Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Breast Cancer | Research article

Independent and joint cross-sectional associations of statin and metformin use with mammographic breast density

Authors: Erica J. Lee Argov, Teofilia Acheampong, Mary Beth Terry, Carmen B. Rodriguez, Mariangela Agovino, Ying Wei, Shweta Athilat, Parisa Tehranifar

Published in: Breast Cancer Research | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Well-tolerated and commonly used medications are increasingly assessed for reducing breast cancer risk. These include metformin and statins, both linked to reduced hormone availability and cell proliferation or growth and sometimes prescribed concurrently. We investigated independent and joint associations of these medications with mammographic breast density (MBD), a useful biomarker for the effect of chemopreventive agents on breast cancer risk.

Methods

Using data from a cross-sectional study of 770 women (78% Hispanic, aged 40–61 years, in a mammography cohort with high cardiometabolic burden), we examined the association of self-reported “ever” use of statins and metformin with MBD measured via clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density classifications (relative risk regression) and continuous semi-automated percent and size of dense area (Cumulus) (linear regression), adjusted for age, body mass index, education, race, menopausal status, age at first birth, and insulin use.

Results

We observed high statin (27%), metformin (13%), and combination (9%) use, and most participants were overweight/obese (83%) and parous (87%). Statin use was associated with a lower likelihood of high density BI-RADS (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.80), percent dense area (PD) (β = − 6.56, 95% CI = − 9.05 to − 4.06), and dense area (DA) (β = − 9.05, 95% CI = − 14.89 to − 3.22). Metformin use was associated with lower PD and higher non-dense area (NDA), but associations were attenuated by co-medication with statins. Compared to non-use of either medication, statin use alone or with metformin were associated with lower PD and DA (e.g., β = − 6.86, 95% CI: − 9.67, − 4.05 and β = − 7.07, 95% CI: − 10.97, − 3.17, respectively, for PD) and higher NDA (β = 25.05, 95% CI: 14.06, 36.03; β = 29.76, 95% CI: 14.55, 44.96, respectively).

Conclusions

Statin use was consistently associated with lower MBD, measured both through clinical radiologist assessment and continuous relative and absolute measures, including dense area. Metformin use was associated with lower PD and higher NDA, but this may be driven by co-medication with statins. These results support that statins may lower MBD but need confirmation with prospective and clinical data to distinguish the results of medication use from that of disease.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
8.
go back to reference Tang GH, Satkunam M, Pond GR, Steinberg GR, Blandino G, Schünemann HJ, et al. Association of metformin with breast cancer incidence and mortality in patients with type II diabetes: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018;27(6):627–35 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29618465. [cited 2019 Jul 12].PubMed Tang GH, Satkunam M, Pond GR, Steinberg GR, Blandino G, Schünemann HJ, et al. Association of metformin with breast cancer incidence and mortality in patients with type II diabetes: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018;27(6):627–35 Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​29618465. [cited 2019 Jul 12].PubMed
10.
go back to reference Gandini S, Puntoni M, Heckman-Stoddard BM, Dunn BK, Ford L, DeCensi A, et al. Metformin and cancer risk and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis taking into account biases and confounders. Cancer Prev Res. 2014;7(9):867–85 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24985407. [cited 2019 Jul 12]. Gandini S, Puntoni M, Heckman-Stoddard BM, Dunn BK, Ford L, DeCensi A, et al. Metformin and cancer risk and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis taking into account biases and confounders. Cancer Prev Res. 2014;7(9):867–85 Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​24985407. [cited 2019 Jul 12].
17.
18.
go back to reference Li YR, Ro V, Steel L, Carrigan E, Nguyen J, Williams A, et al. Impact of long-term lipid-lowering therapy on clinical outcomes in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;176(3):669–77.PubMed Li YR, Ro V, Steel L, Carrigan E, Nguyen J, Williams A, et al. Impact of long-term lipid-lowering therapy on clinical outcomes in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;176(3):669–77.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.PubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Dite GS, Gurrin LC, Byrnes GB, Stone J, Gunasekara A, McCredie MRE, et al. Predictors of mammographic density: insights gained from a novel regression analysis of a twin study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(12):3474–81 Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC2677104/?report=abstract. [cited 2020 Jun 22].PubMedPubMedCentral Dite GS, Gurrin LC, Byrnes GB, Stone J, Gunasekara A, McCredie MRE, et al. Predictors of mammographic density: insights gained from a novel regression analysis of a twin study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(12):3474–81 Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC2677104/?report=abstract. [cited 2020 Jun 22].PubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Nyante SJ, Sherman ME, Pfeiffer RM, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Brinton LA, Aiello Bowles EJ, et al. Prognostic significance of mammographic density change after initiation of tamoxifen for ER-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(3) Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25663687. [cited 2019 Jul 25]. Nyante SJ, Sherman ME, Pfeiffer RM, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Brinton LA, Aiello Bowles EJ, et al. Prognostic significance of mammographic density change after initiation of tamoxifen for ER-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(3) Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​25663687. [cited 2019 Jul 25].
Metadata
Title
Independent and joint cross-sectional associations of statin and metformin use with mammographic breast density
Authors
Erica J. Lee Argov
Teofilia Acheampong
Mary Beth Terry
Carmen B. Rodriguez
Mariangela Agovino
Ying Wei
Shweta Athilat
Parisa Tehranifar
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Breast Cancer Research / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1465-542X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-020-01336-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Breast Cancer Research 1/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine