Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Original research

Maintaining immobilisation devices on trauma patients during CT: a feasibility study

Authors: Pål Johan Stokkeland, Erlend Andersen, Maria Myhre Bjørndal, Arne Morten Mikalsen, Sindre Aslaksen, Per Kristian Hyldmo

Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To reduce the possibility of secondary deterioration of spinal injuries, it is desirable to maintain the spinal immobilisation that is applied in the prehospital setting throughout computed tomography (CT) scanning. A previous study found that metallic components within the inflation valve of the vacuum mattresses caused CT artefacts. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of vacuum mattresses with plastic valves on CT artefacts, the radiation dose, and noise compared to a trauma transfer board and the spine boards currently used in our trauma system.

Methods

We scanned an anthropomorphic whole body phantom with different immobilisation devices on a 128-slice CT scanner using the standard polytrauma CT-protocol at our institution. The phantom was scanned without any immobilisation device and with three different vacuum mattresses, two spine boards, and one trauma transfer board. Two radiologists independently assessed the artefacts. Agreement between the two radiologists was measured using the kappa coefficient. The radiation dose and noise were assessed.

Results

One spine board produced major artefacts due to its metal components. One of the vacuum mattresses resulted in artefacts that impaired clinical judgement. Otherwise, the artefacts predominantly did not impede clinical judgement and were mainly subtle. One of the vacuum mattresses resulted in no artefacts that affected clinical judgement. The overall inter-rater agreement was substantial (0.86, kappa 0.77). We did not observe any artefacts due to plastic valves. The mean CT radiation dose was slightly higher for two of the devices in the head series than that for the trauma transfer board, used as the standard in our system. Only marginal differences were noted for the other devices and series. Small differences in image noise were found between the devices.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that it is feasible to maintain some vacuum mattresses with plastic valves on trauma patients during CT scanning. The tested mattresses did not result in a considerably increased radiation dose or artefacts that hampered clinical judgement. One of the tested vacuum mattresses produced no artefacts that hampered clinical judgement whatsoever.
Literature
1.
go back to reference PHTLS Committee of NAEMT: Spinal Trauma. In PHTLS - Basic and Advanced Prehospital Trauma Life Support. 7th edition. Edited by McSwain NE. St. Louis, IL, USA: Mosby JEMS, Elsevier; 2011: 245-289. PHTLS Committee of NAEMT: Spinal Trauma. In PHTLS - Basic and Advanced Prehospital Trauma Life Support. 7th edition. Edited by McSwain NE. St. Louis, IL, USA: Mosby JEMS, Elsevier; 2011: 245-289.
2.
go back to reference American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: Spine and spinal cord trauma. In Advanced trauma life support for doctors - student course manual. 9th edition. Edited by Rotondo MF. Chicago, IL, USA: American College of Surgeons; 2012: 174-205. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: Spine and spinal cord trauma. In Advanced trauma life support for doctors - student course manual. 9th edition. Edited by Rotondo MF. Chicago, IL, USA: American College of Surgeons; 2012: 174-205.
3.
go back to reference White CC, Domeier RM, Millin MG. EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard - resource document to the position statement of the National Association of EMS physicians and the American College of Surgeons Committee on trauma. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014;18:306–14.CrossRefPubMed White CC, Domeier RM, Millin MG. EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard - resource document to the position statement of the National Association of EMS physicians and the American College of Surgeons Committee on trauma. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014;18:306–14.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sundstrom T, Asbjornsen H, Habiba S, Sunde GA, Wester K. Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:531–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sundstrom T, Asbjornsen H, Habiba S, Sunde GA, Wester K. Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:531–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Hamilton RS, Pons PT. The efficacy and comfort of full-body vacuum splints for cervical-spine immobilization. J Emerg Med. 1996;14:553–9.CrossRefPubMed Hamilton RS, Pons PT. The efficacy and comfort of full-body vacuum splints for cervical-spine immobilization. J Emerg Med. 1996;14:553–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pernik MN, Seidel HH, Blalock RE, Burgess AR, Horodyski M, Rechtine GR, Prasarn ML. Comparison of tissue-interface pressure in healthy subjects lying on two trauma splinting devices: the vacuum mattress splint and long spine board. Injury. 2016;47:1801–5.CrossRefPubMed Pernik MN, Seidel HH, Blalock RE, Burgess AR, Horodyski M, Rechtine GR, Prasarn ML. Comparison of tissue-interface pressure in healthy subjects lying on two trauma splinting devices: the vacuum mattress splint and long spine board. Injury. 2016;47:1801–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hemmes B, Brink PR, Poeze M. Effects of unconsciousness during spinal immobilization on tissue-interface pressures: a randomized controlled trial comparing a standard rigid spineboard with a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard. Injury. 2014;45:1741–6.CrossRefPubMed Hemmes B, Brink PR, Poeze M. Effects of unconsciousness during spinal immobilization on tissue-interface pressures: a randomized controlled trial comparing a standard rigid spineboard with a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard. Injury. 2014;45:1741–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hemmes B, Jeukens CR, Al-Haidari A, Hofman PA, Vd Linden ES, Brink PR, Poeze M. Effect of spineboard and headblocks on the image quality of head CT scans. Emerg Radiol. 2016;23:263–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hemmes B, Jeukens CR, Al-Haidari A, Hofman PA, Vd Linden ES, Brink PR, Poeze M. Effect of spineboard and headblocks on the image quality of head CT scans. Emerg Radiol. 2016;23:263–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Euler A, Stieltjes B, Schindera ST. Automatic tube current modulation for whole-body polytrauma CT with immobilization devices: is there an increase in radiation dose and degradation of image quality? Emerg Radiol. 2017;24:31–37. Euler A, Stieltjes B, Schindera ST. Automatic tube current modulation for whole-body polytrauma CT with immobilization devices: is there an increase in radiation dose and degradation of image quality? Emerg Radiol. 2017;24:31–37.
11.
go back to reference Morsbach F, Bickelhaupt S, Wanner GA, Krauss A, Schmidt B, Alkadhi H. Reduction of metal artifacts from hip prostheses on CT images of the pelvis: value of iterative reconstructions. Radiology. 2013;268:237–44.CrossRefPubMed Morsbach F, Bickelhaupt S, Wanner GA, Krauss A, Schmidt B, Alkadhi H. Reduction of metal artifacts from hip prostheses on CT images of the pelvis: value of iterative reconstructions. Radiology. 2013;268:237–44.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT. Report No 96. AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. College Park: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2008. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT. Report No 96. AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. College Park: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2008.
13.
go back to reference Hyldmo PK, Vist GE, Feyling AC, Rognas L, Magnusson V, Sandberg M, Soreide E. Does turning trauma patients with an unstable spinal injury from the supine to a lateral position increase the risk of neurological deterioration?--a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23:65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hyldmo PK, Vist GE, Feyling AC, Rognas L, Magnusson V, Sandberg M, Soreide E. Does turning trauma patients with an unstable spinal injury from the supine to a lateral position increase the risk of neurological deterioration?--a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23:65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Maintaining immobilisation devices on trauma patients during CT: a feasibility study
Authors
Pål Johan Stokkeland
Erlend Andersen
Maria Myhre Bjørndal
Arne Morten Mikalsen
Sindre Aslaksen
Per Kristian Hyldmo
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0428-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2017 Go to the issue