Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Septicemia | Study protocol

Randomized controlled multicentre study of albumin replacement therapy in septic shock (ARISS): protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Yasser Sakr, Michael Bauer, Axel Nierhaus, Stefan Kluge, Ulricke Schumacher, Christian Putensen, Falk Fichtner, Sirak Petros, Christian Scheer, Ulrich Jaschinski, Ivan Tanev, David Jacob, Norbert Weiler, P. Christian Schulze, Fritz Fiedler, Barbara Kapfer, Frank Brunkhorst, Ingmar Lautenschlaeger, Katja Wartenberg, Stefan Utzolino, Josef Briegel, Onnen Moerer, Petra Bischoff, Alexander Zarbock, Michael Quintel, Luciano Gattinoni, on behalf of SepNet - Critical Care Trials Group

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Albumin is a key regulator of fluid distribution within the extracellular space and has several properties beyond its oncotic activity. The accumulating evidence suggests that supplementation of albumin may provide survival advantages only when the insult is severe as in patients with septic shock.

Methods/design

The randomized controlled multicentre study of albumin replacement therapy in septic shock (ARISS) investigates whether the replacement with albumin and the maintenance of its serum levels of at least 30 g/l for 28 days improve survival in patients with septic shock compared to resuscitation and volume maintenance without albumin. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with septic shock are randomly assigned within a maximum of 24 h after the onset of septic shock after obtaining informed consents to treatment or control groups. Patients assigned to the treatment group receive a 60-g loading dose of human albumin 20% over 2–3 h. Serum albumin levels are maintained at least at 30 g/l in the ICU for a maximum of 28 days following randomization using 40–80 g human albumin 20% infusion. The control group is treated according to the usual practice with crystalloids as the first choice for the resuscitation and maintenance phase of septic shock. The primary endpoint is 90 days mortality and secondary endpoints include 28-day, 60-day, ICU, and in-hospital mortality, organ dysfunction/failure, total amount of fluid administration and total fluid balance in the ICU, and lengths of ICU and hospital stay. In total, 1412 patients need to be analysed, 706 per group. For the sample size estimation, a 15% reduction in 90-day mortality is assumed, i.e. an absolute reduction of 7.5% points to 42.5% (relative risk 1.18). Assuming a dropout rate of 15%, a total of 1662 patients need to be allocated.

Discussion

The results of the clinical trial may influence the treatment of patients with septic shock. The expected improvement in patient survival may result in a reduction in the resources currently used in the treatment of these patients and in the socioeconomic burden of this disease.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03869385. Registration on 18 July 2019. Protocol version: Final 3.0.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Martin GS, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1546–54.CrossRef Martin GS, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1546–54.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vincent JL, et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(5):380–6.CrossRef Vincent JL, et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(5):380–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference SepNet Critical Care Trials, G. Incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock in German intensive care units: the prospective, multicentre INSEP study. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(12):1980–9.CrossRef SepNet Critical Care Trials, G. Incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock in German intensive care units: the prospective, multicentre INSEP study. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(12):1980–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Holst LB, et al. Lower versus higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(15):1381–91.CrossRef Holst LB, et al. Lower versus higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(15):1381–91.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mouncey PR, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1301–11.CrossRef Mouncey PR, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1301–11.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Investigators A, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(16):1496–506.CrossRef Investigators A, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(16):1496–506.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fanali G, et al. Human serum albumin: from bench to bedside. Mol Asp Med. 2012;33(3):209–90.CrossRef Fanali G, et al. Human serum albumin: from bench to bedside. Mol Asp Med. 2012;33(3):209–90.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference O'Brien AJ, et al. Immunosuppression in acutely decompensated cirrhosis is mediated by prostaglandin E2. Nat Med. 2014;20(5):518–23.CrossRef O'Brien AJ, et al. Immunosuppression in acutely decompensated cirrhosis is mediated by prostaglandin E2. Nat Med. 2014;20(5):518–23.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Taverna M, et al. Specific antioxidant properties of human serum albumin. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3(1):4.CrossRef Taverna M, et al. Specific antioxidant properties of human serum albumin. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3(1):4.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Walley KR, et al. Albumin resuscitation increases cardiomyocyte contractility and decreases nitric oxide synthase II expression in rat endotoxemia. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(1):187–94.CrossRef Walley KR, et al. Albumin resuscitation increases cardiomyocyte contractility and decreases nitric oxide synthase II expression in rat endotoxemia. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(1):187–94.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin, R. Human albumin administration in critically ill patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1998;317(7153):235–40.CrossRef Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin, R. Human albumin administration in critically ill patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1998;317(7153):235–40.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ. Patient survival after human albumin administration. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(3):149–64.CrossRef Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ. Patient survival after human albumin administration. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(3):149–64.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Vincent JL, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Morbidity in hospitalized patients receiving human albumin: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(10):2029–38.CrossRef Vincent JL, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Morbidity in hospitalized patients receiving human albumin: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(10):2029–38.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dubois MJ, et al. Albumin administration improves organ function in critically ill hypoalbuminemic patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled, pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(10):2536–40.CrossRef Dubois MJ, et al. Albumin administration improves organ function in critically ill hypoalbuminemic patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled, pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(10):2536–40.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Finfer S, et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(22):2247–56.CrossRef Finfer S, et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(22):2247–56.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Caironi P, et al. Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(15):1412–21.CrossRef Caironi P, et al. Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(15):1412–21.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Singer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.CrossRef Singer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Calandra T, Cohen J, I.C.U.C.C. International Sepsis Forum Definition of Infection in the. The international sepsis forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(7):1538–48.CrossRef Calandra T, Cohen J, I.C.U.C.C. International Sepsis Forum Definition of Infection in the. The international sepsis forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(7):1538–48.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Brunkhorst FM, et al. Effect of empirical treatment with moxifloxacin and meropenem vs meropenem on sepsis-related organ dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2390–9.CrossRef Brunkhorst FM, et al. Effect of empirical treatment with moxifloxacin and meropenem vs meropenem on sepsis-related organ dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2390–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Barnett AG, et al. The time-dependent bias and its effect on extra length of stay due to nosocomial infection. Value Health. 2011;14(2):381–6.CrossRef Barnett AG, et al. The time-dependent bias and its effect on extra length of stay due to nosocomial infection. Value Health. 2011;14(2):381–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.CrossRef Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Eckhardt K, et al. Recording and reporting adverse reactions in clinical trials. New legal provisions according to the 12th Law Amending the German Drug Law (AMG) and the Ordinance on GCP (GCP-V). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005;48(2):173–80.CrossRef Eckhardt K, et al. Recording and reporting adverse reactions in clinical trials. New legal provisions according to the 12th Law Amending the German Drug Law (AMG) and the Ordinance on GCP (GCP-V). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005;48(2):173–80.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Association, W.M. Declaration of Helsinki, Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Seoul: 59th World Medical Association General Assembly; 2008. Association, W.M. Declaration of Helsinki, Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Seoul: 59th World Medical Association General Assembly; 2008.
Metadata
Title
Randomized controlled multicentre study of albumin replacement therapy in septic shock (ARISS): protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Yasser Sakr
Michael Bauer
Axel Nierhaus
Stefan Kluge
Ulricke Schumacher
Christian Putensen
Falk Fichtner
Sirak Petros
Christian Scheer
Ulrich Jaschinski
Ivan Tanev
David Jacob
Norbert Weiler
P. Christian Schulze
Fritz Fiedler
Barbara Kapfer
Frank Brunkhorst
Ingmar Lautenschlaeger
Katja Wartenberg
Stefan Utzolino
Josef Briegel
Onnen Moerer
Petra Bischoff
Alexander Zarbock
Michael Quintel
Luciano Gattinoni
on behalf of SepNet - Critical Care Trials Group
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04921-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Trials 1/2020 Go to the issue