Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Reliability of ADDIS for diagnoses of substance use disorders according to ICD-10, DSM-IV and DSM-5: test-retest and inter-item consistency

Authors: Arne Gerdner, Lynn Wickström

Published in: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study investigates test-retest and inter-item consistency of Alcohol Drog Diagnos InStrument (ADDIS), a structured interview to diagnose substance use disorders according to ICD-10, DSM-IV and DSM-5. ADDIS, the Swedish version of SUDDS, is the only instrument in Swedish that produces diagnostic proposals specific to all drug categories, and for all three diagnostic systems. Screening of stressful life events, anxiety, and depression is also included.

Methods

Thirty patients at addiction treatment facilities were interviewed for diagnostic assessment and re-interviewed after one week.

Results

ADDIS has excellent internal consistency. There is also very high test-retest correlation on number of fulfilled criteria for all diagnostic systems. Agreement of diagnostic proposals is substantial, mean absolute agreement is excellent, and mean systematic correlation is almost perfect.

Conclusion

ADDIS is a reliable tool for specific diagnostic assessment of SUDs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference WHO. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 1993. p. 62–75. WHO. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 1993. p. 62–75.
2.
go back to reference APA. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. rev. (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (APA); 1994. APA. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. rev. (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (APA); 1994.
3.
go back to reference APA. The Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders – fifth edition. (DSM-5). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. APA. The Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders – fifth edition. (DSM-5). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
4.
go back to reference First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams J, Benjamin LS. Handbok—SCID-I och SCID-II för DSM-IV. Svensk bearbetning av Jörgen Herlofsson. Danderyd: Pilgrim Press; 1999. First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams J, Benjamin LS. Handbok—SCID-I och SCID-II för DSM-IV. Svensk bearbetning av Jörgen Herlofsson. Danderyd: Pilgrim Press; 1999.
5.
go back to reference Sheehan D, Janavs J, Harnett-Sheehan K, Sheehan M, Gray C, Lecrubier Y, et al. MINI Internationella Neuropsykiatriska Intervju (M.I.N.I. Swedish Translation Version 6.0.0, DSM-IV). France: University of South Florida College of Medicine - Tampa, USA & Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne - Paris; 2010. Sheehan D, Janavs J, Harnett-Sheehan K, Sheehan M, Gray C, Lecrubier Y, et al. MINI Internationella Neuropsykiatriska Intervju (M.I.N.I. Swedish Translation Version 6.0.0, DSM-IV). France: University of South Florida College of Medicine - Tampa, USA & Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne - Paris; 2010.
6.
go back to reference Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Janavas J, Weiller E, Keskiner A, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:22–33.PubMed Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Janavas J, Weiller E, Keskiner A, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:22–33.PubMed
7.
go back to reference ADDIS (Alkohol Drog Diagnos InStrument. Manual, version 09/2011. Åre: Dahl & Dahl AB. 2011. ADDIS (Alkohol Drog Diagnos InStrument. Manual, version 09/2011. Åre: Dahl & Dahl AB. 2011.
8.
go back to reference Harrison PA, Hoffmann NG. SUDDS: Substance Use Disorder Diagnostic Schedule. St. Paul, MN: Ramsey Clinic Associates; 1985. Harrison PA, Hoffmann NG. SUDDS: Substance Use Disorder Diagnostic Schedule. St. Paul, MN: Ramsey Clinic Associates; 1985.
9.
go back to reference Harrison PA, Hoffmann NG. SUDDS - Substance Use Disorder Diagnostic Schedule Manual. St. Paul, MN: Ramsey Clinic; 1989. Harrison PA, Hoffmann NG. SUDDS - Substance Use Disorder Diagnostic Schedule Manual. St. Paul, MN: Ramsey Clinic; 1989.
10.
go back to reference Hoffmann NG, Harrison PA. SUDDS-5 Manual – Substance Use Disorder Diagnostic Schedule - 5. Carson City, NV: The Change Companies; 2013. Hoffmann NG, Harrison PA. SUDDS-5 Manual – Substance Use Disorder Diagnostic Schedule - 5. Carson City, NV: The Change Companies; 2013.
11.
go back to reference Davis Jr LJ, Hoffmann NG, Morse RM, Luehr J. Substance use disorder diagnostic schedule and an interviewer-administered format. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res. 1992;16:250–4.CrossRef Davis Jr LJ, Hoffmann NG, Morse RM, Luehr J. Substance use disorder diagnostic schedule and an interviewer-administered format. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res. 1992;16:250–4.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hoffmann NG, Harrison PA. SUDDS-IV (Substance use disorder diagnostic Schedule-IV) Manual. 1996. Hoffmann NG, Harrison PA. SUDDS-IV (Substance use disorder diagnostic Schedule-IV) Manual. 1996.
13.
go back to reference Hoffmann NG, Hoffmann TD. Construct validity for alcohol dependence as indicated by the SUDDS-IV. Subst Use Misuse. 2003;38:293–306.CrossRefPubMed Hoffmann NG, Hoffmann TD. Construct validity for alcohol dependence as indicated by the SUDDS-IV. Subst Use Misuse. 2003;38:293–306.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gerdner A. Diagnosinstrument för beroende och missbruk—Granskning av ADDIS validitet och interna konsistens gällande alkoholproblem. Nordisk Alkohol- Narkotikatidskrift. 2009;26:265–76. Gerdner A. Diagnosinstrument för beroende och missbruk—Granskning av ADDIS validitet och interna konsistens gällande alkoholproblem. Nordisk Alkohol- Narkotikatidskrift. 2009;26:265–76.
15.
go back to reference Gerdner A, Kestenberg J, Edvinsson M. Validity of the Swedish SCID and ADDIS diagnostic interviews for substance use disorders: Sensitivity and specificity compared with a LEAD golden standard. Nord J Psychiatry. 2015;69(1):48–56.CrossRefPubMed Gerdner A, Kestenberg J, Edvinsson M. Validity of the Swedish SCID and ADDIS diagnostic interviews for substance use disorders: Sensitivity and specificity compared with a LEAD golden standard. Nord J Psychiatry. 2015;69(1):48–56.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zanarini MC, Skodol AE, Bender D, Dolan R, Sanislow C, Schaefer E, et al. The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: Reliability of Axis I and II diagnoses. J Pers Disord. 2000;14:291–9.CrossRefPubMed Zanarini MC, Skodol AE, Bender D, Dolan R, Sanislow C, Schaefer E, et al. The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: Reliability of Axis I and II diagnoses. J Pers Disord. 2000;14:291–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Otsubo T, Tanaka K, Koda R, Shinoda J, Sano N, Tanaka S, et al. Reliability and validity of Japanese version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005;59(5):517–26.CrossRefPubMed Otsubo T, Tanaka K, Koda R, Shinoda J, Sano N, Tanaka S, et al. Reliability and validity of Japanese version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005;59(5):517–26.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Normann GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989. Streiner DL, Normann GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
20.
go back to reference Schneider B, Maurer K, Sargk D, Heiskel H, Weber B, Frölich L, et al. Concordance of DSM-IV Axis I and II diagnoses by personal and informant’s interview. Psychiatry Res. 2004;127(1–2):121–36.CrossRefPubMed Schneider B, Maurer K, Sargk D, Heiskel H, Weber B, Frölich L, et al. Concordance of DSM-IV Axis I and II diagnoses by personal and informant’s interview. Psychiatry Res. 2004;127(1–2):121–36.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mordal J, Gundersen Ø, Bramnes JG. Norwegian version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview: Feasibility, acceptability and test-retest reliability in an acute psychiatric ward. Eur Psychiatry. 2010;25(3):172–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.02.004.CrossRefPubMed Mordal J, Gundersen Ø, Bramnes JG. Norwegian version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview: Feasibility, acceptability and test-retest reliability in an acute psychiatric ward. Eur Psychiatry. 2010;25(3):172–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.02.004.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kadri N, Agoub M, Gnaoui S, Mchichi Alami K, Hergueta T, Moussaoui D. Moroccan colloquial Arabic version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): qualitative and quantitative validation. Eur Psychiatry. 2005;20:193–5.CrossRefPubMed Kadri N, Agoub M, Gnaoui S, Mchichi Alami K, Hergueta T, Moussaoui D. Moroccan colloquial Arabic version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): qualitative and quantitative validation. Eur Psychiatry. 2005;20:193–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Smith DC, Huber DL, Hall JA. Psychometric Evaluation of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Childhood Diagnoses (KID-SCID). J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2005;11(3–4):1–21.CrossRef Smith DC, Huber DL, Hall JA. Psychometric Evaluation of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Childhood Diagnoses (KID-SCID). J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2005;11(3–4):1–21.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lobbestael J, Leurgans M, Arntz A. Inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II). Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18(1):75–9.CrossRefPubMed Lobbestael J, Leurgans M, Arntz A. Inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II). Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18(1):75–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Williams JBW, Gibbon M, First MB, Spitzer RL, Davies M, Borus J, et al. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID): II. Multisite Test-Retest Reliability Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49(8):630–6.CrossRef Williams JBW, Gibbon M, First MB, Spitzer RL, Davies M, Borus J, et al. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID): II. Multisite Test-Retest Reliability Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49(8):630–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rubio-Stipec M, Peters L, Andres G. Test-retest reliability of the computerized CIDI (CIDI-auto): Substance abuse modules. Subst Abus. 1999;20(4):263–72.PubMed Rubio-Stipec M, Peters L, Andres G. Test-retest reliability of the computerized CIDI (CIDI-auto): Substance abuse modules. Subst Abus. 1999;20(4):263–72.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Reliability of ADDIS for diagnoses of substance use disorders according to ICD-10, DSM-IV and DSM-5: test-retest and inter-item consistency
Authors
Arne Gerdner
Lynn Wickström
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1747-597X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0008-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 1/2015 Go to the issue