Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

3-D computer modelling of malunited posterior malleolar fractures: effect of fragment size and offset on ankle stability, contact pressure and pattern

Authors: Teresa Alonso-Rasgado, David Jimenez-Cruz, Michael Karski

Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The positioning of the fracture fragment of a posterior malleolus fracture is critical to healing and a successful outcome as malunion of a posterior malleolar fracture, a condition seen in clinical practice, can affect the dynamics of the ankle joint, cause posterolateral rotational subluxation of the talus and ultimately lead to destruction of the joint. Current consensus is to employ anatomic reduction with internal fixation when the fragment size is larger than 25 to 33% of the tibial plafond.

Methods

A 3-dimensional finite element (FE) model of ankle was developed in order to investigate the effect of fragment size (6–15 mm) and offset (1–4 mm) of a malunited posterior malleolus on tibiotalar joint contact area, pressure, motion of joint and ligament forces. Three positions of the joint were simulated; neutral position, 20° dorsiflexion and 30° plantarflexion.

Results

Compared to the intact joint our model predicted that contact area was greater in all malunion scenarios considered. In general, the joint contact area was affected more by section length than section offset. In addition fibula contact area played a role in all the malunion cases.

Conclusions

We found no evidence to support the current consensus of fixing posterior malleolus fractures of greater than 25% of the tibial plafond. Our model predicted joint instability only with the highest level of fracture in a loaded limb at an extreme position of dorsiflexion. No increase of peak contact pressure as a result of malunion was predicted but contact pattern was modified. The results of our study support the view that in cases of posterior malleolar fracture, posttraumatic osteoarthritis occurs as a result of load on areas of cartilage not used to loading rather than an increase in contact pressure. Ankle repositioning resulted in increased force in two ankle ligaments. Our finding could explain commonly reported clinical observations.
Literature
1.
2.
Aiyenuro O, Goldberg AJ. Fractures of the foot and ankle. Surgery. 2013;31:474–81.
3.
4.
Nordin M, Frankel VH. Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer business; 2012.
5.
Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Moore Clinically Oriented Anatomy, 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer business; 2014
6.
7.
8.
Yufit P, Seligson D. Malleolar ankle fractures. A guide to evaluation and treatment. Orthopoaedics Trauma. 2010;24:286–97.CrossRef
9.
10.
11.
Jaskulka RA, Ittner G, Schedl R. Fractures of the posterior tibial margin: their role in the prognosis of malleolar fractures. J Trauma. 1989;29:1565–70.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
14.
Deland JT, Morris GD, Sung IH. Biomechanics of the ankle joint. A perspective on total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000;5:747–59.PubMed
15.
Calhoun JH, Li F, Ledbetter BR, Viegas SF. A comprehensive study of pressure distribution in the ankle joint with inversion and eversion. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:125–33.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Veltman ES, Halma JJ, de Gast A. Longterm outcome of 886 posterior malleolar fractures: A systematic review of the literature. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;22(2):73–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
Lindsjö U. Operative treatment of ankle fracture dislocations. A follow-up study of 306/321 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;199:28–38.
20.
McDaniel WJ, Wilson FC. Trimalleolar fractures of the ankle. An end result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;122:37–45.
21.
22.
Brown TD, Hurlbut PT, Hale JE, et al. Effects of imposed hindfoot constrain on ankle contact mechanics for displaced lateral malleolar fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8:511–20.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Hartford JM, Gorczyca JT, McNamara JL, Mayor MB. Tibiotalar contact area. Contribution of posterior malleolus and deltoid ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;320:182–7.
24.
Macko VW, Matthews LS, Zwirkoski P, Goldstein SA. The joint-contact area of the ankle. The contribution of the posterior malleolus. The Journal of Bone &amp. Joint Surg. 1991;73:347–51.
25.
de Souza LJ, Gustillo RB, Meyer TJ. Results of operative treatment of displaced external rotation-abduction fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1066–74.CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
Fitzpatrick DC, Otto JK, McKinley TO, et al. Kinematic and contact stress analysis of posterior malleolus fractures of the ankle. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:271–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Vrahas M, Fu F, Veenis B. Intraarticular contact stresses with simulated ankle malunions. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8:8.CrossRef
29.
Trivedi S. Finite element analysis: A boon to dentistry. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res. 2014;4(3):200–3.CrossRef
30.
31.
32.
Stops A, Wilcox R, Jin Z. Computational modelling of the natural hip: a review of finite element and multibody simulations. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2012;15(9):963–79.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Fagan MJ, Julian S, Mohsen AM. Finite element analysis in spine research. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H. 2002;216(5):281–98.CrossRef
34.
Rahemi H, Mostafavi SK, Esfandiarpour F, Parnianpour M, Shirazi-Adl A. Review of finite element model studies in knee joint biomechanics. J Mod Rehabilitation. 2011;5(3):1–12.
35.
36.
Henninger HB, Reese SP, Anderson AE, Weiss JA. Validation of computational models in biomechanics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H. 2010;224(7):801–12.CrossRef
37.
Alonso-Rasgado T, Jimenez-Cruz D, Bailey CG, et al. Changes in the stress in the femoral head neck junction after osteochondroplasty for hip impingement: A finite element study. J Orthop Res. 2012;30:1999–2006.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Miguel-Andres I, Alonso-Rasgado T, Walmsley A, Watts AC. Effect of anconeus muscle blocking on elbow kinematics: electromyographic, inertial sensors and finite element study. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016; 1–14. doi: 10.​1007/​s10439-016-1715-2
39.
40.
41.
Burstein a H, Reilly DT, Martens M. Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:82–6. 1249116.CrossRefPubMed
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
Goh J, Mech A, Lee E, et al. Biomechanical study on the load-bearing characteristics of the fibula and the effects of fibular resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;279:223–8.
47.
Takebe K, Nakagawa A, Minami H, et al. Role of the fibula in weight-bearing. Clin Orthopaedics Related Res. 1984;184:289–92.
48.
Wang Q, Whittle M, Cunningham J, Kenwright J. Fibula and its ligaments in load transmission and ankle joint stability. Clin Orthopaedics Related Res. 1996;330:261–70.
49.
50.
51.
Raasch WG, Larkin JJ, Draganich LF. Assessment of the posterior malleolus as a restraint to posterior subluxation of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1201–6.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Stiehl JB, Skrade DA, Needleman RA, et al. Effect of axial load and ankle position on ankle stability. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7:72–7.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Weiss JA, Gardiner JC, Ellis BJ, Lujan TJ, Phatak NS. Three-dimensional finite element modeling of ligaments: Technical aspects. Med Eng Phys. 2005;27(10):845–61.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Spratley EM, Wayne JS. Computational model of the human elbow and forearm: Application to complex varus instability. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39(3):1084–91.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Metadata
Title
3-D computer modelling of malunited posterior malleolar fractures: effect of fragment size and offset on ankle stability, contact pressure and pattern
Authors
Teresa Alonso-Rasgado
David Jimenez-Cruz
Michael Karski
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1757-1146
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0194-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research

Cross-sectional associations between variations in ankle shape by statistical shape modeling, injury history, and race: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project

Research

The effects on calcaneofibular ligament function of differences in the angle of the calcaneofibular ligament with respect to the long axis of the fibula: a simulation study

Methodology

Movement coordination patterns between the foot joints during walking

Research

Normal foot loading parameters and repeatability of the Footscan® platform system

Research

Categorisation of foot complaints in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from a New Zealand cohort

Research

Evidence for current recommendations concerning the management of foot health for people with chronic long-term conditions: a systematic review