Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Ultrasonic cartilage thickness measurement is accurate, reproducible, and reliable—validation study using contrast-enhanced micro-CT

Authors: Simon Damian Steppacher, Markus Simon Hanke, Corinne Andrea Zurmühle, Pascal Cyrill Haefeli, Frank Michael Klenke, Moritz Tannast

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ultrasonography is a fast and patient-friendly modality to assess cartilage thickness. However, inconsistent results regarding accuracy have been reported. Therefore, we asked what are (1) the accuracy, (2) reproducibility, and (3) reliability of ultrasonographic cartilage thickness measurement using contrast-enhanced micro-CT for validation?

Methods

A series of 50 cartilage–bone plugs were harvested from fresh bovine and porcine joints. Ultrasonic cartilage thickness was determined using an A-mode, 20-MHz hand-held ultrasonic probe with native (1580 m/s) and adjusted speed of sound (1696 m/s). All measurements were performed by two observers at two different occasions. Angle of insonation was controlled by tilting the device and recording minimal thickness. Retrieval of exact location for measurement was facilitated by aligning the circular design of both cartilage–bone plug and ultrasonic device. There was no soft tissue interference between cartilage surface and ultrasonic probe. Ground truth measurement was performed using micro-CT with iodine contrast agent and a voxel size of 16 μm. The mean cartilage thickness was 1.383 ± 0.402 mm (range, 0.588–2.460 mm).

Results

Mean accuracy was 0.074 ± 0.061 mm (0.002–0.256 mm) for native and 0.093 ± 0.098 mm (0.000–0.401 mm) for adjusted speed of sound. Bland–Altman analysis showed no systematic error. High correlation was found for native and adjusted speed of sound with contrast-enhanced micro-CT (both r = 0.973; p < 0.001). A perfect agreement for reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.992 and 0.994) and reliability (ICC 0.993, 95% confidence interval 0.990–0.995) was found.

Conclusions

Ultrasonic cartilage thickness measurement could be shown to be highly accurate, reliable, and reproducible. The A-mode ultrasonic cartilage thickness measurement is a fast and patient-friendly modality which can detect early joint degeneration and facilitate decision making in joint preserving surgery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. 1961. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;389:5–8. Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. 1961. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;389:5–8.
2.
go back to reference Hayashi D, Guermazi A, Crema MD, Roemer FW. Imaging in osteoarthritis: what have we learned and where are we going. Minerva Med. 2011;102:15–32.PubMed Hayashi D, Guermazi A, Crema MD, Roemer FW. Imaging in osteoarthritis: what have we learned and where are we going. Minerva Med. 2011;102:15–32.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Torp-Pedersen S, Bartels EM, Wilhjelm J, Bliddal H. Articular cartilage thickness measured with US is not as easy as it appears: a systematic review of measurement techniques and image interpretation. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32:54–61.CrossRef Torp-Pedersen S, Bartels EM, Wilhjelm J, Bliddal H. Articular cartilage thickness measured with US is not as easy as it appears: a systematic review of measurement techniques and image interpretation. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32:54–61.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jurvelin JS, Rasanen T, Kolmonen P, Lyyra T. Comparison of optical, needle probe and ultrasonic techniques for the measurement of articular cartilage thickness. J Biomech. 1995;28:231–5.CrossRef Jurvelin JS, Rasanen T, Kolmonen P, Lyyra T. Comparison of optical, needle probe and ultrasonic techniques for the measurement of articular cartilage thickness. J Biomech. 1995;28:231–5.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ohashi S, Ohnishi I, Matsumoto T, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of articular cartilage thickness measurement by B-mode ultrasonography with conventional imaging and real-time spatial compound ultrasonography imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:324–34.CrossRef Ohashi S, Ohnishi I, Matsumoto T, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of articular cartilage thickness measurement by B-mode ultrasonography with conventional imaging and real-time spatial compound ultrasonography imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:324–34.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ohashi S, Ohnishi I, Matsumoto T, et al. Measurement of articular cartilage thickness using a three-dimensional image reconstructed from B-mode ultrasonography mechanical scans feasibility study by comparison with MRI-derived data. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:402–11.CrossRef Ohashi S, Ohnishi I, Matsumoto T, et al. Measurement of articular cartilage thickness using a three-dimensional image reconstructed from B-mode ultrasonography mechanical scans feasibility study by comparison with MRI-derived data. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:402–11.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mandl P, Supp G, Baksa G, et al. Relationship between radiographic joint space narrowing, sonographic cartilage thickness and anatomy in rheumatoid arthritis and control joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:2022–7.CrossRef Mandl P, Supp G, Baksa G, et al. Relationship between radiographic joint space narrowing, sonographic cartilage thickness and anatomy in rheumatoid arthritis and control joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:2022–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tarhan S, Unlu Z. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonographic evaluation of the patients with knee osteoarthritis: a comparative study. Clin Rheumatol. 2003;22:181–8.CrossRef Tarhan S, Unlu Z. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonographic evaluation of the patients with knee osteoarthritis: a comparative study. Clin Rheumatol. 2003;22:181–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yao JQ, Seedhom BB. Ultrasonic measurement of the thickness of human articular cartilage in situ. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38:1269–71.CrossRef Yao JQ, Seedhom BB. Ultrasonic measurement of the thickness of human articular cartilage in situ. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38:1269–71.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yoon CH, Kim HS, Ju JH, Jee WH, Park SH, Kim HY. Validity of the sonographic longitudinal sagittal image for assessment of the cartilage thickness in the knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:1507–16.CrossRef Yoon CH, Kim HS, Ju JH, Jee WH, Park SH, Kim HY. Validity of the sonographic longitudinal sagittal image for assessment of the cartilage thickness in the knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:1507–16.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pradsgaard DØ, Fiirgaard B, Spannow AH, Heuck C, Herlin T. Cartilage thickness of the knee joint in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: comparative assessment by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol. 2015;42:534–40.CrossRef Pradsgaard DØ, Fiirgaard B, Spannow AH, Heuck C, Herlin T. Cartilage thickness of the knee joint in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: comparative assessment by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol. 2015;42:534–40.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Patil SG, Zheng YP, Wu JY, Shi J. Measurement of depth-dependence and anisotropy of ultrasound speed of bovine articular cartilage in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004;30:953–63.CrossRef Patil SG, Zheng YP, Wu JY, Shi J. Measurement of depth-dependence and anisotropy of ultrasound speed of bovine articular cartilage in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004;30:953–63.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Evans JD. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole; 1996. Evans JD. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole; 1996.
15.
go back to reference Montgomery AA, Graham A, Evans PH, Fahey T. Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference. BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2:8–11.CrossRef Montgomery AA, Graham A, Evans PH, Fahey T. Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference. BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2:8–11.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Patil SG, Zheng YP, Chen X. Site dependence of thickness and speed of sound in articular cartilage of bovine patella. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:1345–52.CrossRef Patil SG, Zheng YP, Chen X. Site dependence of thickness and speed of sound in articular cartilage of bovine patella. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:1345–52.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Aula AS, Töyräs J, Tiitu V, Jurvelin JS. Simultaneous ultrasound measurement of articular cartilage and subchondral bone. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18:1570–6.CrossRef Aula AS, Töyräs J, Tiitu V, Jurvelin JS. Simultaneous ultrasound measurement of articular cartilage and subchondral bone. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18:1570–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ostergaard M, Stoltenberg M, Gideon P, et al. Effect of intraarticular osmic acid on synovial membrane volume and inflammation, determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Scand J Rheumatol. 1995;24:5–12.CrossRef Ostergaard M, Stoltenberg M, Gideon P, et al. Effect of intraarticular osmic acid on synovial membrane volume and inflammation, determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Scand J Rheumatol. 1995;24:5–12.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chérin E, Saïed A, Pellaumail B, et al. Assessment of rat articular cartilage maturation using 50-MHz quantitative ultrasonography. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2001;9:178–86.CrossRef Chérin E, Saïed A, Pellaumail B, et al. Assessment of rat articular cartilage maturation using 50-MHz quantitative ultrasonography. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2001;9:178–86.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Töyräs J, Nieminen HJ, Laasanen MS, et al. Ultrasonic characterization of articular cartilage. Biorheology. 2002;39:161–9.PubMed Töyräs J, Nieminen HJ, Laasanen MS, et al. Ultrasonic characterization of articular cartilage. Biorheology. 2002;39:161–9.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Aisen AM, McCune WJ, MacGuire A, et al. Sonographic evaluation of the cartilage of the knee. Radiology. 1984;153:781–4.CrossRef Aisen AM, McCune WJ, MacGuire A, et al. Sonographic evaluation of the cartilage of the knee. Radiology. 1984;153:781–4.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Martino F, Ettorre GC, Angelelli G, et al. Validity of echographic evaluation of cartilage in gonarthrosis. Preliminary report. Clin Rheumatol. 1993;12:178–83.CrossRef Martino F, Ettorre GC, Angelelli G, et al. Validity of echographic evaluation of cartilage in gonarthrosis. Preliminary report. Clin Rheumatol. 1993;12:178–83.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bevers K, Zweers MC, van den Ende CH, et al. Ultrasonographic analysis in knee osteoarthritis: evaluation of inter-observer reliability. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30:673–8.PubMed Bevers K, Zweers MC, van den Ende CH, et al. Ultrasonographic analysis in knee osteoarthritis: evaluation of inter-observer reliability. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30:673–8.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Naredo E, Acebes C, Moller I, et al. Ultrasound validity in the measurement of knee cartilage thickness. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1322–7.CrossRef Naredo E, Acebes C, Moller I, et al. Ultrasound validity in the measurement of knee cartilage thickness. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1322–7.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Modest VE, Murphy MC, Mann RW. Optical verification of a technique for in situ ultrasonic measurement of articular cartilage thickness. J Biomech. 1989;22:171–6.CrossRef Modest VE, Murphy MC, Mann RW. Optical verification of a technique for in situ ultrasonic measurement of articular cartilage thickness. J Biomech. 1989;22:171–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Pellaumail B, Watrin A, Loeuille D, et al. Effect of articular cartilage proteoglycan depletion on high frequency ultrasound backscatter. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2002;10:535–41.CrossRef Pellaumail B, Watrin A, Loeuille D, et al. Effect of articular cartilage proteoglycan depletion on high frequency ultrasound backscatter. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2002;10:535–41.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mathiesen O, Konradsen L, Torp-Pedersen S, Jørgensen U. Ultrasonography and articular cartilage defects in the knee: an in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of cartilage thickness and defect size assessment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12:440–3.CrossRef Mathiesen O, Konradsen L, Torp-Pedersen S, Jørgensen U. Ultrasonography and articular cartilage defects in the knee: an in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of cartilage thickness and defect size assessment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12:440–3.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Spannow AH, Stenboeg E, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, et al. Ultrasound and MRI measurements of joint cartilage in healthy children: a validation study. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32(Suppl 1):S110.PubMed Spannow AH, Stenboeg E, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, et al. Ultrasound and MRI measurements of joint cartilage in healthy children: a validation study. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32(Suppl 1):S110.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Ultrasonic cartilage thickness measurement is accurate, reproducible, and reliable—validation study using contrast-enhanced micro-CT
Authors
Simon Damian Steppacher
Markus Simon Hanke
Corinne Andrea Zurmühle
Pascal Cyrill Haefeli
Frank Michael Klenke
Moritz Tannast
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1099-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2019 Go to the issue