Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Breast Cancer Research
Published in: Breast Cancer Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Propranolol and survival from breast cancer: a pooled analysis of European breast cancer cohorts

Authors: Chris R. Cardwell, Anton Pottegård, Evelien Vaes, Hans Garmo, Liam J. Murray, Chris Brown, Pauline A. J. Vissers, Michael O’Rorke, Kala Visvanathan, Deirdre Cronin-Fenton, Harlinde De Schutter, Mats Lambe, Des G. Powe, Myrthe P. P. van Herk-Sukel, Anna Gavin, Søren Friis, Linda Sharp, Kathleen Bennett

Published in: Breast Cancer Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Preclinical studies have demonstrated that propranolol inhibits several pathways involved in breast cancer progression and metastasis. We investigated whether breast cancer patients who used propranolol, or other non-selective beta-blockers, had reduced breast cancer-specific or all-cause mortality in eight European cohorts.

Methods

Incident breast cancer patients were identified from eight cancer registries and compiled through the European Cancer Pharmacoepidemiology Network. Propranolol and non-selective beta-blocker use was ascertained for each patient. Breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality were available for five and eight cohorts, respectively. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer-specific and all-cause mortality by propranolol and non-selective beta-blocker use. HRs were pooled across cohorts using meta-analysis techniques. Dose–response analyses by number of prescriptions were also performed. Analyses were repeated investigating propranolol use before cancer diagnosis.

Results

The combined study population included 55,252 and 133,251 breast cancer patients in the analysis of breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality respectively. Overall, there was no association between propranolol use after diagnosis of breast cancer and breast cancer-specific or all-cause mortality (fully adjusted HR = 0.94, 95% CI, 0.77, 1.16 and HR = 1.09, 95% CI, 0.93, 1.28, respectively). There was little evidence of a dose–response relationship. There was also no association between propranolol use before breast cancer diagnosis and breast cancer-specific or all-cause mortality (fully adjusted HR = 1.03, 95% CI, 0.86, 1.22 and HR = 1.02, 95% CI, 0.94, 1.10, respectively). Similar null associations were observed for non-selective beta-blockers.

Conclusions

In this large pooled analysis of breast cancer patients, use of propranolol or non-selective beta-blockers was not associated with improved survival.
Literature
1.
Aronow WS. Current role of beta-blockers in the treatment of hypertension. Expert Opin Pharmacopther. 2001;11:2599–607.CrossRef
2.
3.
Powe DG, Voss MJ, Habashy HO, et al. Alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptor (AR) protein expression is associated with poor clinical outcome in breast cancer: an immunohistochemical study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;130:457–63.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Lang K, Drell TL, Lindecke A, et al. Induction of a metastatogenic tumor cell type by neurotransmitters and its pharmacological inhibition by established drugs. Int J Cancer. 2004;112:231–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Pasquier E, Ciccolini J, Carre M, et al. Propranolol potentiates the anti-angiogenic effects and anti-tumor efficacy of chemotherapy agents: implication in breast cancer treatment. Oncotarget. 2011;2:797–809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Annabi B, Lachambre MP, Plouffe K, Moumdjian R, Beliveau R. Propranolol adrenergic blockade inhibits human brain endothelial cells tubulogenesis and matrix metalloproteinase-9 secretion. Pharmacol Res. 2009;60:438–45.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Benish M, Bartal I, Goldfarb Y, et al. Perioperative use of beta-blockers and COX-2 inhibitors may improve immune competence and reduce the risk of tumor metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2042–52.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Sloan EK, Priceman SJ, Cox BF, et al. The sympathetic nervous system induces a metastatic switch in primary breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:7042–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Palm D, Lang K, Niggemann B, et al. The norepinephrine-driven metastasis development of PC-3 human prostate cancer cells in BALB/c nude mice is inhibited by beta-blockers. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:2744–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Wilson JM, Lorimer E, Tyburski MD, Williams CL. Beta-Adrenergic receptors suppress Rap1B prenylation and promote the metastatic phenotype in breast cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16:1364–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Cole SW, Sood AK. Molecular pathways: beta-adrenergic signaling in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:1201–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
14.
Barron TI, Connolly RM, Sharp L, Bennett K, Visvanathan K. Beta blockers and breast cancer mortality: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2635–44.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Cardwell CR, Coleman HG, Murray LJ, Entschladen F, Powe DG. Beta-blocker usage and breast cancer survival: a nested case-control study within a UK clinical practice research datalink cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1852–61.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Sorensen GV, Ganz PA, Cole SW, et al. Use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and risk of breast cancer recurrence: a Danish nationwide prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2265–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
18.
Kildemoes HW, Sorensen HT, Hallas J. The Danish National Prescription Registry. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):38–41.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Peeters PJ, Bazelier MT, Vestergaard P, et al. Use of metformin and survival of diabetic women with breast cancer. Curr Drug Saf. 2013;8:357–63.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
22.
Herings R. PHARMO: a record linkage system for postmarketing surveillance of prescription drugs in the Netherlands. Utrecht: Utrecht University; 1993.
23.
van Herk-Sukel MP, van de Poll-Franse LV, Lemmens VE, et al. New opportunities for drug outcomes research in cancer patients: the linkage of the Eindhoven Cancer Registry and the PHARMO Record Linkage System. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(2):395–404.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Maguire A, Hughes C, Cardwell C, O’Reilly D. Psychotropic medications and the transition into care: a national data linkage study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(2):215–21.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Vlayen J, De Gendt C, Stordeur S, et al. Quality indicators for the management of upper gastrointestinal cancer. Good clinical practice. KCE Reports 200. D/2013/10.273/15. Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE); 2013.
26.
Williams D, Feely J. Pharmacoepidemiology—an Irish perspective. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001;10(7):641–5.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Alvarez-Madrazo S, McTaggart S, Nangle C, Nicholson E, Bennie M. Data resource profile: the Scottish National Prescribing Information System (PIS). Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(3):714–5f.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
29.
Wettermark B, Hammar N, Fored CM, et al. The new Swedish Prescribed Drug Register—opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16(7):726–35.CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
Ahern TP, Pedersen L, Tarp M, et al. Statin prescriptions and breast cancer recurrence risk: a Danish nationwide prospective cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1461–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
33.
Fishman PA, Goodman MJ, Hornbrook MC, et al. Risk adjustment using automated ambulatory pharmacy data: the RxRisk model. Med Care. 2003;41:84–99.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Stukel TA, Demidenko E, Dykes J, Karagas MR. Two-stage methods for the analysis of pooled data. Stat Med. 2001;20:2115–30.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Levesque LE, Hanley JA, Kezouh A, Suissa S. Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes. BMJ. 2010;340:b5087.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Chubak J, Boudreau DM, Wirtz HS, McKnight B, Weiss NS. Threats to validity of nonrandomized studies of postdiagnosis exposures on cancer recurrence and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:1456–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
38.
39.
Zhou Z, Rahme E, Abrahamowicz M, Pilote L. Survival bias associated with time-to-treatment initiation in drug effectiveness evaluation: a comparison of methods. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:1016–23.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Sarfati D, Blakely T, Pearce N. Measuring cancer survival in populations: relative survival vs cancer-specific survival. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:598–610.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Chan DS, Vieira AR, Aune D, et al. Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(10):1901–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Thygesen LC, Daasnes C, Thaulow I, Bronnum-Hansen H. Introduction to Danish (nationwide) registers on health and social issues: structure, access, legislation, and archiving. Scand J Public Health. 2001;39(7 Suppl):12–6.CrossRef
43.
Metadata
Title
Propranolol and survival from breast cancer: a pooled analysis of European breast cancer cohorts
Authors
Chris R. Cardwell
Anton Pottegård
Evelien Vaes
Hans Garmo
Liam J. Murray
Chris Brown
Pauline A. J. Vissers
Michael O’Rorke
Kala Visvanathan
Deirdre Cronin-Fenton
Harlinde De Schutter
Mats Lambe
Des G. Powe
Myrthe P. P. van Herk-Sukel
Anna Gavin
Søren Friis
Linda Sharp
Kathleen Bennett
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Breast Cancer Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1465-542X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0782-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Breast Cancer Research 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research Article

Does primary neoadjuvant systemic therapy eradicate minimal residual disease? Analysis of disseminated and circulating tumor cells before and after therapy

Research article

Neutrophils drive accelerated tumor progression in the collagen-dense mammary tumor microenvironment

Research article

A five-gene reverse transcription-PCR assay for pre-operative classification of breast fibroepithelial lesions

Letter

Common genetic susceptibility to DCIS and invasive ductal carcinoma

Research article

High mammographic breast density predicts locoregional recurrence after modified radical mastectomy for invasive breast cancer: a case-control study

Research article

Imaging the mammary gland and mammary tumours in 3D: optical tissue clearing and immunofluorescence methods
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits