Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

Tonic and burst spinal cord stimulation waveforms for the treatment of chronic, intractable pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Konstantin V. Slavin, Richard B. North, Timothy R. Deer, Peter Staats, Kristina Davis, Roni Diaz

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Burst stimulation is a novel form of neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic pain which has demonstrated promise in small uncontrolled studies, but has not yet gained approval for use in the U.S. We report the study methods for an ongoing multicenter, randomized, controlled, cross-over study designed to gain United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for burst stimulation.

Methods

Participants who are candidates for a currently approved neurostimulation device were enrolled and screened. Participants who fail a tonic trial evaluation, have significant depressive symptoms, or evidence lack of compliance with study procedures by failing to complete 7 days of a Pain Diary are excluded. Participants receiving a permanent implant are randomized to receive: (1) 12 weeks of tonic followed by 12 weeks of burst stimulation or (2) 12 weeks of burst stimulation followed by 12 weeks of tonic stimulation. Assessments occur at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. After 24 weeks, participants choose their preferred therapy and are assessed every 6 months for up to 2 years. All patients had the device leads inserted at the site of a successful tonic stimulation trial. Assessments include: a Pain Diary using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for overall, trunk, and limb pain, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Oswestry Disability Index, paresthesia, satisfaction, and therapy preference. Reported adverse events are collected throughout the study. The primary endpoint is the noninferiority of burst stimulation compared to tonic measured by the within-subject difference in the mean overall VAS score at the end of each 12-week stimulation period.

Discussion

This trial represents the largest controlled trial of burst stimulation to date, and is expected to yield important information regarding the safety and efficacy of burst stimulation.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02011893. Registered on 10 December 2013.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Taylor RS. Spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome and refractory neuropathic back and leg pain/failed back surgery syndrome: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain and Symp Manage. 2006;31(4S):S13–9.CrossRef
2.
Deer T, Krames E, Mekhail N, Pope J, Leong M, Stanton-Hicks M, et al. The appropriate use of neurostimulation: new and evolving neurostimulation therapies and applicable treatment for chronic pain and selected disease states. Neuromodulation. 2014;17:599–615.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Sherman SM. Tonic and burst firing: dual modes of thalamocortical relay. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24(2):122–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Plazier M, van der Loo E, Menovsky T. Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: toward paresthesia-free pain suppression. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(5):986–90.CrossRefPubMed
5.
De Ridder D, Plazier M, Kamerling N, Menovsky T, Vanneste S. Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for limb and back pain. World Neurosurg. 2013;80(5):642–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Schu S, Slotty PJ, Bara G, von Knop M, Edgar D, Vesper J. Prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to examine the effectiveness of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation patterns for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(5):443–50.CrossRefPubMed
7.
de Vos CC, Bom MJ, Vanneste S, Lenders MW, de Ridder D. Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation evaluated in patients with failed back surgery syndrome and painful diabetic neuropathy. Neuromodulation. 2014;17:152–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Courtney P, Espinet A, Mitchell B, Russo M, Muir A, Verrills P, Davis K. Improved pain relief with Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for two weeks in patients using tonic stimulation: results from a small clinical study. Neuromodulation. 2015;18:361–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Monhemius R, Simpson B. Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: assessment by abstinence. Eur J Pain. 2003;7:513–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Eddicks S, Maier-Hauff K, Schenk M, Muller A, Baumann G, et al. Thoracic spinal cord stimulation improves functional status and relieves symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the first placebo-controlled randomised study. Heart. 2007;93:585–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Nashold B, Friedman H. Dorsal column stimulation for control of pain. J Neurosurg. 1972;36:590–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Cui J, Meyerson B, Linderoth B. Opposite effects of spinal cord stimulation in different phases of carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia. Eur J Pain. 1999;3:365–74.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Dworkin R, Turk D, Revick DA, Harding G, Coyne KS, Peirce-Sandner S, et al. Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Pain. 2009;144(1–2):35–42.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
Sullivan MJ, Bishop S, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:524–32.CrossRef
16.
17.
Beck A, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
18.
19.
D’Agostino RB, Massaro JM, Sullivan LM. Non-inferiority trials; design concepts and issues—the encounters of academic consultants in statistics. Stat Med. 2003;22:169–86.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, et al. The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(4):762–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Scott E, Kroenke K, Wu J, Yu Z. Beneficial effects of improvement in depression, pain catastrophizing, and anxiety on pain outcomes: a 12-month longitudinal analysis. J Pain. 2016;17(2):215–22.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Poole H, White S, Blake C, Murphy P, Bramwell R. Depression in chronic pain patients: prevalence and measurement. Pain Pract. 2009;9(3):173–80.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Harris C, D’Eon J. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) in individuals with chronic pain. Pain. 2008;137:609–22.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Tonic and burst spinal cord stimulation waveforms for the treatment of chronic, intractable pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Konstantin V. Slavin
Richard B. North
Timothy R. Deer
Peter Staats
Kristina Davis
Roni Diaz
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1706-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Trials 1/2016 Go to the issue

Study protocol

The biomechanical effect of acupuncture for poststroke cavovarus foot: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial

Methodology

Building a recruitment database for asthma trials: a conceptual framework for the creation of the UK Database of Asthma Research Volunteers

Study protocol

Suprascapular neuropathy in the setting of rotator cuff tears: study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Commentary

Sharing raw data from clinical trials: what progress since we first asked “Whose data set is it anyway?”

Study protocol

Tranexamic Acid in Chronic Subdural Hematomas (TRACS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Research

Use of PRECIS ratings in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory