Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Debate

Operational research as implementation science: definitions, challenges and research priorities

Author: Thomas Monks

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Operational research (OR) is the discipline of using models, either quantitative or qualitative, to aid decision-making in complex implementation problems. The methods of OR have been used in healthcare since the 1950s in diverse areas such as emergency medicine and the interface between acute and community care; hospital performance; scheduling and management of patient home visits; scheduling of patient appointments; and many other complex implementation problems of an operational or logistical nature.

Discussion

To date, there has been limited debate about the role that operational research should take within implementation science. I detail three such roles for OR all grounded in upfront system thinking: structuring implementation problems, prospective evaluation of improvement interventions, and strategic reconfiguration. Case studies from mental health, emergency medicine, and stroke care are used to illustrate each role. I then describe the challenges for applied OR within implementation science at the organisational, interventional, and disciplinary levels. Two key challenges include the difficulty faced in achieving a position of mutual understanding between implementation scientists and research users and a stark lack of evaluation of OR interventions. To address these challenges, I propose a research agenda to evaluate applied OR through the lens of implementation science, the liberation of OR from the specialist research and consultancy environment, and co-design of models with service users.

Summary

Operational research is a mature discipline that has developed a significant volume of methodology to improve health services. OR offers implementation scientists the opportunity to do more upfront system thinking before committing resources or taking risks. OR has three roles within implementation science: structuring an implementation problem, prospective evaluation of implementation problems, and a tool for strategic reconfiguration of health services. Challenges facing OR as implementation science include limited evidence and evaluation of impact, limited service user involvement, a lack of managerial awareness, effective communication between research users and OR modellers, and availability of healthcare data. To progress the science, a focus is needed in three key areas: evaluation of OR interventions, embedding the knowledge of OR in health services, and educating OR modellers about the aims and benefits of service user involvement.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Royston G. One hundred years of operational research in health—UK 1948-2048[star]. J Oper Res Soc. 2009;60(1):169–79.CrossRef Royston G. One hundred years of operational research in health—UK 1948-2048[star]. J Oper Res Soc. 2009;60(1):169–79.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lane DC, Monefeldt C, Rosenhead JV. Looking in the wrong place for healthcare improvements: a system dynamics study of an accident and emergency department. J Oper Res Soc. 2000;51(5):518–31. doi:10.2307/254183.CrossRef Lane DC, Monefeldt C, Rosenhead JV. Looking in the wrong place for healthcare improvements: a system dynamics study of an accident and emergency department. J Oper Res Soc. 2000;51(5):518–31. doi:10.​2307/​254183.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fletcher A, Halsall D, Huxham S, Worthington D. The DH accident and emergency department model: a national generic model used locally. J Oper Res Soc. 2007;58(12):1554–62.CrossRef Fletcher A, Halsall D, Huxham S, Worthington D. The DH accident and emergency department model: a national generic model used locally. J Oper Res Soc. 2007;58(12):1554–62.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Knight VA, Harper PR. Modelling emergency medical services with phase-type distributions. HS. 2012;1(1):58–68. Knight VA, Harper PR. Modelling emergency medical services with phase-type distributions. HS. 2012;1(1):58–68.
11.
go back to reference Monks T, Pearn K, Allen M. Simulating stroke care systems. In: Yilmaz L, et al, editors. Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE; 2015. p. 1391–1402. doi:10.1109/WSC.2015.7408262. Monks T, Pearn K, Allen M. Simulating stroke care systems. In: Yilmaz L, et al, editors. Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE; 2015. p. 1391–1402. doi:10.​1109/​WSC.​2015.​7408262.
12.
go back to reference Jun J, Jacobson S, Swisher J. Application of discrete-event simulation in health care clinics: a survey. J Oper Res Soc. 1999;50(2):109–23.CrossRef Jun J, Jacobson S, Swisher J. Application of discrete-event simulation in health care clinics: a survey. J Oper Res Soc. 1999;50(2):109–23.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Brailsford SC, Lattimer VA, Tarnaras P, Turnbull JC. Emergency and on-demand health care: modelling a large complex system. J Oper Res Soc. 2004;55(1):34–42.CrossRef Brailsford SC, Lattimer VA, Tarnaras P, Turnbull JC. Emergency and on-demand health care: modelling a large complex system. J Oper Res Soc. 2004;55(1):34–42.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Atkinson J-A, Page A, Wells R, Milat A, Wilson A. A modelling tool for policy analysis to support the design of efficient and effective policy responses for complex public health problems. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Atkinson J-A, Page A, Wells R, Milat A, Wilson A. A modelling tool for policy analysis to support the design of efficient and effective policy responses for complex public health problems. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Pitt M, Monks T, Allen M. Systems modelling for improving healthcare. In: Richards D, Rahm Hallberg I, editors. Complex interventions in health: an overview of research methods. London: Routledge; 2015. Pitt M, Monks T, Allen M. Systems modelling for improving healthcare. In: Richards D, Rahm Hallberg I, editors. Complex interventions in health: an overview of research methods. London: Routledge; 2015.
22.
go back to reference Westcombe M, Alberto Franco L, Shaw D. Where next for PSMs—a grassroots revolution? J Oper Res Soc. 2006;57(7):776–8.CrossRef Westcombe M, Alberto Franco L, Shaw D. Where next for PSMs—a grassroots revolution? J Oper Res Soc. 2006;57(7):776–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Penn ML, Kennedy AP, Vassilev II, Chew-Graham CA, Protheroe J, Rogers A, Monks T. Modelling self-management pathways for people with diabetes in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):1–10. doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0325-7.CrossRef Penn ML, Kennedy AP, Vassilev II, Chew-Graham CA, Protheroe J, Rogers A, Monks T. Modelling self-management pathways for people with diabetes in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):1–10. doi:10.​1186/​s12875-015-0325-7.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Vennix JAM. Group model-building: tackling messy problems. Syst Dyn Rev. 1999;15(4):379–401.CrossRef Vennix JAM. Group model-building: tackling messy problems. Syst Dyn Rev. 1999;15(4):379–401.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Utley M, Worthington D. Capacity planning. In: Hall R, editor. Handbook of Healthcare System Scheduling. New York: Springer; 2012. Utley M, Worthington D. Capacity planning. In: Hall R, editor. Handbook of Healthcare System Scheduling. New York: Springer; 2012.
29.
go back to reference Robinson S. Simulation: the practice of model development and use. London: Wiley; 2004. Robinson S. Simulation: the practice of model development and use. London: Wiley; 2004.
30.
go back to reference National Institute of Clinical Excellence, Stroke. In: NICE Clinical Guideline, editor. Diagnosis and initial management of acute stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). 2008. National Institute of Clinical Excellence, Stroke. In: NICE Clinical Guideline, editor. Diagnosis and initial management of acute stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). 2008.
32.
go back to reference Franco AL, Lord E. Understanding multi-methodology: evaluating the perceived impact of mixing methods for group budgetary decisions. Omega. 2010;39:362–72.CrossRef Franco AL, Lord E. Understanding multi-methodology: evaluating the perceived impact of mixing methods for group budgetary decisions. Omega. 2010;39:362–72.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Katsaliaki K, Mustafee N. Applications of simulation within the healthcare context. J Oper Res Soc. 2011;62(8):1431–51.CrossRef Katsaliaki K, Mustafee N. Applications of simulation within the healthcare context. J Oper Res Soc. 2011;62(8):1431–51.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Günal M, Pidd M. Discrete event simulation for performance modelling in health care: a review of the literature. J Simul. 2011;4:42–51.CrossRef Günal M, Pidd M. Discrete event simulation for performance modelling in health care: a review of the literature. J Simul. 2011;4:42–51.CrossRef
35.
36.
go back to reference Brailsford SC, Harper PR, Patel B, Pitt M. An analysis of the academic literature on simulation and modelling in health care. J Simul. 2009;3(3):130–40.CrossRef Brailsford SC, Harper PR, Patel B, Pitt M. An analysis of the academic literature on simulation and modelling in health care. J Simul. 2009;3(3):130–40.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Brailsford SC et al. Overcoming the barriers: a qualitative study of simulation adoption in the NHS. J Oper Res Soc. 2013;64(2):157–68.CrossRef Brailsford SC et al. Overcoming the barriers: a qualitative study of simulation adoption in the NHS. J Oper Res Soc. 2013;64(2):157–68.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Walsh M, Hostick T. Improving health care through community OR. J Oper Res Soc. 2004;56(2):193–201.CrossRef Walsh M, Hostick T. Improving health care through community OR. J Oper Res Soc. 2004;56(2):193–201.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Jahangirian M, Taylor SJE, Eatock J, Stergioulas LK, Taylor PM. Causal study of low stakeholder engagement in healthcare simulation projects. J Oper Res Soc. 2015;66(3):369–79. doi:10.1057/jors.2014.1.CrossRef Jahangirian M, Taylor SJE, Eatock J, Stergioulas LK, Taylor PM. Causal study of low stakeholder engagement in healthcare simulation projects. J Oper Res Soc. 2015;66(3):369–79. doi:10.​1057/​jors.​2014.​1.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Young T, Eatock J, Jahangirian M, Naseer A, Lilford R. Three critical challenges for modeling and simulation in healthcare. In: Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2009 Winter. 2009. Young T, Eatock J, Jahangirian M, Naseer A, Lilford R. Three critical challenges for modeling and simulation in healthcare. In: Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2009 Winter. 2009.
44.
go back to reference Seila AF, Brailsford S. Opportunities and challenges in health care simulation. In: Alexopoulos C, Goldsman D, Wilson JR, editors. Advancing the Frontiers of Simulation. US: Springer; 2009. p. 195–229.CrossRef Seila AF, Brailsford S. Opportunities and challenges in health care simulation. In: Alexopoulos C, Goldsman D, Wilson JR, editors. Advancing the Frontiers of Simulation. US: Springer; 2009. p. 195–229.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Naseer A, Eldabi T, Young TP. RIGHT: a toolkit for selecting healthcare modelling methods. J Sim. 2010;4(1):2–13.CrossRef Naseer A, Eldabi T, Young TP. RIGHT: a toolkit for selecting healthcare modelling methods. J Sim. 2010;4(1):2–13.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Operational research as implementation science: definitions, challenges and research priorities
Author
Thomas Monks
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0444-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Implementation Science 1/2015 Go to the issue