Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Methodology

A scoping study of cultural interventions to treat addictions in Indigenous populations: methods, strategies and insights from a Two-Eyed Seeing approach

Authors: Margo Rowan, Nancy Poole, Beverley Shea, David Mykota, Marwa Farag, Carol Hopkins, Laura Hall, Christopher Mushquash, Barbara Fornssler, Colleen Anne Dell

Published in: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This paper describes the methods, strategies and insights gained from a scoping study using a “Two-Eyed Seeing” approach. An evolving technique, Two-Eyed Seeing respects and integrates the strengths of Indigenous knowledge and Western sciences, often “weaving back and forth” between the two worldviews. The scoping study was used to inform a tool for measuring the impact of culturally based addictions treatment services on wellness in Indigenous populations. It formed part of a three-year study, Honouring Our Strengths: Indigenous Culture as Intervention in Addictions Treatment. The scoping study identified and mapped literature on cultural interventions in addictions treatment, and described the nature, extent and gaps in literature.

Methods

Using a Two-Eyed Seeing approach, we adapted, applied and enhanced a common framework of scoping studies. In the end stage of the scoping review process, an Ad Hoc Review Group, led by our project Elder, reviewed and interpreted Indigenous and Western understandings within the mapped information. Elements of the scoping study were joined with results from community focus groups with staff at treatment centres.

Results

Two-Eyed Seeing contributed differently at each stage of the scoping study. In early stages, it clarified team expertise and potential contributions. At the mid-point, it influenced our shift from a systematic to a scoping review. Near the end, it incorporated Western and Indigenous knowledge to interpret and synthesize evidence from multiple sources.

Conclusions

This paper adds to the collective work on augmenting the methodology of scoping studies. Despite the challenges of a Two-Eyed Seeing approach, it enables researchers using scoping studies to develop knowledge that is better able to translate into meaningful findings for Indigenous communities.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Iwama M, Marshall M, Marshall A, Bartlett C. Two-eyed seeing and the language of healing in community-based research. Can J Native Educ. 2009;32:3–23. Iwama M, Marshall M, Marshall A, Bartlett C. Two-eyed seeing and the language of healing in community-based research. Can J Native Educ. 2009;32:3–23.
3.
go back to reference Bartlett C, Marshall M, Marshall A. Two-eyed seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together Indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing. J Env Stud Sci. 2012;2:331–40.CrossRef Bartlett C, Marshall M, Marshall A. Two-eyed seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together Indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing. J Env Stud Sci. 2012;2:331–40.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Evering B. Relationships between knowledge (s): implications for knowledge generation’. J Env Stud Sci. 2012;2:357–68.CrossRef Evering B. Relationships between knowledge (s): implications for knowledge generation’. J Env Stud Sci. 2012;2:357–68.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hatcher A, Bartlett C, Marshall A, Marshall M. Two-eyed seeing in the classroom environment: concepts, approaches and challenges. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ. 2009;9:141–53.CrossRef Hatcher A, Bartlett C, Marshall A, Marshall M. Two-eyed seeing in the classroom environment: concepts, approaches and challenges. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ. 2009;9:141–53.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lewthwaite B, Renaud R. Pilimmaksarniq: working together for the common good in science curriculum development and delivery in Nunavut. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ. 2009;9:154–72.CrossRef Lewthwaite B, Renaud R. Pilimmaksarniq: working together for the common good in science curriculum development and delivery in Nunavut. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ. 2009;9:154–72.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Martin DH. Two-eyed seeing: a framework for understanding Indigenous and non-Indigenous approaches to Indigenous health research. Can J Nurs Res. 2012;44:20–42.PubMed Martin DH. Two-eyed seeing: a framework for understanding Indigenous and non-Indigenous approaches to Indigenous health research. Can J Nurs Res. 2012;44:20–42.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Castellano MB. Updating Aboriginal traditions of knowledge. In: Hall BL, Dei GJS, Rosenberg DG, editors. Indigenous knowledges in global contexts: multiple readings of our world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2000. p. 21–36. Castellano MB. Updating Aboriginal traditions of knowledge. In: Hall BL, Dei GJS, Rosenberg DG, editors. Indigenous knowledges in global contexts: multiple readings of our world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2000. p. 21–36.
10.
go back to reference Fornssler B, McKenzie HA, Dell CA, Laliberte L, Hopkins C. “I got to know them in a new way”: rela (y/t) ing rhizomes and community-based knowledge (brokers’) transformation of western and Indigenous knowledge. Cult Stud Crit Methodol. 2014;14:179–93.CrossRef Fornssler B, McKenzie HA, Dell CA, Laliberte L, Hopkins C. “I got to know them in a new way”: rela (y/t) ing rhizomes and community-based knowledge (brokers’) transformation of western and Indigenous knowledge. Cult Stud Crit Methodol. 2014;14:179–93.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2005;8:19–32.CrossRef Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2005;8:19–32.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:59–67.CrossRef Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:59–67.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Valaitis R, Martin-Misener R, Wong ST, MacDonald M, Meagher-Stewart D, Austin P, et al. Methods, strategies and technologies used to conduct a scoping literature review of collaboration between primary care and public health. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012;13:219–36.PubMedCrossRef Valaitis R, Martin-Misener R, Wong ST, MacDonald M, Meagher-Stewart D, Austin P, et al. Methods, strategies and technologies used to conduct a scoping literature review of collaboration between primary care and public health. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012;13:219–36.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Daudt HML, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:48–56.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Daudt HML, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:48–56.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rowan M, Poole N, Shea B, Gone JP, Mykota D, Farag M, et al. Cultural interventions to treat addictions in Indigenous populations: findings from a scoping study. Subst Abuse Treat Pr. 2014;9:34–59.CrossRef Rowan M, Poole N, Shea B, Gone JP, Mykota D, Farag M, et al. Cultural interventions to treat addictions in Indigenous populations: findings from a scoping study. Subst Abuse Treat Pr. 2014;9:34–59.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference O’Connor D, Green S, Higgins JPT. Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Mississauga: John Wiley & Sons; 2008. p. 83–94. O’Connor D, Green S, Higgins JPT. Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Mississauga: John Wiley & Sons; 2008. p. 83–94.
18.
go back to reference Ermine W. The ethical space of engagement. ILJ. 2007;6:193–203. Ermine W. The ethical space of engagement. ILJ. 2007;6:193–203.
21.
go back to reference Foale S. The intersection of scientific and Indigenous ecological knowledge in coastal Melanesia: implications for contemporary marine resource management. Int Soc Sci J. 2006;58:129–37.CrossRef Foale S. The intersection of scientific and Indigenous ecological knowledge in coastal Melanesia: implications for contemporary marine resource management. Int Soc Sci J. 2006;58:129–37.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35 Suppl 2:77–89.CrossRef Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35 Suppl 2:77–89.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hibbert P, Sillince J, Diefenbach T, Cunliffe AL. Relationally reflexive practice: a generative approach to theory development in qualitative research. Organ Res Meth. 2014;17:278–98.CrossRef Hibbert P, Sillince J, Diefenbach T, Cunliffe AL. Relationally reflexive practice: a generative approach to theory development in qualitative research. Organ Res Meth. 2014;17:278–98.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hopkins C, Dumont J, Deleary M, Virgil T. Phase I: Culture as Intervention Research Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan. 2012. Hopkins C, Dumont J, Deleary M, Virgil T. Phase I: Culture as Intervention Research Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan. 2012.
26.
go back to reference Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22:1435–43.PubMedCrossRef Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22:1435–43.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference McGowan J, Sampson M, Lefebvre C. An evidence-based checklist for the peer review of electronic search strategies (PRESS EBC). EBLIP. 2010;5:149–54. McGowan J, Sampson M, Lefebvre C. An evidence-based checklist for the peer review of electronic search strategies (PRESS EBC). EBLIP. 2010;5:149–54.
28.
go back to reference Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM, Merchant WR. Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. WORK. 2010;35:399–404.PubMed Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM, Merchant WR. Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. WORK. 2010;35:399–404.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26:91–108.PubMedCrossRef Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26:91–108.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bassett R, McGibbon E. A critical participatory and collaborative method for scoping the literature. Qual Quant. 2013;47:3249–59.CrossRef Bassett R, McGibbon E. A critical participatory and collaborative method for scoping the literature. Qual Quant. 2013;47:3249–59.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A scoping study of cultural interventions to treat addictions in Indigenous populations: methods, strategies and insights from a Two-Eyed Seeing approach
Authors
Margo Rowan
Nancy Poole
Beverley Shea
David Mykota
Marwa Farag
Carol Hopkins
Laura Hall
Christopher Mushquash
Barbara Fornssler
Colleen Anne Dell
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1747-597X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0021-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 1/2015 Go to the issue