Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Development of a process to disclose amyloid imaging results to cognitively normal older adult research participants

Authors: Kristin Harkins, Pamela Sankar, Reisa Sperling, Joshua D Grill, Robert C Green, Keith A Johnson, Megan Healy, Jason Karlawish

Published in: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The objective of this study was to develop a process to maximize the safety and effectiveness of disclosing Positron Emission Tomography (PET) amyloid imaging results to cognitively normal older adults participating in Alzheimer’s disease secondary prevention studies such as the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s Disease (A4) Study.

Methods

Using a modified Delphi Method to develop consensus on best practices, we gathered and analyzed data over three rounds from experts in two relevant fields: informed consent for genetic testing or human amyloid imaging.

Results

Experts reached consensus on (1) text for a brochure that describes amyloid imaging to a person who is considering whether to undergo such imaging in the context of a clinical trial, and (2) a process for amyloid PET result disclosure within such trials. Recommendations included: During consent, potential participants should complete an educational session, where they receive verbal and written information covering what is known and unknown about amyloid imaging, including possible results and their meaning, implications of results for risk of future cognitive decline, and information about Alzheimer’s and risk factors. Participants should be screened for anxiety and depression to determine suitability to receive amyloid imaging information. The person conducting the sessions should check comprehension and be skilled in communication and recognizing distress. Imaging should occur on a separate day from consent, and disclosure on a separate day from imaging. Disclosure should occur in person, with time for questions. At disclosure, investigators should assess mood and willingness to receive results, and provide a written results report. Telephone follow-up within a few days should assess the impact of disclosure, and periodic scheduled assessments of depression and anxiety, with additional monitoring and follow-up for participants showing distress, should be performed.

Conclusions

We developed a document for use with potential study participants to describe the process of amyloid imaging and the implications of amyloid imaging results; and a disclosure process with attention to ongoing monitoring of both mood and safety to receive this information. This document and process will be used in the A4 Study and can be adapted for other research settings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:280–92.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:280–92.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jack Jr CR, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Shaw LM, Aisen PS, Weiner MW, et al. Hypothetical model of the dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:119–29.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Jack Jr CR, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Shaw LM, Aisen PS, Weiner MW, et al. Hypothetical model of the dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:119–29.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sperling RA, Rentz DM, Johnson KA, Karlawish J, Donohue M, Salmon DP, et al. The A4 study: stopping AD before symptoms begin? Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:228fs213.CrossRef Sperling RA, Rentz DM, Johnson KA, Karlawish J, Donohue M, Salmon DP, et al. The A4 study: stopping AD before symptoms begin? Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:228fs213.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Burns JM, Klunk WE. Predicting positivity for a new era of Alzheimer disease prevention trials. Neurology. 2012;79:1530–1.CrossRefPubMed Burns JM, Klunk WE. Predicting positivity for a new era of Alzheimer disease prevention trials. Neurology. 2012;79:1530–1.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Johnson K, Minoshima S, Bohnen N, Donohoe K, Foster N, Herscovitch P, et al. Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET: a report of the Amyloid Imaging Task Force, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:E1–16.CrossRefPubMed Johnson K, Minoshima S, Bohnen N, Donohoe K, Foster N, Herscovitch P, et al. Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET: a report of the Amyloid Imaging Task Force, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:E1–16.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chetelat G, La Joie R, Villain N, Perrotin A, de La Sayette V, Eustache F, et al. Amyloid imaging in cognitively normal individuals, at-risk populations and preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;2:356–65.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Chetelat G, La Joie R, Villain N, Perrotin A, de La Sayette V, Eustache F, et al. Amyloid imaging in cognitively normal individuals, at-risk populations and preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;2:356–65.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Shulman MB, Harkins KA, Green RC, Karlawish J. Using AD biomarker research results for clinical care: a survey of ADNI investigators. Neurology. 2013;81:1114–21.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Shulman MB, Harkins KA, Green RC, Karlawish J. Using AD biomarker research results for clinical care: a survey of ADNI investigators. Neurology. 2013;81:1114–21.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inform Manag. 2004;42:15–29.CrossRef Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inform Manag. 2004;42:15–29.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Minas H, Jorm AF. Where there is no evidence: use of expert consensus methods to fill the evidence gap in low-income countries and cultural minorities. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2010;4:33.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Minas H, Jorm AF. Where there is no evidence: use of expert consensus methods to fill the evidence gap in low-income countries and cultural minorities. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2010;4:33.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman Company; 1975. Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman Company; 1975.
12.
go back to reference Marteau T, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31:301–6.CrossRefPubMed Marteau T, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31:301–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA. Geriatric depression scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In: Brink TL, editor. Clinical gerontology: a guide to assessment and intervention. New York, NY: The Haworth Press; 1986. p. 165–73. Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA. Geriatric depression scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In: Brink TL, editor. Clinical gerontology: a guide to assessment and intervention. New York, NY: The Haworth Press; 1986. p. 165–73.
14.
go back to reference Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvaraz W. Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979;41:209–18.CrossRefPubMed Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvaraz W. Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979;41:209–18.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Karlawish J. Addressing the ethical, policy, and social challenges of preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2011;77:1487–93.CrossRefPubMed Karlawish J. Addressing the ethical, policy, and social challenges of preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2011;77:1487–93.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Grill JD, Johnson DK, Burns JM. Should we disclose amyloid imaging results to cognitively normal individuals? Neurodegen Dis Manage. 2013;3:43–51.CrossRef Grill JD, Johnson DK, Burns JM. Should we disclose amyloid imaging results to cognitively normal individuals? Neurodegen Dis Manage. 2013;3:43–51.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Roberts JS, Dunn LB, Rabinovici GD. Amyloid imaging, risk disclosure and Alzheimer’s disease: ethical and practical issues. Neurodegen Dis Manage. 2013;3:219–29.CrossRef Roberts JS, Dunn LB, Rabinovici GD. Amyloid imaging, risk disclosure and Alzheimer’s disease: ethical and practical issues. Neurodegen Dis Manage. 2013;3:219–29.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lineweaver TT, Bondi MW, Galasko D, Salmon DP. Knowledge of APOE genotype affects subjective and objective memory performance in healthy older adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171:201–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Lineweaver TT, Bondi MW, Galasko D, Salmon DP. Knowledge of APOE genotype affects subjective and objective memory performance in healthy older adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171:201–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lingler JH, Klunk WE. Disclosure of amyloid imaging results to research participants: has the time come? Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:741–4.CrossRefPubMed Lingler JH, Klunk WE. Disclosure of amyloid imaging results to research participants: has the time come? Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:741–4.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lingler J, Roberts S, Butters M, Lisa P, Schulz R, Hu L, et al. Disclosing amyloid imaging results in MCI: what do patients and families want, and why? [abstract]. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:533–P534.CrossRef Lingler J, Roberts S, Butters M, Lisa P, Schulz R, Hu L, et al. Disclosing amyloid imaging results in MCI: what do patients and families want, and why? [abstract]. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:533–P534.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lingler J, Roberts S, Schulz R, Klunk W. Development of a standard approach to disclosing amyloid imaging results in MCI [abstract]. Alzheimers Dement. 2012;8:422.CrossRef Lingler J, Roberts S, Schulz R, Klunk W. Development of a standard approach to disclosing amyloid imaging results in MCI [abstract]. Alzheimers Dement. 2012;8:422.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Witte M, Barnes J, Lingler J, Agronin M, Hochstetler H, Healey K, et al. Testing the use of standardized scripts for disclosing ‘hypothetical/mock’ amyloid PET scan results to nondemented cognitively impaired patients and their care partners [abstract]. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:131–P132.CrossRef Witte M, Barnes J, Lingler J, Agronin M, Hochstetler H, Healey K, et al. Testing the use of standardized scripts for disclosing ‘hypothetical/mock’ amyloid PET scan results to nondemented cognitively impaired patients and their care partners [abstract]. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:131–P132.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Green RC, Roberts JS, Cupples LA, Relkin NR, Whitehouse PJ, Brown T, et al. Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:245–54.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Green RC, Roberts JS, Cupples LA, Relkin NR, Whitehouse PJ, Brown T, et al. Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:245–54.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
25.
go back to reference Christensen K, Roberts S, Karlawish J, Obisesan T, Waterston L, Cupples L, et al. The psychological impact of genetic risk information on individuals with mild cognitive impairment at imminent risk for conversion to Alzheimer’s disease dementia: findings from the REVEAL study [abstract]. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:546.CrossRef Christensen K, Roberts S, Karlawish J, Obisesan T, Waterston L, Cupples L, et al. The psychological impact of genetic risk information on individuals with mild cognitive impairment at imminent risk for conversion to Alzheimer’s disease dementia: findings from the REVEAL study [abstract]. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:546.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Roberts J, Chen C, Uhlmann W, Green R. Effectiveness of a condensed protocol for disclosing APOE genotype and providing risk education for Alzheimer disease. Genet Med. 2012;14:742–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Roberts J, Chen C, Uhlmann W, Green R. Effectiveness of a condensed protocol for disclosing APOE genotype and providing risk education for Alzheimer disease. Genet Med. 2012;14:742–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
27.
go back to reference Roberts JS, Christensen KD, Green RC. Using Alzheimer’s disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: implications for personal genomics. Clin Genet. 2011;80:407–14.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Roberts JS, Christensen KD, Green RC. Using Alzheimer’s disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: implications for personal genomics. Clin Genet. 2011;80:407–14.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development of a process to disclose amyloid imaging results to cognitively normal older adult research participants
Authors
Kristin Harkins
Pamela Sankar
Reisa Sperling
Joshua D Grill
Robert C Green
Keith A Johnson
Megan Healy
Jason Karlawish
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1758-9193
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-015-0112-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 1/2015 Go to the issue