Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

A web-based education program to encourage organ donation registration among lower-educated adolescents in the Netherlands: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

Authors: Esther Steenaart, Rik Crutzen, Math J J M Candel, Nanne K de Vries

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The gap between the supply and demand of organ donors is substantial, causing patients to suffer from long waiting times. Moreover, the lack of registrations places a burden on family members and medical professionals when an unregistered individual dies. This article describes a cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT) study to assess the effectiveness and quality of implementation of a web-based program aimed at encouraging lower-educated adolescents to register a well-informed choice about organ donation, regardless of it being as a donor or not.

Methods/design

The program will be delivered by teachers at schools for Intermediate Vocational Education in the Netherlands. The effectiveness will be assessed in a CRCT design with post-test only using self-administered questionnaires for the primary outcome (i.e. intention to register). Classes will be matched to improve equivalence of groups. From each pair of matched classes, one class will be randomly assigned to the experimental condition, and the other assigned to the control condition. Students in the control groups will fill in the questionnaire before receiving the program, while the experimental groups will do this afterwards. A post-test design prevents the risk of testing bias. The required sample size is 14 schools, with 10 classes per school and 13 unregistered students per class. The questionnaire assesses demographics, behavioural determinants (attitude, self-efficacy, knowledge and social outcomes), intention to register (as a donor) and registration status. Six months after delivery, registration status will be assessed again. Additionally, a process evaluation will be conducted to evaluate the quality of implementation using both qualitative (i.e. semi-structured interviews) and quantitative (i.e. logbooks, questionnaires, Google Analytics to track user behaviour at the website) methods.

Discussion

Findings of the study can help to further improve the program and serve as a basis for a solid dissemination plan. Moreover, the study will provide insight into (change in) determinants of registration and donorship and the translation of research into practice of school-based health promotion interventions, which can serve as an example for others.

Trial registration

The Dutch Trial Register, NTR6771. Registered on 24 October 2017. This is version 2 of the protocol (5 November 2017).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nederlandse Transplantatiestichting. Jaarverslag 2015: samen sterker. Leiden: Nederlandse Transplantatiestichting; 2015. Nederlandse Transplantatiestichting. Jaarverslag 2015: samen sterker. Leiden: Nederlandse Transplantatiestichting; 2015.
3.
go back to reference Coppen R, Paul K, Avezaat C, Hagenaars J, Friele R, Bal R. Praktijken van orgaandonatie in Nederlandse ziekenhuizen. Een studie in het kader van het Masterplan Orgaandonatie 2011. Utrecht/Rotterdam: Nivel, Erasmus University; 2011. Coppen R, Paul K, Avezaat C, Hagenaars J, Friele R, Bal R. Praktijken van orgaandonatie in Nederlandse ziekenhuizen. Een studie in het kader van het Masterplan Orgaandonatie 2011. Utrecht/Rotterdam: Nivel, Erasmus University; 2011.
4.
go back to reference de Groot J, van Hoek M, Hoedemaekers C, Hoitsma A, Schilderman H, Smeets W, Vernooij-Dassen M, van Leeuwen E. Request for organ donation without donor registration: a qualitative study of the perspectives of bereaved relatives. BMC Med Ethics. 2016;17:38.CrossRef de Groot J, van Hoek M, Hoedemaekers C, Hoitsma A, Schilderman H, Smeets W, Vernooij-Dassen M, van Leeuwen E. Request for organ donation without donor registration: a qualitative study of the perspectives of bereaved relatives. BMC Med Ethics. 2016;17:38.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jansen NE, van Leiden HA, Haase-Kromwijk BJ, Hoitsma AJ. Organ donation performance in the Netherlands 2005–08; medical record review in 64 hospitals. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2010;25:1992–7.CrossRef Jansen NE, van Leiden HA, Haase-Kromwijk BJ, Hoitsma AJ. Organ donation performance in the Netherlands 2005–08; medical record review in 64 hospitals. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2010;25:1992–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1986. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1986.
7.
go back to reference Reubsaet A, Brug J, De Vet E, Van Den Borne B. The effects of practicing registration of organ donation preference on self-efficacy and registration intention: an enactive mastery experience. Psychol Health. 2003;18(5):585–94.CrossRef Reubsaet A, Brug J, De Vet E, Van Den Borne B. The effects of practicing registration of organ donation preference on self-efficacy and registration intention: an enactive mastery experience. Psychol Health. 2003;18(5):585–94.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Reubsaet A, Brug J, Kitslaar J, Van Hooff J, Van Den Borne H. The impact and evaluation of two school-based interventions on intention to register an organ donation preference. Health Educ Res. 2004;19(4):447–56.CrossRef Reubsaet A, Brug J, Kitslaar J, Van Hooff J, Van Den Borne H. The impact and evaluation of two school-based interventions on intention to register an organ donation preference. Health Educ Res. 2004;19(4):447–56.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Reubsaet A, Brug J, van den Borne B, van Hooff H. Predictors of organ donation registration among Dutch adolescents. Transplantation. 2001;72(1):51–6.CrossRef Reubsaet A, Brug J, van den Borne B, van Hooff H. Predictors of organ donation registration among Dutch adolescents. Transplantation. 2001;72(1):51–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Reubsaet A, van den Borne B, Brug J, Pruyn J, van Hooff H. Determinants of the intention of Dutch adolescents to register as organ donors. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(3):383–92.CrossRef Reubsaet A, van den Borne B, Brug J, Pruyn J, van Hooff H. Determinants of the intention of Dutch adolescents to register as organ donors. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(3):383–92.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Reubsaet A, Brug J, Nijkamp MD, Candel M, Van Hooff J, Van den Borne H. The impact of an organ donation registration information program for high school students in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(7):1479–86.CrossRef Reubsaet A, Brug J, Nijkamp MD, Candel M, Van Hooff J, Van den Borne H. The impact of an organ donation registration information program for high school students in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(7):1479–86.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kohl FML, Crutzen R, de Vries KN. Online prevention aimed at lifestyle behaviors: a systematic review of reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7):e146.CrossRef Kohl FML, Crutzen R, de Vries KN. Online prevention aimed at lifestyle behaviors: a systematic review of reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7):e146.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cobiac LJ, Vos T, Barendregt JJ. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity: a modelling study. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000110.CrossRef Cobiac LJ, Vos T, Barendregt JJ. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity: a modelling study. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000110.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tieben N, de Graaf PM, de Graaf ND. Changing effects of family background on transitions to secondary education in the Netherlands: consequences of educational expansion and reform. Res Soc Strat Mobil. 2010;28(1):77–90. Tieben N, de Graaf PM, de Graaf ND. Changing effects of family background on transitions to secondary education in the Netherlands: consequences of educational expansion and reform. Res Soc Strat Mobil. 2010;28(1):77–90.
15.
go back to reference Cox D. Naar een goed gevoel: communicatie en niet-registratie bij donorvoorlichting. Wijzer Adviesbureau: Den Haag; 2005. Cox D. Naar een goed gevoel: communicatie en niet-registratie bij donorvoorlichting. Wijzer Adviesbureau: Den Haag; 2005.
16.
go back to reference Wakefield C, Watts K, Homewood J, Meiser B, Siminoff L. Attitudes toward organ donation and donor behaviour: a review of the international literature. Prog Transplant. 2010;20(4):380–91.CrossRef Wakefield C, Watts K, Homewood J, Meiser B, Siminoff L. Attitudes toward organ donation and donor behaviour: a review of the international literature. Prog Transplant. 2010;20(4):380–91.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Siminoff LA, Gordon N, Hewlett J, Arnold RM. Factors influencing families’ consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. J Amer Med Assoc. 2001;286:71–7.CrossRef Siminoff LA, Gordon N, Hewlett J, Arnold RM. Factors influencing families’ consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. J Amer Med Assoc. 2001;286:71–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Peters F, Schmeets H. Het donorregister: wie doet mee en wie niet? In: CBS Bevolkingstrends februari 2015, vol. 2. Den Haag/Heerlen: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek; 2015. Peters F, Schmeets H. Het donorregister: wie doet mee en wie niet? In: CBS Bevolkingstrends februari 2015, vol. 2. Den Haag/Heerlen: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek; 2015.
19.
go back to reference Heij K, Haitjema T, Lam JF. Taalniveau in het MBO. Lienden: Bureau ICE; 2008. Heij K, Haitjema T, Lam JF. Taalniveau in het MBO. Lienden: Bureau ICE; 2008.
20.
go back to reference Steenaart E, Crutzen R, De Vries NK. The complexity of organ donation registration: determinants of registration behavior among lower-educated adolescents. 2018. Transplant Proc 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.06.010. In press. Steenaart E, Crutzen R, De Vries NK. The complexity of organ donation registration: determinants of registration behavior among lower-educated adolescents. 2018. Transplant Proc 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​transproceed.​2018.​06.​010.​ In press.
21.
go back to reference Steckler AB, Linnan L, Israel B. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. Steckler AB, Linnan L, Israel B. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
22.
go back to reference Wilding S, Conner M, Sandberg T, Prestwich A, Lawton R, Wood C, Miles E, Godin G, Sheeran P. The question-behaviour effect: a theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2016;27(1):196–230.CrossRef Wilding S, Conner M, Sandberg T, Prestwich A, Lawton R, Wood C, Miles E, Godin G, Sheeran P. The question-behaviour effect: a theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2016;27(1):196–230.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gruijters SL. Baseline comparisons and covariate fishing: bad statistical habits we should have broken yesterday. Eur Health Psychol. 2016;18(5):205–9. Gruijters SL. Baseline comparisons and covariate fishing: bad statistical habits we should have broken yesterday. Eur Health Psychol. 2016;18(5):205–9.
24.
go back to reference Browne WJ, Golalizadeh LM, Parker RMA. A guide to sample size calculations for random effect models via simulation and the MLPowSim Software Package. Bristol: University of Bristol; 2009. Browne WJ, Golalizadeh LM, Parker RMA. A guide to sample size calculations for random effect models via simulation and the MLPowSim Software Package. Bristol: University of Bristol; 2009.
25.
go back to reference Ivers NM, Halperin IJ, Barnsley J, Grimshaw JM, Shah BR, Tu K, Upshur R, Zwarenstein M. Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review. Trials. 2012;13:120.CrossRef Ivers NM, Halperin IJ, Barnsley J, Grimshaw JM, Shah BR, Tu K, Upshur R, Zwarenstein M. Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review. Trials. 2012;13:120.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Candel MJ, Van Breukelen GJ. Sample size adjustments for varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes analyzed with second-order PQL mixed logistic regression. Stat Med. 2010;29(14):1488–501.PubMed Candel MJ, Van Breukelen GJ. Sample size adjustments for varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes analyzed with second-order PQL mixed logistic regression. Stat Med. 2010;29(14):1488–501.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2010. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2010.
28.
go back to reference Crutzen R, Roosjen JL, Poelman J. Using Google Analytics as a process evaluation method for Internet-delivered interventions: an example on sexual health. Health Promot Int. 2013;28(1):36–42.CrossRef Crutzen R, Roosjen JL, Poelman J. Using Google Analytics as a process evaluation method for Internet-delivered interventions: an example on sexual health. Health Promot Int. 2013;28(1):36–42.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Adami M, Kiger A. The use of triangulation for completeness purposes. Nurse Res. 2004;12(4):19–29.CrossRef Adami M, Kiger A. The use of triangulation for completeness purposes. Nurse Res. 2004;12(4):19–29.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hussein A. The use of triangulation in social sciences research: Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined? J Comp Soc Work. 2009;4(1).CrossRef Hussein A. The use of triangulation in social sciences research: Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined? J Comp Soc Work. 2009;4(1).CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A web-based education program to encourage organ donation registration among lower-educated adolescents in the Netherlands: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
Authors
Esther Steenaart
Rik Crutzen
Math J J M Candel
Nanne K de Vries
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2927-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Trials 1/2018 Go to the issue