Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 3/2016

Open Access 01-06-2016 | Original Article

Effect of spineboard and headblocks on the image quality of head CT scans

Authors: Baukje Hemmes, Cécile R. L. P. N. Jeukens, Aliaa Al-Haidari, Paul A. M. Hofman, Ed S. vd Linden, Peter R. G. Brink, Martijn Poeze

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Trauma patients at risk for, or suspected of, spinal injury are frequently transported to hospital using full spinal immobilisation. At the emergency department, immobilisation is often maintained until radiological work-up is completed. In this study, we examined how these devices for spinal stabilization influence visual image quality. Image quality was judged for both patient CT scans and phantom CT scans. CT scans of 217 patients were assessed retrospectively by two radiologists for visual scoring of image quality, scoring both quantity and impact of artifacts caused by the immobilization devices. For the phantom CT scans, eight set-ups were made, using a vacuum mattress without headblocks and a rigid and a soft-layered spineboard without headblocks, with standard soft-foam headblocks, or with new design headblocks. Overall, artifacts were found in 67 % of CT scans of patients on immobilization devices, which hampered diagnosis in 10 % of the cases. In the phantom CT scans, artifacts were present in all set-ups with one or more devices present and were seen in 20 % of all scan slices. The presence of headblocks resulted in more artifacts in both the patient CT scans and the phantom CT scans. Considerable effort should therefore be made to adjust the design of the immobilization devices and to remove the headblocks before CT scans are made.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Lerner EB, Moscati R (2000) Duration of patient immobilization in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 18:28–30CrossRefPubMed Lerner EB, Moscati R (2000) Duration of patient immobilization in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 18:28–30CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Malik MHA, Lovell ME (2003) Current spinal board usage in emergency departments across the UK. Injury 34:327–29CrossRefPubMed Malik MHA, Lovell ME (2003) Current spinal board usage in emergency departments across the UK. Injury 34:327–29CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Stagg MJ, Lovell ME (2008) A repeat audit of spinal board usage in the emergency department. Injury 39:323–26CrossRefPubMed Stagg MJ, Lovell ME (2008) A repeat audit of spinal board usage in the emergency department. Injury 39:323–26CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference El-Khoury GY, Kathol MH, Daniel WW (1995) Imaging of acute injuries of the cervical spine: value of plain radiography, CT, and MR Imaging. AJR 164:43–50CrossRefPubMed El-Khoury GY, Kathol MH, Daniel WW (1995) Imaging of acute injuries of the cervical spine: value of plain radiography, CT, and MR Imaging. AJR 164:43–50CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference France JC, Bono CM, Vaccaro AR (2005) Initial radiographic evaluation of the spine after trauma: when, what, where, and how to image the acutely traumatized spine. J Orthop Trauma 19:640–49CrossRefPubMed France JC, Bono CM, Vaccaro AR (2005) Initial radiographic evaluation of the spine after trauma: when, what, where, and how to image the acutely traumatized spine. J Orthop Trauma 19:640–49CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hemmes B, Poeze M, Brink PRG (2010) Reduced tissue-interface pressure and increased comfort on a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard. J Trauma 68:593–98CrossRefPubMed Hemmes B, Poeze M, Brink PRG (2010) Reduced tissue-interface pressure and increased comfort on a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard. J Trauma 68:593–98CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Oomens CWJ, Zenhorst W, Broek M et al (2013) A numerical study to analyse the risk for pressure ulcer development on a spine board. Clin Biomech 28:736–42CrossRef Oomens CWJ, Zenhorst W, Broek M et al (2013) A numerical study to analyse the risk for pressure ulcer development on a spine board. Clin Biomech 28:736–42CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ay D, Aktas C, Yesilyurt S, Sarikaya S, Cetin A, Ozdogan ES (2011) Effects of spinal immobilization devices on pulmonary function in healthy volunteer individuals. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg 17:103–07CrossRef Ay D, Aktas C, Yesilyurt S, Sarikaya S, Cetin A, Ozdogan ES (2011) Effects of spinal immobilization devices on pulmonary function in healthy volunteer individuals. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg 17:103–07CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ng I, Lim J, Wong HB (2004) Effects of head posture on cerebral hemodynamics; its influences on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral oxygenation. Neurosurgery 54:593–98CrossRefPubMed Ng I, Lim J, Wong HB (2004) Effects of head posture on cerebral hemodynamics; its influences on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral oxygenation. Neurosurgery 54:593–98CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference White CCDR, Millin MG, Standards and Clinical Practice Committee, National Association of EMS Physicians (2014) EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard - resource document to the position statement of the national association of EMS physicians and the American College of Surgeons committee on trauma. Prehosp Emerg Care 18:306–14CrossRefPubMed White CCDR, Millin MG, Standards and Clinical Practice Committee, National Association of EMS Physicians (2014) EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard - resource document to the position statement of the national association of EMS physicians and the American College of Surgeons committee on trauma. Prehosp Emerg Care 18:306–14CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Daffner RH, Khoury MB (1987) Pseudofractures due to Nec-Loc cervical immobilization collar. Skelet Radiol 16:460–62CrossRef Daffner RH, Khoury MB (1987) Pseudofractures due to Nec-Loc cervical immobilization collar. Skelet Radiol 16:460–62CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Miller JA, Mele C, Abu-Judeh H (1999) Significance of backboard artifacts on portable trauma series chest radiographs. Emerg Radiol 6:334–38CrossRef Miller JA, Mele C, Abu-Judeh H (1999) Significance of backboard artifacts on portable trauma series chest radiographs. Emerg Radiol 6:334–38CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schou J, Kiermayer H, Ummenhofer W, Herion H-P (2001) In search of the most suitable technique for truncal spinal immobilization with associated radiography. Eur J Emerg Med 8:89–92CrossRefPubMed Schou J, Kiermayer H, Ummenhofer W, Herion H-P (2001) In search of the most suitable technique for truncal spinal immobilization with associated radiography. Eur J Emerg Med 8:89–92CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hayes M, Andronikou S, Prabhu S, Schulze O (2006) Multiplanar angles reconstructions of reconstructions - a dangerous practice using multidetector CT. Pediatr Radiol 36:881–83CrossRefPubMed Hayes M, Andronikou S, Prabhu S, Schulze O (2006) Multiplanar angles reconstructions of reconstructions - a dangerous practice using multidetector CT. Pediatr Radiol 36:881–83CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wells IT, Manghat N (2009) Re: A CT reconstruction artefact that mimics acute subdural haemorrhage. Clin Radiol 64:1136–37CrossRefPubMed Wells IT, Manghat N (2009) Re: A CT reconstruction artefact that mimics acute subdural haemorrhage. Clin Radiol 64:1136–37CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference du Plessis A-M, Theron S, Andronikou S (2009) The effects of misinterpretation of an artefact on multidetector row CT scans in children. Pediatr Radiol 39:137–41CrossRefPubMed du Plessis A-M, Theron S, Andronikou S (2009) The effects of misinterpretation of an artefact on multidetector row CT scans in children. Pediatr Radiol 39:137–41CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mathur S, Gadde S, Koteyar SS (2008) Artefact misinterpretation on CT images of the head. Clin Radiol 63:1277–79CrossRefPubMed Mathur S, Gadde S, Koteyar SS (2008) Artefact misinterpretation on CT images of the head. Clin Radiol 63:1277–79CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Loewenhardt B, Huttinger R, Reinert M, Hering B, Rathjen T, Gries A et al (2014) Dose effects and image quality: Is there any influence by bearing devices in whole-body computed tomography in trauma patients? Injury 45:170–75CrossRefPubMed Loewenhardt B, Huttinger R, Reinert M, Hering B, Rathjen T, Gries A et al (2014) Dose effects and image quality: Is there any influence by bearing devices in whole-body computed tomography in trauma patients? Injury 45:170–75CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Johnson RJ, Bury RW (2011) Cervical spine radiology. Anaesth Intensive Care Med 12:504–06CrossRef Johnson RJ, Bury RW (2011) Cervical spine radiology. Anaesth Intensive Care Med 12:504–06CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hauswald M, Braude D (2007) Diffusion of medical progress: early spinal immobilization in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med 14:1087–89CrossRefPubMed Hauswald M, Braude D (2007) Diffusion of medical progress: early spinal immobilization in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med 14:1087–89CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hemmes B, Jeukens CRLPN, Kemerink GJ, Brink PRG, Poeze M (2016) Effect of spinal immobilisation devices on radiation exposure in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Emerg Rad 23:147–53 Hemmes B, Jeukens CRLPN, Kemerink GJ, Brink PRG, Poeze M (2016) Effect of spinal immobilisation devices on radiation exposure in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Emerg Rad 23:147–53
24.
go back to reference American College of Surgeons editor. Advanced Trauma Life Support. Student course manual, 9th ed. Chicago, IL 2012 American College of Surgeons editor. Advanced Trauma Life Support. Student course manual, 9th ed. Chicago, IL 2012
25.
go back to reference National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians editor. PHTLS: Prehospital Trauma Life Support. 8th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2014 National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians editor. PHTLS: Prehospital Trauma Life Support. 8th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2014
Metadata
Title
Effect of spineboard and headblocks on the image quality of head CT scans
Authors
Baukje Hemmes
Cécile R. L. P. N. Jeukens
Aliaa Al-Haidari
Paul A. M. Hofman
Ed S. vd Linden
Peter R. G. Brink
Martijn Poeze
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-016-1396-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Emergency Radiology 3/2016 Go to the issue