Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

The RESPITE trial: remifentanil intravenously administered patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus pethidine intramuscular injection for pain relief in labour: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Matthew Wilson, Christine MacArthur, Fang Gao Smith, Leanne Homer, Kelly Handley, Jane Daniels, On behalf of the RESPITE Collaborative Group

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The commonest opioid used for pain relief in labour is pethidine (meperidine); however, its effectiveness has long been challenged and the drug has known side effects including maternal sedation, nausea and potential transfer across the placenta to the foetus. Over a third of women receiving pethidine require an epidural due to inadequate pain relief. Epidural analgesia increases the risk of an instrumental vaginal delivery and its associated effects. Therefore, there is a clear need for a safe, effective, alternative analgesic to pethidine. Evidence suggests that remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) reduces epidural conversion rates compared to pethidine; however, no trial has yet investigated this as a primary endpoint. We are, therefore, comparing pethidine intramuscular injection to remifentanil PCA in a randomised controlled trial.

Methods/design

Women in established labour, requesting systemic opioid pain relief, will be randomised to either intravenously administered remifentanil PCA (intervention) or pethidine intramuscular injection (control) in an unblinded, 1:1 individual randomised trial.
Following informed consent, 400 women in established labour, who request systemic opioid pain relief, from NHS Trusts across England will undergo a minimised randomisation by a computer or automated telephone system to either pethidine or remifentanil. In order to balance the groups this minimisation is based on four parameters; parity (nulliparous versus multiparous), maternal age (<20, 20 < 30, 30 < 40, 40+ years), ethnicity (South Asian (Pakistani/Indian/Bangladeshi) versus Other) and induced versus spontaneous labour.
The effectiveness of pain relief provided by each technique will be recorded every 30 min after time zero, until epidural placement, delivery or transfer to theatre, quantified by Visual Analogue Scale. Incidence of maternal side effects including sedation, delivery mode, foetal distress requiring delivery, neonatal status at delivery and rate of initiation of breastfeeding within the first hour of birth will also be recorded.
Maternal satisfaction with her childbirth experience will be determined by a postpartum questionnaire prior to discharge from the delivery ward.

Discussion

The RESPITE trial’s primary outcome is the proportion of women who have an epidural placed for pain relief in labour in each arm.

Trial Registration

Current Controlled Trials registration number: ISRCTN29654603. Registered on 23 July 2013.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saravanakumar K, Garstang JS, Hasan K. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for labour: a survey of UK practice. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16(3):221–5.CrossRefPubMed Saravanakumar K, Garstang JS, Hasan K. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for labour: a survey of UK practice. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16(3):221–5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wee MY, Tuckey JP, Thomas P, Burnard S. The IDvIP Trial: a two-centre randomised double-blind controlled trial comparing intramuscular diamorphine and intramuscular pethidine for labour analgesia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wee MY, Tuckey JP, Thomas P, Burnard S. The IDvIP Trial: a two-centre randomised double-blind controlled trial comparing intramuscular diamorphine and intramuscular pethidine for labour analgesia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Reynolds F. Labour analgesia and the baby: good news is no news. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20(1):38–50.CrossRefPubMed Reynolds F. Labour analgesia and the baby: good news is no news. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20(1):38–50.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Evron S, Glezerman M, Sadan O, Boaz M, Ezri T. Remifentanil: a novel systemic analgesic for labor pain. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(1):233–8.CrossRefPubMed Evron S, Glezerman M, Sadan O, Boaz M, Ezri T. Remifentanil: a novel systemic analgesic for labor pain. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(1):233–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358(9275):19–23.CrossRef Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358(9275):19–23.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:CD000331. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:CD000331.
7.
go back to reference Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000331. Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000331.
8.
go back to reference Macarthur C, Glazener C, Lancashire R, Herbison P, Wilson D, Grant A. Faecal incontinence and mode of first and subsequent delivery: a six-year longitudinal study. BJOG. 2005;112(8):1075–82.CrossRefPubMed Macarthur C, Glazener C, Lancashire R, Herbison P, Wilson D, Grant A. Faecal incontinence and mode of first and subsequent delivery: a six-year longitudinal study. BJOG. 2005;112(8):1075–82.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barrett G, Pendry E, Peacock J, Victor C, Thakar R, Manyonda I. Women’s sexual health after childbirth. BJOG. 2000;107(2):186–95.CrossRefPubMed Barrett G, Pendry E, Peacock J, Victor C, Thakar R, Manyonda I. Women’s sexual health after childbirth. BJOG. 2000;107(2):186–95.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Romito P, Lelong N, Ancel PY. Women’s health after childbirth: a longitudinal study in France and Italy. BJOG. 2000;107(10):1202–9.CrossRefPubMed Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Romito P, Lelong N, Ancel PY. Women’s health after childbirth: a longitudinal study in France and Italy. BJOG. 2000;107(10):1202–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Definition of patient controlled analgesia (PCA). In: Mosby’s medical dictionary. 8th edition. Oxford: Elsevier; 2009. Definition of patient controlled analgesia (PCA). In: Mosby’s medical dictionary. 8th edition. Oxford: Elsevier; 2009.
12.
go back to reference Kapila A, Glass PS, Jacobs JR, Muir KT, Hermann DJ, Shiraishi M, et al. Measured context-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil. Anesthesiology. 1995;83(5):968–75.CrossRefPubMed Kapila A, Glass PS, Jacobs JR, Muir KT, Hermann DJ, Shiraishi M, et al. Measured context-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil. Anesthesiology. 1995;83(5):968–75.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hinova A, Fernando R. Systemic remifentanil for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(6):1925–9.CrossRefPubMed Hinova A, Fernando R. Systemic remifentanil for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(6):1925–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Blair JM, Dobson GT, Hill DA, McCracken GR, Fee JP. Patient controlled analgesia for labour: a comparison of remifentanil with pethidine. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(1):22–7.CrossRefPubMed Blair JM, Dobson GT, Hill DA, McCracken GR, Fee JP. Patient controlled analgesia for labour: a comparison of remifentanil with pethidine. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(1):22–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Blair JM, Hill DA, Fee JP. Patient-controlled analgesia for labour using remifentanil: a feasibility study. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87(3):415–20.CrossRefPubMed Blair JM, Hill DA, Fee JP. Patient-controlled analgesia for labour using remifentanil: a feasibility study. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87(3):415–20.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Thurlow JA, Laxton CH, Dick A, Waterhouse P, Sherman L, Goodman NW. Remifentanil by patient-controlled analgesia compared with intramuscular meperidine for pain relief in labour. Br J Aneasth. 2002;88(3):374–8.CrossRef Thurlow JA, Laxton CH, Dick A, Waterhouse P, Sherman L, Goodman NW. Remifentanil by patient-controlled analgesia compared with intramuscular meperidine for pain relief in labour. Br J Aneasth. 2002;88(3):374–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Volikas I, Butwick A, Wilkinson C, Pleming A, Nicholson G. Maternal and neonatal side-effects of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(4):504–9.CrossRefPubMed Volikas I, Butwick A, Wilkinson C, Pleming A, Nicholson G. Maternal and neonatal side-effects of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(4):504–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Howie KM, Millar S. Usage of remifentanil patient controlled analgesia in labour in the UK. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20:S36. Howie KM, Millar S. Usage of remifentanil patient controlled analgesia in labour in the UK. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20:S36.
19.
go back to reference Leong WL, Sng BL, Sia ATH. A comparison between remifentanil and meperidine for labor analgesia: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:818–25.CrossRefPubMed Leong WL, Sng BL, Sia ATH. A comparison between remifentanil and meperidine for labor analgesia: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:818–25.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Douma MR, Verwey RA, Kam-Endtz CE, van der Linden PD, Stienstra R. Obstetric analgesia: a comparison of patient-controlled meperidine, remifentanil, and fentanyl in labour. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(2):209–15.CrossRefPubMed Douma MR, Verwey RA, Kam-Endtz CE, van der Linden PD, Stienstra R. Obstetric analgesia: a comparison of patient-controlled meperidine, remifentanil, and fentanyl in labour. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(2):209–15.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Volikas I, Male D. A comparison of pethidine and remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2001;10:86–90.CrossRefPubMed Volikas I, Male D. A comparison of pethidine and remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2001;10:86–90.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Balki M, Kasodekar S, Dhumne S, Bernstein P, Carvalho JC. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: optimizing drug delivery regimens. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(8):626–33.CrossRef Balki M, Kasodekar S, Dhumne S, Bernstein P, Carvalho JC. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: optimizing drug delivery regimens. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(8):626–33.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Douma MR, Middeldorp JM, Verwey RA, Dahan A, Stienstra R. A randomised comparison of intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia with epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil during labour. Int J Obstet Anaesth. 2011;20(2):118–23.CrossRef Douma MR, Middeldorp JM, Verwey RA, Dahan A, Stienstra R. A randomised comparison of intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia with epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil during labour. Int J Obstet Anaesth. 2011;20(2):118–23.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Stewart PM, Stears A, Tomlinson JW, Brown MJ. Regulation— the real threat to clinical research. BMJ. 2008;337:a1732.CrossRefPubMed Stewart PM, Stears A, Tomlinson JW, Brown MJ. Regulation— the real threat to clinical research. BMJ. 2008;337:a1732.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kenyon S, Ewer AK. Obtaining valid consent to participate in perinatal research where consent is time critical. (Clinical Governance Advice No. 6a); 2016. Kenyon S, Ewer AK. Obtaining valid consent to participate in perinatal research where consent is time critical. (Clinical Governance Advice No. 6a); 2016.
27.
go back to reference Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. MHRA Good Clinical Practice Guide. United Kingdom: Stationery Office; 2012. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. MHRA Good Clinical Practice Guide. United Kingdom: Stationery Office; 2012.
28.
go back to reference Freeman LM, Bloemenkamp KW, Franssen MT, Papatsonis DN, Hajenius PJ, Hollmann MW, et al. Patient controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus epidural analgesia in labour: randomised multicentre equivalence trial. BMJ. 2015;350:h846.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Freeman LM, Bloemenkamp KW, Franssen MT, Papatsonis DN, Hajenius PJ, Hollmann MW, et al. Patient controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus epidural analgesia in labour: randomised multicentre equivalence trial. BMJ. 2015;350:h846.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The RESPITE trial: remifentanil intravenously administered patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus pethidine intramuscular injection for pain relief in labour: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Matthew Wilson
Christine MacArthur
Fang Gao Smith
Leanne Homer
Kelly Handley
Jane Daniels
On behalf of the RESPITE Collaborative Group
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1708-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Trials 1/2016 Go to the issue