Published in:
Open Access
01-12-2018 | Research
Analytic validity of DecisionDx-Melanoma, a gene expression profile test for determining metastatic risk in melanoma patients
Authors:
Robert W. Cook, Brooke Middlebrook, Jeff Wilkinson, Kyle R. Covington, Kristen Oelschlager, Federico A. Monzon, John F. Stone
Published in:
Diagnostic Pathology
|
Issue 1/2018
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
The DecisionDx-Melanoma test provides prognostic information for patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM). Using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumor tissue, the RT-PCR-based test classifies patients into a low- (Class 1) or high-risk (Class 2) category for recurrence based on expression of 31 genes. The current study was designed to assess the analytical validity of this test.
Methods
Inter-assay, inter-instrument, and inter-operator studies were performed to evaluate reliability of the 31-gene expression test results, sample stability and reagent stability. From March 2013 through June 2016, the gene expression test was performed on 8244 CM tumors. De-identified data from Pathology Reports were used to assess technical success.
Results
Robust sample and reagent stability was observed. Inter-assay concordance on 168 specimens run on 2 consecutive days was 99% and matched probability scores were significantly correlated (R2 = 0.96). Inter-instrument concordance was 95%, and probability scores had a correlation R2 of 0.99 (p < 0.001). From 8244 CM specimens submitted since 2013, 85% (7023) fulfilled pre-specified tumor content parameters. In these samples with sufficient tumor requirements, the technical success of the test was 98%.
Conclusion
DecisionDx-Melanoma is a robust gene expression profile test that demonstrates strong reproducibility between experiments and has high technical reliability on clinical samples.