Top

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original research

Does the Norwegian emergency medical dispatch classification as non-urgent predict no need for pre-hospital medical treatment? An observational study

Authors: Eystein Grusd, Jo Kramer-Johansen

Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2016

Abstract

Background

The number of ambulance call-outs in Norway is increasing owing to societal changes and increased demand from the public. Together with improved but more expensive education of ambulance staff, this leads to increased costs and staffing shortages. We wanted to study whether the current dispatch triage tools could reliably identify patients who only required transport, and not pre-hospital medical care. This could allow selection of such patients for designated transport units, freeing up highly trained ambulance staff to attend patients in greater need.

Methods

A cross-sectional observational study was used, drawing on all electronic and paper records in our ambulance service from four random days in 2012. The patients were classified into acuity groups, based on Emergency Medical Dispatch codes, and pre-hospital interventions were extracted from the Patient Report Forms.

Results

Of the 1489 ambulance call-outs included in this study, 82 PRFs (5 %) were missing. A highly significant association was found between acuity group and recorded pre-hospital intervention (p ≤ 0.001). We found no correlation between gender, distance to hospital, age and pre-hospital interventions. Ambulances staffed by paramedics performed more interventions (234/917, 26 %) than those with emergency medical technicians (42/282, 15 %). The strongest predictor for needing pre-hospital interventions was found to be the emergency medical dispatch acuity descriptor.

Discussion

This study has demonstrated that the Norwegian dispatch system is able to correctly identify patients who do not need pre-hospital interventions. Patients with a low acuity code had a very low level of pre-hospital interventions. Evaluation of adherence to protocol in the Emergency Medical Dispatch is not possible due to the inherent need for medical experience in the triage process.

Conclusions

This study validates the Norwegian dispatch tool (Norwegian index) as a predictor of patients who do not need pre-hospital interventions.

Huseby BM, Kalseth B, Ødegaard H, Gjøen-Øien IJ, Mehus KH, Rønningen L, Pedersen M, Sitter M, Pedersen PB, Bremnes R, et al. SAMDATA Spesialisthelsetjenesten 2014. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate of Health; 2015.

Akuttforskriften. Forskrift om krav til akuttmedisinske tjenester utenfor sykehus. (Regulation on pre-hospital emergency medicine services). (in Norwegian), [http://www.lovdata.no/cgi-wift/wiftldles?doc=/usr/www/lovdata/for/sf/ho/ho-20050318-0252.html&emne=krav+til+akuttmedisinske+tjenester&&].

Hinchey P, Myers B, Zalkin J, Lewis R, Garner D. Low acuity EMS dispatch criteria can reliably identify patients without high-acuity illness or injury. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007;11:42–8.CrossRefPubMed

Shah MN, Bishop P, Lerner EB, Fairbanks RJ, Davis EA. Validation of using EMS dispatch codes to identify low-acuity patients. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005;9:24–31.CrossRefPubMed

Den Norske lægeforening. Norsk indeks for medisinsk nødhjelp. 3rd ed. Stavanger: Den norske lægeforening; 2009.

Culley LL, Henwood DK, Clark JJ, Eisenberg MS, Horton C. Increasing the efficiency of emergency medical services by using criteria based dispatch. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24:867–72.CrossRefPubMed

Jacobs I, Nadkarni V, Bahr J, Berg RA, Billi JE, Bossaert L, Cassan P, Coovadia A, D’Este K, Finn J, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the Utstein templates for resuscitation registries. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the international liaison committee on resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa). Resuscitation. 2004;63:233–49.CrossRefPubMed

Hardeland C, Olasveengen TM, Lawrence R, Garrison D, Lorem T, Farstad G, Wik L. Comparison of Medical Priority Dispatch (MPD) and Criteria Based Dispatch (CBD) relating to cardiac arrest calls. Resuscitation. 2014;85:612–6.CrossRefPubMed

Moller TP, Ersboll AK, Tolstrup JS, Ostergaard D, Viereck S, Overton J, Folke F, Lippert F. Why and when citizens call for emergency help: an observational study of 211,193 medical emergency calls. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23:88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Staff T, Sovik S. A retrospective quality assessment of pre-hospital emergency medical documentation in motor vehicle accidents in south-eastern Norway. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Roukema J, Los RK, Bleeker SE, van Ginneken AM, van der Lei J, Moll HA. Paper versus computer: feasibility of an electronic medical record in general pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2006;117:15–21.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Schmidt TA, Cone DC, Mann NC. Criteria currently used to evaluate dispatch triage systems: where do they leave us? Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004;8:126–9.PubMed

13.

Gaynor M, Myung D, Hashmi N, Shankaranarayanan G, Steve M. An intelligent pre-hospital patient care system. Int J Electron Healthc. 2007;3:107–22.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Landman AB, Lee CH, Sasson C, Van Gelder CM, Curry LA. Prehospital electronic patient care report systems: early experiences from emergency medical services agency leaders. PLoS ONE. 2012;7, e32692.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Sporer KA, Youngblood GM, Rodriguez RM. The ability of emergency medical dispatch codes of medical complaints to predict ALS prehospital interventions. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007;11:192–8.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Does the Norwegian emergency medical dispatch classification as non-urgent predict no need for pre-hospital medical treatment? An observational study
Authors: Eystein Grusd
Jo Kramer-Johansen
Publication date: 01-12-2016
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1757-7241
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0258-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Does the Norwegian emergency medical dispatch classification as non-urgent predict no need for pre-hospital medical treatment? An observational study

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Effect of private versus emergency medical systems transportation in trauma patients in a mostly physician based system- a retrospective multicenter study based on the TraumaRegister DGU®

Are ethical norms and current policies still relevant in face of the recent mass terror events?

Moderate traumatic brain injury, acute phase course and deviations in physiological variables: an observational study

Preperitoneal pelvic packing in patients with hemodynamic instability due to severe pelvic fracture: early experience in a Korean trauma center

Erratum to: The accuracy and timeliness of a Point Of Care lactate measurement in patients with Sepsis

Unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest