Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiation Oncology 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Radiotherapy | Research

Per-fraction positional and dosimetric performance of prone breast tangential radiotherapy on Halcyon™ linear accelerator assessed with daily rapid kilo-voltage cone beam computed tomography: a single-institution pilot study

Authors: Suk W. Yoon, Neil K. Taunk, Gary M. Freedman, Emily Hubley, Shannon O’Reilly, Boon- Keng K. Teo, Shibu Anamalayil, Lei Dong, Christopher Kennedy, Wei Zou, James M. Metz, Taoran Li

Published in: Radiation Oncology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study investigates daily breast geometry and delivered dose to prone-positioned patients undergoing tangential whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) on an O-ring linear accelerator with 6X flattening filter free mode (6X-FFF), planned with electronic compensation (ECOMP) method. Most practices rely on skin marks or daily planar image matching for prone breast WBRT. This system provides low dose daily CBCT, which was used to study daily robustness of delivered dose parameters for prone-positioned WBRT.

Methods

Eight patients treated with 16-fraction prone-breast WBRT were retrospectively studied. Planning CTs were deformed to daily CBCT to generate daily synthetic CTs, on which delivered dose distributions were calculated. A total of 8 × 16 = 128 synthetic CTs were generated. Consensus ASTRO definition was used to contour Breast PTV Eval for each daily deformed CT. Breast PTV Eval coverage (V90%) and hotspot (V105% and Dmax) were monitored daily to compare prescription dose with daily delivered dose. Various predictors including patient weight, breast width diameter (BWD), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) were fit into an analysis of covariance model predicting V90% and V105% deviation from prescribed (ΔV90%, ΔV105%). Statistical significance is indicated with asterisks (* for p < 0.05; ** for p < 0.001).

Results

Daily delivered Breast PTV Eval V90% was moderately smaller than prescribed (median ΔV90% = − 0.1%*), while V105% was much larger (median ΔV105% = + 10.1%** or + 92.4 cc**). Patient’s weight loss correlated with significantly increased ΔV105% (+ 4.6%/ − 1% weight, R2 = 0.4**) and moderately decreased ΔV90% (− 0.071%/ − 1% wt., R2 = 0.2**). Comprehensive ANCOVA models indicated three factors affect ΔV90% and ΔV105% the most: (1) BWD decrease (− 0.09%* and + 10%**/ − 1 cm respectively), (2) PTV Eval volume decrease (− 0.4%** and + 9%**/ − 100 cc), and for ΔV105% only, (3) the extent of breast deformation (+ 10%**/ − 0.01 DSC). Breast PTV Eval volume also decreased with time (− 2.21*cc/fx), possibly indicating seroma resolution and increase in V105% over time.

Conclusions

Daily CBCT revealed key delivered dose parameters vary significantly for patients undergoing tangential prone breast WBRT planned with ECOMP using 6X-FFF. Patient weight, BWD, and breast shape deformation could be used to predict dosimetric variations from prescribed. Preliminary findings suggest an adaptive plan based on daily CBCT could reduce excessive dose to the breast.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Fisher B, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:822–8.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:822–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Agarwal S, Pappas L, Neumayer L, Kokeny K, Agarwal J. Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease-specific survival for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:267–74.CrossRefPubMed Agarwal S, Pappas L, Neumayer L, Kokeny K, Agarwal J. Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease-specific survival for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:267–74.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Morrow NV, Stepaniak C, White J, Wilson JF, Li XA. Intra- and interfractional variations for prone breast irradiation: an indication for image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:910–7.CrossRefPubMed Morrow NV, Stepaniak C, White J, Wilson JF, Li XA. Intra- and interfractional variations for prone breast irradiation: an indication for image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:910–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Batumalai V, Phan P, Choong C, Holloway L, Delaney GP. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different image assessment methods for tangential breast radiotherapy. J Med Radiat Sci. 2016;63:224–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Batumalai V, Phan P, Choong C, Holloway L, Delaney GP. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different image assessment methods for tangential breast radiotherapy. J Med Radiat Sci. 2016;63:224–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Topolnjak R, et al. Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78:1235–43.CrossRefPubMed Topolnjak R, et al. Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78:1235–43.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Michiels S, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy of head-and-neck cancer on a fast-rotating O-ring linac: plan quality and delivery time comparison with a C-arm linac. Radiother Oncol. 2018;128:479–84.CrossRefPubMed Michiels S, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy of head-and-neck cancer on a fast-rotating O-ring linac: plan quality and delivery time comparison with a C-arm linac. Radiother Oncol. 2018;128:479–84.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barsky AR, et al. Initial clinical experience treating patients with breast cancer on a 6-MV flattening-filter-free O-ring linear accelerator. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019;4:571–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barsky AR, et al. Initial clinical experience treating patients with breast cancer on a 6-MV flattening-filter-free O-ring linear accelerator. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019;4:571–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Cai B, et al. Characterization of a prototype rapid kilovoltage x-ray image guidance system designed for a ring shape radiation therapy unit. Med Phys. 2019;46:1355–70.CrossRefPubMed Cai B, et al. Characterization of a prototype rapid kilovoltage x-ray image guidance system designed for a ring shape radiation therapy unit. Med Phys. 2019;46:1355–70.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Smith BD, et al. Radiation therapy for the whole breast: executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018;8:145–52.CrossRefPubMed Smith BD, et al. Radiation therapy for the whole breast: executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018;8:145–52.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hymas RV, et al. Dosimetric predictors of toxicity and cosmesis in women treated with hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2014;90:S270–1.CrossRef Hymas RV, et al. Dosimetric predictors of toxicity and cosmesis in women treated with hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2014;90:S270–1.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Freedman GM, White JR, Arthur DW, Allen Li X, Vicini FA. Accelerated fractionation with a concurrent boost for early stage breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2013;106:15–20.CrossRefPubMed Freedman GM, White JR, Arthur DW, Allen Li X, Vicini FA. Accelerated fractionation with a concurrent boost for early stage breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2013;106:15–20.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference White, J. et al. Breast cancer atlas for radiation therapy planning: consensus definitions. White, J. et al. Breast cancer atlas for radiation therapy planning: consensus definitions.
17.
go back to reference Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57:289–300. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57:289–300.
18.
go back to reference Jozsef G, Dewyngaert JK, Becker SJ, Lymberis S, Formenti SC. Prospective study of cone-beam computed tomography image-guided radiotherapy for prone accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:568–74.CrossRefPubMed Jozsef G, Dewyngaert JK, Becker SJ, Lymberis S, Formenti SC. Prospective study of cone-beam computed tomography image-guided radiotherapy for prone accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:568–74.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Per-fraction positional and dosimetric performance of prone breast tangential radiotherapy on Halcyon™ linear accelerator assessed with daily rapid kilo-voltage cone beam computed tomography: a single-institution pilot study
Authors
Suk W. Yoon
Neil K. Taunk
Gary M. Freedman
Emily Hubley
Shannon O’Reilly
Boon- Keng K. Teo
Shibu Anamalayil
Lei Dong
Christopher Kennedy
Wei Zou
James M. Metz
Taoran Li
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Radiotherapy
Published in
Radiation Oncology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1748-717X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01700-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Radiation Oncology 1/2020 Go to the issue