Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Breast Cancer | Research article

Molecular and epigenetic profiles of BRCA1-like hormone-receptor-positive breast tumors identified with development and application of a copy-number-based classifier

Authors: Youdinghuan Chen, Yue Wang, Lucas A. Salas, Todd W. Miller, Kenneth Mark, Jonathan D. Marotti, Arminja N. Kettenbach, Chao Cheng, Brock C. Christensen

Published in: Breast Cancer Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

BRCA1-mutated cancers exhibit deficient homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, resulting in extensive copy number alterations and genome instability. HR deficiency can also arise in tumors without a BRCA1 mutation. Compared with other breast tumors, HR-deficient, BRCA1-like tumors exhibit worse prognosis but selective chemotherapeutic sensitivity. Presently, patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) who do not respond to hormone endocrine-targeting therapy are given cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, more recent evidence showed a similar genomic profile between BRCA1-deficient TNBCs and hormone-receptor-positive tumors. Characterization of the somatic alterations of BRCA1-like hormone-receptor-positive breast tumors as a group, which is currently lacking, can potentially help develop biomarkers for identifying additional patients who might respond to chemotherapy.

Methods

We retrained and validated a copy-number-based support vector machine (SVM) classifier to identify HR-deficient, BRCA1-like breast tumors. We applied this classifier to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) breast tumors. We assessed mutational profiles and proliferative capacity by covariate-adjusted linear models and identified differentially methylated regions using DMRcate in BRCA1-like hormone-receptor-positive tumors.

Results

Of the breast tumors in TCGA and METABRIC, 22% (651/2925) were BRCA1-like. Stratifying on hormone-receptor status, 13% (302/2405) receptor-positive and 69% (288/417) triple-negative tumors were BRCA1-like. Among the hormone-receptor-positive subgroup, BRCA1-like tumors showed significantly increased mutational burden and proliferative capacity (both P < 0.05). Genome-scale DNA methylation analysis of BRCA1-like tumors identified 202 differentially methylated gene regions, including hypermethylated BRCA1. Individually significant CpGs were enriched for enhancer regions (P < 0.05). The hypermethylated gene sets were enriched for DNA and chromatin conformation (all Bonferroni P < 0.05).

Conclusions

To provide insights into alternative classification and potential therapeutic targeting strategies of BRCA1-like hormone-receptor-positive tumors we developed and applied a novel copy number classifier to identify BRCA1-like hormone-receptor-positive tumors and their characteristic somatic alteration profiles.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Perou CM, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–52.CrossRef Perou CM, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–52.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70.CrossRef Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nik-Zainal S, et al. Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences. Nature. 2016;534:47–54.CrossRef Nik-Zainal S, et al. Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences. Nature. 2016;534:47–54.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chalasani P, Livingston R. Differential chemotherapeutic sensitivity for breast tumors with ‘BRCAness’: a review. Oncologist. 2013;18:909–16.CrossRef Chalasani P, Livingston R. Differential chemotherapeutic sensitivity for breast tumors with ‘BRCAness’: a review. Oncologist. 2013;18:909–16.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Farmer H, et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature. 2005;434:917–21.CrossRef Farmer H, et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature. 2005;434:917–21.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fong PC, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:123–34.CrossRef Fong PC, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:123–34.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Popova T, et al. Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation. Cancer Res. 2012;72:5454–62.CrossRef Popova T, et al. Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation. Cancer Res. 2012;72:5454–62.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Abkevich V, et al. Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1776–82.CrossRef Abkevich V, et al. Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1776–82.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Turner N, Tutt A, Ashworth A. Hallmarks of ‘BRCAness’ in sporadic cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:814–9.CrossRef Turner N, Tutt A, Ashworth A. Hallmarks of ‘BRCAness’ in sporadic cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:814–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vollebergh MA, et al. An aCGH classifier derived from BRCA1-mutated breast cancer and benefit of high-dose platinum-based chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1561–70.CrossRef Vollebergh MA, et al. An aCGH classifier derived from BRCA1-mutated breast cancer and benefit of high-dose platinum-based chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1561–70.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vollebergh MA, et al. Genomic patterns resembling BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated breast cancers predict benefit of intensified carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:R47.CrossRef Vollebergh MA, et al. Genomic patterns resembling BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated breast cancers predict benefit of intensified carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:R47.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Severson TM, et al. The BRCA1ness signature is associated significantly with response to PARP inhibitor treatment versus control in the I-SPY 2 randomized neoadjuvant setting. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19:99.CrossRef Severson TM, et al. The BRCA1ness signature is associated significantly with response to PARP inhibitor treatment versus control in the I-SPY 2 randomized neoadjuvant setting. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19:99.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Telli ML, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and iniparib as neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative and BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer with assessment of a tumor-based measure of genomic instability: PrECOG 0105. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1895–901.CrossRef Telli ML, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and iniparib as neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative and BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer with assessment of a tumor-based measure of genomic instability: PrECOG 0105. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1895–901.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Davies H, et al. HRDetect is a predictor of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency based on mutational signatures. Nat Med. 2017;23:517–25.CrossRef Davies H, et al. HRDetect is a predictor of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency based on mutational signatures. Nat Med. 2017;23:517–25.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Joosse SA, et al. Prediction of BRCA1-association in hereditary non-BRCA1/2 breast carcinomas with array-CGH. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:479–89.CrossRef Joosse SA, et al. Prediction of BRCA1-association in hereditary non-BRCA1/2 breast carcinomas with array-CGH. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:479–89.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Joosse SA, et al. Prediction of BRCA2-association in hereditary breast carcinomas using array-CGH. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:379–89.CrossRef Joosse SA, et al. Prediction of BRCA2-association in hereditary breast carcinomas using array-CGH. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:379–89.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lips EH, et al. Quantitative copy number analysis by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) of BRCA1-associated breast cancer regions identifies BRCAness. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R107.CrossRef Lips EH, et al. Quantitative copy number analysis by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) of BRCA1-associated breast cancer regions identifies BRCAness. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R107.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schouten PC, et al. Robust BRCA1-like classification of copy number profiles of samples repeated across different datasets and platforms. Mol Oncol. 2015;9:1274–86.CrossRef Schouten PC, et al. Robust BRCA1-like classification of copy number profiles of samples repeated across different datasets and platforms. Mol Oncol. 2015;9:1274–86.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Polak P, et al. A mutational signature reveals alterations underlying deficient homologous recombination repair in breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2017;49:1476–86.CrossRef Polak P, et al. A mutational signature reveals alterations underlying deficient homologous recombination repair in breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2017;49:1476–86.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Larsen MJ, et al. Classifications within molecular subtypes enables identification of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers by RNA tumor profiling. PLoS One. 2013;8. Larsen MJ, et al. Classifications within molecular subtypes enables identification of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers by RNA tumor profiling. PLoS One. 2013;8.
24.
go back to reference Wang Y, Ung MH, Cantor S, Cheng C. Computational investigation of homologous recombination DNA repair deficiency in sporadic breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15742.CrossRef Wang Y, Ung MH, Cantor S, Cheng C. Computational investigation of homologous recombination DNA repair deficiency in sporadic breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15742.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Watanabe Y, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation status of DNA repair genes in breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Genes Cells. 2013;18:1120–30.CrossRef Watanabe Y, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation status of DNA repair genes in breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Genes Cells. 2013;18:1120–30.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Shukla V, et al. BRCA1 affects global DNA methylation through regulation of DNMT1. Cell Res. 2010;20:1201–15.CrossRef Shukla V, et al. BRCA1 affects global DNA methylation through regulation of DNMT1. Cell Res. 2010;20:1201–15.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Johnson KC, et al. DNA methylation in ductal carcinoma in situ related with future development of invasive breast cancer. Clin Epigenetics. 2015;7. Johnson KC, et al. DNA methylation in ductal carcinoma in situ related with future development of invasive breast cancer. Clin Epigenetics. 2015;7.
28.
go back to reference Curtis C, et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature. 2012;486:346–52.CrossRef Curtis C, et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature. 2012;486:346–52.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Pereira B, et al. The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refines their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes. Nat Commun. 2016;7. Pereira B, et al. The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refines their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes. Nat Commun. 2016;7.
30.
go back to reference Timms KM, et al. Association of BRCA1/2 defects with genomic scores predictive of DNA damage repair deficiency among breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16. Timms KM, et al. Association of BRCA1/2 defects with genomic scores predictive of DNA damage repair deficiency among breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16.
31.
go back to reference Manié E, et al. Genomic hallmarks of homologous recombination deficiency in invasive breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2016;138:891–900.CrossRef Manié E, et al. Genomic hallmarks of homologous recombination deficiency in invasive breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2016;138:891–900.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lips EH, et al. BRCA1-mutated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer shows BRCAness, suggesting sensitivity to drugs targeting homologous recombination deficiency. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:1236–41.CrossRef Lips EH, et al. BRCA1-mutated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer shows BRCAness, suggesting sensitivity to drugs targeting homologous recombination deficiency. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:1236–41.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Didraga MA, et al. A non-BRCA1/2 hereditary breast cancer sub-group defined by aCGH profiling of genetically related patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;130:425–36.CrossRef Didraga MA, et al. A non-BRCA1/2 hereditary breast cancer sub-group defined by aCGH profiling of genetically related patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;130:425–36.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Barretina J, et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature. 2012;483:603–7.CrossRef Barretina J, et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature. 2012;483:603–7.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Roig B, et al. Metabolomics reveals novel blood plasma biomarkers associated to the BRCA1-mutated phenotype of human breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7. Roig B, et al. Metabolomics reveals novel blood plasma biomarkers associated to the BRCA1-mutated phenotype of human breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7.
36.
go back to reference Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20:273–97. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20:273–97.
37.
go back to reference Chang C, Lin C. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2013;2:1–39.CrossRef Chang C, Lin C. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2013;2:1–39.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Robin X, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:77.CrossRef Robin X, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:77.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Marquard AM, et al. Pan-cancer analysis of genomic scar signatures associated with homologous recombination deficiency suggests novel indications for existing cancer drugs. Biomark Res. 2015;3:9.CrossRef Marquard AM, et al. Pan-cancer analysis of genomic scar signatures associated with homologous recombination deficiency suggests novel indications for existing cancer drugs. Biomark Res. 2015;3:9.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kandoth C, et al. Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types. Nature. 2013;502:333–9.CrossRef Kandoth C, et al. Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types. Nature. 2013;502:333–9.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Rosenthal, R., McGranahan, N., Herrero, J., Taylor, B. S. & Swanton, C. deconstructSigs: delineating mutational processes in single tumors distinguishes DNA repair deficiencies and patterns of carcinoma evolution. Genome Biol. 17, (2016). Rosenthal, R., McGranahan, N., Herrero, J., Taylor, B. S. & Swanton, C. deconstructSigs: delineating mutational processes in single tumors distinguishes DNA repair deficiencies and patterns of carcinoma evolution. Genome Biol. 17, (2016).
42.
go back to reference Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474:609–15.CrossRef Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474:609–15.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Sharma P, et al. The prognostic value of BRCA1 promoter methylation in early stage triple negative breast cancer. J Cancer Ther Res. 2014;3:2.CrossRef Sharma P, et al. The prognostic value of BRCA1 promoter methylation in early stage triple negative breast cancer. J Cancer Ther Res. 2014;3:2.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Peters TJ, et al. De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2015;8:6.CrossRef Peters TJ, et al. De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2015;8:6.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R115.CrossRef Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R115.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Holstege H, et al. BRCA1-mutated and basal-like breast cancers have similar aCGH profiles and a high incidence of protein truncating TP53 mutations. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:654.CrossRef Holstege H, et al. BRCA1-mutated and basal-like breast cancers have similar aCGH profiles and a high incidence of protein truncating TP53 mutations. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:654.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Lips EH, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: BRCAness and concordance of clinical features with BRCA1-mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:2172–7.CrossRef Lips EH, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: BRCAness and concordance of clinical features with BRCA1-mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:2172–7.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Alexandrov LB, et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature. 2013;500:415–21.CrossRef Alexandrov LB, et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature. 2013;500:415–21.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference D’Andrea AD. BRCA1: a missing link in the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:376–8.CrossRef D’Andrea AD. BRCA1: a missing link in the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:376–8.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Feng T, et al. miR-124 inhibits cell proliferation in breast cancer through downregulation of CDK4. Tumor Biol. 2015;36:5987–97.CrossRef Feng T, et al. miR-124 inhibits cell proliferation in breast cancer through downregulation of CDK4. Tumor Biol. 2015;36:5987–97.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Nakayama KI, Nakayama K. Ubiquitin ligases: cell-cycle control and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:369–81.CrossRef Nakayama KI, Nakayama K. Ubiquitin ligases: cell-cycle control and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:369–81.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Jones PA, Liang G. Rethinking how DNA methylation patterns are maintained. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009;10:805–11.CrossRef Jones PA, Liang G. Rethinking how DNA methylation patterns are maintained. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009;10:805–11.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Brocks D, et al. Intratumor DNA methylation heterogeneity reflects clonal evolution in aggressive prostate cancer. Cell Rep. 2014;8:798–806.CrossRef Brocks D, et al. Intratumor DNA methylation heterogeneity reflects clonal evolution in aggressive prostate cancer. Cell Rep. 2014;8:798–806.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Konstantinopoulos PA, Ceccaldi R, Shapiro GI, D’Andrea AD. Homologous recombination deficiency: exploiting the fundamental vulnerability of ovarian cancer. Cancer Discovery. 2015;5:1137–54.CrossRef Konstantinopoulos PA, Ceccaldi R, Shapiro GI, D’Andrea AD. Homologous recombination deficiency: exploiting the fundamental vulnerability of ovarian cancer. Cancer Discovery. 2015;5:1137–54.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Molecular and epigenetic profiles of BRCA1-like hormone-receptor-positive breast tumors identified with development and application of a copy-number-based classifier
Authors
Youdinghuan Chen
Yue Wang
Lucas A. Salas
Todd W. Miller
Kenneth Mark
Jonathan D. Marotti
Arminja N. Kettenbach
Chao Cheng
Brock C. Christensen
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Breast Cancer Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1465-542X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-1090-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Breast Cancer Research 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine