Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiation Oncology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Radiation oncology resident training in patient safety and quality improvement: a national survey of residency program directors

Authors: Matthew B. Spraker, Matthew J. Nyflot, Kristi R. G. Hendrickson, Stephanie Terezakis, Shannon E. Fogh, Gabrielle M. Kane, Eric C. Ford, Jing Zeng

Published in: Radiation Oncology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Physicians and physicists are expected to contribute to patient safety and quality improvement (QI) in Radiation Oncology (RO), but prior studies suggest that training for this may be inadequate. RO and medical physics (MP) program directors (PDs) were surveyed to better understand the current patient safety/QI training in their residency programs.

Methods

PDs were surveyed via email in January 2017. Survey questions inquired about current training, curriculum elements, and barriers to development and/or improvement of safety and QI training.

Results

Eighty-nine RO PDs and 84 MP PDs were surveyed, and 21 RO PDs (28%) and 31 MP PDs (37%) responded. Both RO and MP PDs had favorable opinions of current safety and QI training, and used a range of resources for program development, especially safety and QI publications. Various curriculum elements were reported. Curriculum elements used by RO and MP PDs were similar, except RO were more likely than MP PDs to implement morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference (72% vs. 45%, p < 0.05). RO and MP PDs similarly cited various barriers, but RO PDs were more likely to cite lack of experience than MP PDs (40% vs. 16%, p < 0.05). PDs responded similarly independent of whether they reported using a departmental incident learning system (ILS) or not.

Conclusions

PDs view patient safety/QI as an important part of resident education. Most PDs agreed that residents are adequately exposed to patient safety/QI and prepared to meet the patient safety/QI expectations of clinical practice. This conflicts with other independent studies that indicate a majority of residents feel their patient safety/QI training is inadequate and lacks formal exposure to QI tools.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Marks LB, et al. The need for physician leadership in creating a culture of safety. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(5):1287–9.CrossRef Marks LB, et al. The need for physician leadership in creating a culture of safety. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(5):1287–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Marks LB, et al. The impact of advanced technologies on treatment deviations in radiation treatment delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69(5):1579–86.CrossRef Marks LB, et al. The impact of advanced technologies on treatment deviations in radiation treatment delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69(5):1579–86.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Spraker MB, et al. A survey of residents' experience with patient safety and quality improvement concepts in radiation oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017;7(4):e253–9.CrossRef Spraker MB, et al. A survey of residents' experience with patient safety and quality improvement concepts in radiation oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017;7(4):e253–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wagner R, et al. Detailed findings from the CLER National Report of findings 2016. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(2 1):35–54.CrossRef Wagner R, et al. Detailed findings from the CLER National Report of findings 2016. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(2 1):35–54.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fogh S, Pawlicki T. A report on quality and safety education for radiation oncology residents. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(5):988–9.CrossRef Fogh S, Pawlicki T. A report on quality and safety education for radiation oncology residents. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(5):988–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Harris PA, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.CrossRef Harris PA, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Asp L, et al. AAPM report no. 38: statement on the role of a physicist in radiation oncology. New York: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 1993. Asp L, et al. AAPM report no. 38: statement on the role of a physicist in radiation oncology. New York: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 1993.
10.
go back to reference Safety is no accident: A framework for quality radiation oncology and care. 2012. Safety is no accident: A framework for quality radiation oncology and care. 2012.
11.
go back to reference Zietman A, Palta J, Steinberg M. Safety is no accident: a framework for quality radiation oncology and care. Arlington: American Society for Radiation Oncology; 2012. Zietman A, Palta J, Steinberg M. Safety is no accident: a framework for quality radiation oncology and care. Arlington: American Society for Radiation Oncology; 2012.
12.
go back to reference Adleman J, et al. Development of a quality and safety competency curriculum for radiation oncology residency: an international Delphi study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98(2):428–37.CrossRef Adleman J, et al. Development of a quality and safety competency curriculum for radiation oncology residency: an international Delphi study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98(2):428–37.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yeung A, Greenwalt J. A framework for quality improvement and patient safety education in radiation oncology residency programs. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015;5(6):423–6.CrossRef Yeung A, Greenwalt J. A framework for quality improvement and patient safety education in radiation oncology residency programs. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015;5(6):423–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Woodhouse KD, et al. The implementation and assessment of a quality and safety culture education program in a large radiation oncology department. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016;6(4):e127–34.CrossRef Woodhouse KD, et al. The implementation and assessment of a quality and safety culture education program in a large radiation oncology department. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016;6(4):e127–34.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ford EC, et al. A patient safety education program in a medical physics residency. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18(6):268–74.CrossRef Ford EC, et al. A patient safety education program in a medical physics residency. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18(6):268–74.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jani AB, et al. Results of the 2014 survey of the Association of Directors of radiation oncology programs (ADROP). Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015;5(6):e673–8.CrossRef Jani AB, et al. Results of the 2014 survey of the Association of Directors of radiation oncology programs (ADROP). Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015;5(6):e673–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Church JA, et al. National study to determine the comfort levels of radiation therapists and medical dosimetrists to report errors. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013;3(4):e165–70.CrossRef Church JA, et al. National study to determine the comfort levels of radiation therapists and medical dosimetrists to report errors. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013;3(4):e165–70.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hoopes DJ, et al. Practice patterns for peer review in radiation oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015;5(1):32–8.CrossRef Hoopes DJ, et al. Practice patterns for peer review in radiation oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015;5(1):32–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Radiation oncology resident training in patient safety and quality improvement: a national survey of residency program directors
Authors
Matthew B. Spraker
Matthew J. Nyflot
Kristi R. G. Hendrickson
Stephanie Terezakis
Shannon E. Fogh
Gabrielle M. Kane
Eric C. Ford
Jing Zeng
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Radiation Oncology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1748-717X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1128-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Radiation Oncology 1/2018 Go to the issue