Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Article

Utilization of breast MRI and breast MRI-guided biopsy in clinical practice: results of a survey in Québec and France

Authors: Benoît Mesurolle, Simon Sun, Michelle Zhang

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To investigate the practice regarding breast MRI exams and breast MRI-guided biopsies in two countries with different health care systems, France and Québec. A 12-item questionnaire was distributed online among radiologists from France and Québec, attempting to determine: demographic characteristics and breast MRI diagnostic and MRI-guided practices (indications, workload, availability, and waiting time assessment).

Results

One hundred and seventy radiologists (France, 132 respondents (28.5%); Quebec, 38 respondents (35.2%)) participated in the survey, most of them based in non-academic centers. Thirty-eight percent of Quebec and 2.3% of French radiologists did not perform breast MRI in their daily practice. Nearly 50% of French and Quebec respondents interpreted 1–10 breast MRI exams per week. Decision-making factors of preoperative MRI were similar in both countries (pathology, age, and breast density), with a heavier emphasis placed on the surgeon’s opinion in Quebec (47.8% versus 21.8% (p = 0.009)). Quebec demonstrated a higher waiting time than France (1–2 weeks in 40% versus less than 1 week in 40%). MRI-guided breast biopsies (less than 5 MRI-guided biopsies per week) were being performed by a minority of the respondents (36% in France and 43% in Québec).

Conclusion

Most of radiologists performing breast MRIs work in non-academic institutions in both countries. Waiting time is higher in Quebec, but most of preoperative breast MRIs are performed within 3 weeks in both countries. The surgeon plays an important role in recommending preoperative MRI in Quebec. MRI-guided breast biopsies are not widely available in both countries.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gilles R, Guinebretière JM, Lucidarme O et al (1994) Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 191:625–631CrossRef Gilles R, Guinebretière JM, Lucidarme O et al (1994) Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 191:625–631CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lehman CD, DeMartini W, Anderson BO, Edge SB (2009) Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7:193–201CrossRef Lehman CD, DeMartini W, Anderson BO, Edge SB (2009) Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7:193–201CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tan S, David J, Lalonde L et al (2017) Breast magnetic resonance imaging: are those who need it getting it? Curr Oncol. 24(3):e205–e213CrossRef Tan S, David J, Lalonde L et al (2017) Breast magnetic resonance imaging: are those who need it getting it? Curr Oncol. 24(3):e205–e213CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Parsyan A, Moldoveanu D, Balram B et al (2016) Influence of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 211:1089–1094CrossRef Parsyan A, Moldoveanu D, Balram B et al (2016) Influence of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 211:1089–1094CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zhang M, Sun S, Mesurolle B (2017) The impact of pre-operative breast MRI on surgical waiting time. PLoS One 12:e0169756CrossRef Zhang M, Sun S, Mesurolle B (2017) The impact of pre-operative breast MRI on surgical waiting time. PLoS One 12:e0169756CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Clauser P, Mann R, Athanasiou A et al (2018) A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 28:1909–1918CrossRef Clauser P, Mann R, Athanasiou A et al (2018) A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 28:1909–1918CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Adkisson CD, Vallow LA, Kowalchik K et al (2011) Patient age and preoperative breast MRI in women with breast cancer: biopsy and surgical implications. Ann Surg Oncol 18(6):1678–1683CrossRef Adkisson CD, Vallow LA, Kowalchik K et al (2011) Patient age and preoperative breast MRI in women with breast cancer: biopsy and surgical implications. Ann Surg Oncol 18(6):1678–1683CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Deber RA (2003) Rekindling reform: lessons from Canada. Am J Public Health 93:20–24CrossRef Deber RA (2003) Rekindling reform: lessons from Canada. Am J Public Health 93:20–24CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rodwin VG (2003) The health care system under French National Health Insurance: lessons for health reform. Am J Public Health 93:31–37CrossRef Rodwin VG (2003) The health care system under French National Health Insurance: lessons for health reform. Am J Public Health 93:31–37CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Thomassin-Naggara I, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Chopier J, Tardivon A, Trop I (2013) Current opinion on clip placement after breast biopsy: a survey of practising radiologists in France and Quebec. Clin Radiol 68:378–383CrossRef Thomassin-Naggara I, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Chopier J, Tardivon A, Trop I (2013) Current opinion on clip placement after breast biopsy: a survey of practising radiologists in France and Quebec. Clin Radiol 68:378–383CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bassett LW, Dhaliwal SG, Eradat J et al (2008) National trends and practices in breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:332–339CrossRef Bassett LW, Dhaliwal SG, Eradat J et al (2008) National trends and practices in breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:332–339CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Houssami N, Turner R, Morrow M (2013) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Ann Surg 257:249–255CrossRef Houssami N, Turner R, Morrow M (2013) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Ann Surg 257:249–255CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312(7023):71–72CrossRef Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312(7023):71–72CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lee J, Tanaka E, Eby PR et al (2017) Preoperative breast MRI: surgeons’ patient selection patterns and potential bias in outcomes analyses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:923–932CrossRef Lee J, Tanaka E, Eby PR et al (2017) Preoperative breast MRI: surgeons’ patient selection patterns and potential bias in outcomes analyses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:923–932CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Boisserie-Lacroix M (2006) Disclosing a diagnosis of breast cancer: what is the role of the radiologist? J Radiol 87:105–108CrossRef Boisserie-Lacroix M (2006) Disclosing a diagnosis of breast cancer: what is the role of the radiologist? J Radiol 87:105–108CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Séradour B, Ancelle-Park R (2006) Breast cancer screening: are results of French and international programmes comparable? J Radiol 87:1009–1014CrossRef Séradour B, Ancelle-Park R (2006) Breast cancer screening: are results of French and international programmes comparable? J Radiol 87:1009–1014CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dehn T (2008) Who should run breast clinics, surgeons or radiologists? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:187–192CrossRef Dehn T (2008) Who should run breast clinics, surgeons or radiologists? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:187–192CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Verheyden C, Pages-Bouic E, Balleyguier C et al (2016) Underestimation Rate at MR Imaging-guided Vacuumassisted Breast Biopsy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study of 1509 Breast Biopsies. Radiology 281:708-719. Verheyden C, Pages-Bouic E, Balleyguier C et al (2016) Underestimation Rate at MR Imaging-guided Vacuumassisted Breast Biopsy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study of 1509 Breast Biopsies. Radiology 281:708-719.
20.
go back to reference Plantade R, Thomassin-Naggara I (2014) MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsies. Diagn Interv Imaging 95:779-801CrossRef Plantade R, Thomassin-Naggara I (2014) MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsies. Diagn Interv Imaging 95:779-801CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chopier J, Dratwa C, Antoine M, Gonin J, Thomassin Naggara I (2014) Radiopathological correlations: masses, non-masslike enhancements and MRI-guidedbiopsy. Diagn Interv Imaging 95:213–225CrossRef Chopier J, Dratwa C, Antoine M, Gonin J, Thomassin Naggara I (2014) Radiopathological correlations: masses, non-masslike enhancements and MRI-guidedbiopsy. Diagn Interv Imaging 95:213–225CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Molinie F, Leux C, Delafosse P et al (2013) Waiting time disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment: a population-based study in France. Breast 22(5):810–816CrossRef Molinie F, Leux C, Delafosse P et al (2013) Waiting time disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment: a population-based study in France. Breast 22(5):810–816CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hulvat M, Sandalow N, Rademaker A, Helenowski I, Hansen NM (2010) Time from diagnosis to definitive operative treatment of operable breast cancer in the era of multimodal imaging. Surgery 148:746–750 discussion 50-51CrossRef Hulvat M, Sandalow N, Rademaker A, Helenowski I, Hansen NM (2010) Time from diagnosis to definitive operative treatment of operable breast cancer in the era of multimodal imaging. Surgery 148:746–750 discussion 50-51CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kothari A, Fentiman IS (2003) 22. Diagnostic delays in breast cancer and impact on survival. Int J Clin Pract 57:200–203 Kothari A, Fentiman IS (2003) 22. Diagnostic delays in breast cancer and impact on survival. Int J Clin Pract 57:200–203
28.
go back to reference Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL et al (2009) Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg 209:180–187CrossRef Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL et al (2009) Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg 209:180–187CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Vreeland TJ, Berry Iv JS, Schneble E et al (2017) Routine pre-treatment MRI for breast cancer in a single-payer medical center: effects on surgical choices, timing and outcomes J Cancer 23; 8:2442-2448 Vreeland TJ, Berry Iv JS, Schneble E et al (2017) Routine pre-treatment MRI for breast cancer in a single-payer medical center: effects on surgical choices, timing and outcomes J Cancer 23; 8:2442-2448
30.
go back to reference Flory N, Lang EV (2011) Distress in the radiology waiting room. Radiology 260:166–173CrossRef Flory N, Lang EV (2011) Distress in the radiology waiting room. Radiology 260:166–173CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lang EV, Berbaum KS, Lutgendorf SK (2009) Large-core breast biopsy: abnormal salivary cortisol profiles associated with uncertainty of diagnosis. Radiology 250:631–637CrossRef Lang EV, Berbaum KS, Lutgendorf SK (2009) Large-core breast biopsy: abnormal salivary cortisol profiles associated with uncertainty of diagnosis. Radiology 250:631–637CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Brocken P, Prins JB, Dekhuijzen PN, van der Heijden HF (2012) The faster the better?-A systematic review on distress in the diagnostic phase of suspected cancer, and the influence of rapid diagnostic pathways. Psychooncology 21:1–10CrossRef Brocken P, Prins JB, Dekhuijzen PN, van der Heijden HF (2012) The faster the better?-A systematic review on distress in the diagnostic phase of suspected cancer, and the influence of rapid diagnostic pathways. Psychooncology 21:1–10CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Utilization of breast MRI and breast MRI-guided biopsy in clinical practice: results of a survey in Québec and France
Authors
Benoît Mesurolle
Simon Sun
Michelle Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00886-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Insights into Imaging 1/2020 Go to the issue