Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Rectal Cancer | Study protocol

A single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial to investigate the optimal removal time of the urinary catheter after laparoscopic anterior resection of the rectum: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Lai Xu, Zhi-Yan Tao, Jun-Yang Lu, Guan-Nan Zhang, Hui-Zhong Qiu, Bin Wu, Guo-Le Lin, Tao Xu, Yi Xiao

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Urinary catheter placement is essential before laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer. Whether early removal of the catheter increases the incidence of urinary retention and urinary tract infection (UTI) is not clear. This study aims to determine the optimal time for removal of the urinary catheter after laparoscopic anterior resection of the rectum.

Methods/design

A total of 220 participants meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group. The experimental group will have their urethral catheters removed on postoperative day 2 and the control group will have their urethral catheters removed on postoperative day 7. In both groups, catheter removal will be performed when the bladder is full. The incidence of urinary retention and UTI in the two groups will be compared to determine the optimal catheter removal time.

Discussion

This is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial to determine whether early removal of the urinary catheter after laparoscopic anterior resection of the rectum will help to decrease the incidence of postoperative acute urinary retention and UTI.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03065855. Registered on 23 February 2017.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mcleod RS, et al. Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guideline and implementation strategy based on the knowledge-to-action cycle. Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):1016–25.CrossRef Mcleod RS, et al. Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guideline and implementation strategy based on the knowledge-to-action cycle. Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):1016–25.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Benoist S, et al. Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 1999;125(2):135–41.CrossRef Benoist S, et al. Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 1999;125(2):135–41.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kwaan MR, et al. Early removal of urinary catheters after rectal surgery is associated with increased urinary retention. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(4):401–5.CrossRef Kwaan MR, et al. Early removal of urinary catheters after rectal surgery is associated with increased urinary retention. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(4):401–5.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yoo BE, et al. Early removal of the urinary catheter after total or tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is safe. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(7):686–91.CrossRef Yoo BE, et al. Early removal of the urinary catheter after total or tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is safe. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(7):686–91.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dunstan DA, Scott N, Todd AK. Screening for anxiety and depression:reassessing the utility of Zung scales. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):329–36.CrossRef Dunstan DA, Scott N, Todd AK. Screening for anxiety and depression:reassessing the utility of Zung scales. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):329–36.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ahmed MR, et al. Timing of urinary catheter removal after uncomplicated total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;176:60–3.CrossRef Ahmed MR, et al. Timing of urinary catheter removal after uncomplicated total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;176:60–3.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A, Breivik H. Detecting postoperative urinary retention with an ultrasound scanner. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46(3):279–82.CrossRef Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A, Breivik H. Detecting postoperative urinary retention with an ultrasound scanner. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46(3):279–82.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Delacroix SE Jr, Winters JC. Voiding dysfunction after pelvic colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010;23(2):119–27.CrossRef Delacroix SE Jr, Winters JC. Voiding dysfunction after pelvic colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010;23(2):119–27.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Winslow ER, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM. Perioperative outcomes and complications of open vs laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in a mature surgical practice. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(2):221–7.CrossRef Winslow ER, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM. Perioperative outcomes and complications of open vs laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in a mature surgical practice. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(2):221–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stubbs BM, et al. A prospective study of early removal of the urethral catheter after colorectal surgery in patients having epidural analgesia as part of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme. Color Dis. 2013;15(6):733–6.CrossRef Stubbs BM, et al. A prospective study of early removal of the urethral catheter after colorectal surgery in patients having epidural analgesia as part of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme. Color Dis. 2013;15(6):733–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tammela T, Arjamaa O. Comparison of long-term and short-term stretch on rat urinary bladder in vitro. Urolithiasis. 1988;16(4):277–80. Tammela T, Arjamaa O. Comparison of long-term and short-term stretch on rat urinary bladder in vitro. Urolithiasis. 1988;16(4):277–80.
Metadata
Title
A single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial to investigate the optimal removal time of the urinary catheter after laparoscopic anterior resection of the rectum: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Lai Xu
Zhi-Yan Tao
Jun-Yang Lu
Guan-Nan Zhang
Hui-Zhong Qiu
Bin Wu
Guo-Le Lin
Tao Xu
Yi Xiao
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3210-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Trials 1/2019 Go to the issue