Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Acute Respiratory Distress-Syndrome | Research Letter

Renin–angiotensin system dysregulation in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19: a preliminary report

Authors: Davide Eleuteri, Luca Montini, Salvatore Lucio Cutuli, Cristina Rossi, Francesca Alcaro, Massimo Antonelli

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

The renin–angiotensin system (RAS) may have an important role into the pathogenesis of the COVID-19. Indeed, SARS-CoV-2 binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) to gain entry to host cells. ACE2 is a peptidase that cleaves the potent vasoconstrictor angiotensin II (Ang II) to generate angiotensin 1–7 (Ang 1–7), a heptapeptide having vasodilator and anti-inflammatory function. Thus, ACE2 is a crucial counter-regulatory component of the RAS [1]. From March 9 to March 27, 2020, we analyzed plasma levels of renin, angiotensin I (Ang I), Ang II and Ang 1–7 in 32 consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-Cov-2 infection and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) within 24 h of admission to ICU, approved by the Ethical Committee of Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli. All samples were drawn at morning. Before sample collection the hemodynamic parameters were optimized according to standard of care of our institution. RAS peptide concentrations were compared between survivors and non-survivors and correlated with clinical parameters. Compared to survivors, non-survivors had higher serum renin with lower Ang I, Ang II and Ang 1–7 (Table 1). The results were similar excluding from analysis 4 patients who were taking RAS inhibitors at inclusion (Table 2). Patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) had lower Ang 1–7 than patients who never required IMV (214 pg/ml [IQR: 163–298] vs 335 [IQR: 259–499], p = 0.01). Our observations are consistent with a previous study on patients with vasodilatory shock, demonstrating that renin levels above the median of study population were associated with an increased risk of mortality. In these patients, treatment with synthetic Ang II reduced renin concentrations and the risk of mortality [2]. Therefore, the authors speculated that exogenous Ang II modulated the inflammatory response caused by excess renin. Furthermore, renin concentrations were positively correlated to Ang I/II ratios denoting an impaired conversion of Ang I to Ang II by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). In our research, although not correlated to serum renin, Ang I/II ratios were markedly higher than those reported in healthy subjects (median Ang I/II ratio 1.8 vs 0.4, respectively) [3]. This relative Ang II deficiency is coherent with older studies on patients with ARDS unrelated to SARS-CoV-2 reporting a defect of endothelial–bound ACE activity due to endothelial injury [4]. Indeed, in patients with COVID-19 there is evidence of vascular involvement with diffuse inflammation which can result in widespread endothelial dysfunction [3, 5]. However, we did not measure all the angiotensin peptides, and hence, we cannot exclude an enhanced conversion of Ang I and Ang II to downstream products other than Ang 1–7, such as angiotensin 1–9 and angiotensin 1–5. Previous studies reported that some patients with COVID-19 and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure present near normal lung mechanics indicating that a loss of lung perfusion regulation may account for gas impairment [6]. In our series respiratory system compliance (Crs) was obtained in 18 out of 21 patients who received IMV. Median Crs was 39 ml/cm H2O [IQR: 38–52] and 6 out of 18 patients had a preserved Crs (52 ml/cm H2O [IQR: 52–55]). This subgroup of 6 patients had similar Ang II plasma levels despite renin concentrations significantly higher than the 12 patients with reduced Crs (median renin [IQR] 166.8 pg/ml [114.2–255.2] vs 13.6 [9–66.6], p = 0.02). Thus, the development of hypoxemia without marked loss of aerated lung could be explained by the worsening of ventilation perfusion mismatch induced by inadequate Ang II production. These preliminary data suggest that a more efficient RAS axis correlate with a better outcome in patients with ARDS due to SARS-Cov-2. Although the obvious limitations of our small, observational study preclude definitive conclusions, these findings could be considered hypothesis generating for future researches.
Table 1
Clinical characteristics, RAS peptides levels and outcomes in the total cohort
Variables
All (n = 32)
Survivors (n = 18)
Non-Survivors (n = 14)
P Value
Age, years, median (IQR)
73 (64–78)
69 (56–74)
78 (74–80)
0.001
Males N (%)
27 (84)
15 (84)
12 (86)
0.85
SAPS II score, median (IQR)
36 (23–42)
28 (19–36)
40 (31–56)
0.017
SOFA score at ICU admission, median (IQR)
3 (2–6)
3 (2–4)
4 (3–8)
0.115
PaO2/FiO2 ratio at study inclusion, median (IQR)
150 (127–179)
169 (132–181)
143 (113–153)
0.11
Noradrenaline at study inclusion, N (%)
12 (37.5)
4 (22)
8 (57)
0.07
Comorbidities, N (%)
Hypertension
16 (50)
9(50)
7 (50)
1
Cardiovascular disease
9 (28)
4 (22)
5 (36)
0.4
Chronic treatment with ACEi and/or ARBs, N (%)
11 (34.3)
4 (22.2)
7 (50)
0.25
ACEi and/or ARBs at study inclusion N (%)(‡)
4 (12.5)
2 (11.1)
2 (14.2)
1
ARDS (†) categories at study inclusion N (%)
Mild
9 (28)
5 (28)
4 (29)
1
Moderate
23 (72)
13 (72)
10 (71)
 
Respiratory support throughout the ICU stay N (%)
NIV/HFNC
11 (34)
11(61)
0 (0)
 < 0.0004
IMV
21 (66)
7 (39)
14 (100)
 
AKI (††) at study inclusion, N (%)
5 (15.6)
1 (5.5)
4 (28.5)
0.13
ICU LoS, days, median (IQR)
8.5 (5–17)
8 (4–13)
10.5 (7–18)
0.189
RAS peptides levels at study inclusion (*)
Renin, pg/mL median (IQR)
16.5 (6.27–105)
13 (4.47–31.77)
56.7 (11–255)
0.04
Angiotensin I, pg/mL, median (IQR)
655 (445–1175)
685 (580–1500)
475 (410–690)
0.03
Angiotensin II, pg/mL, median (IQR)
350 (230–650)
470 (300–920)
250 (220–350)
0.01
Angiotensin 1–7, pg/mL, median (IQR) (**)
230 (170–350)
320 (210–440)
210 (160–250)
0.023
Angiotensin I/Angiotensin II ratio, median (IQR)
1.8 (1.3–2.4)
1.6 (1.3–2.0)
1.9 (1.2–2.9)
0.42
Angiotensin II/ Angiotensin 1–7 ratio, median (IQR)
1.6 (0.96–1.92)
1.66 (0.97–2)
1.58 (0.71–1.72)
0.39
SAPS II, Simplified Acute Physiologic Score Two; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; PaO2, arterial partial pressure of oxygen; FiO2, Fraction of inspired oxygen; ICU, intensive care unit; ACEi, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy; NIV, noninvasive mechanical ventilation; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; LoS, length of stay; AKI, Acute kidney injury; RAS, renin–angiotensin system; IQR, interquartile range; N, number of patients
(‡)Seven out of 11 patients who were on chronic treatment with ACEi/ARBs discontinued these medications during hospitalization. The median time from withdrawal of these agents to study inclusion was 6 days [IQR: 4–7]
Acute respiratory distress syndrome was defined according to Berlin criteria (2012)
††Acute kidney injury was defined according to KDIGO criteria (2012)
*healthy reference ranges: Renin 1.5–20 pg/ml; Angiotensin I (median 42 pg/ml [IQR:30.46–87.34]); Angiotensin II 25.1 ± 5.2 pg/ml; Angiotensin (1–7) 21.0 ± 4.1 pg/ml
Direct plasma renin levels were determined by chemiluminescent immunoassay. Angiotensin compounds were measured by ELISA assay (Fine Biotech Co., Ltd)
**Angiotensin 1–7 plasmatic levels were lower in patients who received IMV compared with those who never received IMV (214 pg/ml [IQR: 163–298] and 335 pg/ml [IQR: 259–499], respectively, p = 0.01)
P values were calculated by Mann–Whitney test, Chi-square test and Fisher exact test, as appropriate, with a significance level of .05. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA)
Table 2
RAS peptides levels based on sensitivity analysis (*)
RAS peptides levels at study inclusion (**)
All
(n = 28)
Survivors
(n = 16)
Non-survivors
(n = 12)
P value
Renin, pg/mL median (IQR)
15.3 (6.1–79)
13 (4.5–21.3)
77.8 (10.5–256.4)
0.04
Angiotensin I, pg/mL, median (IQR)
579 (408–1156)
996 (579–1510)
439 (400–541)
0.03
Angiotensin II, pg/mL, median (IQR)
276 (217–752)
584 (240–915)
248 (209–301)
0.04
Angiotensin 1–7, pg/mL, median (IQR)
221 (174–355)
328 (214–510)
212 (168–231)
0.04
Angiotensin I/Angiotensin II ratio, median (IQR)
1.8 (1.2–2.6)
1.5 (1.2–2.8)
1.9 (1.3–2.4)
0.86
Angiotensin II/ Angiotensin 1–7 ratio, median (IQR)
1.53 (0.8–2)
1.7 (0.9–2)
1.4 (0.6–1.6)
0.2
*We performed a sensitivity analysis excluding 4 patients who were taking ACEi/ARBs at study inclusion
**Healthy reference ranges: renin: 1.5–20 pg/ml; Angiotensin I: median 42 [IQR: 30.5–87.3] pg/ml; Angiotensin II: 25.1 ± 5.2 pg/ml; Angiotensin (1–7): 21.0 ± 4.1 pg/ml. Direct plasma renin levels were determined by chemiluminescent immunoassay. Angiotensin compounds were measured by ELISA assay (Fine Biotech Co., Ltd)
P values were calculated by Mann–Whitney test, Chi-square test and Fisher exact test, as appropriate, with a significance level of 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA)
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zhang H, Penninger JM, Li Y, Zhong N, Slutsky AS. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:586–90.CrossRef Zhang H, Penninger JM, Li Y, Zhong N, Slutsky AS. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:586–90.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bellomo R, Forni LG, Busse LW, McCurdy MT, Ham KR, Boldt DW, et al. Renin and survival in patients given angiotensin II for catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. A clinical trial. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2020;202:1253–61. Bellomo R, Forni LG, Busse LW, McCurdy MT, Ham KR, Boldt DW, et al. Renin and survival in patients given angiotensin II for catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. A clinical trial. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2020;202:1253–61.
3.
go back to reference Bellomo R, Wunderink RW, Szerlip H, et al. Angiotensin I and angiotensin II concentrations and their ratio in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Crit Care. 2020;24:43.CrossRef Bellomo R, Wunderink RW, Szerlip H, et al. Angiotensin I and angiotensin II concentrations and their ratio in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Crit Care. 2020;24:43.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Orfanos SE, Armaganidis A, Glynos C, Psevdi E, Kaltsas P, Sarafidou P, Catravas JD, Dafni UG, Langleben D, Roussos C. Pulmonary capillary endothelium-bound angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in acute lung injury. Circulation. 2000;102(16):2011–8.CrossRef Orfanos SE, Armaganidis A, Glynos C, Psevdi E, Kaltsas P, Sarafidou P, Catravas JD, Dafni UG, Langleben D, Roussos C. Pulmonary capillary endothelium-bound angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in acute lung injury. Circulation. 2000;102(16):2011–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, Haberecker M, Andermatt R, Zinkernagel AS, Mehra MR, Schuepbach RA, Ruschitzka F, Moch H. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):1417–8.CrossRef Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, Haberecker M, Andermatt R, Zinkernagel AS, Mehra MR, Schuepbach RA, Ruschitzka F, Moch H. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):1417–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Caironi P, Busana M, Romitti F, Brazzi L, Camporota L. COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes? Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(6):1099–102.CrossRef Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Caironi P, Busana M, Romitti F, Brazzi L, Camporota L. COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes? Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(6):1099–102.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Renin–angiotensin system dysregulation in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19: a preliminary report
Authors
Davide Eleuteri
Luca Montini
Salvatore Lucio Cutuli
Cristina Rossi
Francesca Alcaro
Massimo Antonelli
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03507-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Critical Care 1/2021 Go to the issue