Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Original research article

Pharmacovigilance in Israel – tools, processes, and actions

Authors: Eyal Schwartzberg, Matitiahu Berkovitch, Dorit Dil Nahlieli, Joseph Nathan, Einat Gorelik

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Due to the limited safety data available at the time that a new medication is first marketed, it is essential to continue the collection and monitoring of safety data about adverse drug reactions (ADRs) during the medication’s life cycle. This activity, known as pharmacovigilance (PV), is performed worldwide by the pharmaceutical industry as well as by regulatory agencies. In 2012, the Israeli Ministry of Health (MOH) established a Pharmacovigilance and Drug Information Department. The Department is tasked with identifying, monitoring, and initiating activities aimed at minimizing risks associated with medication utilization. To enable this, the MOH has devised procedures for PV and promoted extensive legislation in this area that require marketing authorization holders (MAHs) and medical institutions in Israel to report ADRs and new safety information to the MOH. A computerized database was created to support the reporting process. The objective of this article is to characterize the PV tools and activities implemented in Israel.

Methods

Since September 2014, The Israeli Pharmacovigilance and Drug Information Department receives ICSRs at a central computerized database developed for this purpose. The data were analyzed by Department personnel and ICSRs were characterized according to their seriousness, source, categories of drugs involved, and the reporting format. Additionally, the Department reviewed signals detected from ADR reports and from other sources and assessed the resulting regulatory actions.

Results

An analysis of the Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) submitted to the MOH’s ADRs central database reveals that during the review period, a total of 16,409 ICSRs were received by the Department and 850 signals were identified, resulting in the following PV activities: inquiry and enhanced follow-up (430, 50.6%), prescriber’s and patient’s leaflets updates (204, 24%), recall of products/batches (6, 0.7%), alerts for health care professionals (63, 7.4%). Eighty five (10%) of the signals required a comprehensive investigation involving external specialist and 1 (0.1%) resulted in initiation of epidemiologic study. Additionally, in 2015 the Department incorporated comprehensive framework for risk minimization of marketed medicinal products, also known as risk management plans (RMPs).

Conclusions

As practiced by other health authorities, the Israeli MOH effectively implemented various PV tools to ensure the safety of the Israeli health consumer.
Literature
15.
go back to reference Hazell L, Shakir SA. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385–96.CrossRef Hazell L, Shakir SA. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385–96.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lopez-Gonzalez E, Herdeiro MT, Figueiras A. Determinants of under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2009;32(1):19–31.CrossRef Lopez-Gonzalez E, Herdeiro MT, Figueiras A. Determinants of under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2009;32(1):19–31.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pharmacovigilance in Israel – tools, processes, and actions
Authors
Eyal Schwartzberg
Matitiahu Berkovitch
Dorit Dil Nahlieli
Joseph Nathan
Einat Gorelik
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-017-0154-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2017 Go to the issue