Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Integrative article

Ethics and regulation of inter-country medically assisted reproduction: a call for action

Authors: Carmel Shalev, Adi Moreno, Hedva Eyal, Michal Leibel, Rhona Schuz, Talia Eldar-Geva

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The proliferation of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) for the treatment of infertility has brought benefit to many individuals around the world. But infertility and its treatment continue to be a cause of suffering, and over the past decade, there has been a steady growth in a new global market of inter-country medically assisted reproduction (IMAR) involving ‘third-party’ individuals acting as surrogate mothers and gamete donors in reproductive collaborations for the benefit of other individuals and couples who wish to have children. At the same time there is evidence of a double standard of care for third-party women involved in IMAR, violations of human rights of children and women, and extreme abuses that are tantamount to reproductive trafficking. This paper is the report of an inter-disciplinary working group of experts who convened in Israel to discuss the complex issues of IMAR. In Israel too IMAR practices have grown rapidly in recent years, mainly because of restrictions on access to domestic surrogacy for same sex couples and a chronically insufficient supply of egg cells for the treatment of couples and singles in need. Drawing upon local expertise, the paper describes documented practices that are harmful, suggests principles of good practice based on an ethic of care, and calls for action at the international, national and professional levels to establish a human rights based system of international governance for IMAR based on three regulatory models: public health monitoring, inter-country adoption, and trafficking in human beings, organs and tissues.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Since in most cases eggs and sperm are provided for a cost, and providers are financially compensated for their genetic materials, we refrain in this article from the common usage of the term “donation” in reference to these practices, and prefer the more neutral and accurate term “provision” or “providers”.
 
Literature
4.
go back to reference Shalev C, Gooldin S. The Uses and Misuses of In-Vitro Fertilization in Israel: Some Sociological and Ethical Considerations. Nashim J Jewish Womens Stud Gender Issues. 2006;12:151–76.CrossRef Shalev C, Gooldin S. The Uses and Misuses of In-Vitro Fertilization in Israel: Some Sociological and Ethical Considerations. Nashim J Jewish Womens Stud Gender Issues. 2006;12:151–76.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shalev C. Halakha and Patriarchal Motherhood - An Anatomy of the New Israeli Surrogacy Law. Israel Law Rev. 1998;32:51–80.CrossRef Shalev C. Halakha and Patriarchal Motherhood - An Anatomy of the New Israeli Surrogacy Law. Israel Law Rev. 1998;32:51–80.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Weisberg DK. The birth of surrogacy in Israel. Gainesville: University Press of Florida; 2005. Weisberg DK. The birth of surrogacy in Israel. Gainesville: University Press of Florida; 2005.
7.
go back to reference Shalev C, Werner-Felmayer G. Patterns of globalized reproduction: Egg cells regulation in Israel and Austria. Israel J Health Policy Res. 2012;1(1):1–15.CrossRef Shalev C, Werner-Felmayer G. Patterns of globalized reproduction: Egg cells regulation in Israel and Austria. Israel J Health Policy Res. 2012;1(1):1–15.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Samama E. Within me, but not mine: surrogacy in Israel. In: New Cannibal Markets: Globalization and Commodification of the Human Body. Paris: Jean-Daniel Rainhorn and Samira El Boudamoussi, Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme; 2015. p. 123–40. Samama E. Within me, but not mine: surrogacy in Israel. In: New Cannibal Markets: Globalization and Commodification of the Human Body. Paris: Jean-Daniel Rainhorn and Samira El Boudamoussi, Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme; 2015. p. 123–40.
10.
go back to reference Werner-Felmayer G, Shalev C. Human Germline Modification – A Missing Link. Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(12):49–51.CrossRefPubMed Werner-Felmayer G, Shalev C. Human Germline Modification – A Missing Link. Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(12):49–51.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) Permanent Bureau. Study of Legal Parentage and the issues arising from International Surrogacy Arrangements. Preliminary Document. No 3 C. 2014. Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) Permanent Bureau. Study of Legal Parentage and the issues arising from International Surrogacy Arrangements. Preliminary Document. No 3 C. 2014.
12.
go back to reference Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH). Conclusions and Recommendations of the 2015 Council. 2015. para 5. Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH). Conclusions and Recommendations of the 2015 Council. 2015. para 5.
13.
go back to reference Shalev C. Limiting Commodification: International Law and Its Challenges. In: Jean-Daniel R, Samira El B, editors. New Cannibal Markets: Globalization and Commodification of the Human Body. Paris: Editions House of Human Sciences; 2015. p. 363–82. Shalev C. Limiting Commodification: International Law and Its Challenges. In: Jean-Daniel R, Samira El B, editors. New Cannibal Markets: Globalization and Commodification of the Human Body. Paris: Editions House of Human Sciences; 2015. p. 363–82.
14.
go back to reference Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. The global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: twenty key findings for the new millennium. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24(3):158–63.CrossRefPubMed Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. The global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: twenty key findings for the new millennium. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24(3):158–63.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kroløkke C, Foss KA, Pant S. Fertility Travel: The Commodification of Human Reproduction: Charlotte Krolokke, Karen A. Foss, and Saumya Pant, Guest Editors. Cult Pol Int J. 2012;8(2):273–82. Duke University Press.CrossRef Kroløkke C, Foss KA, Pant S. Fertility Travel: The Commodification of Human Reproduction: Charlotte Krolokke, Karen A. Foss, and Saumya Pant, Guest Editors. Cult Pol Int J. 2012;8(2):273–82. Duke University Press.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference UNESCO. Declaration on the Responsibilities of the Present Generations towards Future Generations. 1997. UNESCO. Declaration on the Responsibilities of the Present Generations towards Future Generations. 1997.
17.
go back to reference Franklin S, McNeil M, Rothman BK, Corea G, Arditti R, Klein RD, Minden S. Reproductive futures: recent literature and current feminist debates on reproductive technologies. 1988. Franklin S, McNeil M, Rothman BK, Corea G, Arditti R, Klein RD, Minden S. Reproductive futures: recent literature and current feminist debates on reproductive technologies. 1988.
18.
go back to reference Franklin S. Biological Relatives-IVF, Stem Cells and the Future of Kinship. Durham and London: Duke University Press; 2013.CrossRef Franklin S. Biological Relatives-IVF, Stem Cells and the Future of Kinship. Durham and London: Duke University Press; 2013.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Teman E. Birthing a mother: The surrogate body and the pregnant self. Berkeley: Univ of California Press; 2010.CrossRef Teman E. Birthing a mother: The surrogate body and the pregnant self. Berkeley: Univ of California Press; 2010.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pande A. Not an ‘Angel’, not a ‘Whore’ Surrogates as ‘Dirty’ Workers in India. Indian J Gender Stud. 2009;16(2):141–73.CrossRef Pande A. Not an ‘Angel’, not a ‘Whore’ Surrogates as ‘Dirty’ Workers in India. Indian J Gender Stud. 2009;16(2):141–73.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nahman M. Nodes of Desire Romanian Egg Sellers, Dignity and Feminist Alliances in Transnational Ova Exchanges. Eur J Wom Stud. 2008;15(2):65–82.CrossRef Nahman M. Nodes of Desire Romanian Egg Sellers, Dignity and Feminist Alliances in Transnational Ova Exchanges. Eur J Wom Stud. 2008;15(2):65–82.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Shalev C. An Ethic of Care and Responsibility: Reflections on Third-Party Reproduction. Med Stud. 2012;3:147–56.CrossRef Shalev C. An Ethic of Care and Responsibility: Reflections on Third-Party Reproduction. Med Stud. 2012;3:147–56.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948
24.
go back to reference Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women. 1979 Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women. 1979
25.
go back to reference UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. 2005 UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. 2005
26.
go back to reference Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1989
27.
go back to reference WHO Guiding Principles on Human Cell, Tissue and Organ Transplantation, 1991. 2010. WHO Guiding Principles on Human Cell, Tissue and Organ Transplantation, 1991. 2010.
28.
go back to reference European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. 1997 European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. 1997
29.
30.
go back to reference Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Transplantation of Organs and Tissues of Human Origin. 2002 Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Transplantation of Organs and Tissues of Human Origin. 2002
31.
go back to reference WMA Statement on Human Organ Donation and Transplantation, 2000. 2006. WMA Statement on Human Organ Donation and Transplantation, 2000. 2006.
32.
go back to reference Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism. 2008. Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism. 2008.
33.
go back to reference Directive 2010/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for transplantation. Directive 2010/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for transplantation.
34.
go back to reference Alghrani A, Harris J. Reproductive liberty: should the foundation of families be regulated. Child Fam LQ. 2006;18:191. Alghrani A, Harris J. Reproductive liberty: should the foundation of families be regulated. Child Fam LQ. 2006;18:191.
35.
36.
go back to reference Archard D. Freedom Not to Be Free: The Case of the Slavery Contract in J.S. Mill’s On Liberty. Philos Q. 1990;40(160):453–65.CrossRef Archard D. Freedom Not to Be Free: The Case of the Slavery Contract in J.S. Mill’s On Liberty. Philos Q. 1990;40(160):453–65.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 – Article 29. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 – Article 29.
38.
go back to reference Cohen G. Circumvention tourism. Cornell Law Rev. 2012;97:1311–98. Cohen G. Circumvention tourism. Cornell Law Rev. 2012;97:1311–98.
39.
go back to reference Helble M. The movement of patients across borders: challenges and opportunities for public health. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:68–72.CrossRefPubMed Helble M. The movement of patients across borders: challenges and opportunities for public health. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:68–72.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Lunt N, et al. Medical tourism: treatments, markets and health system implications: A scoping review. OECD Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs; 2011. Lunt N, et al. Medical tourism: treatments, markets and health system implications: A scoping review. OECD Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs; 2011.
41.
go back to reference Whittaker A. Cross-border assisted reproduction in Asia: implications for access, equity and regulations. Reprod Health Matters. 2011;19(37):107–16.CrossRefPubMed Whittaker A. Cross-border assisted reproduction in Asia: implications for access, equity and regulations. Reprod Health Matters. 2011;19(37):107–16.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Martin D, Kane S. National self-sufficiency in reproductive resources: An innovative response to transnational reproductive travel. Int J Fem Approaches to Bioeth. 2014;7(2):10–44. at p, 12. Martin D, Kane S. National self-sufficiency in reproductive resources: An innovative response to transnational reproductive travel. Int J Fem Approaches to Bioeth. 2014;7(2):10–44. at p, 12.
46.
go back to reference Kramer W, Schneider J, Schultz N. US oocyte donors: a retrospective study of medical and psychosocial issues. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(12):3144–9.CrossRefPubMed Kramer W, Schneider J, Schultz N. US oocyte donors: a retrospective study of medical and psychosocial issues. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(12):3144–9.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Papadimos TJ, Papadimos AT. The student and the ovum: The lack of autonomy and informed consent in trading genes for tuition. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004;2(1):1.CrossRef Papadimos TJ, Papadimos AT. The student and the ovum: The lack of autonomy and informed consent in trading genes for tuition. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004;2(1):1.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Sergentanis TN, et al. IVF and breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:106–23.CrossRefPubMed Sergentanis TN, et al. IVF and breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:106–23.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Baylis F, Downie J. Achieving national altruistic self-sufficiency in human eggs for third-party reproduction in Canada. Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth. 2014;7(2):164–84. Baylis F, Downie J. Achieving national altruistic self-sufficiency in human eggs for third-party reproduction in Canada. Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth. 2014;7(2):164–84.
51.
go back to reference Nahman M. Extractions: An ethnography of reproductive tourism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.CrossRef Nahman M. Extractions: An ethnography of reproductive tourism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Liphkin N, Etti S. Surrogacy in Israel 2010. Haifa: Isha L’Isha Feminist Centre; 2010. Liphkin N, Etti S. Surrogacy in Israel 2010. Haifa: Isha L’Isha Feminist Centre; 2010.
53.
go back to reference Teman E. Birthing a mother: the surrogate body and the pregnant self. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2010.CrossRef Teman E. Birthing a mother: the surrogate body and the pregnant self. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2010.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Sonia A. The surrogate in commercial surrogacy: legal and ethical considerations. In: Surrogacy, Law and Human Rights. London: Ashgate; 2015. p. 11. Sonia A. The surrogate in commercial surrogacy: legal and ethical considerations. In: Surrogacy, Law and Human Rights. London: Ashgate; 2015. p. 11.
55.
go back to reference SAMA Resource Group for Women and Health, India. Can we see the baby bump please? 2013. documentary film. SAMA Resource Group for Women and Health, India. Can we see the baby bump please? 2013. documentary film.
56.
go back to reference Saravanan S. An ethnomethodological approach to examine exploitation in the context of capacity, trust and experience of commercial surrogacy in India. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2013;8:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saravanan S. An ethnomethodological approach to examine exploitation in the context of capacity, trust and experience of commercial surrogacy in India. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2013;8:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
go back to reference Nadimpally S, Vrinda M, Anjali S. Globalisation of birth markets: a case study of assisted reproductive technologies in India. Glob Health. 2011;7:27.CrossRef Nadimpally S, Vrinda M, Anjali S. Globalisation of birth markets: a case study of assisted reproductive technologies in India. Glob Health. 2011;7:27.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Zippi Brand Frank (dir.), Israel. Google Baby (documentary film, 2009) Zippi Brand Frank (dir.), Israel. Google Baby (documentary film, 2009)
60.
go back to reference Valerie Gudenus (dir.). Ma Na Sapna - A Mother’s Dream. Switzerland: ZHDK; 2013. Valerie Gudenus (dir.). Ma Na Sapna - A Mother’s Dream. Switzerland: ZHDK; 2013.
61.
go back to reference Rudrappa Sharmila. Discounted Life: The Price of Global Surrogacy in India. New York: NYU Press; 2015. Rudrappa Sharmila. Discounted Life: The Price of Global Surrogacy in India. New York: NYU Press; 2015.
62.
go back to reference Weis C. Trajectories of labor and delivery: Surrogacy workers in Russia. Presentation given at: Gender, justice and the political economy of the cross-border fertility industry April 7–8, 2016 University of Vienna. Weis C. Trajectories of labor and delivery: Surrogacy workers in Russia. Presentation given at: Gender, justice and the political economy of the cross-border fertility industry April 7–8, 2016 University of Vienna.
63.
go back to reference Majumdar Anindita. Surrogate Mothers and Gay Fathers: Navigating the Commercial Surrogacy Arrangement in India. In: Hofmann S, Moreno A editors. Intimate Economies: Bodies, Emotions and Sexualities on the Global Market. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016. Majumdar Anindita. Surrogate Mothers and Gay Fathers: Navigating the Commercial Surrogacy Arrangement in India. In: Hofmann S, Moreno A editors. Intimate Economies: Bodies, Emotions and Sexualities on the Global Market. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016.
69.
go back to reference Ba’am (Administrative Appeal Motion) 1118/14 Anonymous v. Ministry of Welfare and Social Services (1 April 2015) Ba’am (Administrative Appeal Motion) 1118/14 Anonymous v. Ministry of Welfare and Social Services (1 April 2015)
71.
go back to reference Kusum S. Overview of surrogacy law in India. Indian Bar Rev. 2014;41(1):161–70. Kusum S. Overview of surrogacy law in India. Indian Bar Rev. 2014;41(1):161–70.
73.
go back to reference Parks J. Care ethics and the global practice of commercial surrogacy. Bioethics. 2010;24(7):333–40.CrossRefPubMed Parks J. Care ethics and the global practice of commercial surrogacy. Bioethics. 2010;24(7):333–40.CrossRefPubMed
75.
go back to reference Blyth E, Crawshaw M, Frith L, Jones C. Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. J Law Med. 2012;19(4):769.PubMed Blyth E, Crawshaw M, Frith L, Jones C. Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. J Law Med. 2012;19(4):769.PubMed
76.
go back to reference de Melo-Martín I. The ethics of anonymous gamete donation: Is there a right to know one’s genetic origins? Hastings Cent Rep. 2014;44(2):28–35.CrossRefPubMed de Melo-Martín I. The ethics of anonymous gamete donation: Is there a right to know one’s genetic origins? Hastings Cent Rep. 2014;44(2):28–35.CrossRefPubMed
77.
go back to reference European Committee on Crime Problems (CDPC). Draft Council of Europe Convention Against Trafficking in Human Organs. 2012. European Committee on Crime Problems (CDPC). Draft Council of Europe Convention Against Trafficking in Human Organs. 2012.
78.
go back to reference Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly. Recommendation 2009 (2013): Towards a Council of Europe convention to combat trafficking in organs, tissues and cells of human origin. 2013. Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly. Recommendation 2009 (2013): Towards a Council of Europe convention to combat trafficking in organs, tissues and cells of human origin. 2013.
79.
go back to reference Council of Europe. Recommendation 7 (2004) of the Committee of Ministers to member states on organ trafficking. 2004. Article 2(4). Council of Europe. Recommendation 7 (2004) of the Committee of Ministers to member states on organ trafficking. 2004. Article 2(4).
80.
go back to reference Joint Council of Europe/United Nations Study. Trafficking in organs, tissues and cells and trafficking in human beings for the purpose of the removal of organs. 2009. Joint Council of Europe/United Nations Study. Trafficking in organs, tissues and cells and trafficking in human beings for the purpose of the removal of organs. 2009.
81.
go back to reference UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, 2005 – Article 2. UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, 2005 – Article 2.
82.
go back to reference Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly, Recommendation 1611 (2003) on trafficking in organs in Europe, 25 June 2003 Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly, Recommendation 1611 (2003) on trafficking in organs in Europe, 25 June 2003
83.
go back to reference United Nations Protocol to Prevent. Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children. 2000. United Nations Protocol to Prevent. Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children. 2000.
Metadata
Title
Ethics and regulation of inter-country medically assisted reproduction: a call for action
Authors
Carmel Shalev
Adi Moreno
Hedva Eyal
Michal Leibel
Rhona Schuz
Talia Eldar-Geva
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0117-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2016 Go to the issue