Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

GoActive: a protocol for the mixed methods process evaluation of a school-based physical activity promotion programme for 13–14year old adolescents

Authors: Stephanie T. Jong, Helen Elizabeth Brown, Caroline H. D. Croxson, Paul Wilkinson, Kirsten L. Corder, Esther M. F. van Sluijs

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Process evaluations are critical for interpreting and understanding outcome trial results. By understanding how interventions function across different settings, process evaluations have the capacity to inform future dissemination of interventions. The complexity of Get others Active (GoActive), a 12-week, school-based physical activity intervention implemented in eight schools, highlights the need to investigate how implementation is achieved across a variety of school settings. This paper describes the mixed methods GoActive process evaluation protocol that is embedded within the outcome evaluation. In this detailed process evaluation protocol, we describe the flexible and pragmatic methods that will be used for capturing the process evaluation data.

Methods

A mixed methods design will be used for the process evaluation, including quantitative data collected in both the control and intervention arms of the GoActive trial, and qualitative data collected in the intervention arm. Data collection methods will include purposively sampled, semi-structured interviews and focus group interviews, direct observation, and participant questionnaires (completed by students, teachers, older adolescent mentors, and local authority-funded facilitators). Data will be analysed thematically within and across datasets. Overall synthesis of findings will address the process of GoActive implementation, and through which this process affects outcomes, with careful attention to the context of the school environment.

Discussion

This process evaluation will explore the experience of participating in GoActive from the perspectives of key groups, providing a greater understanding of the acceptability and process of implementation of the intervention across the eight intervention schools. This will allow for appraisal of the intervention’s conceptual base, inform potential dissemination, and help optimise post-trial sustainability. The process evaluation will also assist in contextualising the trial effectiveness results with respect to how the intervention may or may not have worked and, if it was found to be effective, what might be required for it to be sustained in the ‘real world’. Furthermore, it will offer suggestions for the development and implementation of future initiatives to promote physical activity within schools.

Trial registration

ISRCTN, ISRCTN31583496. Registered on 18 February 2014.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Century J, Rudnick M, Freeman C. A Framework for Measuring Fidelity of Implementation: A Foundation for Shared Language and Accumulation of Knowledge. Am J Eval. 2010;31:199–218.CrossRef Century J, Rudnick M, Freeman C. A Framework for Measuring Fidelity of Implementation: A Foundation for Shared Language and Accumulation of Knowledge. Am J Eval. 2010;31:199–218.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Grant A, Treweek S, Dreischulte T, Foy R, Guthrie B. Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: A proposed framework for design and reporting. Trials. 2013;14. Grant A, Treweek S, Dreischulte T, Foy R, Guthrie B. Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: A proposed framework for design and reporting. Trials. 2013;14.
3.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, Medical Research Council G. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, Medical Research Council G. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference van de Glind I, Bunn C, Gray CM, Hunt K, Andersen E, Jelsma J, Morgan H, Pereira H, Roberts G, Rooksby J, et al. The intervention process in the European Fans in Training (EuroFIT) trial: A mixed method protocol for evaluation. Trials. 2017;18. van de Glind I, Bunn C, Gray CM, Hunt K, Andersen E, Jelsma J, Morgan H, Pereira H, Roberts G, Rooksby J, et al. The intervention process in the European Fans in Training (EuroFIT) trial: A mixed method protocol for evaluation. Trials. 2017;18.
5.
go back to reference Masterson-Algar P, Burton CR, Brady MC, Nicoll A, Clarke CE, Rick C, Hughes M, Au P, Smith CH, Sackley CM. The PD COMM trial: A protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial assessing the effectiveness of two types of SLT for people with Parkinson’s disease. Trials. 2017;18. Masterson-Algar P, Burton CR, Brady MC, Nicoll A, Clarke CE, Rick C, Hughes M, Au P, Smith CH, Sackley CM. The PD COMM trial: A protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial assessing the effectiveness of two types of SLT for people with Parkinson’s disease. Trials. 2017;18.
6.
go back to reference Grant A, Dreischulte T, Treweek S, Guthrie B. Study protocol of a mixed-methods evaluation of a cluster randomized trial to improve the safety of NSAID and antiplatelet prescribing: Data-driven quality improvement in primary care. Trials. 2012;13. Grant A, Dreischulte T, Treweek S, Guthrie B. Study protocol of a mixed-methods evaluation of a cluster randomized trial to improve the safety of NSAID and antiplatelet prescribing: Data-driven quality improvement in primary care. Trials. 2012;13.
7.
go back to reference Ellard DR, Taylor SJ, Parsons S, Thorogood M. The OPERA trial: A protocol for the process evaluation of randomised trial of an exercise intervention for older people in residential nursing accommodation. Trials. 2011;12. Ellard DR, Taylor SJ, Parsons S, Thorogood M. The OPERA trial: A protocol for the process evaluation of randomised trial of an exercise intervention for older people in residential nursing accommodation. Trials. 2011;12.
8.
go back to reference Mann C, Shaw A, Guthrie B, Wye L, Man MS, Hollinghurst S, Brookes S, Bower P, Mercer S, Salisbury C. Protocol for a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to improve management of multimorbidity in general practice: the 3D study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011260.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mann C, Shaw A, Guthrie B, Wye L, Man MS, Hollinghurst S, Brookes S, Bower P, Mercer S, Salisbury C. Protocol for a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to improve management of multimorbidity in general practice: the 3D study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011260.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Griffin TL, Pallan MJ, Clarke JL, Lancashire ER, Lyon A, Parry JM, Adab P. Process evaluation design in a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial. the WAVES study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11. Griffin TL, Pallan MJ, Clarke JL, Lancashire ER, Lyon A, Parry JM, Adab P. Process evaluation design in a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial. the WAVES study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11.
10.
go back to reference Campbell R, Rawlins E, Wells S, Kipping RR, Chittleborough CR, Peters TJ, Lawlor DA, Jago R. Intervention fidelity in a school-based diet and physical activity intervention in the UK: Active for Life Year 5. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12. Campbell R, Rawlins E, Wells S, Kipping RR, Chittleborough CR, Peters TJ, Lawlor DA, Jago R. Intervention fidelity in a school-based diet and physical activity intervention in the UK: Active for Life Year 5. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12.
11.
go back to reference Griffin TL, Clarke JL, Lancashire ER, Pallan MJ. Process evaluation results of a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial: the WAVES study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17. Griffin TL, Clarke JL, Lancashire ER, Pallan MJ. Process evaluation results of a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial: the WAVES study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17.
12.
go back to reference Edwardson CL, Harrington DM, Yates T, Bodicoat DH, Khunti K, Gorely T, Sherar LB, Edwards RT, Wright C, Harrington K, Davies MJ. A cluster randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the ‘Girls Active’ intervention: A study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2015;15. Edwardson CL, Harrington DM, Yates T, Bodicoat DH, Khunti K, Gorely T, Sherar LB, Edwards RT, Wright C, Harrington K, Davies MJ. A cluster randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the ‘Girls Active’ intervention: A study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2015;15.
13.
go back to reference Sebire SJ, Edwards MJ, Campbell R, Jago R, Kipping R, Banfield K, Tomkinson K, Garfield K, Lyons RA, Simon J, et al. Protocol for a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a peer-led school-based intervention to increase the physical activity of adolescent girls (PLAN-A). Pilot and Feasibility Stud. 2016;2. Sebire SJ, Edwards MJ, Campbell R, Jago R, Kipping R, Banfield K, Tomkinson K, Garfield K, Lyons RA, Simon J, et al. Protocol for a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a peer-led school-based intervention to increase the physical activity of adolescent girls (PLAN-A). Pilot and Feasibility Stud. 2016;2.
14.
go back to reference Brown HE, Whittle F, Jong ST, Croxson C, Sharp SJ, Wilkinson P, Wilson EC, van Sluijs EM, Vignoles A, Corder K. A cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and costeffectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among 13–14-year-old adolescents. BMJ Open. 2017;0:e014419. Brown HE, Whittle F, Jong ST, Croxson C, Sharp SJ, Wilkinson P, Wilson EC, van Sluijs EM, Vignoles A, Corder K. A cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and costeffectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among 13–14-year-old adolescents. BMJ Open. 2017;0:e014419.
15.
go back to reference Corder K, Schiff A, Kesten JM, van Sluijs EM. Development of a universal approach to increase physical activity among adolescents: the GoActive intervention. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008610.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Corder K, Schiff A, Kesten JM, van Sluijs EM. Development of a universal approach to increase physical activity among adolescents: the GoActive intervention. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008610.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O’Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance. London: MRC; 2014. Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O’Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance. London: MRC; 2014.
17.
go back to reference Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O’Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O’Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6:134–47.CrossRefPubMed Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6:134–47.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Plano Clark V. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. USA: SAGE Publications; 2011. Creswell JW, Plano Clark V. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. USA: SAGE Publications; 2011.
21.
go back to reference Salmon J, Jorna M, Hume C, Arundell L, Chahine N, Tienstra M, Crawford D. A translational research intervention to reduce screen behaviours and promote physical activity among children: Switch-2-Activity. Health Promot Int. 2011;26:311–21.CrossRefPubMed Salmon J, Jorna M, Hume C, Arundell L, Chahine N, Tienstra M, Crawford D. A translational research intervention to reduce screen behaviours and promote physical activity among children: Switch-2-Activity. Health Promot Int. 2011;26:311–21.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. US and UK: SAGE Publications; 2013. Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. US and UK: SAGE Publications; 2013.
23.
go back to reference Wragg EC. An introduction to classroom observation. 2nd ed. USA and Canada: Routledge Falmer; 1994. p. 1997. Wragg EC. An introduction to classroom observation. 2nd ed. USA and Canada: Routledge Falmer; 1994. p. 1997.
24.
go back to reference Buss AH, Plomin R. Temperament. Early Developing Personality Traits. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale; 1984. Buss AH, Plomin R. Temperament. Early Developing Personality Traits. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale; 1984.
25.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. StataCorp LP: College Station; 2015. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. StataCorp LP: College Station; 2015.
27.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ. 2010;341:c4587. O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ. 2010;341:c4587.
29.
go back to reference Farmer T, Robinson K, Elliott SJ, Eyles J. Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research. Qual Health Res. 2006;16:377–94.CrossRefPubMed Farmer T, Robinson K, Elliott SJ, Eyles J. Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research. Qual Health Res. 2006;16:377–94.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick KR. Points of Convergence in Music Education. J Mixed Methods Res. 2014;10:273–91.CrossRef Fitzpatrick KR. Points of Convergence in Music Education. J Mixed Methods Res. 2014;10:273–91.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wittink MN, Barg FK, Gallo JJ. Unwritten rules of talking to doctors about depression: integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:302–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wittink MN, Barg FK, Gallo JJ. Unwritten rules of talking to doctors about depression: integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:302–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Medical Research Council. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: MRC; 2000. Medical Research Council. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: MRC; 2000.
33.
go back to reference Hawe P, Sheill A, Riley T. Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ. 2004;328:1561. Hawe P, Sheill A, Riley T. Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ. 2004;328:1561.
Metadata
Title
GoActive: a protocol for the mixed methods process evaluation of a school-based physical activity promotion programme for 13–14year old adolescents
Authors
Stephanie T. Jong
Helen Elizabeth Brown
Caroline H. D. Croxson
Paul Wilkinson
Kirsten L. Corder
Esther M. F. van Sluijs
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2661-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Trials 1/2018 Go to the issue