Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiation Oncology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

On the analysis of clonogenic survival data: Statistical alternatives to the linear-quadratic model

Authors: Steffen Unkel, Claus Belka, Kirsten Lauber

Published in: Radiation Oncology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The most frequently used method to quantitatively describe the response to ionizing irradiation in terms of clonogenic survival is the linear-quadratic (LQ) model. In the LQ model, the logarithm of the surviving fraction is regressed linearly on the radiation dose by means of a second-degree polynomial. The ratio of the estimated parameters for the linear and quadratic term, respectively, represents the dose at which both terms have the same weight in the abrogation of clonogenic survival. This ratio is known as the α/β ratio. However, there are plausible scenarios in which the α/β ratio fails to sufficiently reflect differences between dose-response curves, for example when curves with similar α/β ratio but different overall steepness are being compared. In such situations, the interpretation of the LQ model is severely limited.

Methods

Colony formation assays were performed in order to measure the clonogenic survival of nine human pancreatic cancer cell lines and immortalized human pancreatic ductal epithelial cells upon irradiation at 0-10 Gy. The resulting dataset was subjected to LQ regression and non-linear log-logistic regression. Dimensionality reduction of the data was performed by cluster analysis and principal component analysis.

Results

Both the LQ model and the non-linear log-logistic regression model resulted in accurate approximations of the observed dose-response relationships in the dataset of clonogenic survival. However, in contrast to the LQ model the non-linear regression model allowed the discrimination of curves with different overall steepness but similar α/β ratio and revealed an improved goodness-of-fit. Additionally, the estimated parameters in the non-linear model exhibit a more direct interpretation than the α/β ratio. Dimensionality reduction of clonogenic survival data by means of cluster analysis was shown to be a useful tool for classifying radioresistant and sensitive cell lines. More quantitatively, principal component analysis allowed the extraction of scores of radioresistance, which displayed significant correlations with the estimated parameters of the regression models.

Conclusions

Undoubtedly, LQ regression is a robust method for the analysis of clonogenic survival data. Nevertheless, alternative approaches including non-linear regression and multivariate techniques such as cluster analysis and principal component analysis represent versatile tools for the extraction of parameters and/or scores of the cellular response towards ionizing irradiation with a more intuitive biological interpretation. The latter are highly informative for correlation analyses with other types of data, including functional genomics data that are increasingly beinggenerated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Franken NA, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, van Bree C. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2006; 1:2315–319.CrossRefPubMed Franken NA, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, van Bree C. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2006; 1:2315–319.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Soffar A, Storch K, Aleem E, Cordes N. Cdk2 knockdown enhances head and neck cancer cell radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Biol. 2003; 89:523–31.CrossRef Soffar A, Storch K, Aleem E, Cordes N. Cdk2 knockdown enhances head and neck cancer cell radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Biol. 2003; 89:523–31.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Franken NA, Oei AL, Kok HP, Rodermond HM, Sminia P, Crezee J, et al. Cell survival and radiosensitisation: modulation of the linear and quadratic parameters of the lq model (review). Int J Oncol. 2013; 42:1501–1515.PubMed Franken NA, Oei AL, Kok HP, Rodermond HM, Sminia P, Crezee J, et al. Cell survival and radiosensitisation: modulation of the linear and quadratic parameters of the lq model (review). Int J Oncol. 2013; 42:1501–1515.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Bates DM, Watts DG. Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications. New York: Wiley; 2007. Bates DM, Watts DG. Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications. New York: Wiley; 2007.
6.
go back to reference Everitt BS, Landau S, Leese M, Stahl D. Cluster Analysis, 5th. Chichester: Springer; 2012. Everitt BS, Landau S, Leese M, Stahl D. Cluster Analysis, 5th. Chichester: Springer; 2012.
7.
go back to reference Jolliffe IT. Principal Component Analysis, 2nd. New York: Springer; 2002. Jolliffe IT. Principal Component Analysis, 2nd. New York: Springer; 2002.
8.
go back to reference Orth M, Lauber K, Niyazi M, Friedl AA, Li M, Maihöfer C, et al. Current concepts in clinical radiation oncology. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2014; 53:1–29.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Orth M, Lauber K, Niyazi M, Friedl AA, Li M, Maihöfer C, et al. Current concepts in clinical radiation oncology. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2014; 53:1–29.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bruns CJ, Harbison MT, Kuniyasu H, Eue I, Fidler IJ. In vivo selection and characterization of metastatic variants from human pancreatic adenocarcinoma by using orthotopic implantation in nude mice. Neoplasia. 1999; 1:50–62.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bruns CJ, Harbison MT, Kuniyasu H, Eue I, Fidler IJ. In vivo selection and characterization of metastatic variants from human pancreatic adenocarcinoma by using orthotopic implantation in nude mice. Neoplasia. 1999; 1:50–62.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Iwamura T, Caffrey TC, Kitamura N, Yamanari H, Setoguchi T, Hollingsworth MA. P-selectin expression in a metastatic pancreatic tumor cell line (SUIT-2). Cancer Res. 1997; 57:1206–1212.PubMed Iwamura T, Caffrey TC, Kitamura N, Yamanari H, Setoguchi T, Hollingsworth MA. P-selectin expression in a metastatic pancreatic tumor cell line (SUIT-2). Cancer Res. 1997; 57:1206–1212.PubMed
11.
go back to reference R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://​www.​R-project.​org.
12.
13.
go back to reference Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1974; 19:716–23.CrossRef Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1974; 19:716–23.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Spiess AN, Neumeyer N. An evaluation of R 2 as an inadequate measure for nonlinear models in pharmacological and biochemical research: a monte carlo approach. BMC Pharmacol. 2010; 10:6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Spiess AN, Neumeyer N. An evaluation of R 2 as an inadequate measure for nonlinear models in pharmacological and biochemical research: a monte carlo approach. BMC Pharmacol. 2010; 10:6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ritz C, Streibig JC. Nonlinear Regression with R. New York: Springer; 2008. Ritz C, Streibig JC. Nonlinear Regression with R. New York: Springer; 2008.
16.
go back to reference Ward JH. Hierarchical groupings to optimze an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc. 1963; 58:236–44.CrossRef Ward JH. Hierarchical groupings to optimze an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc. 1963; 58:236–44.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960; 20:141–51.CrossRef Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960; 20:141–51.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schlaich F, Brons S, Haberer T, Debus J, Combs SE, Weber KJ. Comparison of the effects of photon versus carbon ion irradiation when combined with chemotherapy in vitro. Radiat Oncol. 2013; 8:260.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Schlaich F, Brons S, Haberer T, Debus J, Combs SE, Weber KJ. Comparison of the effects of photon versus carbon ion irradiation when combined with chemotherapy in vitro. Radiat Oncol. 2013; 8:260.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Schnurr M, Duewell P, Bauer C, Rothenfusser S, Lauber K, Endres S, et al. Strategies to relieve immunosuppression in pancreatic cancer. Immunother. 2015; 7:363–76.CrossRef Schnurr M, Duewell P, Bauer C, Rothenfusser S, Lauber K, Endres S, et al. Strategies to relieve immunosuppression in pancreatic cancer. Immunother. 2015; 7:363–76.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kaufman L, Rousseuw PJ. Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2005. Kaufman L, Rousseuw PJ. Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2005.
21.
go back to reference Pinheiro JC, Bates DG. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus. New York: Springer; 2000.CrossRef Pinheiro JC, Bates DG. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus. New York: Springer; 2000.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Franken NA, Barendsen GW. Enhancement of radiation effectiveness by hyperthermia and incorporation of halogenated pyrimidines at low radiation doses as compared with high doses: implications for mechanisms. Int J Radiat Biol. 2014; 90:313–7.CrossRefPubMed Franken NA, Barendsen GW. Enhancement of radiation effectiveness by hyperthermia and incorporation of halogenated pyrimidines at low radiation doses as compared with high doses: implications for mechanisms. Int J Radiat Biol. 2014; 90:313–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Franken NA, ten Cate R, Krawczyk PM, Stap J, Haveman J, Aten J, et al. Comparison of rbe values of high-let α-particles for the induction of dna-dsbs, chromosome aberrations and cell reproductive death. Radiat Oncol. 2011; 6:64.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Franken NA, ten Cate R, Krawczyk PM, Stap J, Haveman J, Aten J, et al. Comparison of rbe values of high-let α-particles for the induction of dna-dsbs, chromosome aberrations and cell reproductive death. Radiat Oncol. 2011; 6:64.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
go back to reference Kellerer AM, Rossi HH. The theory of dual radiation action. Curr Top Radiat Res Q. 1972; 8:85–158. Kellerer AM, Rossi HH. The theory of dual radiation action. Curr Top Radiat Res Q. 1972; 8:85–158.
26.
go back to reference Govindarajulu Z. Statistical Techniques in Bioassay, 2nd. Basel: Karger; 2001.CrossRef Govindarajulu Z. Statistical Techniques in Bioassay, 2nd. Basel: Karger; 2001.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ekstrand KE. The Hug-Kellerer equation as the universal cell survival curve. Phys Med Biol. 2010; 55:267–73.CrossRef Ekstrand KE. The Hug-Kellerer equation as the universal cell survival curve. Phys Med Biol. 2010; 55:267–73.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ernst A, Anders H, Kapfhammer H, Orth M, Hennel R, Seidl K, et al. Hsp90 inhibition as a means of radiosensitizing resistant, aggressive soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Lett. 2015; 365:211–22.CrossRefPubMed Ernst A, Anders H, Kapfhammer H, Orth M, Hennel R, Seidl K, et al. Hsp90 inhibition as a means of radiosensitizing resistant, aggressive soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Lett. 2015; 365:211–22.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
On the analysis of clonogenic survival data: Statistical alternatives to the linear-quadratic model
Authors
Steffen Unkel
Claus Belka
Kirsten Lauber
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Radiation Oncology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1748-717X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0584-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Radiation Oncology 1/2016 Go to the issue