Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

COMplex Fracture Orthopedic Rehabilitation (COMFORT) - Real-time visual biofeedback on weight bearing versus standard training methods in the treatment of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Authors: Marco Raaben, Syaiful Redzwan, Robin Augustine, Taco Johan Blokhuis

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Proximal femur fractures are a common injury after low energy trauma in the elderly. Most rehabilitation programs are based on restoring mobility and early resumption of weight-bearing. However, therapy compliance is low in patients following lower extremity fractures. Moreover, little is known about the relevance of gait parameters and how to steer the rehabilitation after proximal femur fractures in the elderly. Therefore, the aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial is to gain insight in gait parameters and evaluate if real-time visual biofeedback can improve therapy compliance after proximal femur fractures in the elderly.

Methods

This is a two-arm, parallel-design, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Inclusion criteria are age ≥ 60 years, a proximal femur fracture following low energy trauma, and unrestricted-weight bearing. Exclusion criteria are cognitive impairment and limited mobility before trauma. Participants are randomized into either the control group, which receives care as usual, or the intervention group, which receives real-time visual biofeedback about weight-bearing during gait in addition to care as usual. Spatiotemporal gait parameters will be measured in 94 participants per group during a 30-m walk with an ambulatory biofeedback system (SensiStep). The progress of rehabilitation will be evaluated by the primary outcome parameters maximum peak load and step duration in relation to the discharge date. Secondary outcome parameters include other spatiotemporal gait parameters in relation to discharge date. Furthermore, the gait parameters will be related to three validated clinical tests: Elderly Mobility Scale; Functional Ambulation Categories; and Visual Analogue Scale. The primary hypothesis is that participants in the intervention group will show improved and faster rehabilitation compared to the control group.

Discussion

The first aim of this multicenter trial is to investigate the normal gait patterns after proximal femur fractures in the elderly. The use of biofeedback systems during rehabilitation after proximal femur fractures in the elderly is promising; therefore, the second aim is to investigate the effect of real-time visual biofeedback on gait after proximal femur fractures in the elderly. This could lead to improved outcome. In addition, analysis of the population may indicate characteristics of subgroups that benefit from feedback, making a differentiated approach in rehabilitation strategy possible.

Trial registration

TrialRegister.nl, NTR6794. Registered on 31 October 2017.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Peeters CMM, Visser E, Van De Ree CLP, Gosens T, Den Oudsten BL, De Vries J. Quality of life after hip fracture in the elderly: A systematic literature review. Injury. 2016;47:1369–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.018CrossRefPubMed Peeters CMM, Visser E, Van De Ree CLP, Gosens T, Den Oudsten BL, De Vries J. Quality of life after hip fracture in the elderly: A systematic literature review. Injury. 2016;47:1369–82. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​injury.​2016.​04.​018CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Beaupre LA, Binder EF, Cameron ID, Jones CA, Orwig D, Sherrington C, et al. Maximising functional recovery following hip fracture in frail seniors. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013;27:771–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2014.01.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beaupre LA, Binder EF, Cameron ID, Jones CA, Orwig D, Sherrington C, et al. Maximising functional recovery following hip fracture in frail seniors. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013;27:771–88. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​berh.​2014.​01.​001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Vasarhelyi A, Baumert T, Fritsch C, Hopfenmüller W, Gradl G, Mittlmeier T. Partial weight bearing after surgery for fractures of the lower extremity – is it achievable? Gait Posture. 2006;23:99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.12.005CrossRefPubMed Vasarhelyi A, Baumert T, Fritsch C, Hopfenmüller W, Gradl G, Mittlmeier T. Partial weight bearing after surgery for fractures of the lower extremity – is it achievable? Gait Posture. 2006;23:99–105. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​gaitpost.​2004.​12.​005CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Robling AG, Castillo AB, Turner CH. Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2006;8:455–98.CrossRefPubMed Robling AG, Castillo AB, Turner CH. Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2006;8:455–98.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Klein-Nulend J, Bacabac RG, Mullender MG. Mechanobiology of bone tissue. Pathol Biol. 2005;53:576–80.CrossRefPubMed Klein-Nulend J, Bacabac RG, Mullender MG. Mechanobiology of bone tissue. Pathol Biol. 2005;53:576–80.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hurkmans HLP, Bussmann JBJ, Benda E, Verhaar JAN, Stam HJ. Techniques for measuring weight bearing during standing and walking. Clin Biomech. 2003;18:576–89. Hurkmans HLP, Bussmann JBJ, Benda E, Verhaar JAN, Stam HJ. Techniques for measuring weight bearing during standing and walking. Clin Biomech. 2003;18:576–89.
8.
go back to reference Hershko E, Tauber C, Carmeli E. Biofeedback versus physiotherapy in patients with partial weight-bearing. Am J Orthop. 2008;37:92–6. Hershko E, Tauber C, Carmeli E. Biofeedback versus physiotherapy in patients with partial weight-bearing. Am J Orthop. 2008;37:92–6.
9.
go back to reference Raaben M, Holtslag HR, Leenen LPH, Augustine R, Blokhuis TJ. Real-time visual biofeedback during weight bearing improves therapy compliance in patients following lower extremity fractures. Gait Posture. 2018;59:206–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.022CrossRefPubMed Raaben M, Holtslag HR, Leenen LPH, Augustine R, Blokhuis TJ. Real-time visual biofeedback during weight bearing improves therapy compliance in patients following lower extremity fractures. Gait Posture. 2018;59:206–10. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​gaitpost.​2017.​10.​022CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jiang Y, Norman KE. Effects of visual and auditory cues on gait initiation in people with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215506cr925oaCrossRefPubMed Jiang Y, Norman KE. Effects of visual and auditory cues on gait initiation in people with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:36–45. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1191/​0269215506cr925o​aCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Druzbicki M, Guzik A, Przysada G, Kwolek A, Brzozowska-Magoń A. Efficacy of gait training using a treadmill with and without visual biofeedback in patients after stroke: A randomized study. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:419–25.CrossRefPubMed Druzbicki M, Guzik A, Przysada G, Kwolek A, Brzozowska-Magoń A. Efficacy of gait training using a treadmill with and without visual biofeedback in patients after stroke: A randomized study. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:419–25.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Baram Y, Lenger R. Gait improvement in patients with cerebral palsy by visual and auditory feedback. Neuromodulation. 2012;15:48–52.CrossRefPubMed Baram Y, Lenger R. Gait improvement in patients with cerebral palsy by visual and auditory feedback. Neuromodulation. 2012;15:48–52.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Isakov E. Gait rehabilitation: a new biofeedback device for monitoring and enhancing weight-bearing over the affected lower limb. Eura Medicophys. 2007;43:21–6.PubMed Isakov E. Gait rehabilitation: a new biofeedback device for monitoring and enhancing weight-bearing over the affected lower limb. Eura Medicophys. 2007;43:21–6.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hurkmans HL, Bussmann JB, Benda E, Verhaar JA, Stam HJ. Effectiveness of audio feedback for partial weight-bearing in and outside the hospital: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:565–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.019CrossRefPubMed Hurkmans HL, Bussmann JB, Benda E, Verhaar JA, Stam HJ. Effectiveness of audio feedback for partial weight-bearing in and outside the hospital: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:565–70. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​apmr.​2011.​11.​019CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Raaben M, Holtslag H, Augustine R, van Merkerk R, Koopman B, Blokhuis T. Technical aspects and validation of a new biofeedback system for measuring lower limb loading in the dynamic situation. Sensors. 2017;17:658. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17030658CrossRefPubMedCentral Raaben M, Holtslag H, Augustine R, van Merkerk R, Koopman B, Blokhuis T. Technical aspects and validation of a new biofeedback system for measuring lower limb loading in the dynamic situation. Sensors. 2017;17:658. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​s17030658CrossRefPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:922–35.CrossRefPubMed Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:922–35.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Thabane L, Mbuagbaw L, Zhang S, Samaan Z, Marcucci M, Ye C, et al. A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: The what, why, when and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-92CrossRef Thabane L, Mbuagbaw L, Zhang S, Samaan Z, Marcucci M, Ye C, et al. A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: The what, why, when and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:1. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1471-2288-13-92CrossRef
Metadata
Title
COMplex Fracture Orthopedic Rehabilitation (COMFORT) - Real-time visual biofeedback on weight bearing versus standard training methods in the treatment of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
Authors
Marco Raaben
Syaiful Redzwan
Robin Augustine
Taco Johan Blokhuis
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2612-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Trials 1/2018 Go to the issue