Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Computed Tomography | Research

Morphometric characteristics of the thoracοlumbar and lumbar vertebrae in the Greek population: a computed tomography-based study on 900 vertebrae—“Hellenic Spine Society (HSS) 2017 Award Winner”

Authors: Theodoros B. Grivas, Olga Savvidou, Stefanos Binos, Georgios Vynichakis, Dimitrios Lykouris, Michail Skaliotis, Eleni Velissariou, Konstandinos Giotopoulos, Konstandinos Velissarios

Published in: Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Vertebrae morphology appears to have genetic and ethnic variations. Knowledge of the vertebra and pedicle morphology is essential for proper selection and safe application of transpedicular screws. The aim of this study is to create a morphometric database for thoracolumbar and lumbar vertebrae (T9–L5) among individuals of both sexes in the Greek population.

Material and methods

The morphometric dimensions of T9–L5 vertebrae on computed tomography (CT) scan images were measured in 100 adults (79 males and 21 females), without spinal pathology, age from 33 to 87 years old (mean 70 ± 8.73 years). The anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), the posterior vertebral body height (PVBH), the angle formed by the upper end plate of vertebral body and the horizontal line in the sagittal plane, the inner cancellous and outer cortical pedicle height and width, the angle formed by the longitudinal trajectory of the right- and left-sided pedicles and the midline anteroposterior axis of the vertebra (pedicle axis angle (PAA)), and the postero-anterior trajectory’s length of the pedicle from the entry point to the anterior cortex of the vertebra (PTLP), for the right- and left-sided pedicles, were calculated. The Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to compare the differences in various morphometric characteristics between sexes. The collected data were statistically analyzed using the SAS/STAT software 3.1.3 and SPSS version 22. The statistical significance was set at the level of p < 0.05. The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the measured parameters was also calculated.

Results

The L5 vertebra had the maximum AVBH with a mean of 28.47 mm (SD ± 2.55 mm) in males and 26.48 mm (SD ± 1.61 mm) in females. The maximum PVBH in males was at L1 vertebra with a mean of 27.77 mm (SD ± 1.64 mm) and in females at L2 vertebral with a mean of 27.11 mm (SD ± 1.27 mm). Regarding the left pedicle dimensions, the maximum inner cancellous and outer cortical pedicle height was at T11 with a mean of 12.86 mm (SD ± 1.26 mm) and 18.82 mm (SD ± 1.37 mm) in males and 10.24 mm (SD ± 1.88 mm) and 16.19 mm (SD ± 3.27 mm) in females, respectively. The maximum inner cancellous and outer cortical pedicle width was at L5 with a mean of 11.57 mm (SD ± 1.97 mm) and 17.08 mm (SD ± 1.97 mm) in males and 10.24 mm (SD ± 1.88 mm) and 16.27 mm (SD ± 3.27 mm) in females, respectively. The largest PAA was found at the L5 with a mean angle of 26.23° (SD ± 2.65°) in males and 23.63° (SD ± 4.59°) in females, respectively. The maximum PTLP was found at the level of L4 with a mean of 55.31 mm (SD ± 4.52 mm) in males and 48.7 mm (SD ± 4.17 mm) in females, respectively. Regarding the right pedicle dimensions, the maximum inner cancellous and outer cortical pedicle height was found at T12 with a mean of 13.03 mm (SD ± 2.01 mm) and 18.01 mm (SD ± 1.56 mm) in males and 10.24 mm (SD ± 1.23 mm) and 16.14 mm (SD ± 1.23 mm) in females, respectively. The maximum inner cancellous and outer cortical pedicle width was at L5 with a mean of 11.3 mm (SD ± 2.86 mm) and 16.34 mm (SD ± 2.98 mm) in males and 12 mm (SD ± 3.18 mm) and 15.69 mm (SD ± 2.59 mm) in females, respectively. The greater PAA was at the L5 vertebral with a mean of 25.7° (SD ± 5.19°) in males and 25.56° (SD ± 5.31°) in females, respectively. The maximum PTLP was at the level of L3 with a mean of 54.86 mm (SD ± 3.18 mm) in males and 49.01 mm (SD ± 2.97 mm) in females, respectively. At all vertebrae, the only statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) between the two sexes was the mean PTLP of the right and the left pedicle. The L5 vertebra was found to have the largest AVBH, PAA, and pedicle width in male and female populations.

Conclusions

This study provides a database of morphometric characteristics on thoracolumbar and lumbar vertebrae from T9 to L5 in the Greek population. This database may prove to be of great significance for forthcoming comparative studies. It can also serve as a basis in order to detect pathological changes in the spine and furthermore to plan operative interventions. It was found that the dimensions of thoracolumbar and lumbar vertebrae in the Greek population are sex-dependent. In the current study, vertebra and pedicle dimensions seem to have some similarities compared to other Western populations. However, in the thoracolumbar region, the pedicles of T9 and T10 may hardly accommodate a 4.00-mm pedicle screw given the narrow inner cancellous pedicle width. Importantly, the vertebra and pedicle dimensions measured in the current study can be used to guide the selection of transpedicular screws in the Greek population and to guide further research.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Jost B, Visarius H, Arm E, Langlotz F, Nolte LP, Ozdoba C. Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement. An in vivo computed tomography analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(4):452–8.CrossRef Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Jost B, Visarius H, Arm E, Langlotz F, Nolte LP, Ozdoba C. Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement. An in vivo computed tomography analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(4):452–8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, Coulomb M, Lavalleé S, Sautot P. Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:39–48.CrossRef Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, Coulomb M, Lavalleé S, Sautot P. Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:39–48.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(5):606–14.CrossRef Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(5):606–14.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hart RA, Hansen BL, Shea M, Hsu F, Anderson GJ. Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a comparison of image-guided and manual techniques in cadavers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(12):E326–31.CrossRef Hart RA, Hansen BL, Shea M, Hsu F, Anderson GJ. Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a comparison of image-guided and manual techniques in cadavers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(12):E326–31.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Youkilis AS, Quint DJ, McGillicuddy JE, Papadopoulos SM. Stereotactic navigation for placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(4):771–8.PubMed Youkilis AS, Quint DJ, McGillicuddy JE, Papadopoulos SM. Stereotactic navigation for placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(4):771–8.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Ebmeier K, Giest K, Kalff R. Intraoperative computerized tomography for improved accuracy of spinal navigation in pedicle screw placement of the thoracic spine. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;85:105–13.CrossRef Ebmeier K, Giest K, Kalff R. Intraoperative computerized tomography for improved accuracy of spinal navigation in pedicle screw placement of the thoracic spine. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;85:105–13.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J. 2000;9(3):235–40.CrossRef Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J. 2000;9(3):235–40.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cho W, Cho SK. The biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Aug;92(8):1061–5.CrossRef Cho W, Cho SK. The biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Aug;92(8):1061–5.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Christodoulou A, Apostolou T, Ploumis A, Terzidis I, Hantzokos I, Pournaras J. Pedicle dimensions of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in the Greek population. Clin Anat. 2005; Sep;18(6):404–8.CrossRef Christodoulou A, Apostolou T, Ploumis A, Terzidis I, Hantzokos I, Pournaras J. Pedicle dimensions of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in the Greek population. Clin Anat. 2005; Sep;18(6):404–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Laine T, Makitalo K, Schlenzka D, Tallroth K, Poussa M, Alho A. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients. Eur Spine J. 1997;6(6):402–5.CrossRef Laine T, Makitalo K, Schlenzka D, Tallroth K, Poussa M, Alho A. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients. Eur Spine J. 1997;6(6):402–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Goel VK, Gilbertson LG. Basic science and spinal instrumentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;335:10–31.CrossRef Goel VK, Gilbertson LG. Basic science and spinal instrumentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;335:10–31.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Varghese V, Kumar GS, Krishnan V. Effect of various factors on pull out strength of pedicle screw in normal and osteoporotic cancellous bone models. Med Eng Phys. 2017;40:28–38.CrossRef Varghese V, Kumar GS, Krishnan V. Effect of various factors on pull out strength of pedicle screw in normal and osteoporotic cancellous bone models. Med Eng Phys. 2017;40:28–38.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Spengler D, Brick C. Spinal pedicle fixation: reality and validity of roentgenogram—based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. Spine. 1998;13:1012–6.CrossRef Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Spengler D, Brick C. Spinal pedicle fixation: reality and validity of roentgenogram—based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. Spine. 1998;13:1012–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(3):E111–20.CrossRef Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(3):E111–20.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kretzer RM, Chaput C, Sciubba DM, et al. A computed tomography-based morphometric study of thoracic pedicle anatomy in a random United States trauma population. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;1(4):235–43.CrossRef Kretzer RM, Chaput C, Sciubba DM, et al. A computed tomography-based morphometric study of thoracic pedicle anatomy in a random United States trauma population. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;1(4):235–43.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Biscevic M, Biscevic S, Ljuca F, et al. Clinical and radiological morphometry of posterior parts of thoracic and lumbar vertebras. Coll Antropol. 2012;36(4):1313–7.PubMed Biscevic M, Biscevic S, Ljuca F, et al. Clinical and radiological morphometry of posterior parts of thoracic and lumbar vertebras. Coll Antropol. 2012;36(4):1313–7.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Acharya S, Dorje T, Srivastva A. Lower dorsal and lumbar pedicle morphometry in Indian population. A study of four hundred fifty vertebrae. Spine. 2010;35:E378–84.CrossRef Acharya S, Dorje T, Srivastva A. Lower dorsal and lumbar pedicle morphometry in Indian population. A study of four hundred fifty vertebrae. Spine. 2010;35:E378–84.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Avuthu S, Salian PRV, Kotian P, Shetty BSK. Computed tomographic morphometry of thoracic and lumbar pedicles in south Indian population. Asian J Pharm Health Sci. 2014;4(2):996–1000. Avuthu S, Salian PRV, Kotian P, Shetty BSK. Computed tomographic morphometry of thoracic and lumbar pedicles in south Indian population. Asian J Pharm Health Sci. 2014;4(2):996–1000.
19.
go back to reference Liau KM, Yusof MI, Abdullah MS, Abdullah S, Yusof AH. Computed tomographic morphometry of thoracic pedicles: safety margin of transpedicular screw fixation in Malaysian Malay population. Spine. 2006;31:545–50.CrossRef Liau KM, Yusof MI, Abdullah MS, Abdullah S, Yusof AH. Computed tomographic morphometry of thoracic pedicles: safety margin of transpedicular screw fixation in Malaysian Malay population. Spine. 2006;31:545–50.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doormik A, Widell EH, Knight GW, Patwardhan SG, Thomas JC. Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine. 1987;12:160–5.CrossRef Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doormik A, Widell EH, Knight GW, Patwardhan SG, Thomas JC. Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine. 1987;12:160–5.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Olsewski JN, Simmons EH, Kallen FC, Mendel FC, Severin CM, Berens DL. Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:541–9.CrossRef Olsewski JN, Simmons EH, Kallen FC, Mendel FC, Severin CM, Berens DL. Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:541–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ, Ramsey M, Salvo J, Balderston RA, Cotler JM. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1193–11.CrossRef Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ, Ramsey M, Salvo J, Balderston RA, Cotler JM. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1193–11.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Morphometric characteristics of the thoracοlumbar and lumbar vertebrae in the Greek population: a computed tomography-based study on 900 vertebrae—“Hellenic Spine Society (HSS) 2017 Award Winner”
Authors
Theodoros B. Grivas
Olga Savvidou
Stefanos Binos
Georgios Vynichakis
Dimitrios Lykouris
Michail Skaliotis
Eleni Velissariou
Konstandinos Giotopoulos
Konstandinos Velissarios
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2397-1789
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-019-0176-4