Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Chiropractic identity, role and future: a survey of North American chiropractic students

Authors: Jordan A Gliedt, Cheryl Hawk, Michelle Anderson, Kashif Ahmad, Dinah Bunn, Jerrilyn Cambron, Brian Gleberzon, John Hart, Anupama Kizhakkeveettil, Stephen M Perle, Michael Ramcharan, Stephanie Sullivan, Liang Zhang

Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The literature pertaining to chiropractic students’ opinions with respect to the desired future status of the chiropractic physician is limited and is an appropriate topic worthy of study. A previous pilot study was performed at a single chiropractic college. This current study is an expansion of this pilot project to collect data from chiropractic students enrolled in colleges throughout North America.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to investigate North American chiropractic students’ opinions concerning professional identity, role and future.

Methods

A 23-item cross-sectional electronic questionnaire was developed. A total of 7,455 chiropractic students from 12 North American English-speaking chiropractic colleges were invited to complete the survey. Survey items encompassed demographics, evidence-based practice, chiropractic identity and setting, and scope of practice. Data were collected and descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

Results

A total of 1,247 (16.7% response rate) questionnaires were electronically submitted. Most respondents agreed (34.8%) or strongly agreed (52.2%) that it is important for chiropractors to be educated in evidence-based practice. A majority agreed (35.6%) or strongly agreed (25.8%) the emphasis of chiropractic intervention is to eliminate vertebral subluxations/vertebral subluxation complexes. A large number of respondents (55.2%) were not in favor of expanding the scope of the chiropractic profession to include prescribing medications with appropriate advanced training. Most respondents estimated that chiropractors should be considered mainstream health care practitioners (69.1%). Several respondents (46.8%) think that chiropractic research should focus on the physiological mechanisms of chiropractic adjustments.

Conclusion

The chiropractic students in this study showed a preference for participating in mainstream health care, report an exposure to evidence-based practice, and desire to hold to traditional chiropractic theories and practices. The majority of students would like to see an emphasis on correction of vertebral subluxation, while a larger percent found it is important to learn about evidence-based practice. These two key points may seem contradictory, suggesting cognitive dissonance. Or perhaps some students want to hold on to traditional theory (e.g., subluxation-centered practice) while recognizing the need for further research to fully explore these theories. Further research on this topic is needed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McGregor M, Puhl AA, Reinhart C, Injeyan HS, Soave D. Differentiating intraprofessional attitudes toward paradigms in health care delivery among chiropractic factions: results from a randomly sampled survey. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:51.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef McGregor M, Puhl AA, Reinhart C, Injeyan HS, Soave D. Differentiating intraprofessional attitudes toward paradigms in health care delivery among chiropractic factions: results from a randomly sampled survey. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:51.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gaboury I, Bujold M, Boon H, Moher D. Interprofessional collaboration within Canadian integrative healthcare clinics: key components. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(5):707–15.PubMedCrossRef Gaboury I, Bujold M, Boon H, Moher D. Interprofessional collaboration within Canadian integrative healthcare clinics: key components. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(5):707–15.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kreitzer MJ, Kligler B, Meeker WC. Health professions education and integrative healthcare. Explor. 2009;5(4):212–27.CrossRef Kreitzer MJ, Kligler B, Meeker WC. Health professions education and integrative healthcare. Explor. 2009;5(4):212–27.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Murphy DR, Justice BD, Paskowski IC, Perle SM, Schneider MJ. The establishment of a primary spine care practitioner and its benefits to health care reform in the united states. Chiropr Man Ther. 2011;19(1):17.CrossRef Murphy DR, Justice BD, Paskowski IC, Perle SM, Schneider MJ. The establishment of a primary spine care practitioner and its benefits to health care reform in the united states. Chiropr Man Ther. 2011;19(1):17.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Villanueva-Russell Y. Caught in the crosshairs: identity and cultural authority within chiropractic. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(11):1826–37.PubMedCrossRef Villanueva-Russell Y. Caught in the crosshairs: identity and cultural authority within chiropractic. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(11):1826–37.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference McGregor-Triano M: Jurisdictional Control of Conservative Spine Care: Chiropractic Versus Medicine. The University of Texas at Dallas: University of Texas at Dallas; 2006. McGregor-Triano M: Jurisdictional Control of Conservative Spine Care: Chiropractic Versus Medicine. The University of Texas at Dallas: University of Texas at Dallas; 2006.
7.
go back to reference Gliedt JA, Briggs S, Williams JS, Smith DP, Blampied J. Background, expectations and beliefs of a chiropractic student population: a cross-sectional survey. J Chiropr Educ. 2012;26(2):146–60.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Gliedt JA, Briggs S, Williams JS, Smith DP, Blampied J. Background, expectations and beliefs of a chiropractic student population: a cross-sectional survey. J Chiropr Educ. 2012;26(2):146–60.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Institute for Alternative Futures. Chiropractic 2025: Divergent Futures. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Alternative Futures; 2013. Institute for Alternative Futures. Chiropractic 2025: Divergent Futures. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Alternative Futures; 2013.
9.
go back to reference Gliedt JA: Finding a common ground in chiropractic: the key to progression. Top Integr Health Care 2011, 2(4). Gliedt JA: Finding a common ground in chiropractic: the key to progression. Top Integr Health Care 2011, 2(4).
10.
go back to reference Kaptchuck TJ, Eisenberg DM. Chiropractic: origins, controversies, and contributions. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(20):2215–24.CrossRef Kaptchuck TJ, Eisenberg DM. Chiropractic: origins, controversies, and contributions. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(20):2215–24.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nulty D. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assess Eval High Educ. 2008;33(3):301–14.CrossRef Nulty D. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assess Eval High Educ. 2008;33(3):301–14.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sturgis P, Roberts C, Smith P. Middle alternatives revisited: how the neither/nor response acts as a way of saying “i don’t know”? Sociol Methods Res. 2014;43(1):15–38.CrossRef Sturgis P, Roberts C, Smith P. Middle alternatives revisited: how the neither/nor response acts as a way of saying “i don’t know”? Sociol Methods Res. 2014;43(1):15–38.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Chiropractic identity, role and future: a survey of North American chiropractic students
Authors
Jordan A Gliedt
Cheryl Hawk
Michelle Anderson
Kashif Ahmad
Dinah Bunn
Jerrilyn Cambron
Brian Gleberzon
John Hart
Anupama Kizhakkeveettil
Stephen M Perle
Michael Ramcharan
Stephanie Sullivan
Liang Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2045-709X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-014-0048-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2015 Go to the issue