Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Ovarian Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Clinical study of a CT evaluation model combined with serum CA125 in predicting the treatment of newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Authors: Lu Qin, Huming Huang, Mengjie Chen, Yuejuan Liang, He Wang

Published in: Journal of Ovarian Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The treatment of newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) was predicted by an ovarian cancer computed tomography (CT) evaluation model combined with serum CA125.

Methods

Clinical data for 194 patients with advanced EOC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) combined with interval debulking surgery (IDS) or primary debulking surgery (PDS) were retrospectively analyzed, and the appropriate treatment was predicted by comparing the subgroup differences in intraoperative situations, postoperative situations and survival rates.

Results

There were no significant differences with respect to operation time, intraoperative blood loss, ideal tumor cytoreductive rate or postoperative complication rate between the NACT + IDS group and the PDS group with scores less than 5 (score < 5) (p = 0.764, p = 0.504, p = 0.906, p = 0.176). However, there was a statistically significant difference in overall survival rate between the two groups (p = 0.029), with better survival in the PDS group than in the NACT + IDS group. There were significant differences between the NACT + IDS group and the PDS group with scores greater than or equal to 5 (score ≥ 5). The former was better than the latter in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, ideal tumor cytoreductive rate, and postoperative complication rate (p = 0.002, p = 0.040, p = 0.014, p = 0.021). However, there was no significant difference in overall survival rate between the two groups (p = 0.383).

Conclusions

According to the new evaluation system, for a score < 5, we suggest that patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC undergo PDS; for a score ≥ 5, we recommend NACT + IDS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z. Cancer statistics,2014. Cancer. 2014;64(1):9–29. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z. Cancer statistics,2014. Cancer. 2014;64(1):9–29.
2.
go back to reference Ce B, Xia Z. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. J Pract Obstet Gynecol. 2015;04:263–6. Ce B, Xia Z. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. J Pract Obstet Gynecol. 2015;04:263–6.
3.
go back to reference Bristow RE, Duska LR, Lambrou NC, et al. A model for predicting surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma using computed tomography. Cancer. 2000;89(7):1532–40.CrossRefPubMed Bristow RE, Duska LR, Lambrou NC, et al. A model for predicting surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma using computed tomography. Cancer. 2000;89(7):1532–40.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Vorgias G, Iavazzo C, Savvopoulos P, et al. Can the preoperative ca-125 level predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma?A single institution cohort study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(1):11–5.CrossRefPubMed Vorgias G, Iavazzo C, Savvopoulos P, et al. Can the preoperative ca-125 level predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma?A single institution cohort study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(1):11–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Colombo N, Van Gorp T, Parma G, et al. Ovarian cancer. Oncol Hematol. 2006;60(2):159–79. Colombo N, Van Gorp T, Parma G, et al. Ovarian cancer. Oncol Hematol. 2006;60(2):159–79.
6.
go back to reference Kang S. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase optimal cytoreduction rate in advanced ovarian cancer? Meta-analysis of 21 studies. Surg Oncol. 2009;16(8):2315–20.CrossRef Kang S. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase optimal cytoreduction rate in advanced ovarian cancer? Meta-analysis of 21 studies. Surg Oncol. 2009;16(8):2315–20.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(1):1–6.CrossRefPubMed McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(1):1–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Xuemei J, Huihua D, Shuyu W, Wei X, Zhihong Z. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gynecologic malignancies. Jiangsu Med. 2010;09:1017–20. Xuemei J, Huihua D, Shuyu W, Wei X, Zhihong Z. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gynecologic malignancies. Jiangsu Med. 2010;09:1017–20.
9.
go back to reference Tongwei R. Application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Chinese and Foreign Medical. 2009;22:8–10. Tongwei R. Application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Chinese and Foreign Medical. 2009;22:8–10.
10.
go back to reference Ying Z, Yingli Z, Ping Z. Progress in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer. J Oncol. 2014;11:942–6. Ying Z, Yingli Z, Ping Z. Progress in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer. J Oncol. 2014;11:942–6.
11.
go back to reference Obeidat B, Latimer J. Can optimal primary cytoreduction be predicted in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer? Role of preoperative serum CA-125 level. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2004;57(3):153–6.CrossRef Obeidat B, Latimer J. Can optimal primary cytoreduction be predicted in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer? Role of preoperative serum CA-125 level. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2004;57(3):153–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Loizzi V, Cormio G, Resta L, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer:a case-control study[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15(2):217–23.CrossRefPubMed Loizzi V, Cormio G, Resta L, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer:a case-control study[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15(2):217–23.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wright JD, Ananth CV, Tsui J, et al. Comparative effectiveness of upfront treatment strategies in elderly women with ovarian cancer[J]. Cancer. 2014;120(8):1246–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wright JD, Ananth CV, Tsui J, et al. Comparative effectiveness of upfront treatment strategies in elderly women with ovarian cancer[J]. Cancer. 2014;120(8):1246–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Fago-Olsen CL, Ottesen B, Kehlet H, et al. Dose neoadjuvant chemotherapy impair long-term survival for ovarian cancer patients?A nationwide Danish study[J]. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(2):292–8.CrossRefPubMed Fago-Olsen CL, Ottesen B, Kehlet H, et al. Dose neoadjuvant chemotherapy impair long-term survival for ovarian cancer patients?A nationwide Danish study[J]. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(2):292–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, et al. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(5):1248–59.CrossRefPubMed Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, et al. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(5):1248–59.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Schwart PE. Contemporary considerations for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary ovarian cancer[J].Gynecology. Cancers. 2009;11(6):457–65. Schwart PE. Contemporary considerations for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary ovarian cancer[J].Gynecology. Cancers. 2009;11(6):457–65.
Metadata
Title
Clinical study of a CT evaluation model combined with serum CA125 in predicting the treatment of newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
Authors
Lu Qin
Huming Huang
Mengjie Chen
Yuejuan Liang
He Wang
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Ovarian Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1757-2215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0422-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Ovarian Research 1/2018 Go to the issue