Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Review

Rare diseases and orphan drugs: Latvian story

Authors: Konstantins Logviss, Dainis Krievins, Santa Purvina

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ten years have passed since Latvia became a Member State of the EU in 2004. As a result European regulations, including those related to rare diseases and orphan drugs, have been applied to Latvian legislative system. Orphan diseases have been recognized as a priority area for action in the public health system, though there are significant differences in the national healthcare services for rare diseases among the EU States. This study aims to determine situation in the field of rare diseases in Latvia and compare it with other European countries.

Methods

We used the national plan for rare diseases, EUCERD reports, Orphanet data, Latvian and European regulations, publicly available data from the state agencies, and directly contacted drug manufacturers and wholesalers.

Results

National plan for rare diseases was developed and approved in 2013. Although there are no official designated centers of expertise as well as no specific register for rare diseases. Newborns are screened for only two disorders: phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism. Currently 34 orphan drugs are available on Latvian market. Three medicines (8.8%) are included in the reimbursement drug list, all indicated for Ph + CML. 15 drugs (44.1%) were reimbursed within the framework of individual reimbursement system, and five drugs (14.7%) were provided within the program of medicinal treatment of rare diseases in children.

Conclusions

Majority of orphan drugs authorized in the EU are not available in Latvia, moreover those drugs that are available are often not accessible because they are insufficiently reimbursed. Besides, approval of the national plan might be an important step towards improving situation in the field of rare diseases.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions on Rare Diseases: Europe’s challenges. 2008, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions on Rare Diseases: Europe’s challenges. 2008, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
14.
go back to reference Statistics on the number of patients by region, types of localization, gender and age groups from 2009 to 2012. Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Updated 22.07.2013. Available from http://www.spkc.gov.lv/veselibas-aprupes-statistika/. Accessed 17.04.2014, [http://www.spkc.gov.lv/veselibas-aprupes-statistika/] Statistics on the number of patients by region, types of localization, gender and age groups from 2009 to 2012. Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Updated 22.07.2013. Available from http://​www.​spkc.​gov.​lv/​veselibas-aprupes-statistika/​.​ Accessed 17.04.2014, [http://​www.​spkc.​gov.​lv/​veselibas-aprupes-statistika/​]
15.
go back to reference Gatta G, van der Zwan JM, Casali PG, Siesling S, Dei Tos AP, Kunkler I, Otter R, Licitra L, Mallone S, Tavilla A, Trama A, Capocaccia R: Rare cancers are not so rare: The rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer. 2011, 47 (17): 2493-2511. 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.08.008.CrossRefPubMed Gatta G, van der Zwan JM, Casali PG, Siesling S, Dei Tos AP, Kunkler I, Otter R, Licitra L, Mallone S, Tavilla A, Trama A, Capocaccia R: Rare cancers are not so rare: The rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer. 2011, 47 (17): 2493-2511. 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.08.008.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Aymé S, Rodwell C: 2012 Report on the State of the Art of Rare Disease Activities in Europe of the European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases. 2012, Available from http://www.eucerd.eu/?post_type=document&p=1501. Accessed 29.01.2014, [http://www.eucerd.eu/?post_type=document&p=1501] Aymé S, Rodwell C: 2012 Report on the State of the Art of Rare Disease Activities in Europe of the European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases. 2012, Available from http://​www.​eucerd.​eu/​?​post_​type=​document&​p=​1501.​ Accessed 29.01.2014, [http://​www.​eucerd.​eu/​?​post_​type=​document&​p=​1501]
21.
go back to reference Inventory of Community and Member States’ incentive measures to aid the research, marketing, development and availability of orphan medicinal products. 2005 revision: 16-17. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/orphanmp/doc/inventory_2006_08_en.pdf. Accessed 29.01.2014, [http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/orphanmp/doc/inventory_2006_08_en.pdf] Inventory of Community and Member States’ incentive measures to aid the research, marketing, development and availability of orphan medicinal products. 2005 revision: 16-17. Available from http://​ec.​europa.​eu/​health/​files/​orphanmp/​doc/​inventory_​2006_​08_​en.​pdf.​ Accessed 29.01.2014, [http://​ec.​europa.​eu/​health/​files/​orphanmp/​doc/​inventory_​2006_​08_​en.​pdf]
23.
go back to reference Order of reimbursement of medicines and medical devices for outpatient treatment. In 2006, Riga, Version of 01.01.2014. Available from http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=147522. Accessed 29.01.2014, [http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=147522] Order of reimbursement of medicines and medical devices for outpatient treatment. In 2006, Riga, Version of 01.01.2014. Available from http://​likumi.​lv/​doc.​php?​id=​147522.​ Accessed 29.01.2014, [http://​likumi.​lv/​doc.​php?​id=​147522]
24.
go back to reference Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Simoens S: A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets. Health Policy. 2010, 97: 173-179. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.017.CrossRefPubMed Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Simoens S: A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets. Health Policy. 2010, 97: 173-179. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.017.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Iskrov G, Miteva-Katrandzhieva T, Stefanov R: Challenges to orphan drugs access in Eastern Europe: The case of Bulgaria. Health Policy. 2012, 108: 10-18. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.013.CrossRefPubMed Iskrov G, Miteva-Katrandzhieva T, Stefanov R: Challenges to orphan drugs access in Eastern Europe: The case of Bulgaria. Health Policy. 2012, 108: 10-18. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.013.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Pavlović N, Stanimirov B, Stojančević M, Paut-Kusturica M, Stoimenova A, Goločorbin-Kon S, Mikov M: An insight on differences in availability and reimbursement of orphan medicines among Serbia, Bulgaria and Sweden. Biotechnol Biotec Eq. 2012, 26 (5): 3236-3241. 10.5504/BBEQ.2012.0085.CrossRef Pavlović N, Stanimirov B, Stojančević M, Paut-Kusturica M, Stoimenova A, Goločorbin-Kon S, Mikov M: An insight on differences in availability and reimbursement of orphan medicines among Serbia, Bulgaria and Sweden. Biotechnol Biotec Eq. 2012, 26 (5): 3236-3241. 10.5504/BBEQ.2012.0085.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Michel M, Toumi M: Access to orphan drugs in Europe: current and future issues. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012, 12 (1): 23-29. 10.1586/erp.11.95.CrossRefPubMed Michel M, Toumi M: Access to orphan drugs in Europe: current and future issues. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012, 12 (1): 23-29. 10.1586/erp.11.95.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Spokiene I: Legal assessment of current situation on orphan patients in Lithuania. Medicina (Kaunas). 2008, 44 (8): 571-576. Spokiene I: Legal assessment of current situation on orphan patients in Lithuania. Medicina (Kaunas). 2008, 44 (8): 571-576.
32.
go back to reference Drummond MF, Wilson DA, Kanavos P, Ubel P, Rovira J: Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007, 23 (1): 36-42. 10.1017/S0266462307051550.CrossRefPubMed Drummond MF, Wilson DA, Kanavos P, Ubel P, Rovira J: Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007, 23 (1): 36-42. 10.1017/S0266462307051550.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, Simoens S: Drugs for rare diseases: influence of orphan designation status on price. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011, 9 (4): 275-279. 10.2165/11590170-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMed Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, Simoens S: Drugs for rare diseases: influence of orphan designation status on price. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011, 9 (4): 275-279. 10.2165/11590170-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMed
34.
35.
go back to reference Boon W, Moors E: Exploring emerging technologies using metaphors–a study of orphan drugs and pharmacogenomics. Soc Sci Med. 2008, 66: 1915-1927. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.012.CrossRefPubMed Boon W, Moors E: Exploring emerging technologies using metaphors–a study of orphan drugs and pharmacogenomics. Soc Sci Med. 2008, 66: 1915-1927. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.012.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Schey C, Milanova T, Hutchings A: Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe: 2010–2020. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011, 6: 62-10.1186/1750-1172-6-62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schey C, Milanova T, Hutchings A: Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe: 2010–2020. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011, 6: 62-10.1186/1750-1172-6-62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Simoens S: Budget impact analysis of orphan drugs in Belgium: estimates from 2008 to 2013. J Med Econ. 2010, 13 (2): 295-301. 10.3111/13696998.2010.491427.CrossRefPubMed Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Simoens S: Budget impact analysis of orphan drugs in Belgium: estimates from 2008 to 2013. J Med Econ. 2010, 13 (2): 295-301. 10.3111/13696998.2010.491427.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Orofino J, Soto J, Casado MA, Oyagüez I: Global spending on orphan drugs in France, Germany, the UK, Italy and Spain during 2007. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010, 8 (5): 301-315. 10.2165/11531880-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMed Orofino J, Soto J, Casado MA, Oyagüez I: Global spending on orphan drugs in France, Germany, the UK, Italy and Spain during 2007. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010, 8 (5): 301-315. 10.2165/11531880-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Hutchings A, Schey C, Dutton R, Achana F, Antonov K: Estimating the budget impact of orphan drugs in Sweden and France 2013–2020. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014, 9: 22-10.1186/1750-1172-9-22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hutchings A, Schey C, Dutton R, Achana F, Antonov K: Estimating the budget impact of orphan drugs in Sweden and France 2013–2020. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014, 9: 22-10.1186/1750-1172-9-22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Picavet E, Annemans L, Cleemput I, Cassiman D, Simoens S: Market uptake of orphan drugs – a European analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012, 37: 664-667. 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01364.x.CrossRefPubMed Picavet E, Annemans L, Cleemput I, Cassiman D, Simoens S: Market uptake of orphan drugs – a European analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012, 37: 664-667. 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01364.x.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Rare diseases and orphan drugs: Latvian story
Authors
Konstantins Logviss
Dainis Krievins
Santa Purvina
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-014-0147-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2014 Go to the issue