Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Conflict and Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Review

Justification for a Nuclear Global Health Workforce: multidisciplinary analysis of risk, survivability & preparedness, with emphasis on the triage management of thermal burns

Authors: Frederick M. Burkle Jr, Tom Potokar, James E. Gosney Jr, Cham Dallas

Published in: Conflict and Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Major challenges and crises in global health will not be solved by health alone; requiring rather a multidisciplinary, evidence-based analytical approach to prevention, preparedness and response. One such potential crisis is the continued spread of nuclear weapons to more nations concurrent with the increased volatility of international relations that has significantly escalated the risk of a major nuclear weapon exchange. This study argues for the development of a multidisciplinary global health response agenda based on the reality of the current political analysis of nuclear risk, research evidence suggesting higher-than-expected survivability risk, and the potential for improved health outcomes based on medical advances. To date, the medical consequences of such an exchange are not credibly addressed by any nation at this time, despite recent advances. While no one country could mount such a response, an international body of responders organized in the same fashion as the current World Health Organization’s global health workforce initiative for large-scale natural and public health emergencies could enlist and train for just such an emergency. A Nuclear Global Health Workforce is described for addressing the unprecedented medical and public health needs to be expected in the event of a nuclear conflict or catastrophic accident. The example of addressing mass casualty nuclear thermal burns outlines the potential triage and clinical response management of survivors enabled by this global approach.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Burkle FM Jr. Global Health security demands a strong international health Regulations Treaty and leadership from a highly resourced World Health Organization. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015;9(5):568–80.CrossRefPubMed Burkle FM Jr. Global Health security demands a strong international health Regulations Treaty and leadership from a highly resourced World Health Organization. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015;9(5):568–80.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Burkle FM, Dallas CE. Developing a nuclear Global Health workforce amid the increasing threat of a nuclear crisis. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(1):129–44.CrossRefPubMed Burkle FM, Dallas CE. Developing a nuclear Global Health workforce amid the increasing threat of a nuclear crisis. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(1):129–44.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dalton R. The Iran nuclear negotiations: one year on. Asian Affairs. 47(3):351–65. Dalton R. The Iran nuclear negotiations: one year on. Asian Affairs. 47(3):351–65.
11.
go back to reference Dallas CE, Maliha W, Reeves G, et al. Nuclear and radiological events, basic disaster life support, version 3.0. In: Swienton R, Markenson D, editors. . Chicago: American Medical Association; 2012. Chap 6. Dallas CE, Maliha W, Reeves G, et al. Nuclear and radiological events, basic disaster life support, version 3.0. In: Swienton R, Markenson D, editors. . Chicago: American Medical Association; 2012. Chap 6.
13.
go back to reference Power J. Conundrums of humanity: the quest for global justice. Boston: Martinus, Nijhoff Publishers/Brill Academic Publishers; 2007.CrossRef Power J. Conundrums of humanity: the quest for global justice. Boston: Martinus, Nijhoff Publishers/Brill Academic Publishers; 2007.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dallas CE, Burkle FM Jr. Nuclear war in the Middle East: where is the voice of medicine and public health. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011;26(5):383–5.CrossRefPubMed Dallas CE, Burkle FM Jr. Nuclear war in the Middle East: where is the voice of medicine and public health. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011;26(5):383–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Press DG, Sagan SD, Valentino BA. Atomic aversion: experimental evidence on taboos, traditions, and the non-use of nuclear weapons. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2013;Feb:1–19. Press DG, Sagan SD, Valentino BA. Atomic aversion: experimental evidence on taboos, traditions, and the non-use of nuclear weapons. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2013;Feb:1–19.
17.
go back to reference Dallas CE, Bell W, Stewart D, Caruso A, Burkle FM. Nuclear war between Israel and Iran: lethality beyond the pale. Confl Heal. 2013;7:10.CrossRef Dallas CE, Bell W, Stewart D, Caruso A, Burkle FM. Nuclear war between Israel and Iran: lethality beyond the pale. Confl Heal. 2013;7:10.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dallas CE, Bell WC. Prediction Modelling to determine medical response to urban nuclear attack. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2007;1(2):80–9.CrossRefPubMed Dallas CE, Bell WC. Prediction Modelling to determine medical response to urban nuclear attack. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2007;1(2):80–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bell WC, Dallas CE. Vulnerability of populations and the urban health care systems to nuclear weapon attack--examples from four American cities. Int J Health Geogr. 2007;6:5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bell WC, Dallas CE. Vulnerability of populations and the urban health care systems to nuclear weapon attack--examples from four American cities. Int J Health Geogr. 2007;6:5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference National Security Staff Interagency Policy Coordination Subcommittee for Preparedness and Response to Radiological and Nuclear Threats, Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation, Executive Office of the President (National Security Staff and Office of Science and Technology Policy), 2nd Edition. 2010. National Security Staff Interagency Policy Coordination Subcommittee for Preparedness and Response to Radiological and Nuclear Threats, Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation, Executive Office of the President (National Security Staff and Office of Science and Technology Policy), 2nd Edition. 2010.
23.
go back to reference Bernard V. Editorial: a price too high: rethinking nuclear weapons in light of their human cost. Int Rev Red Cross. 2015;97(899):499–506.CrossRef Bernard V. Editorial: a price too high: rethinking nuclear weapons in light of their human cost. Int Rev Red Cross. 2015;97(899):499–506.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Burkle FM Jr, Greenough PG. Impact of public health emergencies on modern disaster taxonomy, planning, and response. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(3):192–9.CrossRefPubMed Burkle FM Jr, Greenough PG. Impact of public health emergencies on modern disaster taxonomy, planning, and response. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(3):192–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Becker SM, Middleton SA. Improving hospital preparedness for radiological terrorism: perspectives from emergency department physicians and nurses. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2:174–84.CrossRefPubMed Becker SM, Middleton SA. Improving hospital preparedness for radiological terrorism: perspectives from emergency department physicians and nurses. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2:174–84.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Jeng J, Gibran N, Peck M. Burn care in disaster and other austere settings. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(4):893–907.CrossRefPubMed Jeng J, Gibran N, Peck M. Burn care in disaster and other austere settings. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(4):893–907.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Raynaud L, Borne M, Coste S, et al. Triage protocol: both undertriage and overtriage need to be evaluated. J Trauma. 2010;69(4):998.CrossRefPubMed Raynaud L, Borne M, Coste S, et al. Triage protocol: both undertriage and overtriage need to be evaluated. J Trauma. 2010;69(4):998.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Leaning JL. Burn and blast casualties: triage in nuclear war. In: Solomon F, Marston RQ, editors. Medical implications of nuclear war. Institute of Medicine (US) steering Committee for the Symposium on the medical implications of nuclear war. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1986. p. 251–83. Leaning JL. Burn and blast casualties: triage in nuclear war. In: Solomon F, Marston RQ, editors. Medical implications of nuclear war. Institute of Medicine (US) steering Committee for the Symposium on the medical implications of nuclear war. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1986. p. 251–83.
30.
go back to reference Kumar P, Jagetia GC. A review of triage and management of victims following a nuclear disaster. Burns. 1994;20(4):397–401.CrossRefPubMed Kumar P, Jagetia GC. A review of triage and management of victims following a nuclear disaster. Burns. 1994;20(4):397–401.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Coleman CN, Koerner JF. Biodosimetry: medicine, science, and systems to support the medical decision-maker following a large scale nuclear or radiation incident. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;172(1–3):38–46.CrossRef Coleman CN, Koerner JF. Biodosimetry: medicine, science, and systems to support the medical decision-maker following a large scale nuclear or radiation incident. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;172(1–3):38–46.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sullivan JM, Prasanna PG, Grace MB, et al. Assessment of biodosimetry methods for a mass-casualty radiological incident: medical response and management considerations. Health Phys. 2013;105(6):540–54.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan JM, Prasanna PG, Grace MB, et al. Assessment of biodosimetry methods for a mass-casualty radiological incident: medical response and management considerations. Health Phys. 2013;105(6):540–54.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Caro JJ, Coleman CN, Knebel A, et al. Unaltered ethical standards for individual physicians in the face of drastically reduced resources resulting from an improvised nuclear device event. J Clin Ethics. 2011;22(1):33–41.PubMed Caro JJ, Coleman CN, Knebel A, et al. Unaltered ethical standards for individual physicians in the face of drastically reduced resources resulting from an improvised nuclear device event. J Clin Ethics. 2011;22(1):33–41.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Kramer KC, Michell MW, Oliviera H, et al. Oral and enteral resuscitation of burn shock the historical record and implications for mass casualty care. (REF: Jeng G, Gibran N, Peck M) Burn Care in Disaster and other austere conditions. Surg Clin N Am. 2014;94:893–907.CrossRef Kramer KC, Michell MW, Oliviera H, et al. Oral and enteral resuscitation of burn shock the historical record and implications for mass casualty care. (REF: Jeng G, Gibran N, Peck M) Burn Care in Disaster and other austere conditions. Surg Clin N Am. 2014;94:893–907.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Joho BS, Lozano D, Pagella P, Wargo M, Amani H. Burn disaster-management planning: a preparedness tool kit. J Burn Care Res. 2014;35(4):e205–16.CrossRefPubMed Joho BS, Lozano D, Pagella P, Wargo M, Amani H. Burn disaster-management planning: a preparedness tool kit. J Burn Care Res. 2014;35(4):e205–16.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Muller P, Lozano D. Control of blood loss in the treatment of a Jehovah's witness with massive thermal injuries using a fibroblast derived temporary skin substitute. Burns. 2004;30(5):483–7.CrossRefPubMed Muller P, Lozano D. Control of blood loss in the treatment of a Jehovah's witness with massive thermal injuries using a fibroblast derived temporary skin substitute. Burns. 2004;30(5):483–7.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Gray DT, Pine RW, Harnar TJ, et al. Early surgical excision versus conventional therapy in patients with 20 to 40 percent burns: a comparative study. Am J Surg. 1982;144(1):76–80.CrossRefPubMed Gray DT, Pine RW, Harnar TJ, et al. Early surgical excision versus conventional therapy in patients with 20 to 40 percent burns: a comparative study. Am J Surg. 1982;144(1):76–80.CrossRefPubMed
38.
39.
go back to reference Kearns RD, Holmes JH 4th, Alson RL, et al. Disaster planning: the past, present, and future concepts and principles of managing a surge of burn injured patients for those involved in hospital facility planning and preparedness. J Burn Care Res. 2014;35(1):e33–42.CrossRefPubMed Kearns RD, Holmes JH 4th, Alson RL, et al. Disaster planning: the past, present, and future concepts and principles of managing a surge of burn injured patients for those involved in hospital facility planning and preparedness. J Burn Care Res. 2014;35(1):e33–42.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Justification for a Nuclear Global Health Workforce: multidisciplinary analysis of risk, survivability & preparedness, with emphasis on the triage management of thermal burns
Authors
Frederick M. Burkle Jr
Tom Potokar
James E. Gosney Jr
Cham Dallas
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Conflict and Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1752-1505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-017-0116-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Conflict and Health 1/2017 Go to the issue