Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Clinical outcomes and structural integrity of C-shaped rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair: comparison with crescent-shaped tears

Authors: Wonyong Lee, Sung-Jae Kim, Chong-Hyuk Choi, Yun-Rak Choi, Yong-Min Chun

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We aimed to describe a new C-shaped tear configuration, and to compare clinical outcomes and structural integrity between the C-shaped and the established crescent-shaped small to medium-sized rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair.

Methods

This retrospective study included 102 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair in a single-row fashion for small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears of either C or crescent shape from March 2009 to June 2014. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and active range of motion (ROM) were evaluated for functional outcomes. Postoperative magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) or computed tomographic arthrography (CTA) was performed 6 months postoperatively to assess structural integrity.

Results

After 2 years of follow-up, both groups showed no significant difference in VAS pain score, functional scores, or ROM, although the C-shaped tear group exhibited significantly inferior outcomes 3 months after surgery. There was no significant difference in the re-tear rate on follow-up MRA and CTA between groups A and B (24.4 vs. 19.7%, respectively; p = 0.570). The postoperative stiffness rate was significantly higher in the C-shaped tear group than that in crescent-shaped tear group only at 3-month follow-up point after surgery (26.8 vs. 9.8%, respectively; p = 0.024).

Conclusions

Contrary to our hypothesis, there were no significant differences in functional outcomes and structural integrity between C-shaped and crescent-shaped small- to medium-sized tears 2 years after arthroscopic repair. However, C-shaped tears exhibited significantly worse clinical outcomes, including a higher postoperative stiffness rate than crescent-shaped tears in the early postoperative period at the 3-month follow-up point.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ellman H. Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(254):64–74. Ellman H. Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(254):64–74.
2.
go back to reference Davidson J, Burkhart SS. The geometric classification of rotator cuff tears: a system linking tear pattern to treatment and prognosis. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:417–24.CrossRefPubMed Davidson J, Burkhart SS. The geometric classification of rotator cuff tears: a system linking tear pattern to treatment and prognosis. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:417–24.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference DeOrio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:563–7.CrossRefPubMed DeOrio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:563–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Park JS, Park HJ, Kim SH, et al. Prognostic factors affecting rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic repair in small to medium-sized tears. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2386–92.CrossRefPubMed Park JS, Park HJ, Kim SH, et al. Prognostic factors affecting rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic repair in small to medium-sized tears. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2386–92.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim SJ, Jung M, Lee JH, et al. Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears: in-continuity technique vs. disruption of subscapularis-supraspinatus tear margin: comparison of clinical outcomes and structural integrity between the two techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:2056–61.CrossRefPubMed Kim SJ, Jung M, Lee JH, et al. Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears: in-continuity technique vs. disruption of subscapularis-supraspinatus tear margin: comparison of clinical outcomes and structural integrity between the two techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:2056–61.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Flurin PH, Landreau P, Gregory T, et al. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness cuff tears: a multicentric retrospective study of 576 cases with anatomical assessment. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2005;91:31–42.CrossRefPubMed Flurin PH, Landreau P, Gregory T, et al. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness cuff tears: a multicentric retrospective study of 576 cases with anatomical assessment. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2005;91:31–42.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chung SW, Huong CB, Kim SH, et al. Shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair: risk factors and influence on outcome. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:290–300.CrossRefPubMed Chung SW, Huong CB, Kim SH, et al. Shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair: risk factors and influence on outcome. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:290–300.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Brislin KJ, Field LD, Savoie FH 3rd. Complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:124–8.CrossRefPubMed Brislin KJ, Field LD, Savoie FH 3rd. Complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:124–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Shin SJ, Do NH, Lee J, et al. Efficacy of a subacromial corticosteroid injection for persistent pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2231–6.CrossRefPubMed Shin SJ, Do NH, Lee J, et al. Efficacy of a subacromial corticosteroid injection for persistent pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2231–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Huberty DP, Schoolfield JD, Brady PC, et al. Incidence and treatment of postoperative stiffness following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:880–90.CrossRefPubMed Huberty DP, Schoolfield JD, Brady PC, et al. Incidence and treatment of postoperative stiffness following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:880–90.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Franceschi F, Papalia R, Vasta S, et al. Surgical management of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:494–501.CrossRefPubMed Franceschi F, Papalia R, Vasta S, et al. Surgical management of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:494–501.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mansat P, Cofield RH, Kersten TE, et al. Complications of rotator cuff repair. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997;28:205–13.CrossRefPubMed Mansat P, Cofield RH, Kersten TE, et al. Complications of rotator cuff repair. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997;28:205–13.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Longo UG, Lamberti A, Khan WS, et al. Synthetic augmentation for massive rotator cuff tears. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011;19:360–5.CrossRefPubMed Longo UG, Lamberti A, Khan WS, et al. Synthetic augmentation for massive rotator cuff tears. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011;19:360–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mall NA, Tanaka MJ, Choi LS, et al. Factors affecting rotator cuff healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:778–88.CrossRefPubMed Mall NA, Tanaka MJ, Choi LS, et al. Factors affecting rotator cuff healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:778–88.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Le BT, Wu XL, Lam PH, et al. Factors predicting rotator cuff retears: an analysis of 1000 consecutive rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1134–42.CrossRefPubMed Le BT, Wu XL, Lam PH, et al. Factors predicting rotator cuff retears: an analysis of 1000 consecutive rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1134–42.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Park JS, McGarry MH, Campbell ST, et al. The optimum tension for bridging sutures in transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair: a cadaveric biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2118–25.CrossRefPubMed Park JS, McGarry MH, Campbell ST, et al. The optimum tension for bridging sutures in transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair: a cadaveric biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2118–25.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Howe C, Huber P, Wolf FM, et al. Differential suture loading in an experimental rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:324–9.CrossRefPubMed Howe C, Huber P, Wolf FM, et al. Differential suture loading in an experimental rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:324–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Davidson PA, Rivenburgh DW. Rotator cuff repair tension as a determinant of functional outcome. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2000;9:502–6.CrossRef Davidson PA, Rivenburgh DW. Rotator cuff repair tension as a determinant of functional outcome. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2000;9:502–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cho NS, Rhee YG. The factors affecting the clinical outcome and integrity of arthroscopically repaired rotator cuff tears of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009;1:96–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cho NS, Rhee YG. The factors affecting the clinical outcome and integrity of arthroscopically repaired rotator cuff tears of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009;1:96–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Vavken P, Sadoghi P, Palmer M, et al. Platelet-rich plasma reduces retear rates after arthroscopic repair of small-and medium-sized rotator cuff tears but is not cost-effective. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:3071–6.CrossRefPubMed Vavken P, Sadoghi P, Palmer M, et al. Platelet-rich plasma reduces retear rates after arthroscopic repair of small-and medium-sized rotator cuff tears but is not cost-effective. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:3071–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical outcomes and structural integrity of C-shaped rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair: comparison with crescent-shaped tears
Authors
Wonyong Lee
Sung-Jae Kim
Chong-Hyuk Choi
Yun-Rak Choi
Yong-Min Chun
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0863-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2018 Go to the issue