Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original research

Team talk and team activity in simulated medical emergencies: a discourse analytical approach

Authors: Stine Gundrosen, Ellen Andenæs, Petter Aadahl, Gøril Thomassen

Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Communication errors can reduce patient safety, especially in emergency situations that require rapid responses by experts in a number of medical specialties. Talking to each other is crucial for utilizing the collective expertise of the team. Here we explored the functions of “team talk” (talking between team members) with an emphasis on the talk-work relationship in interdisciplinary emergency teams.

Methods

Five interdisciplinary medical emergency teams were observed and videotaped during in situ simulations at an emergency department at a university hospital in Norway. Team talk and simultaneous actions were transcribed and analysed. We used qualitative discourse analysis to perform structural mapping of the team talk and to analyse the function of online commentaries (real-time observations and assessments of observations based on relevant cues in the clinical situation).

Results

Structural mapping revealed recurring and diverse patterns. Team expansion stood out as a critical phase in the teamwork. Online commentaries that occurred during the critical phase served several functions and demonstrated the inextricable interconnections between team talk and actions.

Discussion

Discourse analysis allowed us to capture the dynamics and complexity of team talk during a simulated emergency situation. Even though the team talk did not follow a predefined structure, the team members managed to manoeuvre safely within the complex situation. Our results support that online commentaries contributes to shared team situation awareness.

Conclusions

Discourse analysis reveals naturally occurring communication strategies that trigger actions relevant for safe practice and thus provides supplemental insights into what comprises “good” team communication in medical emergencies.
Literature
1.
Beckmann U, West L, Groombridge G, Baldwin I, Hart GK, Clayton DG, et al. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care: AIMS-ICU. The development and evaluation of an incident reporting system in intensive care. Anaesth Intens Care. 1996;24(3):314–9.
2.
Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, Regehr G, Baker G, Reznick R, et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(5):330–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Rabøl LI, Andersen ML, Østergaard D, Bjørn B, Lilja B, Mogensen T. Descriptions of verbal communication errors between staff. An analysis of 84 root cause analysis-reports from Danish hospitals. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(3):268–74.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 2000.
5.
Gillespie BM, Chaboyer W, Fairweather N. Factors that influence the expected length of operation: results of a prospective study. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2011; doi:10.​1136/​bmjqs-2011-000169
6.
Entin EE, Serfaty D. Adaptive team coordination. Hum Factors. 1999;41(2):312–25.CrossRef
7.
Riethmüller M, Fernandez Castelao E, Eberhardt I, Timmermann A, Boos M. Adaptive coordination development in student anaesthesia teams: a longitudinal study. Ergonomics. 2012;55(1):55–68.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Stout RJ, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Milanovich DM. Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Hum Factors. 1999;41(1):61–71.CrossRef
9.
Kolbe M, Burtscher M, Manser T, Künzle B, Grote G. The role of coordination in preventing harm in healthcare groups: Research examples from anaesthesia and an integrated model of coordination for action teams in health care. In: Boos M, Kolbe M, Kappeler PM, Ellwart T, editors. Coordination in human and primate groups. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011. p. 75–92.
10.
Manser T. Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesth Scand. 2009;53(2):143–51.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Flin R, Winter J, Cakil Sarac MR. Human factors in patient safety: review of topics and tools. Report for Methods and Measures Working Group of WHO Patient Safety. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
12.
Fletcher G, McGeorge P, Flin RH, Glavin RJ, Maran NJ. The role of non-technical skills in anaesthesia: a review of current literature. BJA. 2002;88(3):418–29.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Jeffcott SA, Mackenzie CF. Measuring team performance in healthcare: review of research and implications for patient safety. J Crit Care. 2008;23(2):188–96.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P, Glavin R, Maran N, Patey R. Anaesthetists’ Non‐Technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system†. BJA. 2003;90(5):580–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Mishra A, Catchpole K, McCulloch P. The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(2):104–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Hull L, Arora S, Kassab E, Kneebone R, Sevdalis N. Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. J Am Coll Surgeons. 2011;212(2):234–43.CrossRef
17.
18.
Gaba DM. Have we gone too far in translating ideas from aviation to patient safety? No. BMJ. 2011;342:c7310.CrossRef
19.
Bogenstätter Y, Tschan F, Semmer NK, Spychiger M, Breuer M, Marsch S. How accurate is information transmitted to medical professionals joining a medical emergency? A simulator study. Hum Factors. 2009;51(2):115–25.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
22.
Roberts C, Sarangi S. Theme‐oriented discourse analysis of medical encounters. Med Educ. 2005;39(6):632–40.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Sarangi S. Practising discourse analysis in healthcare settings. In: Bourgeault I, DeVries R, Dingwall R, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research. London: Sage; 2010. p. 397–416.CrossRef
24.
Slade D, Scheeres H, Manidis M, Iedema R, Dunston R, Stein-Parbury J, et al. Emergency communication: the discursive challenges facing emergency clinicians and patients in hospital emergency departments. Discourse Commun. 2008;2(3):271–98.CrossRef
25.
Heritage J, Maynard DW. Introduction: Analyzing interaction between doctors and patients in primary care encounters. In: Heritage J, Maynard DW, Drew P, Goodwin MH, Gumperz JJ, Schiffrin D, editors. Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 1–21.
26.
Thomassen G. The role of role-play: managing activity ambiguities in simulated doctor consultation in medical education. Commun Med. 2009;6(1):83–93.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Wears RL, Perry SJ. Discourse and process analyses of shift change handoffs in emergency departments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2010;54(12):953–6. doi:10.​1177/​1541931210054012​32.
28.
Lingard L, Whyte S, Espin S, Ross Baker G, Orser B, Doran D. Towards safer interprofessional communication: constructing a model of “utility” from preoperative team briefings. J Interprof Care. 2006;20(5):471–83.CrossRefPubMed
29.
ten Have P. Transcribing Talk-in-interaction. In: Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide. London: Sage Publications; 1999. p. 78–9.
30.
Heritage J, Stivers T. Online commentary in acute medical visits: a method of shaping patient expectations. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(11):1501–17.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Kolbe M, Burtscher MJ, Wacker J, Grande B, Nohynkova R, Manser T, et al. Speaking up is related to better team performance in simulated anesthesia inductions: an observational study. Anesth Analg. 2012;115(5):1099–108.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Salas E, Wilson KA, Murphy CE, King H, Salisbury M. Communicating, coordinating, and cooperating when lives depend on it: tips for teamwork. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(6):333–41.CrossRef
33.
34.
Burke CS, Stagl KC, Salas E, Pierce L, Kendall D. Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(6):1189.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Salas E, Sims DE, Burke CS. Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Group Res. 2005;36(5):555–99.CrossRef
36.
Burtscher MJ, Manser T, Kolbe M, Grote G, Grande B, Spahn DR, et al. Adaption in anaesthesia team coordination in response to a simulated critical event and its relationship to clinical performance. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(6):801–6.
37.
Gundrosen S, Solligård E, Aadahl P. Team competence among nurses in an intensive care unit: The feasibility of in situ simulation and assessing non-technical skills. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014;30(6):312–7.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Wayne DB, Didwania A, Feinglass J, Fudala MJ, Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC. Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: A case-control study. Chest. 2008;133(1):56–61.
39.
Kobayashi L, Patterson MD, Overly FL, Shapiro MJ, Williams KA, Jay GD. Educational and research implications of portable human patient simulation in acute care medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):1166–74.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Sørensen JL, Navne LE, Martin HM, Ottesen B, Albrecthsen CK, Pedersen BW, et al. Clarifying the learning experiences of healthcare professionals with in situ and off-site simulation-based medical education: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e008345.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358:483–88.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Linell P. Communicative activity types as organisations in discourses and discourses in organisations. In: Tanskanen SK, Helasvuo ML, Johansson M, Raitaniemi M, editors. Discourse in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2010. p. 33–59.CrossRef
43.
Linell P. Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Information Age Publishing; 2009: p 201-212.
44.
Sarangi S. Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: the case of genetic counselling. In: Sarangi S, Coulthard M, editors. Discourse and social life. Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education; 2000. p. 1–27.
45.
Manser T, Howard SK, Gaba DM. Adaptive coordination in cardiac anaesthesia: a study of situational changes in coordination patterns using a new observation system. Ergonomics. 2008;51(8):1153–78.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Linell P. Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing; 1998. p. 111–26.CrossRef
47.
48.
Kolbe M, Künzle B, Zala-Mezö E, Burtscher MJ, Wacker J, Spahn DR, et al., The functions of team monitoring and ‘talking to the room’for performance in anesthesia teams. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2010;54(12):857–61. doi:10.​1177/​1541931210054012​11.
49.
Archer D, Akert RM. Words and everything else: Verbal and nonverbal cues in social interpretation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977;35(6):443.
50.
Mehrabian A. Communication without words. Psychology Today. 1968;2(4):52–5.
Metadata
Title
Team talk and team activity in simulated medical emergencies: a discourse analytical approach
Authors
Stine Gundrosen
Ellen Andenæs
Petter Aadahl
Gøril Thomassen
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0325-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2016 Go to the issue

Original research

Longer time to antibiotics and higher mortality among septic patients with non-specific presentations -a cross sectional study of Emergency Department patients indicating that a screening tool may improve identification

Original research

Increasing incidence of hypotension in the emergency department; a 12 year population-based cohort study

Original research

Characteristics and outcomes of emergency patients with self-inflicted injuries: a report from ambulance records in Osaka City, Japan

Original research

Unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest

Original research

Physical function and pain after surgical or conservative management of multiple rib fractures – a follow-up study

Original research

Mechanical chest compressions in the coronary catheterization laboratory to facilitate coronary intervention and survival in patients requiring prolonged resuscitation efforts