Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Ultrasound Journal 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Appendicitis | Original article

Factors affecting perception of the normal pediatric appendix on sonography

Authors: Denise Castro, Joseph Yang, Prasan Patel, Eric Sauerbrei, Wilma Hopman, Mila Kolar, Don Soboleski

Published in: The Ultrasound Journal | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To determine if an inherent perception skill along with sonographer experience, knowledge base, scanning time play a role in the identification of the normal appendix in the pediatric population. This is a retrospective review of pediatric (< 18 years old) patients with a clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis presenting to the emergency department of two affiliated academic tertiary care hospitals over a 1-year time span. All patients had a sonogram performed by 1/15 sonographers or by 1/8 on-call radiology residents. Those with a normal or non-visualized appendix with subsequent discharge from ER were included in the study. Patient demographics, minutes spent scanning, and sonographer years of experience in general abdominal scanning and residents level of training were recorded.

Results

Of the 127 patients included in the study, 51 (40%) were male and 76 (60%) were female, with a mean age of 11.8 ± 4.2 years. Sonographers who failed to see a normal appendix had less experience (median 8 years) than those who did visualize the appendix (median 15 years), p ≤ 0.001. Longer time spent scanning was also associated with visualizing a normal appendix (20.4 versus 29.1 min, p = 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, more time spent scanning (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01, 1.07, p = 0.012) and increased sonographer experience (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02, 1.13, p = 0.012) resulted in greater odds of perceiving the appendix. The top 4 were significantly more likely to visualize the appendix (88.0%) than all of the other combined (20.8%, p < 0.001), and they also had substantially more experience (median 15 years versus 8 years, p < 0.001). Overall, sonographers were more likely to see a normal appendix (61%) than the residents (14%), p < 0.001.

Conclusion

Sonography to rule out appendicitis in the pediatric patient is in general most successful when performed by experienced sonographers with adequate time to perform the scan. Triaging patients to those sonographers who have displayed optimal perceptual ability of the normal appendix may help optimize patient care and hospital resources. Having experienced sonographers available after hours would allow for optimal care in the setting of ‘query’ appendicitis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, Newman-Toker DE (2013) Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:611–617CrossRef Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, Newman-Toker DE (2013) Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:611–617CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Krupinski EA (2000) The importance of perception research in medical imaging. Radiat Med 18:329–334PubMed Krupinski EA (2000) The importance of perception research in medical imaging. Radiat Med 18:329–334PubMed
3.
go back to reference Pow RE, Mello-Thoms C, Brennan P (2016) Evaluation of the effect of double reporting on test accuracy in screening and diagnostic imaging studies: a review of the evidence. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 60:306–314CrossRef Pow RE, Mello-Thoms C, Brennan P (2016) Evaluation of the effect of double reporting on test accuracy in screening and diagnostic imaging studies: a review of the evidence. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 60:306–314CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Garland LH (1949) On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures. Radiology 52:309–328CrossRef Garland LH (1949) On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures. Radiology 52:309–328CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH (2015) Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics 35:1668–1676CrossRef Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH (2015) Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics 35:1668–1676CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Provenzale JM, Kranz PG (2011) Understanding errors in diagnostic radiology: proposal of a classification scheme and application to emergency radiology. Emerg Radiol 18:403–408CrossRef Provenzale JM, Kranz PG (2011) Understanding errors in diagnostic radiology: proposal of a classification scheme and application to emergency radiology. Emerg Radiol 18:403–408CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tourassi G, Voisin S, Paquit V, Krupinski E (2013) Investigating the link between radiologists’ gaze, diagnostic decision, and image content. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20:1067–1075CrossRef Tourassi G, Voisin S, Paquit V, Krupinski E (2013) Investigating the link between radiologists’ gaze, diagnostic decision, and image content. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20:1067–1075CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cochrane AL, Garland LH (1952) Observer error in the interpretation of chest films; an international investigation. Lancet 2:505–509CrossRef Cochrane AL, Garland LH (1952) Observer error in the interpretation of chest films; an international investigation. Lancet 2:505–509CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pitman AG (2006) Perceptual error and the culture of open disclosure in Australian radiology. Australas Radiol 50:206–211CrossRef Pitman AG (2006) Perceptual error and the culture of open disclosure in Australian radiology. Australas Radiol 50:206–211CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee JH, Jeong YK, Park KB, Park JK, Jeong AK, Hwang JC (2005) Operator-dependent techniques for graded compression sonography to detect the appendix and diagnose acute appendicitis. Am J Roentgenol 184(1):91–97CrossRef Lee JH, Jeong YK, Park KB, Park JK, Jeong AK, Hwang JC (2005) Operator-dependent techniques for graded compression sonography to detect the appendix and diagnose acute appendicitis. Am J Roentgenol 184(1):91–97CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tegnander E, Eik-Nes SH (2006) The examiner’s ultrasound experience has a significant impact on the detection rate of congenital heart defects at the second-trimester fetal examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28(1):8–14CrossRef Tegnander E, Eik-Nes SH (2006) The examiner’s ultrasound experience has a significant impact on the detection rate of congenital heart defects at the second-trimester fetal examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28(1):8–14CrossRef
12.
go back to reference O’Connor PJ, Rankine J, Gibbon WW, Richardson A, Winter F, Miller JH (2005) Interobserver variation in sonography of the painful shoulder. J Clin Ultrasound 33:53–56CrossRef O’Connor PJ, Rankine J, Gibbon WW, Richardson A, Winter F, Miller JH (2005) Interobserver variation in sonography of the painful shoulder. J Clin Ultrasound 33:53–56CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Waite S, Grigorian A, Alexander RG, Macknik SL, Carrasco M, Jeeger DJ, Martinez-Conde S (2019) Analysis of perceptual expertise in radiology—current knowledge and a new perspective. Front Hum Neurosci 13:213CrossRef Waite S, Grigorian A, Alexander RG, Macknik SL, Carrasco M, Jeeger DJ, Martinez-Conde S (2019) Analysis of perceptual expertise in radiology—current knowledge and a new perspective. Front Hum Neurosci 13:213CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors affecting perception of the normal pediatric appendix on sonography
Authors
Denise Castro
Joseph Yang
Prasan Patel
Eric Sauerbrei
Wilma Hopman
Mila Kolar
Don Soboleski
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2524-8987
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-019-0148-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

The Ultrasound Journal 1/2019 Go to the issue