Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis | Research

Development of a new high sensitivity mechanical switch for augmentative and alternative communication access in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Authors: M. Caligari, M. Godi, M. Giardini, R. Colombo

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

People with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (PwALS) in the advanced phase are critically affected by an almost total loss of mobility and severe communication problems. Scanning access based on the patient’s interaction with a sensor (or switch) that intercepts even a weak body movement is a valid communication aid. However, its use becomes limited with the progressive decline of residual movements. To overcome this problem, we designed a new sensor, the Lever Magnetic-spring Mechanical Switch (LeMMS), allowing repeated activation/release cycles requiring a very small activation force.

Methods

The LeMMS was applied and validated in a group of 20 PwALS in an advanced stage of disease. All subjects were regular users of communication aids employing other sensors, but which they could no longer operate their sensors (different from LeMMS). Patients were assessed at baseline (t0) and after one (t1), 6 (t2) and 12 (t3) months. Assessment at t0 included administration of standardized clinical scales, the Click-Test-30 counting the maximum number of LeMMS activations in 30 s, and thumb/fingers strength assessment with the Kendall scale. The QUEST 2.0-Dev questionnaire was administered at t1. Some use-related information and the Click-Test-30 were collected at t1, t2 and t3.

Results

After one training session, all patients could operate the LeMMS with minimal residual movement of one finger. At t1, they used it on average 5.45 h/day. The mean score of the QUEST 2.0-Dev was 4.63, suggesting strong satisfaction with the LeMMS. Regarding Click-Test-30 scores, no significant difference was found between t0 and t1, but performance at t2 and t3 declined significantly (p < 0.005 vs. t0). At t3, 9/20 patients were still able to use their communication aid.

Conclusions

This new switch sensor can enable PwALS to use their communication aids for a prolonged time even in the advanced phase of disease. It is easy to use, reliable and cheap, thus representing an intermediate alternative to more sophisticated and costly devices.
Literature
1.
Colombo R, Mazzini L, Mora G, Parenzan R, Creola G, Pirali I, et al. Measurement of isometric muscle strength: a reproducibility study of maximal voluntary contraction in normal subjects and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Med Eng Phys. 2000;22(3):167–74.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Murphy J. Communication strategies of people with ALS and their partners. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2004;5(2):121–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Brownlee A, Palovcak M. The role of augmentative communication devices in the medical management of ALS. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(6):445–50.PubMed
4.
Ball LJ, Beukelman DR, Pattee GL. Communication effectiveness of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Commun Disord. 2004;37(3):197–215.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
Beukelman DR, Fager S, Ball L, Dietz A. AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: a review. Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23(3):230–42.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Schlosser RW, Balandin S, Hemsley B, Iacono T, Probst P, von Tetzchner S. Facilitated communication and authorship: a systematic review. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30(4):359–68.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Light J, McNaughton D. From basic to applied research to improve outcomes for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: potential contributions of eye tracking research methods. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30(2):99–105.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Caligari M, Godi M, Guglielmetti S, Franchignoni F, Nardone A. Eye tracking communication devices in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: impact on disability and quality of life. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2013;14(7–8):546–52.PubMedCrossRef
10.
McCane LM, Sellers EW, McFarland DJ, Mak JN, Carmack CS, Zeitlin D, et al. Brain-computer interface (BCI) evaluation in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2014;15(3–4):207–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Thompson DE, Blain-Moraes S, Huggins JE. Performance assessment in brain-computer interface-based augmentative and alternative communication. Biomed Eng Online. 2013;12:43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Cipresso P, Carelli L, Solca F, Meazzi D, Meriggi P, Poletti B, et al. The use of P300-based BCIs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: from augmentative and alternative communication to cognitive assessment. Brain Behav. 2012;2(4):479–98.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Anson D, Moist P, Przywara M, Wells H, Saylor H, Maxime H. The effects of word completion and word prediction on typing rates using on-screen keyboards. Assist Technol. 2006;18(2):146–54.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Linse K, Aust E, Joos M, Hermann A. Communication matters-pitfalls and promise of Hightech communication devices in palliative Care of Severely Physically Disabled Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Front Neurol. 2018;9:603.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Craig A, Tran Y, McIsaac P, Boord P. The efficacy and benefits of environmental control systems for the severely disabled. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11(1):RA32–9.PubMed
16.
Alden DG, Daniels RW, Kanarick AF. Keyboard Design and Operation: A Review of the Major Issues. Human Factors. J Hum Factors Ergon Soc. 1972;14(4):275–93.CrossRef
17.
18.
Nagurka M, Marklin R. Measurement of stiffness and damping characteristics of computer keyboard keys. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2005;127(2):283–8.CrossRef
19.
Cedarbaum JM, Stambler N, Malta E, Fuller C, Hilt D, Thurmond B, et al. The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. BDNF ALS Study Group (Phase III). J Neurol Sci. 1999;169(1–2):13–21.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Kendall FP. I muscoli: funzioni e test con postura e dolore. Verduci: Roma; 2006.
21.
Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil. 2002;14(3):101–5.CrossRef
22.
Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(5):644–7.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Froud R, Abel G. Using ROC curves to choose minimally important change thresholds when sensitivity and specificity are valued equally: the forgotten lesson of Pythagoras. Theoretical considerations and an example application of change in health status. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114468.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Gryfe P, Kurtz I, Gutmann M, Laiken G. Freedom through a single switch: coping and communicating with artificial ventilation. J Neurol Sci. 1996;139(Suppl):132–3.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Gibbons C, Beneteau E. Functional Performance Using Eye Control and Single Switch Scanning by People With ALS. Perspect Augment Altern Commun. 2010;19(3):64–9.CrossRef
27.
Applebaum EV, Breton D, Feng ZW, Ta AT, Walsh K, Chassé K, et al. Modified 30-second Sit to Stand test predicts falls in a cohort of institutionalized older veterans. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176946.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Darvishi S, Gharabaghi A, Ridding MC, Abbott D, Baumert M. Reaction time predicts brain-computer Interface aptitude. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2018;6:2000311.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Baxter S, Enderby P, Evans P, Judge S. Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47(2):115–29.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Moorcroft A, Scarinci N, Meyer C. A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the provision and use of low-tech and unaided AAC systems for people with complex communication needs and their families. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;2:1–22.
31.
Bailey RL, Parette HP, Stoner JB, Angell ME, Carroll K. Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2006;37(1):50–60.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Cooper L, Balandin S, Trembath D. The loneliness experiences of young adults with cerebral palsy who use alternative and augmentative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2009;25(3):154–64.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Spataro R, Ciriacono M, Manno C, La Bella V. The eye-tracking computer device for communication in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;130(1):40–5.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Dattilo J, Estrella G, Estrella LJ, Light J, McNaughton D, Seabury M. «I have chosen to live life abundantly»: perceptions of leisure by adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24(1):16–28.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Romano N, Chun RYS. Augmentative and Alternative Communication use: family and professionals’ perceptions of facilitators and barriers. Codas. 2018;30(4):e20170138.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Hansen JP, Tørning K, Johansen AS, Itoh K, Aoki H. Gaze typing compared with input by head and hand. In: Proceedings of the 2004 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications. NY, USA: ACM New York; 2004. p. 131–8.
37.
Ball LJ, Nordness AS, Fager SK, Kersch K, Mohr B, Pattee GL, et al. Eye gaze access of AAC technology for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of medical speech-language pathology. 2010;18(3):11.
38.
Guy V, Soriani M-H, Bruno M, Papadopoulo T, Desnuelle C, Clerc M. Brain computer interface with the P300 speller: usability for disabled people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61(1):5–11.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Vitacca M, Comini L, Assoni G, Fiorenza D, Gilè S, Bernocchi P, et al. Tele-assistance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: long term activity and costs. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(6):494–500.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Hobson EV, Baird WO, Cooper CL, Mawson S, Shaw PJ, Mcdermott CJ. Using technology to improve access to specialist care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2016;17(5–6):313–24.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Mannino M, Cellura E, Grimaldi G, Volanti P, Piccoli F, La Bella V. Telephone follow-up for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2007;14(1):79–84.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of a new high sensitivity mechanical switch for augmentative and alternative communication access in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Authors
M. Caligari
M. Godi
M. Giardini
R. Colombo
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0626-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research

Muscle synergies demonstrate only minimal changes after treatment in cerebral palsy

Research

Neuromuscular adaptations and sensorimotor integration following a unilateral transfemoral amputation

Research

A modified standardized nine hole peg test for valid and reliable kinematic assessment of dexterity post-stroke

Research

Reduction of the onset response in kilohertz frequency alternating current nerve block with amplitude ramps from non-zero amplitudes

Research

Effects of extended powered knee prosthesis stance time via visual feedback on gait symmetry of individuals with unilateral amputation: a preliminary study

Research

Vision does not always help stroke survivors compensate for impaired limb position sense