Published in:
Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article
B-cell and T-cell quantification in minor salivary glands in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: development and validation of a pixel-based digital procedure
Published in: Arthritis Research & Therapy | Issue 1/2016
Login to get accessAbstract
Background
Evaluating lymphocytic infiltration of minor salivary gland biopsy in primary Sjögren’s syndrome is challenging. We developed and evaluated a digital method for quantifying B and T lymphocytes in whole minor salivary gland biopsy slides.
Methods
Minor salivary gland biopsies were immunostained with anti-CD20/anti-CD3 antibodies using red/brown chromogens. Slides were digitised and spliced into mosaics of smaller JPEG format images in which red and brown pixels were counted. ImageJ Cell counter was used for validation. Agreement between the digital and manual methods was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots and the interclass correlation coefficient. External validation relied on the Chisholm-Mason, Tarpley, and focus-score methods.
Results
Of 62 minor salivary gland biopsy slides, 61.3 % had a Chisholm-Mason grade ≥ III or a focus score ≥1. The number of pixels correlated well with manual cell counts (r = 0.95 for red pixels vs. B cell count and r = 0.91 for brown pixels vs. T cell count). Interclass correlation coefficients between digital and manual counts were excellent (0.92 for B/T cells). B-cell proportion showed a significant positive correlation with the focus score (Spearman’s coefficient 0.463, p < 0.0001). Median B-cell proportion was lower in minor salivary gland biopsies with Chisholm grades I–II (2.5 % (0.2–13.9)) than III–IV (30.0 % (15.5–45.2)) and increased with Tarpley’s class (1, 2.2 % (0.2–6.6); 2, 27.2 % (13.0–38.9); and 3–4, 48.5 % (29.4–56.4); p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Minor salivary gland biopsy B-cell proportion was also significantly correlated with several markers of clinical and biological activity of the disease, especially with markers of systemic B-cell hyperactivation.
Conclusion
The digital procedure proved accurate compared to the reference standard, producing reliable results for whole tissue sections.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00740948]. Registered 22 August 2008.