237-742.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Richardson W, Detsky A. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: VII. How to use a clinical decision analysis. JAMA. 1992;273:1292–5.CrossRef Richardson W, Detsky A. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: VII. How to use a clinical decision analysis. JAMA. 1992;273:1292–5.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Justice AC, Covinsky KE, Berlin JA. Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:515–24.CrossRefPubMed Justice AC, Covinsky KE, Berlin JA. Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:515–24.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Barratt A, Irwig L, Glasziou P, et al. Relative benefit of mammography reduces with age. Evid Based Healthc. 2002;6:156–7.CrossRef Barratt A, Irwig L, Glasziou P, et al. Relative benefit of mammography reduces with age. Evid Based Healthc. 2002;6:156–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kajbaf S, Nichol G, Zimmerman D. Cancer screening and life expectancy of Canadian patients with kidney failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17:1786–9.CrossRefPubMed Kajbaf S, Nichol G, Zimmerman D. Cancer screening and life expectancy of Canadian patients with kidney failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17:1786–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference LeBrun CJ, Diehl LF, Abbott KC, Welch PG, Yuan CM. Life expectancy benefits of cancer screening in the end-stage renal disease population. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;35:237–43.CrossRefPubMed LeBrun CJ, Diehl LF, Abbott KC, Welch PG, Yuan CM. Life expectancy benefits of cancer screening in the end-stage renal disease population. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;35:237–43.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Yasmeen S, Xing G, Morris C, Chlebowski RT, Romano PS. Comorbidities and mammography use interact to explain racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Cancer. 2011;117:3252–61.CrossRefPubMed Yasmeen S, Xing G, Morris C, Chlebowski RT, Romano PS. Comorbidities and mammography use interact to explain racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Cancer. 2011;117:3252–61.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Terret C, Castel-Kremer E, Albrand G, Droz JP. Effects of comorbidity on screening and early diagnosis of cancer in elderly people. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:80–7.CrossRefPubMed Terret C, Castel-Kremer E, Albrand G, Droz JP. Effects of comorbidity on screening and early diagnosis of cancer in elderly people. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:80–7.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Quale C, Chu PW, Rosenberg R, Kerlikowske K. Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older? Med Care. 2006;44:463–70.CrossRefPubMed Smith-Bindman R, Quale C, Chu PW, Rosenberg R, Kerlikowske K. Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older? Med Care. 2006;44:463–70.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Schousboe JT, Kerlikowske K, Loh A, Cummings SR. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:10–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schousboe JT, Kerlikowske K, Loh A, Cummings SR. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:10–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Salzmann P, Phillips KA, Cauley JA, Cummings SR. Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness. JAMA. 1999;282:2156–63.CrossRefPubMed Kerlikowske K, Salzmann P, Phillips KA, Cauley JA, Cummings SR. Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness. JAMA. 1999;282:2156–63.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Walter LC, Lindquist K, O'Hare AM, Johansen KL. Targeting screening mammography according to life expectancy among women undergoing dialysis. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1203–8.CrossRefPubMed Walter LC, Lindquist K, O'Hare AM, Johansen KL. Targeting screening mammography according to life expectancy among women undergoing dialysis. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1203–8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Chertow GM, Paltiel AD, Owen WF Jr, Lazarus JM. Cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in end-stage renal disease. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1345–50.CrossRefPubMed Chertow GM, Paltiel AD, Owen WF Jr, Lazarus JM. Cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in end-stage renal disease. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1345–50.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Sennerstam RB, Wiksell H, Schassburger KU, Auer GU. Breast cancer and clinical outcome among women over 60 years of age a plead for more screening and alternative treatments. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2012;34:189–94. Sennerstam RB, Wiksell H, Schassburger KU, Auer GU. Breast cancer and clinical outcome among women over 60 years of age a plead for more screening and alternative treatments. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2012;34:189–94.
34.
go back to reference Stout NK, Rosenberg MA, Trentham-Dietz A, Smith MA, Robinson SM, Fryback DG. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:774–82.CrossRefPubMed Stout NK, Rosenberg MA, Trentham-Dietz A, Smith MA, Robinson SM, Fryback DG. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:774–82.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Fleming ST, Pursley HG, Newman B, Pavlov D, Chen K. Comorbidity as a predictor of stage of illness for patients with breast cancer. Med Care. 2005;43:132–40.CrossRefPubMed Fleming ST, Pursley HG, Newman B, Pavlov D, Chen K. Comorbidity as a predictor of stage of illness for patients with breast cancer. Med Care. 2005;43:132–40.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Yasmeen S, Hubbard RA, Romano PS, et al. Risk of Advanced-Stage Breast Cancer among Older Women with Comorbidities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012. Yasmeen S, Hubbard RA, Romano PS, et al. Risk of Advanced-Stage Breast Cancer among Older Women with Comorbidities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012.
37.
go back to reference McPherson CP, Swenson KK, Lee MW. The effects of mammographic detection and comorbidity on the survival of older women with breast cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1061–8.CrossRefPubMed McPherson CP, Swenson KK, Lee MW. The effects of mammographic detection and comorbidity on the survival of older women with breast cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1061–8.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Messecar DC. Mammography screening for older women with and without cognitive impairment. J Gerontol Nurs. 2000;26:14–24. quiz 52-13.CrossRefPubMed Messecar DC. Mammography screening for older women with and without cognitive impairment. J Gerontol Nurs. 2000;26:14–24. quiz 52-13.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Mandelblatt JS, Wheat ME, Monane M, Moshief RD, Hollenberg JP, Tang J. Breast cancer screening for elderly women with and without comorbid conditions. A decision analysis model. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:722–30.CrossRefPubMed Mandelblatt JS, Wheat ME, Monane M, Moshief RD, Hollenberg JP, Tang J. Breast cancer screening for elderly women with and without comorbid conditions. A decision analysis model. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:722–30.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Gulati R, Mariotto AB, et al. Personalizing age of cancer screening cessation based on comorbid conditions: model estimates of harms and benefits. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:104–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Gulati R, Mariotto AB, et al. Personalizing age of cancer screening cessation based on comorbid conditions: model estimates of harms and benefits. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:104–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:493–502.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:493–502.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Randolph WM, Goodwin JS, Mahnken JD, Freeman JL. Regular mammography use is associated with elimination of age-related disparities in size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:783–90.CrossRefPubMed Randolph WM, Goodwin JS, Mahnken JD, Freeman JL. Regular mammography use is associated with elimination of age-related disparities in size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:783–90.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Walter LC. What is the right cancer screening rate for older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:2037–9.CrossRefPubMed Walter LC. What is the right cancer screening rate for older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:2037–9.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Schonberg MA, McCarthy EP, York M, Davis RB, Marcantonio ER. Factors influencing elderly women's mammography screening decisions: implications for counseling. BMC Geriatr. 2007;7:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schonberg MA, McCarthy EP, York M, Davis RB, Marcantonio ER. Factors influencing elderly women's mammography screening decisions: implications for counseling. BMC Geriatr. 2007;7:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Schonberg MA, Walter LC. Talking about stopping cancer screening-not so easy. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:532–3.CrossRefPubMed Schonberg MA, Walter LC. Talking about stopping cancer screening-not so easy. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:532–3.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Scinto JD, Gill TM, Grady JN, Holmboe ES. Screening mammography: Is it suitably targeted to older women who are most likely to benefit? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1101–4.CrossRefPubMed Scinto JD, Gill TM, Grady JN, Holmboe ES. Screening mammography: Is it suitably targeted to older women who are most likely to benefit? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1101–4.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Lee SJ, Boscardin WJ, Stijacic-Cenzer I, Conell-Price J, O'Brien S, Walter LC. Time lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark. BMJ. 2012;346, e8441.CrossRef Lee SJ, Boscardin WJ, Stijacic-Cenzer I, Conell-Price J, O'Brien S, Walter LC. Time lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark. BMJ. 2012;346, e8441.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Schonberg MA, Hamel MB, Davis RB, et al. Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid on Mammography Screening for Women 75 Years and Older. JAMA Intern Med. 2013. Schonberg MA, Hamel MB, Davis RB, et al. Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid on Mammography Screening for Women 75 Years and Older. JAMA Intern Med. 2013.
52.
go back to reference Kramer BS, Elmore JG. Projecting the benefits and harms of mammography using statistical models: proof or proofiness? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107. Kramer BS, Elmore JG. Projecting the benefits and harms of mammography using statistical models: proof or proofiness? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107.
53.
go back to reference Mandelblatt J, Schechter CB, Lawrence W, Yi B, Cullen J. The SPECTRUM population model of the impact of screening and treatment on U.S. breast cancer trends from 1975 to 2000: principles and practice of the model methods. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1975;2006:47–55.CrossRef Mandelblatt J, Schechter CB, Lawrence W, Yi B, Cullen J. The SPECTRUM population model of the impact of screening and treatment on U.S. breast cancer trends from 1975 to 2000: principles and practice of the model methods. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1975;2006:47–55.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography by Comorbidity and Age: A Qualitative Synthesis of Observational Studies and Decision Analyses
Authors
Dejana Braithwaite, PhD
Louise C. Walter, MD
Monika Izano, MSc
Karla Kerlikowske, MD
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3580-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.