Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Globalization and Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Australia’s overseas development aid commitment to health through the sustainable development goals: a multi-stakeholder perspective

Authors: Claire E. Brolan, Christopher A. McEwan, Peter S. Hill

Published in: Globalization and Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In 2018, the Australian Government, through a Senate-led Parliamentary Inquiry, sought the views of diverse stakeholders on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) implementation both domestically and as part of Australia’s Overseas Development Assistance (ODA) program. One hundred and sixty-four written submissions were received. The submissions offered perspective and guidance from a rich cross-section of those involved, and with keen interest in, Australia’s ODA-SDG commitment. This article identifies and explores the submissions to that Inquiry which placed impetus on Australia’s ODA-SDG and health and development nexus. It then compares how the synthesized views, concerns and priorities of selected Inquiry stakeholders align with and reflect the Australian Government’s treatment of SDG 3 in its SDG Voluntary National Review (VNR), as well as with the final Inquiry report summarizing submission content.

Results

Four key themes were synthesized and drawn from the thirty-one stakeholder submissions included in our analysis. Disconnect was then found to exist between the selected stakeholder views and the Australian Government’s SDG-VNR’s treatment of SDG 3, as well as with the content of the Parliamentary Inquiry’s final report with respect to the ODA-SDG and health and development nexus.

Conclusions

We situate the findings of our analysis within the wider strategic context of the Australian Government’s policy commitment to “step up” in the Pacific region. This research provides an insight into both multi-stakeholder and Federal Government views on ODA in the Indo-Pacific region, especially at a time when Australia’s Pacific engagement has come to the forefront of both foreign and security policy. We conclude that the SDG agenda, including the SDG health and development agenda, could offer a unique vehicle for enabling a paradigm shift in the Australian Government’s development approach toward the Pacific region and its diverse peoples. This potential is strongly reflected in stakeholder perspectives included in our analysis. However, study findings remind that the political determinants of health, and overlapping political determinants of SDG achievement, will be instrumental in the coming decade, and that stakeholders from different sectors need to be genuinely engaged in SDG-ODA policy-related decision-making and planning by governments in both developed and developing countries alike.
Literature
8.
go back to reference Niklasson L. Improving the sustainable development goals: strategies and the governance challenges. New York: Routledge; 2019.CrossRef Niklasson L. Improving the sustainable development goals: strategies and the governance challenges. New York: Routledge; 2019.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lanshina T, Barinova V, Loginova A, Lavrovskii E, Ponedelnik I. Localizing and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals at the national level: Cases of leadership. Int J Agric Manag. 2019;8(1):207–24. Lanshina T, Barinova V, Loginova A, Lavrovskii E, Ponedelnik I. Localizing and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals at the national level: Cases of leadership. Int J Agric Manag. 2019;8(1):207–24.
11.
go back to reference Fues T. Recalibrating the G20's mission towards sustainable development: Opportunities and challenges for the German presidency. Int Organ Res J. 2017;12(2):34–53. Fues T. Recalibrating the G20's mission towards sustainable development: Opportunities and challenges for the German presidency. Int Organ Res J. 2017;12(2):34–53.
13.
go back to reference Stafford-Smith M, Griggs D, Gaffney O, Ullah F, Reyers B, Kanie B, et al. 2017. Integration: the key to implementing the sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci. 2017;12(6):911–9.CrossRef Stafford-Smith M, Griggs D, Gaffney O, Ullah F, Reyers B, Kanie B, et al. 2017. Integration: the key to implementing the sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci. 2017;12(6):911–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ayson R. The ‘arc of instability’ and Australia’s strategic policy. Aust J Int Aff. 2007;61(2):215–31.CrossRef Ayson R. The ‘arc of instability’ and Australia’s strategic policy. Aust J Int Aff. 2007;61(2):215–31.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Medcalfe R. In Defence of the indo-Pacific: Australia’s new strategic map. Aust J Int Aff. 2014;68(4):470–83.CrossRef Medcalfe R. In Defence of the indo-Pacific: Australia’s new strategic map. Aust J Int Aff. 2014;68(4):470–83.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cobett J, Dinnen S. Examining recent shifts in Australia’s foreign aid policy: new paradigm or more incremental change? Aust J Int Aff. 2016;70(1):87–103.CrossRef Cobett J, Dinnen S. Examining recent shifts in Australia’s foreign aid policy: new paradigm or more incremental change? Aust J Int Aff. 2016;70(1):87–103.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference White H. In denial: Defending Australia as China looks south. Aust Foreign Aff. 2019;(6):5–27. White H. In denial: Defending Australia as China looks south. Aust Foreign Aff. 2019;(6):5–27.
21.
go back to reference Lanteigne M. Water Dragon? China, Power Shifts and Soft Balancing in the South Pacific. Pol Sci. 2012;64(1):21–38.CrossRef Lanteigne M. Water Dragon? China, Power Shifts and Soft Balancing in the South Pacific. Pol Sci. 2012;64(1):21–38.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hameiri S. China’s ‘charm offensive’ in the Pacific and Australia’s regional order. Pac Rev. 2015;28(5):631–54.CrossRef Hameiri S. China’s ‘charm offensive’ in the Pacific and Australia’s regional order. Pac Rev. 2015;28(5):631–54.CrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Kamradt-Scott A. Securing indo-Pacific health security: Australia’s approach to regional health security. Aust J Int Aff. 2018;72(6):500–19.CrossRef Kamradt-Scott A. Securing indo-Pacific health security: Australia’s approach to regional health security. Aust J Int Aff. 2018;72(6):500–19.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tarte S. The changing paradigm of Pacific regional politics. Round Table. 2017;106(2):135–42.CrossRef Tarte S. The changing paradigm of Pacific regional politics. Round Table. 2017;106(2):135–42.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fry G, Tarte S. The ‘new Pacific diplomacy’: an introduction. In: Fry G, Tarte S, editors. The new Pacific diplomacy. Canberra: ANU Press; 2015. p. 3–19.CrossRef Fry G, Tarte S. The ‘new Pacific diplomacy’: an introduction. In: Fry G, Tarte S, editors. The new Pacific diplomacy. Canberra: ANU Press; 2015. p. 3–19.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Dreher T, Boyer M. Climate refugees or migrants? Contesting media frames on climate justice in the Pacific. Environ Commun. 2015;9(1):58–76.CrossRef Dreher T, Boyer M. Climate refugees or migrants? Contesting media frames on climate justice in the Pacific. Environ Commun. 2015;9(1):58–76.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Brolan CE, Herron L, Carney A, Fritz EM, James J, Margetts M. A potential human rights act in Queensland and inclusion of the right to health. Aust NZ J Publ Heal. 2018;42(2):120–6.CrossRef Brolan CE, Herron L, Carney A, Fritz EM, James J, Margetts M. A potential human rights act in Queensland and inclusion of the right to health. Aust NZ J Publ Heal. 2018;42(2):120–6.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res. 2001;1(3):385–405.CrossRef Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res. 2001;1(3):385–405.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Weitzman EA. Software and qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 803–20. Weitzman EA. Software and qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 803–20.
38.
go back to reference Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2006. Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2006.
39.
go back to reference Pankhurst JO. Appeals to evidence for the resolution of wicked problems: the origins and mechanisms of evidentiary bias. Policy Sc. 2016;49:373–93.CrossRef Pankhurst JO. Appeals to evidence for the resolution of wicked problems: the origins and mechanisms of evidentiary bias. Policy Sc. 2016;49:373–93.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Green J, Thorgood N. Qualitative methods for Health Research. 2nd ed. London, UK: Sage; 2009. Green J, Thorgood N. Qualitative methods for Health Research. 2nd ed. London, UK: Sage; 2009.
41.
go back to reference Kickbusch I. The political determinants of health – 10 years on: Public health professionals need to become more political astute to their goals. BMJ Clin Res (Online). 2015;350:h81. Kickbusch I. The political determinants of health – 10 years on: Public health professionals need to become more political astute to their goals. BMJ Clin Res (Online). 2015;350:h81.
42.
go back to reference Ruiz-Cantero MT, Guijarro-Garvi M, Bean DR, Martínez-Riera JR, Fernández-Sáez J. Governance commitment to reduce maternal mortality. A political determinant beyond the wealth of the countries. Health Place. 2019;57:313–20.CrossRef Ruiz-Cantero MT, Guijarro-Garvi M, Bean DR, Martínez-Riera JR, Fernández-Sáez J. Governance commitment to reduce maternal mortality. A political determinant beyond the wealth of the countries. Health Place. 2019;57:313–20.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Mishori R. The Social Determinants of Health? Time to Focus on the Political Determinants of Health! Med Care. 2019;57(7):491–3.CrossRef Mishori R. The Social Determinants of Health? Time to Focus on the Political Determinants of Health! Med Care. 2019;57(7):491–3.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Australia’s overseas development aid commitment to health through the sustainable development goals: a multi-stakeholder perspective
Authors
Claire E. Brolan
Christopher A. McEwan
Peter S. Hill
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Globalization and Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1744-8603
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0507-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Globalization and Health 1/2019 Go to the issue