Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Methodology

Towards an appropriate framework to facilitate responsible inclusion of pregnant women in drug development programs

Authors: Kit C. B. Roes, Indira S. E. van der Zande, Maarten van Smeden, Rieke van der Graaf

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Evidence-based treatment for pregnant women will ultimately require research conducted in the population of pregnant women. Currently, few scholars have addressed the issue of responsible inclusion of pregnant women in drug research. Because of additional risks associated with including pregnant women in drug research and the altered ways in which drugs are processed by the pregnant body, pregnant women cannot be treated as an ordinary subgroup in the various phases of drug development. Instead, responsible inclusion of pregnant women requires careful design and planning of research for pregnant women specifically. Knowledge about these aspects is virtually nonexistent.
In this article, we present a practical framework for the responsible inclusion of pregnant women in drug development. We suggest that the framework consists of using a question-based approach with five key questions in combination with three prerequisites which should be addressed when considering inclusion of pregnant women in drug research. The five questions are:
A.
Can we consider the drug safe (enough) for first exposure in pregnant women and fetuses?
 
B.
In which dose range (potentially depending on gestational age) can the drug be considered to remain safe in pregnant women?
 
C.
At what dose (regimen, within the range considered safe) can we expect efficacy in pregnant women?
 
D.
Can efficacy be confirmed at the target dose, either similar to the initial population or different?
 
E.
Can clinical safety be confirmed at a sufficiently acceptable level at the target dose for pregnant women and fetuses, so as to conclude a positive benefit–risk ratio?
 
Combining questions and prerequisites leads to a scheme for appropriate timing of responsible inclusion of pregnant women in drug research. Accordingly, we explore several research design options for including pregnant women in drug trials that are feasible within the framework. Ultimately, the framework may lead to (i) earlier inclusion of pregnant women in drug development, (ii) ensuring that key prerequisites, such as proper dosing, are addressed before more substantial numbers of pregnant women are included in trials, and (iii) optimal use of safety and efficacy data from the initial (nonpregnant) population throughout the drug development process.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lyerly AD, Little MO, Faden R. The second wave: toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research. Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth. 2008;1:5–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lyerly AD, Little MO, Faden R. The second wave: toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research. Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth. 2008;1:5–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Little M, Lyerly A, Faden R. Pregnant women and medical research: a moral imperative. Bioethica Forum. 2009;2:60–5. Little M, Lyerly A, Faden R. Pregnant women and medical research: a moral imperative. Bioethica Forum. 2009;2:60–5.
5.
go back to reference Shields KE, Lyerly AD. Exclusion of pregnant women from industry-sponsored clinical trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1077–81.CrossRefPubMed Shields KE, Lyerly AD. Exclusion of pregnant women from industry-sponsored clinical trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1077–81.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Haas DM, Gallauresi B, Shields K, Zeitlin D, Clark SM, Hebert MF, et al. Pharmacotherapy and pregnancy: highlights from the third international conference for individualized pharmacotherapy in pregnancy. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;4:204–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Haas DM, Gallauresi B, Shields K, Zeitlin D, Clark SM, Hebert MF, et al. Pharmacotherapy and pregnancy: highlights from the third international conference for individualized pharmacotherapy in pregnancy. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;4:204–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Lupattelli A, Spigset O, Twigg MJ, Zagorodnikova K, Mårdby AC, Moretti ME, et al. Medication use in pregnancy: a cross-sectional, multinational web-based study. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004365.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lupattelli A, Spigset O, Twigg MJ, Zagorodnikova K, Mårdby AC, Moretti ME, et al. Medication use in pregnancy: a cross-sectional, multinational web-based study. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004365.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Office of Research on Women's Health. Enrolling pregnant women: issues in clinical research. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2011. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Office of Research on Women's Health. Enrolling pregnant women: issues in clinical research. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2011.
13.
go back to reference Cain J, Lowell J, Thorndyke L, Localio AR. Contraceptive requirements for clinical research. Obstet Gynecol. 2000:861–6. Cain J, Lowell J, Thorndyke L, Localio AR. Contraceptive requirements for clinical research. Obstet Gynecol. 2000:861–6.
14.
go back to reference van der Zande ISE, van der Graaf R, Browne JL, van Delden JJM. Fair inclusion of pregnant women in clinical research: a systematic review of reported reasons for exclusion. In: Baylis F, Ballantyne A, editors. Clinical trials involving pregnant women. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 65–94.CrossRef van der Zande ISE, van der Graaf R, Browne JL, van Delden JJM. Fair inclusion of pregnant women in clinical research: a systematic review of reported reasons for exclusion. In: Baylis F, Ballantyne A, editors. Clinical trials involving pregnant women. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 65–94.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Blehar MC, Spong C, Grady C, Goldkind SF, Sahin L, Clayton JA. Enrolling pregnant women: issues in clinical research. Womens Health Issues. 2013;23:e39–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blehar MC, Spong C, Grady C, Goldkind SF, Sahin L, Clayton JA. Enrolling pregnant women: issues in clinical research. Womens Health Issues. 2013;23:e39–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Frew PM, Saint-Victor DS, Isaacs MB, Kim S, Swamy GK, Sheffield JS, et al. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: an overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(Suppl 7):S400–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frew PM, Saint-Victor DS, Isaacs MB, Kim S, Swamy GK, Sheffield JS, et al. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: an overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(Suppl 7):S400–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Little BB. Pharmacokinetics during pregnancy: Evidence-based maternal dose formulation. Obstet Gynecol. 1999:858–68. Little BB. Pharmacokinetics during pregnancy: Evidence-based maternal dose formulation. Obstet Gynecol. 1999:858–68.
19.
20.
go back to reference Halperin SA. Research involving pregnant women. Trials Tribul. 2012;2:139–46. Halperin SA. Research involving pregnant women. Trials Tribul. 2012;2:139–46.
21.
go back to reference de Visser SJ. A question based approach to drug development. Doctoral thesis. Centre for Human Drug Research: Leiden University; 2003. de Visser SJ. A question based approach to drug development. Doctoral thesis. Centre for Human Drug Research: Leiden University; 2003.
22.
go back to reference de Visser SJ, Tuk B, van Gerven JMA, Cohen AF. Drug development project management by a new question based approach and decision analysis support. Scrip Mag. 2003. de Visser SJ, Tuk B, van Gerven JMA, Cohen AF. Drug development project management by a new question based approach and decision analysis support. Scrip Mag. 2003.
23.
go back to reference Sheiner LB. Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development*. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997;61:275–91.CrossRefPubMed Sheiner LB. Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development*. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997;61:275–91.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Bauer P, Köhne K. Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses. Biometrics. 1994;50:1029–41.CrossRefPubMed Bauer P, Köhne K. Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses. Biometrics. 1994;50:1029–41.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Sheffield JS, Siegel D, Mirochnick M, Heine RP, Nguyen C, Bergman KL, et al. Designing drug trials: considerations for pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:S437–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sheffield JS, Siegel D, Mirochnick M, Heine RP, Nguyen C, Bergman KL, et al. Designing drug trials: considerations for pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:S437–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Grouin JM, Coste M, Lewis J. Subgroup analyses in randomized clinical trials: statistical and regulatory issues. J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15:869–82.CrossRefPubMed Grouin JM, Coste M, Lewis J. Subgroup analyses in randomized clinical trials: statistical and regulatory issues. J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15:869–82.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Briggs GG, Polifka JE, Wisner KL, Gervais E, Miller RK, Berard A, et al. Should pregnant women be included in phase IV clinical drug trials? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:810–5.CrossRefPubMed Briggs GG, Polifka JE, Wisner KL, Gervais E, Miller RK, Berard A, et al. Should pregnant women be included in phase IV clinical drug trials? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:810–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Towards an appropriate framework to facilitate responsible inclusion of pregnant women in drug development programs
Authors
Kit C. B. Roes
Indira S. E. van der Zande
Maarten van Smeden
Rieke van der Graaf
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2495-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Trials 1/2018 Go to the issue