Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Improving the production of applied health research findings: insights from a qualitative study of operational research

Authors: Sonya Crowe, Simon Turner, Martin Utley, Naomi J. Fulop

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Knowledge produced through applied health research is often of a form not readily accessible to or actionable by policymakers and practitioners, which hinders its implementation. Our aim was to identify research activities that can support the production of knowledge tailored to inform policy and practice. To do this, we studied an operational research approach to improving the production of applied health research findings.

Methods

A 2-year qualitative study was conducted of the operational research contribution to a multidisciplinary applied health research project that was successful in rapidly informing national policy. Semi-structured interviews (n = 20) were conducted with all members of the project’s research team and advisory group (patient and health professional representatives and academics). These were augmented by participant (> 150 h) and non-participant (> 15 h) observations focusing on the process and experience of attempting to support knowledge production. Data were analysed thematically using QSR NVivo software.

Results

Operational research performed a knowledge mediation role shaped by a problem-focused approach and an intent to perform those tasks necessary to producing readily implementable knowledge but outwith the remit of other disciplinary strands of the project. Three characteristics of the role were found to support this: engaging and incorporating different perspectives to improve services by capturing a range of health professional and patient views alongside quantitative and qualitative research evidence; rendering data meaningful by creating and presenting evidence in forms that are accessible to and engage different audiences, enabling them to make sense of it for practical use; and maintaining perceived objectivity and rigour by establishing credibility, perceived neutrality and confidence in the robustness of the research in order to unite diverse professionals in thinking creatively about system-wide service improvement.

Conclusions

Our study contributes useful empirical insights about knowledge mediation activities within multidisciplinary applied health research projects that support the generation of accessible, practice-relevant and actionable knowledge. Incorporating such activities, or a dedicated role, for mediating knowledge production within such projects could help to enhance the uptake of research findings into routine healthcare and warrants further consideration.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Johnstone PL. Mixed methods, mixed methodology health services research in practice. Qual Health Res. 2004;14:259–71.CrossRefPubMed Johnstone PL. Mixed methods, mixed methodology health services research in practice. Qual Health Res. 2004;14:259–71.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ross S, Lavis J, Rodriguez C, Woodside J, Denis J-L. Partnership experiences: involving decision-makers in the research process. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy. 2003;8:26–34.CrossRefPubMed Ross S, Lavis J, Rodriguez C, Woodside J, Denis J-L. Partnership experiences: involving decision-makers in the research process. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy. 2003;8:26–34.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bowen SJ, Graham ID. From knowledge translation to engaged scholarship: promoting research relevance and utilization. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:S3–8.CrossRefPubMed Bowen SJ, Graham ID. From knowledge translation to engaged scholarship: promoting research relevance and utilization. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:S3–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gagnon ML. Moving knowledge to action through dissemination and exchange. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:25–31.CrossRefPubMed Gagnon ML. Moving knowledge to action through dissemination and exchange. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:25–31.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Landry R, Amara N, Lamari M. Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Res Policy. 2001;30:333–49.CrossRef Landry R, Amara N, Lamari M. Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Res Policy. 2001;30:333–49.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bate P. Synthesizing research and practice: using the action research approach in health care settings. Soc Policy Adm. 2000;34:478–93.CrossRef Bate P. Synthesizing research and practice: using the action research approach in health care settings. Soc Policy Adm. 2000;34:478–93.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nair KM, Dolovich L, Brazil K, Raina P. It’s all about relationships: a qualitative study of health researchers’ perspectives of conducting interdisciplinary health research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nair KM, Dolovich L, Brazil K, Raina P. It’s all about relationships: a qualitative study of health researchers’ perspectives of conducting interdisciplinary health research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C. The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Acad Manag J. 2005;48:117–34.CrossRef Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C. The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Acad Manag J. 2005;48:117–34.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Currie G, Suhomlinova O. The impact of institutional forces upon knowledge sharing in the UK NHS: the triumph of Professional power and the inconsistency of policy. Public Adm. 2006;84:1–30.CrossRef Currie G, Suhomlinova O. The impact of institutional forces upon knowledge sharing in the UK NHS: the triumph of Professional power and the inconsistency of policy. Public Adm. 2006;84:1–30.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nicolini D, Powell J, Conville P, Martinez-Solano L. Managing knowledge in the healthcare sector. A review Int J Manag Rev. 2008;10:245–63. Nicolini D, Powell J, Conville P, Martinez-Solano L. Managing knowledge in the healthcare sector. A review Int J Manag Rev. 2008;10:245–63.
14.
go back to reference Bartunek J, Trullen J, Bonet E, Sauquet A. Sharing and expanding academic and practitioner knowledge in health care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;(8 Suppl 2):62–8. Bartunek J, Trullen J, Bonet E, Sauquet A. Sharing and expanding academic and practitioner knowledge in health care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;(8 Suppl 2):62–8.
15.
go back to reference Marabelli M, Newell S, Krantz C, Swan J. Knowledge sharing and health-care coordination: the role of creation and use brokers. Health Syst. 2014;3:185–98.CrossRef Marabelli M, Newell S, Krantz C, Swan J. Knowledge sharing and health-care coordination: the role of creation and use brokers. Health Syst. 2014;3:185–98.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Robertson DW, Martin DK, Singer PA. Interdisciplinary research: putting the methods under the microscope. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:1–5.CrossRef Robertson DW, Martin DK, Singer PA. Interdisciplinary research: putting the methods under the microscope. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:1–5.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ven AHVD, Johnson PE. Knowledge for theory and practice. Acad Manag Rev. 2006;31:802–21.CrossRef Ven AHVD, Johnson PE. Knowledge for theory and practice. Acad Manag Rev. 2006;31:802–21.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva. 2003;41:179–94.CrossRef Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva. 2003;41:179–94.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Monks T, Pitt M, Stein K, James M. Maximizing the population benefit from thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2012;43:2706–11.CrossRefPubMed Monks T, Pitt M, Stein K, James M. Maximizing the population benefit from thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2012;43:2706–11.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Heaton J, Day J, Britten N. Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study. Implement Sci. 2016;11:20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heaton J, Day J, Britten N. Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study. Implement Sci. 2016;11:20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Brown KL, Wray J, Knowles RL, Crowe S, Tregay J, Ridout D, et al. Infant deaths in the UK community following successful cardiac surgery: building the evidence base for optimal surveillance, a mixed-methods study. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2016. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK363028/. Accessed 15 May 2017. Brown KL, Wray J, Knowles RL, Crowe S, Tregay J, Ridout D, et al. Infant deaths in the UK community following successful cardiac surgery: building the evidence base for optimal surveillance, a mixed-methods study. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2016. Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​books/​NBK363028/​. Accessed 15 May 2017.
24.
go back to reference Mackintosh N, Watson K, Rance S, Sandall J. Value of a modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS) in managing maternal complications in the peripartum period: an ethnographic study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:26–34.CrossRefPubMed Mackintosh N, Watson K, Rance S, Sandall J. Value of a modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS) in managing maternal complications in the peripartum period: an ethnographic study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:26–34.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Elder NC, Miller WL. Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies. J Fam Pract. 1995;41:279–85.PubMed Elder NC, Miller WL. Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies. J Fam Pract. 1995;41:279–85.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Zhang W, Creswell J. The use of “mixing” procedure of mixed methods in health services research. Med Care. 2013;51:e51–7.CrossRefPubMed Zhang W, Creswell J. The use of “mixing” procedure of mixed methods in health services research. Med Care. 2013;51:e51–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:92–8.CrossRefPubMed O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:92–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference O’Cathain A, Nicholl J, Murphy E. Structural issues affecting mixed methods studies in health research: a qualitative study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O’Cathain A, Nicholl J, Murphy E. Structural issues affecting mixed methods studies in health research: a qualitative study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Lindkvist L. Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: a typology of knowledge work in groups*. J Manag Stud. 2005;42:1189–210.CrossRef Lindkvist L. Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: a typology of knowledge work in groups*. J Manag Stud. 2005;42:1189–210.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Carlile PR. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organ Sci. 2002;13:442–55.CrossRef Carlile PR. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organ Sci. 2002;13:442–55.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Franco LA, Montibeller G. Facilitated modelling in operational research. Eur J Oper Res. 2010;205:489–500.CrossRef Franco LA, Montibeller G. Facilitated modelling in operational research. Eur J Oper Res. 2010;205:489–500.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Kislov R, Harvey G, Walshe K. Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: lessons from the theory of communities of practice. Implement Sci. 2011;6:64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kislov R, Harvey G, Walshe K. Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: lessons from the theory of communities of practice. Implement Sci. 2011;6:64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Franco LA, Hämäläinen RP. Behavioural operational research: returning to the roots of the OR profession. Eur J Oper Res. 2016;249:791–5.CrossRef Franco LA, Hämäläinen RP. Behavioural operational research: returning to the roots of the OR profession. Eur J Oper Res. 2016;249:791–5.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Röckmann C, van Leeuwen J, Goldsborough D, Kraan M, Piet G. The interaction triangle as a tool for understanding stakeholder interactions in marine ecosystem based management. Mar Policy. 2015;52:155–62.CrossRef Röckmann C, van Leeuwen J, Goldsborough D, Kraan M, Piet G. The interaction triangle as a tool for understanding stakeholder interactions in marine ecosystem based management. Mar Policy. 2015;52:155–62.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Peters RG, Covello VT, McCallum DB. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study. Risk Anal. 1997;17:43–54.CrossRefPubMed Peters RG, Covello VT, McCallum DB. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study. Risk Anal. 1997;17:43–54.CrossRefPubMed
37.
38.
go back to reference Büyükdamgacı G. Process of organizational problem definition: how to evaluate and how to improve. Omega. 2003;31:327–38.CrossRef Büyükdamgacı G. Process of organizational problem definition: how to evaluate and how to improve. Omega. 2003;31:327–38.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Kotiadis K, Tako AA, Vasilakis C. A participative and facilitative conceptual modelling framework for discrete event simulation studies in healthcare. J Oper Res Soc. 2013;65:197–213.CrossRef Kotiadis K, Tako AA, Vasilakis C. A participative and facilitative conceptual modelling framework for discrete event simulation studies in healthcare. J Oper Res Soc. 2013;65:197–213.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Robinson S. Measuring service quality in the process of delivering a simulation study: the customer’s perspective. Int Trans Oper Res. 1998;5:357–74.CrossRef Robinson S. Measuring service quality in the process of delivering a simulation study: the customer’s perspective. Int Trans Oper Res. 1998;5:357–74.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Howick S, Ackermann F. Mixing OR methods in practice: past, present and future directions. Eur J Oper Res. 2011;215:503–11.CrossRef Howick S, Ackermann F. Mixing OR methods in practice: past, present and future directions. Eur J Oper Res. 2011;215:503–11.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Franco LA, Lord E. Understanding multi-methodology: evaluating the perceived impact of mixing methods for group budgetary decisions. Omega. 2011;39:362–72.CrossRef Franco LA, Lord E. Understanding multi-methodology: evaluating the perceived impact of mixing methods for group budgetary decisions. Omega. 2011;39:362–72.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Crowe S, Brown K, Tregay J, Wray J, Knowles R, Ridout DA, et al. Combining qualitative and quantitative operational research methods to inform quality improvement in pathways that span multiple settings. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:641–52. Crowe S, Brown K, Tregay J, Wray J, Knowles R, Ridout DA, et al. Combining qualitative and quantitative operational research methods to inform quality improvement in pathways that span multiple settings. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:641–52.
46.
go back to reference Pitt M, Monks T, Crowe S, Vasilakis C. Systems modelling and simulation in health service design, delivery and decision making. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;25(1):38-45. Pitt M, Monks T, Crowe S, Vasilakis C. Systems modelling and simulation in health service design, delivery and decision making. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;25(1):38-45.
47.
go back to reference Checkland P, Poulter J. Learning for action: a short definitive account of soft systems methodology, and its use practitioners, teachers and students. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. Checkland P, Poulter J. Learning for action: a short definitive account of soft systems methodology, and its use practitioners, teachers and students. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
48.
go back to reference Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C, Steinberg D, Colla P. CART: classification and regression trees. Wadsworth Belmont CA. 1983;156. ISBN: 9780412048418. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C, Steinberg D, Colla P. CART: classification and regression trees. Wadsworth Belmont CA. 1983;156. ISBN: 9780412048418.
49.
go back to reference Crowe S, Knowles R, Wray J, Tregay J, Ridout DA, Utley M, et al. Identifying improvements to complex pathways: evidence synthesis and stakeholder engagement in infant congenital heart disease. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010363.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Crowe S, Knowles R, Wray J, Tregay J, Ridout DA, Utley M, et al. Identifying improvements to complex pathways: evidence synthesis and stakeholder engagement in infant congenital heart disease. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010363.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Crowe S, Ridout DA, Knowles R, Tregay J, Wray J, Barron DJ, et al. Death and emergency readmission of infants discharged after interventions for congenital heart disease: a national study of 7643 infants to inform service improvement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e003369.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Crowe S, Ridout DA, Knowles R, Tregay J, Wray J, Barron DJ, et al. Death and emergency readmission of infants discharged after interventions for congenital heart disease: a national study of 7643 infants to inform service improvement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e003369.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
go back to reference Tregay J, Wray J, Crowe S, Knowles R, Daubeney P, Franklin R, et al. Going home after infant cardiac surgery: a UK qualitative study. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101:320–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tregay J, Wray J, Crowe S, Knowles R, Daubeney P, Franklin R, et al. Going home after infant cardiac surgery: a UK qualitative study. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101:320–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
go back to reference Tregay J, Brown KL, Crowe S, Bull C, Knowles RL, Smith L, et al. Signs of deterioration in infants discharged home following congenital heart surgery in the first year of life: a qualitative study. Arch. Dis Child. 2016;101:902-8. Tregay J, Brown KL, Crowe S, Bull C, Knowles RL, Smith L, et al. Signs of deterioration in infants discharged home following congenital heart surgery in the first year of life: a qualitative study. Arch. Dis Child. 2016;101:902-8.
53.
go back to reference Tregay J, Brown K, Crowe S, Bull C, Knowles R, Wray J. “I was so worried about every drop of milk”—feeding problems at home are a significant concern for parents after major heart surgery in infancy: feeding problems after infant cardiac surgery. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13:e12302.CrossRef Tregay J, Brown K, Crowe S, Bull C, Knowles R, Wray J. “I was so worried about every drop of milk”—feeding problems at home are a significant concern for parents after major heart surgery in infancy: feeding problems after infant cardiac surgery. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13:e12302.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Tregay J, Wray J, Bull C, Franklin RC, Daubeney P, Barron DJ, et al. Unexpected deaths and unplanned re-admissions in infants discharged home after cardiac surgery: a systematic review of potential risk factors. Cardiol Young. 2014:1–14. Tregay J, Wray J, Bull C, Franklin RC, Daubeney P, Barron DJ, et al. Unexpected deaths and unplanned re-admissions in infants discharged home after cardiac surgery: a systematic review of potential risk factors. Cardiol Young. 2014:1–14.
Metadata
Title
Improving the production of applied health research findings: insights from a qualitative study of operational research
Authors
Sonya Crowe
Simon Turner
Martin Utley
Naomi J. Fulop
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0643-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Implementation Science 1/2017 Go to the issue