Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Original research

Large variations of oxygen delivery in self-inflating resuscitation bags used for preoxygenation - a mechanical simulation

Authors: Sven Grauman, Joakim Johansson, Thomas Drevhammar

Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags (SIRB) are common and essential tools in airway management and ventilation. They are often used in resuscitation and emergency anaesthesia outside the operating theatre. There is a common notion that all SIRBs applied with a tight sealed mask will deliver close to 100 % oxygen during spontaneous breathing. The aim of the study was to measure the oxygen delivery of six commonly used SIRBs in a mechanical spontaneous breathing adult in vitro model.

Methods

Three SIRBs of each of the six models were evaluated for oxygen delivery during simulated breathing with an adult mechanical lung. The test was repeated three times per device (54 tests in total). The breathing profile was fixed to a minute volume of 10 L/min, a tidal volume of 500 mL and the SIRBs supplied with an oxygen fresh gas flow of 15 L/min. The fraction of delivered oxygen (FDO2) was measured over a three-minute period. Average FDO2 was calculated and compared at 30, 60 and 90 s.

Results

At 90 s all models had reached a stable FDO2. Average FDO2 at 90 s; Ambu Oval Plus 99,5 %; Ambu Spur II 99,8 %; Intersurgical BVM Resuscitator 76,7 %; Laerdal Silicone 97,3 %; Laerdal The Bag II 94,5 % and the O-Two Smart Bag 39,0 %. All differences in FDO2 were significant apart from the two Ambu models.

Conclusions

In simulated spontaneous breathing, four out of six (by Ambu and Laerdal) Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags delivered a high fraction of oxygen while two (Intersurgical and O-two) underperformed in oxygen delivery. These large variations confirm results reported in other studies. It is our opinion that underperforming Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags might pose a serious threat to patients’ health if used in resuscitation and anaesthesia. Manufacturers of Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bags rarely provide information on performance for spontaneous breathing. This poses a challenge to all organizations that need their devices to deliver adequate oxygen during spontaneous breathing.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sakles JC. Maintenance of Oxygenation During Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24:1395–404.CrossRef Sakles JC. Maintenance of Oxygenation During Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24:1395–404.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Groombridge CJ, Ley E, Miller M, et al. A prospective, randomised trial of pre-oxygenation strategies available in the pre-hospital environment. Anaesthesia. 2017;72:580–4.CrossRef Groombridge CJ, Ley E, Miller M, et al. A prospective, randomised trial of pre-oxygenation strategies available in the pre-hospital environment. Anaesthesia. 2017;72:580–4.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boulton AJ, Mashru A, Lyon R. Oxygenation strategies prior to and during prehospital emergency anaesthesia in UK HEMS practice (PREOXY survey). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020;28:99.CrossRef Boulton AJ, Mashru A, Lyon R. Oxygenation strategies prior to and during prehospital emergency anaesthesia in UK HEMS practice (PREOXY survey). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020;28:99.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nimmagadda U, Salem MR, Crystal GJ. Preoxygenation. Physiologic Basis, Benefits, and Potential Risks. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:507–17.CrossRef Nimmagadda U, Salem MR, Crystal GJ. Preoxygenation. Physiologic Basis, Benefits, and Potential Risks. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:507–17.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bouroche G, Bourgain JL. Preoxygenation and general anesthesia: a review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81:910–20. Bouroche G, Bourgain JL. Preoxygenation and general anesthesia: a review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81:910–20.
6.
go back to reference Higgs A, McGrath BA, Goddard C, et al. Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120:323–52.CrossRef Higgs A, McGrath BA, Goddard C, et al. Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120:323–52.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Groombridge C, Chin CW, Hanrahan B, et al. Assessment of Common Preoxygenation Strategies Outside of the Operating Room Environment. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23:342–6.CrossRef Groombridge C, Chin CW, Hanrahan B, et al. Assessment of Common Preoxygenation Strategies Outside of the Operating Room Environment. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23:342–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Robinson A, Ercole A. Evaluation of the self-inflating bag-valve-mask and non-rebreather mask as preoxygenation devices in volunteers. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001785.CrossRef Robinson A, Ercole A. Evaluation of the self-inflating bag-valve-mask and non-rebreather mask as preoxygenation devices in volunteers. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001785.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pourmand A, Robinson C, Dorwart K, et al. Pre-oxygenation: Implications in emergency airway management. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35:1177–83.CrossRef Pourmand A, Robinson C, Dorwart K, et al. Pre-oxygenation: Implications in emergency airway management. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35:1177–83.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chrimes N. Not all bag-valve-mask devices are created equal: beware a possible lower FiO2 during spontaneous ventilation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014;42:276.PubMed Chrimes N. Not all bag-valve-mask devices are created equal: beware a possible lower FiO2 during spontaneous ventilation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014;42:276.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Mills PJ, Baptiste J, Preston J, et al. Manual resuscitators and spontaneous ventilation-An evaluation. Crit Care Med. 1991;19:1425–31.CrossRef Mills PJ, Baptiste J, Preston J, et al. Manual resuscitators and spontaneous ventilation-An evaluation. Crit Care Med. 1991;19:1425–31.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hess D, Hirsch C, Marquis-D’Amico C, et al. Imposed work and oxygen delivery during spontaneous breathing with adult disposable manual ventilators. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1256–63.CrossRef Hess D, Hirsch C, Marquis-D’Amico C, et al. Imposed work and oxygen delivery during spontaneous breathing with adult disposable manual ventilators. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1256–63.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nimmagadda U, Salem MR, Joseph NJ, et al. Efficacy of Preoxygenation with Tidal Volume Breathing: Comparison of Breathing Systems. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:693–8.CrossRef Nimmagadda U, Salem MR, Joseph NJ, et al. Efficacy of Preoxygenation with Tidal Volume Breathing: Comparison of Breathing Systems. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:693–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kwei P, Matzelle S, Wallman D, et al. Inadequate preoxygenation during spontaneous ventilation with single patient use self-inflating resuscitation bags. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006;34:685–6.PubMed Kwei P, Matzelle S, Wallman D, et al. Inadequate preoxygenation during spontaneous ventilation with single patient use self-inflating resuscitation bags. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006;34:685–6.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Driver BE, Prekker ME, Kornas RL, et al. Flush Rate Oxygen for Emergency Airway Preoxygenation. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69:1–6.CrossRef Driver BE, Prekker ME, Kornas RL, et al. Flush Rate Oxygen for Emergency Airway Preoxygenation. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69:1–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Large variations of oxygen delivery in self-inflating resuscitation bags used for preoxygenation - a mechanical simulation
Authors
Sven Grauman
Joakim Johansson
Thomas Drevhammar
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00885-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2021 Go to the issue