Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Commentary

The right to know one’s genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproduction

Author: Vardit Ravitsky

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The use of donor sperm or egg for reproduction raises the issue of the right of donor-conceived individuals to know their genetic origins. This paper argues in favor of acknowledging such a right and explores the challenges that cross-border medically assisted reproduction would raise in relation to it. It first explores possible justifications for such a right by discerning its possible conceptual and empirical groundings. It describes some key ethical and policy implications of the removal of donor anonymity. It then argues that novel technologies such as mitochondrial replacement and gene editing raise new concerns in this area and may expand the scope of such a right. Finally, it argues that while many barriers to accessing information about genetic origins already exist at national levels, cross-border medically assisted reproduction may exacerbate a reality in which many individuals conceived through third-party participation are deprived of information that may be crucial to their future well-being for medical or psycho-social reasons.
Literature
2.
go back to reference ASRM (Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine). Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:45–9.CrossRef ASRM (Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine). Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:45–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Baylis F. The ethics of creating children with three genetic parents. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:531–4.CrossRefPubMed Baylis F. The ethics of creating children with three genetic parents. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:531–4.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Blyth E, Crawshaw M, Frith L, Jones C. Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. J Law Med. 2012;19(4):769.PubMed Blyth E, Crawshaw M, Frith L, Jones C. Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. J Law Med. 2012;19(4):769.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Blyth E, Frith L. Donor-Conceived People’s Access to Genetic and Biographical History: An Analysis of Provisions in Different Jurisdictions Permitting Disclosure of Donor Identity. Int J Law Policy Fam. 2009;23(2):174–91.CrossRef Blyth E, Frith L. Donor-Conceived People’s Access to Genetic and Biographical History: An Analysis of Provisions in Different Jurisdictions Permitting Disclosure of Donor Identity. Int J Law Policy Fam. 2009;23(2):174–91.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Blyth E, Frith L, Jones C, Speirs J. The role of birth certificates in relation to access to biographical and genetic history in donor conception. Int J Child Rights. 2009;17(2):207–23.CrossRef Blyth E, Frith L, Jones C, Speirs J. The role of birth certificates in relation to access to biographical and genetic history in donor conception. Int J Child Rights. 2009;17(2):207–23.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brewaeys A, et al. Anonymous or Identity-Registered Sperm Donors? A Study of Dutch Recipients’ Choices. Hum Reprod. 2004;20:820. finding that only 17% of parents choosing an anonymous donor intended to disclose to the child the circumstances of his or her conception.CrossRef Brewaeys A, et al. Anonymous or Identity-Registered Sperm Donors? A Study of Dutch Recipients’ Choices. Hum Reprod. 2004;20:820. finding that only 17% of parents choosing an anonymous donor intended to disclose to the child the circumstances of his or her conception.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Daniels K. Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part I: semen donors. Hum Fertil. 2009;10(3):151–8.CrossRef Daniels K. Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part I: semen donors. Hum Fertil. 2009;10(3):151–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Frith L. Gamete Donation and Anonymity: The Ethical and Legal Debate. Hum Reprod. 2001;818:820–22. Frith L. Gamete Donation and Anonymity: The Ethical and Legal Debate. Hum Reprod. 2001;818:820–22.
10.
go back to reference Frith L. Beneath the rhetoric: The role of rights in the practice of non-anonymous gamete donation. Bioethics. 2001;15(5/6):473–84.CrossRefPubMed Frith L. Beneath the rhetoric: The role of rights in the practice of non-anonymous gamete donation. Bioethics. 2001;15(5/6):473–84.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Frith L, Blyth E, Farrand A. UK gamete donors’ reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitment. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1675–80.CrossRefPubMed Frith L, Blyth E, Farrand A. UK gamete donors’ reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitment. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1675–80.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gottlieb C, et al. Disclosure of Donor Insemination to the Child: The Impact of Swedish Legislation on Couples’ Attitudes. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2052 (contrasting a finding that 52% of parents of donor-conceived children had told or planned to tell the child about the child’s origins with earlier studies showing much lower rates of disclosure).CrossRefPubMed Gottlieb C, et al. Disclosure of Donor Insemination to the Child: The Impact of Swedish Legislation on Couples’ Attitudes. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2052 (contrasting a finding that 52% of parents of donor-conceived children had told or planned to tell the child about the child’s origins with earlier studies showing much lower rates of disclosure).CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Guichon J, Giroux M, Mitchell I, editors. The Right to Know One’s Origins: Assisted Human Reproduction and the Best Interests of Children. Brussels: ASP - Academic & Scientific Publishers; 2013. Guichon J, Giroux M, Mitchell I, editors. The Right to Know One’s Origins: Assisted Human Reproduction and the Best Interests of Children. Brussels: ASP - Academic & Scientific Publishers; 2013.
14.
go back to reference Hamzelou J. Exclusive: World’s first baby born with new “3 parent” technique. 2016. At: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2107219-exclusive-worlds-first-baby-born-with-new-3-parent-technique/(Last accessed October 17, 2016). Hamzelou J. Exclusive: World’s first baby born with new “3 parent” technique. 2016. At: https://​www.​newscientist.​com/​article/​2107219-exclusive-worlds-first-baby-born-with-new-3-parent-technique/​(Last accessed October 17, 2016).
16.
go back to reference Kirkman M. Parents’ Contributions to the Narrative Identity of Offspring of Donor-Assisted Conception. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(2229):2234–35. Kirkman M. Parents’ Contributions to the Narrative Identity of Offspring of Donor-Assisted Conception. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(2229):2234–35.
17.
go back to reference Leighton K. Addressing the harms of not knowing one’s heredity: lessons from genealogical bewilderment. Adoption Cult. 2012;3:63–107. Leighton K. Addressing the harms of not knowing one’s heredity: lessons from genealogical bewilderment. Adoption Cult. 2012;3:63–107.
18.
go back to reference McGee G, Brakman SV, Gurmankin AD. Gamete donation and anonymity: disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should not be optional. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(10):2033–6.CrossRefPubMed McGee G, Brakman SV, Gurmankin AD. Gamete donation and anonymity: disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should not be optional. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(10):2033–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference McWhinnie A. Gamete Donation and Anonymity: Should Offspring from Donated Gametes Continue To Be Denied Knowledge of Their Origins and Antecedents? Hum Reprod. 2001;16:807.CrossRefPubMed McWhinnie A. Gamete Donation and Anonymity: Should Offspring from Donated Gametes Continue To Be Denied Knowledge of Their Origins and Antecedents? Hum Reprod. 2001;16:807.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Patrizio P, Mastroianni AC, Mastroianni L. Disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should be optional. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(10):2036–8.CrossRefPubMed Patrizio P, Mastroianni AC, Mastroianni L. Disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should be optional. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(10):2036–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ravitsky V. Knowing where you come from: The Rights of Donor-Conceived Individuals and the Meaning of Genetic Relatedness. Minn J Law Sci Technol. 2010;11(2):655–84. Ravitsky V. Knowing where you come from: The Rights of Donor-Conceived Individuals and the Meaning of Genetic Relatedness. Minn J Law Sci Technol. 2010;11(2):655–84.
26.
go back to reference Ravitsky V. Conceived and Deceived: The Medical Interests of Donor-Conceived Individuals”. Hastings Cent Rep. 2012;42(1):17–22.CrossRefPubMed Ravitsky V. Conceived and Deceived: The Medical Interests of Donor-Conceived Individuals”. Hastings Cent Rep. 2012;42(1):17–22.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ravitsky V. Autonomous Choice and the Right to Know One’s Genetic Origins. Hastings Cent Rep. 2014;44(2):36–7.CrossRefPubMed Ravitsky V. Autonomous Choice and the Right to Know One’s Genetic Origins. Hastings Cent Rep. 2014;44(2):36–7.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ravitsky V. Donor conception and lack of access to genetic heritage. Am J Bioethics. 2016;16(12):45-46. Ravitsky V. Donor conception and lack of access to genetic heritage. Am J Bioethics. 2016;16(12):45-46.
29.
go back to reference Ravitsky V, Scheib JE. Donor-conceived individuals’ right to know. In: Bioethics Forum. 2010. http://www.thehastingscenter.org/donor-conceived-individuals-right-to-know/(Last accessed October 17, 2016). Ravitsky V, Scheib JE. Donor-conceived individuals’ right to know. In: Bioethics Forum. 2010. http://​www.​thehastingscente​r.​org/​donor-conceived-individuals-right-to-know/​(Last accessed October 17, 2016).
30.
go back to reference Shalev C, Moreno A, Eyal H, Leibel M, Schuz R, Eldar-Geva T. Ethics and Regulation of Inter-country Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Call for Action. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016;5:59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shalev C, Moreno A, Eyal H, Leibel M, Schuz R, Eldar-Geva T. Ethics and Regulation of Inter-country Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Call for Action. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016;5:59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The right to know one’s genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproduction
Author
Vardit Ravitsky
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0125-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2017 Go to the issue