Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Application of the ICF based Norwegian function assessment scale to employees in Germany

Authors: Sylvia Jankowiak, Uwe Rose, Norbert Kersten

Published in: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

At the interface of the occupational setting and rehabilitation, normative values for functional ability are desirable and worthwhile. The Norwegian Function Assessment Scale (NFAS) is a 39 item self-report instrument based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). As the questionnaire was not used in a working population, we aimed to obtain functional levels of employees in Germany as measured through the NFAS.

Methods

The NFAS was included in the Study on Mental Health at Work (S-MGA) 2011/12, a representative German survey of employees aged 31 to 60 years. For descriptive analyses, 95% confidence intervals were applied through bootstrap estimation to the skewed data of the NFAS (range from 1 = ‘no difficulty’ to 5 = ‘could not do it’). The data were analysed by age decades, professional qualification, and by disabilities, congenital diseases and accidents, stratified by sex. Linear regression analyses were conducted to estimate adjusted effects of age, professional qualification, and health limitations.

Results

The NFAS total score was 1.17 (95% CI = 1.15–1.17). Thirty-five percent of the employees’ (1378 out of 3937 participants) reported the best possible functional ability (NFAS total score of 1.00). Managing and walking/standing were the NFAS’ most affected domains with a score of 1.26 (95% CI = 1.23–1.27), respectively. The regression analysis confirmed more functional difficulties for elder employees, females, employees with low professional qualification, and for employees suffering from disability and accidents.

Conclusions

The study presents normative values of functional ability for the workforce. The results are useful for score interpretation in rehabilitation and return-to-work processes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kirch W. Encyclopedia of public health: volume 1: A-H volume 2: I-Z. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2008. Kirch W. Encyclopedia of public health: volume 1: A-H volume 2: I-Z. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2008.
2.
go back to reference Nordenfelt L. The concept of work ability. Brussels: PIE Peter Lang; 2008. Nordenfelt L. The concept of work ability. Brussels: PIE Peter Lang; 2008.
3.
go back to reference Badura B, Ducki A, Schröder H, Klose J, Meyer M. Fehlzeiten-Report 2015. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2015.CrossRef Badura B, Ducki A, Schröder H, Klose J, Meyer M. Fehlzeiten-Report 2015. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2015.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference De Boer WEL, Brenninkmeijer W, Zuidam W. Long-term disability arrangement. A comparative study of assessments and quality control. Hoofddrop, the Netherlands: The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research; 2004. De Boer WEL, Brenninkmeijer W, Zuidam W. Long-term disability arrangement. A comparative study of assessments and quality control. Hoofddrop, the Netherlands: The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research; 2004.
5.
go back to reference Statistics Norway. Statistical yearbook of Norway 2013. Oslo: Statistics Norway; 2014. Statistics Norway. Statistical yearbook of Norway 2013. Oslo: Statistics Norway; 2014.
6.
go back to reference Robert Koch-Institut (Hrsg). Gesundheit in Deutschland. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Berlin: RKI; 2015. Robert Koch-Institut (Hrsg). Gesundheit in Deutschland. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Berlin: RKI; 2015.
7.
go back to reference Brage S, Donceel P, Falez F. Development of ICF core set for disability evaluation in social security. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1392–6.CrossRefPubMed Brage S, Donceel P, Falez F. Development of ICF core set for disability evaluation in social security. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1392–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cerniauskaite M, Quintas R, Boldt C, Raggi A, Cieza A, Bickenbach JE, et al. Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2009: its use, implementation and operationalisation. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:281–309.CrossRefPubMed Cerniauskaite M, Quintas R, Boldt C, Raggi A, Cieza A, Bickenbach JE, et al. Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2009: its use, implementation and operationalisation. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:281–309.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Organization WH. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. Organization WH. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
10.
go back to reference Brage S, Fleten N, Knudsrød O, Reiso H, Ryen A. Norwegian functional scale - a new instrument in sickness certification and disability assessments. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 2004;124:2472–4. Brage S, Fleten N, Knudsrød O, Reiso H, Ryen A. Norwegian functional scale - a new instrument in sickness certification and disability assessments. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 2004;124:2472–4.
11.
go back to reference Osteras N, Brage S, Garratt A, Benth JS, Natvig B, Gulbrandsen P. Functional ability in a population: normative survey data and reliability for the ICF based Norwegian function assessment scale. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:278.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Osteras N, Brage S, Garratt A, Benth JS, Natvig B, Gulbrandsen P. Functional ability in a population: normative survey data and reliability for the ICF based Norwegian function assessment scale. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:278.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Magnussen LH, Strand LI, Eriksen HR. Physical and mental functioning in disability pensioners with back pain. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2009;17:37–47.CrossRef Magnussen LH, Strand LI, Eriksen HR. Physical and mental functioning in disability pensioners with back pain. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2009;17:37–47.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Oyeflaten I, Midtgarden IJ, Maeland S, Eriksen HR, Magnussen LH. Functioning, coping and work status three years after participating in an interdisciplinary, occupational rehabilitation program. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42:425–33.CrossRefPubMed Oyeflaten I, Midtgarden IJ, Maeland S, Eriksen HR, Magnussen LH. Functioning, coping and work status three years after participating in an interdisciplinary, occupational rehabilitation program. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42:425–33.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Osteras N, Gulbrandsen P, Garratt A, Benth JS, Dahl FA, Natvig B, et al. A randomised comparison of a four- and a five-point scale version of the Norwegian function assessment scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Osteras N, Gulbrandsen P, Garratt A, Benth JS, Dahl FA, Natvig B, et al. A randomised comparison of a four- and a five-point scale version of the Norwegian function assessment scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Schröder H, Schiel S, Schulz S, Kleudgen M. Mentale Gesundheit bei der Arbeit (S-MGA): Methodenbericht zur Repräsentativerhebung an Erwerbstätigen in Deutschland. 2. überarbeitete Auflage ed. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin: Dortmund/Berlin/Dresden; 2015. Schröder H, Schiel S, Schulz S, Kleudgen M. Mentale Gesundheit bei der Arbeit (S-MGA): Methodenbericht zur Repräsentativerhebung an Erwerbstätigen in Deutschland. 2. überarbeitete Auflage ed. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin: Dortmund/Berlin/Dresden; 2015.
16.
go back to reference Bundesamt S. Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Haushalte und Familien. Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2011. Bundesamt S. Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Haushalte und Familien. Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2011.
17.
go back to reference Rose U, Schiel S, Schröder H, Kleudgen M, Tophoven S, Rauch A, et al. The study on mental health at work: design and sampling. Scand J Public Health. 2017;45:584–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rose U, Schiel S, Schröder H, Kleudgen M, Tophoven S, Rauch A, et al. The study on mental health at work: design and sampling. Scand J Public Health. 2017;45:584–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Bundesamt S. Statistisches Jahrbuch Deutschland und Internationales 2016. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2016. Bundesamt S. Statistisches Jahrbuch Deutschland und Internationales 2016. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2016.
19.
go back to reference SYSTAT Inc. SYSTAT 13. Statistics I. Chicago: SYSTAT Software, Inc.; 2009. SYSTAT Inc. SYSTAT 13. Statistics I. Chicago: SYSTAT Software, Inc.; 2009.
20.
go back to reference Rüschendorf L. Mathematische Statistik. Berlin: Springer; 2014. Rüschendorf L. Mathematische Statistik. Berlin: Springer; 2014.
21.
go back to reference Tweedie MCK. An index which distinguishes between some important exponential families. Statistics: Applications and New Directions - Proceedings of the Indian Statistical Institute Golden Jubilee International Conference. Calcutta: Indian Statistical Institute. 1984;579–604. Tweedie MCK. An index which distinguishes between some important exponential families. Statistics: Applications and New Directions - Proceedings of the Indian Statistical Institute Golden Jubilee International Conference. Calcutta: Indian Statistical Institute. 1984;579–604.
22.
go back to reference Grammenos S. Illness, disability and social inclusion. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions; 2003. Grammenos S. Illness, disability and social inclusion. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions; 2003.
23.
go back to reference Falvo D. Medical and psychosocial aspects of chronic illness and disability. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 2014. Falvo D. Medical and psychosocial aspects of chronic illness and disability. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 2014.
Metadata
Title
Application of the ICF based Norwegian function assessment scale to employees in Germany
Authors
Sylvia Jankowiak
Uwe Rose
Norbert Kersten
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6673
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-017-0183-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 1/2018 Go to the issue