Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Position statement

Principles for consistent value assessment and sustainable funding of orphan drugs in Europe

Authors: Laura Gutierrez, Julien Patris, Adam Hutchings, Warren Cowell

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The European Orphan Medicinal Products (OMP) Regulation has successfully encouraged research to develop treatments for rare diseases resulting in the authorisation of new OMPs in Europe. While decisions on OMP designation and marketing authorisation are made at the European Union level, reimbursement decisions are made at the national level. OMP value and affordability are high priority issues for policymakers and decisions regarding their pricing and funding are highly complex. There is currently no European consensus on how OMP value should be assessed and inequalities of access to OMPs have previously been observed. Against this background, policy makers in many countries are considering reforms to improve access to OMPs. This paper proposes ten principles to be considered when undertaking such reforms, from the perspective of an OMP manufacturer. We recommend the continued prioritisation of rare diseases by policymakers, an increased alignment between payer and regulatory frameworks, pricing centred on OMP value, and mechanisms to ensure long-term financial sustainability allowing a continuous and virtuous development of OMPs. Our recommendations support the development of more consistent frameworks and encourage collaboration between all stakeholders, including research-based industry, payers, clinicians, and patients.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Simoens S, Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, Morel T. Cost-effectiveness assessment of orphan drugs: a scientific and political conundrum. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(1):1–3.CrossRefPubMed Simoens S, Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, Morel T. Cost-effectiveness assessment of orphan drugs: a scientific and political conundrum. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(1):1–3.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Drummond MF, Wilson DA, Kanavos P, Ubel P, Rovira J. Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(1):36–42.CrossRefPubMed Drummond MF, Wilson DA, Kanavos P, Ubel P, Rovira J. Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(1):36–42.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hughes-Wilson W, Palma A, Schuurman A, Simoens S. Paying for the Orphan Drug System: break or bend? Is it time for a new evaluation system for payers in Europe to take account of new rare disease treatments? Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:74.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Hughes-Wilson W, Palma A, Schuurman A, Simoens S. Paying for the Orphan Drug System: break or bend? Is it time for a new evaluation system for payers in Europe to take account of new rare disease treatments? Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:74.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Roos JC, Hyry HI, Cox TM. Orphan drug pricing may warrant a competition law investigation. BMJ. 2010;341:c6471.CrossRefPubMed Roos JC, Hyry HI, Cox TM. Orphan drug pricing may warrant a competition law investigation. BMJ. 2010;341:c6471.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Le Cam Y. Inventory of Access and Prices of orphan drugs across Europe: A collaborative work between National Alliances on Rare diseases & Eurordis. Presentation, Paris. 2010. Le Cam Y. Inventory of Access and Prices of orphan drugs across Europe: A collaborative work between National Alliances on Rare diseases & Eurordis. Presentation, Paris. 2010.
12.
go back to reference Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Simoens S. A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets. Health Policy. 2010;97(2–3):173–9.CrossRefPubMed Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Simoens S. A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets. Health Policy. 2010;97(2–3):173–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Michel M, Toumi M. Access to orphan drugs in Europe: current and future issues. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(1):23–9.CrossRefPubMed Michel M, Toumi M. Access to orphan drugs in Europe: current and future issues. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(1):23–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Garau M, Mestre-Ferrandiz J. Access mechanisms for orphan drugs: a comparative study of selected European countries. OHE Briefing. 2009;52(October):1–24. Garau M, Mestre-Ferrandiz J. Access mechanisms for orphan drugs: a comparative study of selected European countries. OHE Briefing. 2009;52(October):1–24.
18.
go back to reference Davies JE, Neidle S, Taylor DG. Developing and paying for medicines for orphan indications in oncology: utilitarian regulation vs equitable care? Br J Cancer. 2012;106(1):14–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Davies JE, Neidle S, Taylor DG. Developing and paying for medicines for orphan indications in oncology: utilitarian regulation vs equitable care? Br J Cancer. 2012;106(1):14–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hughes DA, Tunnage B, Yeo ST. Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: do they deserve special status for funding? QJM. 2005;98(11):829–36.CrossRefPubMed Hughes DA, Tunnage B, Yeo ST. Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: do they deserve special status for funding? QJM. 2005;98(11):829–36.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Morel T, Arickx F, Befrits G, Siviero P, van der Meijden C, Xoxi E, et al. Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:198.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Morel T, Arickx F, Befrits G, Siviero P, van der Meijden C, Xoxi E, et al. Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:198.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
26.
go back to reference McCabe C, Edlin R, Round J. Economic considerations in the provision of treatments for rare diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;686:211–22.CrossRefPubMed McCabe C, Edlin R, Round J. Economic considerations in the provision of treatments for rare diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;686:211–22.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Drummond MF. Challenges in the economic evaluation of orphan drugs. Eurohealth. 2008;14(2):16–7. Drummond MF. Challenges in the economic evaluation of orphan drugs. Eurohealth. 2008;14(2):16–7.
31.
go back to reference Tambuyzer E. Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(12):921–9.CrossRefPubMed Tambuyzer E. Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(12):921–9.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Mavris M, Le Cam Y. The European Medicines Agency and transparency: The rare disease patients’ perspective. Regulatory Rapporteur. 2014. Mavris M, Le Cam Y. The European Medicines Agency and transparency: The rare disease patients’ perspective. Regulatory Rapporteur. 2014.
35.
go back to reference Mavris M, Le Cam Y. Involvement of patient organisations in research and development of orphan drugs for rare diseases in europe. Mol Syndromol. 2012;3(5):237–43.PubMedCentralPubMed Mavris M, Le Cam Y. Involvement of patient organisations in research and development of orphan drugs for rare diseases in europe. Mol Syndromol. 2012;3(5):237–43.PubMedCentralPubMed
36.
go back to reference Mentzakis E, Stefanowska P, Hurley J. A discrete choice experiment investigating preferences for funding drugs used to treat orphan diseases: an exploratory study. Health Econ Policy Law. 2011;6(3):405–33.CrossRefPubMed Mentzakis E, Stefanowska P, Hurley J. A discrete choice experiment investigating preferences for funding drugs used to treat orphan diseases: an exploratory study. Health Econ Policy Law. 2011;6(3):405–33.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Clarke JT. Is the current approach to reviewing new drugs condemning the victims of rare diseases to death? A call for a national orphan drug review policy. CMAJ. 2006;174(2):189–90.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Clarke JT. Is the current approach to reviewing new drugs condemning the victims of rare diseases to death? A call for a national orphan drug review policy. CMAJ. 2006;174(2):189–90.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
38.
go back to reference Schlander M, Beck M. Expensive drugs for rare disorders: to treat or not to treat? The case of enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis VI. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25(5):1285–93.CrossRefPubMed Schlander M, Beck M. Expensive drugs for rare disorders: to treat or not to treat? The case of enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis VI. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25(5):1285–93.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, Simoens S. Orphan drugs for rare diseases: grounds for special status. Drug Dev Res. 2012;73:115–9.CrossRef Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, Simoens S. Orphan drugs for rare diseases: grounds for special status. Drug Dev Res. 2012;73:115–9.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Sussex J, Rollet P, Garau M, Schmitt C, Kent A, Hutchings A. A pilot study of multicriteria decision analysis for valuing orphan medicines. Value Health. 2013;16(8):1163–9.CrossRefPubMed Sussex J, Rollet P, Garau M, Schmitt C, Kent A, Hutchings A. A pilot study of multicriteria decision analysis for valuing orphan medicines. Value Health. 2013;16(8):1163–9.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Schlander M, Garattini S, Kolominsky-Rabas P, Nord E, Persson U, Postma M, et al. Incremental cost per Quality adjusted life years gained? The need for alternative methods to evaluate medical interventions for ultra rare disorders. Value Health. 2013;16:A324 (abstract CP1).CrossRef Schlander M, Garattini S, Kolominsky-Rabas P, Nord E, Persson U, Postma M, et al. Incremental cost per Quality adjusted life years gained? The need for alternative methods to evaluate medical interventions for ultra rare disorders. Value Health. 2013;16:A324 (abstract CP1).CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Rémuzat C, Toumi M, Falissard B. New drug regulations in France: what are the impacts on market access? Part 2 - impacts on market access and impacts for the pharmaceutical industry. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2013;1:20892. Rémuzat C, Toumi M, Falissard B. New drug regulations in France: what are the impacts on market access? Part 2 - impacts on market access and impacts for the pharmaceutical industry. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2013;1:20892.
46.
go back to reference Simoens S. Market access of orphan drugs and the role of multi-criteria decision making. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7 Suppl 2:A26.PubMedCentral Simoens S. Market access of orphan drugs and the role of multi-criteria decision making. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7 Suppl 2:A26.PubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Irwin J, Peacock S. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: An emerging alternative for assessing the value of orphan medicinal products. Regulatory Rapporteur, vol. 12, No 1. 2015. Irwin J, Peacock S. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: An emerging alternative for assessing the value of orphan medicinal products. Regulatory Rapporteur, vol. 12, No 1. 2015.
49.
go back to reference Kanavos P, Nicod E. What is wrong with orphan drug policies? Suggestions for ways forward. Value Health. 2012;15(8):1182–4.CrossRefPubMed Kanavos P, Nicod E. What is wrong with orphan drug policies? Suggestions for ways forward. Value Health. 2012;15(8):1182–4.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Eichler HG, Oye K, Baird LG, Abadie E, Brown J, Drum CL, et al. Adaptive licensing: taking the next step in the evolution of drug approval. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(3):426–37.CrossRefPubMed Eichler HG, Oye K, Baird LG, Abadie E, Brown J, Drum CL, et al. Adaptive licensing: taking the next step in the evolution of drug approval. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(3):426–37.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Butlen-Ducuing F, Riviere F, Aarum S, Llinares-Garcia J. European Medicines Agency support mechanisms fostering orphan drug development. Drug News Perspect. 2010;23(1):71–81.CrossRefPubMed Butlen-Ducuing F, Riviere F, Aarum S, Llinares-Garcia J. European Medicines Agency support mechanisms fostering orphan drug development. Drug News Perspect. 2010;23(1):71–81.CrossRefPubMed
54.
55.
go back to reference Simoens S, Cassiman D, Dooms M, Picavet E. Orphan drugs for rare diseases: is it time to revisit their special market access status? Drugs. 2012;72(11):1437–43.CrossRefPubMed Simoens S, Cassiman D, Dooms M, Picavet E. Orphan drugs for rare diseases: is it time to revisit their special market access status? Drugs. 2012;72(11):1437–43.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Cheng MM, Ramsey SD, Devine EB, Garrison LP, Bresnahan BW, Veenstra DL. Systematic review of comparative effectiveness data for oncology orphan drugs. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18(1):47–62.PubMed Cheng MM, Ramsey SD, Devine EB, Garrison LP, Bresnahan BW, Veenstra DL. Systematic review of comparative effectiveness data for oncology orphan drugs. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18(1):47–62.PubMed
58.
go back to reference Hutchings A, Schey C, Dutton R, Achana F, Antonov K. Estimating the budget impact of orphan drugs in Sweden and France 2013–2020. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9:22.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Hutchings A, Schey C, Dutton R, Achana F, Antonov K. Estimating the budget impact of orphan drugs in Sweden and France 2013–2020. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9:22.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
59.
go back to reference McCabe C, Tsuchiya A, Claxton K, Raftery J. Orphan drugs revisited. QJM. 2006;99(5):341–5. discussion 50–1.CrossRefPubMed McCabe C, Tsuchiya A, Claxton K, Raftery J. Orphan drugs revisited. QJM. 2006;99(5):341–5. discussion 50–1.CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Simoens S, Dooms M. How much is the life of a cancer patient worth? A pharmaco-economic perspective. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011;36(3):249–56.CrossRefPubMed Simoens S, Dooms M. How much is the life of a cancer patient worth? A pharmaco-economic perspective. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011;36(3):249–56.CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Connock M, Juarez-Garcia A, Frew E, Mans A, Dretzke J, Fry-Smith A, et al. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapies for Fabry’s disease and mucopolysaccharidosis type 1. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10(20):iii–iv. 20.CrossRef Connock M, Juarez-Garcia A, Frew E, Mans A, Dretzke J, Fry-Smith A, et al. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapies for Fabry’s disease and mucopolysaccharidosis type 1. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10(20):iii–iv. 20.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Farrugia A, O’Mahony B, Cassar J. Health technology assessment and haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2012;18(2):152–7.CrossRefPubMed Farrugia A, O’Mahony B, Cassar J. Health technology assessment and haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2012;18(2):152–7.CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Dunoyer M, Rollet P. Value and specificity of rare diseases business model-is the pursuit of this societal priority sustainable? Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7 Suppl 2:A23.CrossRefPubMedCentral Dunoyer M, Rollet P. Value and specificity of rare diseases business model-is the pursuit of this societal priority sustainable? Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7 Suppl 2:A23.CrossRefPubMedCentral
65.
go back to reference Chabot I, Rocchi A. Oncology drug health technology assessment recommendations: Canadian versus UK experiences. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;6:357–67.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Chabot I, Rocchi A. Oncology drug health technology assessment recommendations: Canadian versus UK experiences. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;6:357–67.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
67.
go back to reference Picavet E, Annemans L, Cleemput I, Cassiman D, Simoens S. Market uptake of orphan drugs–a European analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012;37(6):664–7.CrossRefPubMed Picavet E, Annemans L, Cleemput I, Cassiman D, Simoens S. Market uptake of orphan drugs–a European analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012;37(6):664–7.CrossRefPubMed
68.
go back to reference Owen A, Spinks J, Meehan A, Robb T, Hardy M, Kwasha D, et al. A new model to evaluate the long-term cost effectiveness of orphan and highly specialised drugs following listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: the Bosentan Patient Registry. J Med Econ. 2008;11(2):235–43.PubMed Owen A, Spinks J, Meehan A, Robb T, Hardy M, Kwasha D, et al. A new model to evaluate the long-term cost effectiveness of orphan and highly specialised drugs following listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: the Bosentan Patient Registry. J Med Econ. 2008;11(2):235–43.PubMed
72.
go back to reference Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Simoens S. Issues surrounding orphan disease and orphan drug policies in Europe. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(5):343–50.CrossRefPubMed Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Simoens S. Issues surrounding orphan disease and orphan drug policies in Europe. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(5):343–50.CrossRefPubMed
74.
go back to reference Rosenberg-Yunger ZR, Daar AS, Thorsteinsdottir H, Martin DK. Priority setting for orphan drugs: an international comparison. Health Policy. 2011;100(1):25–34.CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg-Yunger ZR, Daar AS, Thorsteinsdottir H, Martin DK. Priority setting for orphan drugs: an international comparison. Health Policy. 2011;100(1):25–34.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Principles for consistent value assessment and sustainable funding of orphan drugs in Europe
Authors
Laura Gutierrez
Julien Patris
Adam Hutchings
Warren Cowell
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-015-0269-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2015 Go to the issue