Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiation Oncology 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Data management, documentation and analysis systems in radiation oncology: a multi-institutional survey

Authors: Kerstin A. Kessel, Stephanie E. Combs

Published in: Radiation Oncology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Recently, information availability has become more elaborate and widespread, and treatment decisions are based on a multitude of factors. Gathering relevant data, also referred to as Big Data, is therefore critical for reaching the best patient care, and enhancing interdisciplinary and clinical research. Combining patient data from all involved systems is essential to prepare unstructured data for analyses. This demands special coordination in data management. Our study aims to characterize current developments in German-speaking hospital departments and practices. We successfully conducted the survey with the members of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie (DEGRO).

Methods

A questionnaire was developed consisting of 17 questions related to data management, documentation and clinical trial analyses, reflecting the clinical topics such as basic patient information, imaging, follow-up information as well as connection of documentation tools with radiooncological treatment planning machines.

Results

A total of 44 institutions completed the online survey (University hospitals n = 17, hospitals n = 13, practices/institutes n = 14). University hospitals, community hospitals and private practices are equally equipped concerning IT infrastructure for clinical use. However, private practices have a low interest in research work. All respondents stated the biggest obstacles about introducing a documentation system into their unit lie in funding and support of the central IT departments. Only 27 % (12/44) of responsible persons are specialists for documentation and data management.

Conclusion

Our study gives an understanding of the challenges and solutions we need to be looking at for medical data storage. In the future, inter-departmental cross-links will enable the radiation oncology community to generate large-scale analyses.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Huang HK. PACS and Imaging Informatics. Hoboken: Wiley; 2010. Huang HK. PACS and Imaging Informatics. Hoboken: Wiley; 2010.
2.
4.
go back to reference Shilakes CC, Tylman J. Enterprise information portals. New York: Merrill Lynch; 1998. Shilakes CC, Tylman J. Enterprise information portals. New York: Merrill Lynch; 1998.
5.
go back to reference Prokosch HU, Ganslandt T. Perspectives for medical informatics. Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research. Methods Inf Med. 2009;48:38–44. doi:10.3414/ME9132.PubMed Prokosch HU, Ganslandt T. Perspectives for medical informatics. Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research. Methods Inf Med. 2009;48:38–44. doi:10.​3414/​ME9132.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Lu Z, Su J. Clinical data management: Current status, challenges, and future directions from industry perspectives. Open Access J Clin Trials. 2010;2:93–105. doi:10.2147/OAJCTS8172.CrossRef Lu Z, Su J. Clinical data management: Current status, challenges, and future directions from industry perspectives. Open Access J Clin Trials. 2010;2:93–105. doi:10.​2147/​OAJCTS8172.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kessel KA, Bohn C, Engelmann U, Oetzel D, Bougatf N, Bendl R, et al. Five-year experience with setup and implementation of an integrated database system for clinical documentation and research. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;114:206–17. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.02.002.CrossRefPubMed Kessel KA, Bohn C, Engelmann U, Oetzel D, Bougatf N, Bendl R, et al. Five-year experience with setup and implementation of an integrated database system for clinical documentation and research. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;114:206–17. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cmpb.​2014.​02.​002.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kessel KA, Habermehl D, Bohn C, Jäger A, Floca RO, Zhang L, et al. Database supported electronic retrospective analyses in radiation oncology: establishing a workflow using the example of pancreatic cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2012;188:1119–24. doi:10.1007/s00066-012-0214-0.CrossRefPubMed Kessel KA, Habermehl D, Bohn C, Jäger A, Floca RO, Zhang L, et al. Database supported electronic retrospective analyses in radiation oncology: establishing a workflow using the example of pancreatic cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2012;188:1119–24. doi:10.​1007/​s00066-012-0214-0.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ratib O, Swiernik M, McCoy JM. From PACS to integrated EMR. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2003;27:207–15.CrossRefPubMed Ratib O, Swiernik M, McCoy JM. From PACS to integrated EMR. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2003;27:207–15.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lindsköld L, Alvfeldt G, Wintell M. What makes ‘big data’ different from “regular data” within radiology? The easiest answer: when it no longer fits into Excel! In: Cook TS, Zhang J, eds. SPIE 2015. 941805–8. doi:10.1117/12.2081359 Lindsköld L, Alvfeldt G, Wintell M. What makes ‘big data’ different from “regular data” within radiology? The easiest answer: when it no longer fits into Excel! In: Cook TS, Zhang J, eds. SPIE 2015. 941805–8. doi:10.​1117/​12.​2081359
Metadata
Title
Data management, documentation and analysis systems in radiation oncology: a multi-institutional survey
Authors
Kerstin A. Kessel
Stephanie E. Combs
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Radiation Oncology / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1748-717X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0543-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Radiation Oncology 1/2015 Go to the issue