Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Interaction between position sense and force control in bimanual tasks

Authors: Giulia Ballardini, Valentina Ponassi, Elisa Galofaro, Giorgio Carlini, Francesca Marini, Laura Pellegrino, Pietro Morasso, Maura Casadio

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several daily living activities require people to coordinate the motion and the force produced by both arms, using their position sense and sense of effort. However, to date, the interaction in bimanual tasks has not been extensively investigated.

Methods

We focused on bimanual tasks where subjects were required:
  • (Experiment 1) to move their hands until reaching the same position – equal hand position implied identical arm configurations in joint space - under different loading conditions;
  • (Experiment 2) to produce the same amount of isometric force by pushing upward, with their hands placed in symmetric or asymmetric positions.
The arm motions and forces required for accomplishing these tasks were in the vertical direction. We enrolled a healthy population of 20 subjects for Experiment 1 and 25 for Experiment 2. Our primary outcome was the systematic difference between the two hands at the end of each trial in terms of position for Experiment 1 and force for Experiment 2. In both experiments using repeated measure ANOVA we evaluated the effect of each specific condition, namely loading in the former case and hand configuration in the latter.

Results

In the first experiment, the difference between the hands’ positions was greater when they were concurrently loaded with different weights. Conversely, in the second experiment, when subjects were asked to exert equal forces with both arms, the systematic difference between left and right force was not influenced by symmetric or asymmetric arm configurations, but by the position of the left hand, regardless of the right hand position. The performance was better when the left hand was in the higher position.

Conclusions

The experiments report the reciprocal interaction between position sense and sense of effort inbimanual tasks performed by healthy subjects. Apart for the intrinsic interest for a better understanding of basic sensorimotor processes, the results are also relevant to clinical applications, for defining functional evaluation and rehabilitative protocols for people with neurological diseases or conditions that impair the ability to sense and control concurrently position and force.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The Just Noticeable Difference (JND), i.e., the minimum percent variation between two stimuli necessary to perceive a difference [58], was measured for force perception in lifting task yielding a rough 10% figure [5860]. Therefore, the subjects of our experiments, although holding light-weights operated well beyond such threshold, with one weight being 83% heavier than the other.
 
2
(i) restricting the analysis to a single axis (the vertical axis) and (ii) focusing on steady-state (static positions and isometric forces) rather than dynamics.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Walter CB, Swinnen SP. Asymmetric interlimb interference during the performance of a dynamic bimanual task. Brain Cogn. 1990;14(2):185–200.PubMedCrossRef Walter CB, Swinnen SP. Asymmetric interlimb interference during the performance of a dynamic bimanual task. Brain Cogn. 1990;14(2):185–200.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Diedrichsen J, Hazeltine E, Nurss WK, Ivry RB. The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90(4):2409–18.PubMedCrossRef Diedrichsen J, Hazeltine E, Nurss WK, Ivry RB. The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90(4):2409–18.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hu X, Newell KM. Asymmetric interference associated with force amplitude and hand dominance in bimanual constant isometric force. Mot Control. 2012;16(3):297–316.CrossRef Hu X, Newell KM. Asymmetric interference associated with force amplitude and hand dominance in bimanual constant isometric force. Mot Control. 2012;16(3):297–316.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tazoe T, Sasada S, Sakamoto M, Komiyama T. Modulation of interhemispheric interactions across symmetric and asymmetric bimanual force regulations. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;37(1):96–104.PubMedCrossRef Tazoe T, Sasada S, Sakamoto M, Komiyama T. Modulation of interhemispheric interactions across symmetric and asymmetric bimanual force regulations. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;37(1):96–104.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Johnson KA, Cunnington R, Bradshaw JL, Phillips JG, Iansek R, Rogers MA. Bimanual co-ordination in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 1998;121(4):743–53.PubMedCrossRef Johnson KA, Cunnington R, Bradshaw JL, Phillips JG, Iansek R, Rogers MA. Bimanual co-ordination in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 1998;121(4):743–53.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Charles J, Gordon AM. Development of hand–arm bimanual intensive training (HABIT) for improving bimanual coordination in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(11):931–6.PubMedCrossRef Charles J, Gordon AM. Development of hand–arm bimanual intensive training (HABIT) for improving bimanual coordination in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(11):931–6.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Guiard Y. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Mot Behav. 1987;19(4):486–517.PubMedCrossRef Guiard Y. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Mot Behav. 1987;19(4):486–517.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Caccavale F, Natale C, Siciliano B, Villani L. Achieving a cooperative behavior in a dual-arm robot system via a modular control structure. J Robot Syst. 2001;18(12):691–9.CrossRef Caccavale F, Natale C, Siciliano B, Villani L. Achieving a cooperative behavior in a dual-arm robot system via a modular control structure. J Robot Syst. 2001;18(12):691–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Osone T, Tatsuno J, Nishida T, Kobayashi H. Cooperative motion planning for dual arm robot to demonstrate human arm movements. In: Proceedings 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Rome: IEEE; 2002. p. 488–93. Osone T, Tatsuno J, Nishida T, Kobayashi H. Cooperative motion planning for dual arm robot to demonstrate human arm movements. In: Proceedings 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Rome: IEEE; 2002. p. 488–93.
12.
go back to reference Wimbock T, Ott C, Hirzinger G. Impedance behaviors for two-handed manipulation: design and experiments. In: Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Berlin: IEEE; 2007. p. 4182–9. Wimbock T, Ott C, Hirzinger G. Impedance behaviors for two-handed manipulation: design and experiments. In: Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Berlin: IEEE; 2007. p. 4182–9.
13.
go back to reference Taylor JL. Proprioception. Encycl Neurosci. 2009:1143–9. Taylor JL. Proprioception. Encycl Neurosci. 2009:1143–9.
14.
go back to reference Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their role in sigaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012,4:1651–97.PubMedCrossRef Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their role in sigaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012,4:1651–97.PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Moore KD, Demers MJ, Glasgow JI, Bagg SD, et al. Quantitative assessment of limb postion sense following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(2):178–87.PubMedCrossRef Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Moore KD, Demers MJ, Glasgow JI, Bagg SD, et al. Quantitative assessment of limb postion sense following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(2):178–87.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sergio LE, Kalaska JF. Changes in the temporal pattern of primary motor cortex activity in a directional isometric force versus limb movement task. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80(3):1577–83.PubMedCrossRef Sergio LE, Kalaska JF. Changes in the temporal pattern of primary motor cortex activity in a directional isometric force versus limb movement task. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80(3):1577–83.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sergio LE, Hamel-Pâquet C, Kalaska JF. Motor cortex neural correlates of output kinematics and kinetics during isometric-force and arm-reaching tasks. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94(4):2353–78.PubMedCrossRef Sergio LE, Hamel-Pâquet C, Kalaska JF. Motor cortex neural correlates of output kinematics and kinetics during isometric-force and arm-reaching tasks. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94(4):2353–78.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hamel-Pâquet C, Sergio LE, Kalaska JF. Parietal area 5 activity does not reflect the differential time-course of motor output kinetics during arm-reaching and isometric-force tasks. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95(6):3353–70.PubMedCrossRef Hamel-Pâquet C, Sergio LE, Kalaska JF. Parietal area 5 activity does not reflect the differential time-course of motor output kinetics during arm-reaching and isometric-force tasks. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95(6):3353–70.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Phillips D, Karduna A. No relationship between joint position sense and force sense at the shoulder. J Mot Behav. 2018;50(2):228–34.PubMedCrossRef Phillips D, Karduna A. No relationship between joint position sense and force sense at the shoulder. J Mot Behav. 2018;50(2):228–34.PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Brooks J, Allen TJ, Proske U. The senses of force and heaviness at the human elbow joint. Exp Brain Res. 2013;226(4):617–29.PubMedCrossRef Brooks J, Allen TJ, Proske U. The senses of force and heaviness at the human elbow joint. Exp Brain Res. 2013;226(4):617–29.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Savage G, Allen TJ, Proske U. The senses of active and passive forces at the human ankle joint. Exp Brain Res. 2015;233(7):2167–80.PubMedCrossRef Savage G, Allen TJ, Proske U. The senses of active and passive forces at the human ankle joint. Exp Brain Res. 2015;233(7):2167–80.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Niespodziński B, Kochanowicz A, Mieszkowski J, Piskorska E, Żychowska M. Relationship between joint position sense, force sense, and muscle strength and the impact of gymnastic training on proprioception. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–10.CrossRef Niespodziński B, Kochanowicz A, Mieszkowski J, Piskorska E, Żychowska M. Relationship between joint position sense, force sense, and muscle strength and the impact of gymnastic training on proprioception. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–10.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Elangovan N, Herrmann A, Konczak J. Assessing proprioceptive function: evaluating joint position matching methods againist psychophysical thresholds. Phys Ther. 2014;94(4):553–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Elangovan N, Herrmann A, Konczak J. Assessing proprioceptive function: evaluating joint position matching methods againist psychophysical thresholds. Phys Ther. 2014;94(4):553–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hillier S, Immink M, Thewlis D. Assessing proprioception: a systematic review of possibilities. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(10):933–49.PubMedCrossRef Hillier S, Immink M, Thewlis D. Assessing proprioception: a systematic review of possibilities. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(10):933–49.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Goble DJ. Proprioceptive acuity assessment via joint position matching: from basic science to general practice. Phys Ther. 2016;90(8):1176–84.CrossRef Goble DJ. Proprioceptive acuity assessment via joint position matching: from basic science to general practice. Phys Ther. 2016;90(8):1176–84.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Marini F, Squeri V, Morasso P, Campus C, Konczak J, Masia L. Robot-aided developmental assessment of wrist proprioception in children. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14(1):3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Marini F, Squeri V, Morasso P, Campus C, Konczak J, Masia L. Robot-aided developmental assessment of wrist proprioception in children. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14(1):3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(4):1651–97.PubMedCrossRef Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(4):1651–97.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mitchell M, Martin BJ, Adamo DE. Upper limb asymmetry in the sense of effort is dependent on force level. Front Psychol. 2017;8(APR):1–8. Mitchell M, Martin BJ, Adamo DE. Upper limb asymmetry in the sense of effort is dependent on force level. Front Psychol. 2017;8(APR):1–8.
32.
go back to reference Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL. Nondominant arm advantages in load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90(3):1503–13.PubMedCrossRef Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL. Nondominant arm advantages in load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90(3):1503–13.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Scotland S, Adamo DE, Martin BJ. Sense of effort revisited: relative contributions of sensory feedback and efferent copy. Neurosci Lett. 2014;561:208–12.PubMedCrossRef Scotland S, Adamo DE, Martin BJ. Sense of effort revisited: relative contributions of sensory feedback and efferent copy. Neurosci Lett. 2014;561:208–12.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL. Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. J Neurophysiol. 2006;88(5):2408–21.CrossRef Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL. Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. J Neurophysiol. 2006;88(5):2408–21.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Goble DJ, Brown SH. The biological and behavioral basis of upper limb asymmetries in sensorimotor performance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(3):598–610.PubMedCrossRef Goble DJ, Brown SH. The biological and behavioral basis of upper limb asymmetries in sensorimotor performance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(3):598–610.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Liu H, Stufflebeam SM, Sepulcre J, Hedden T, Buckner RL. Evidence from intrinsic activity that asymmetry of the human brain is controlled by multiple factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(48):20499–503.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Liu H, Stufflebeam SM, Sepulcre J, Hedden T, Buckner RL. Evidence from intrinsic activity that asymmetry of the human brain is controlled by multiple factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(48):20499–503.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Triggs WJ, Subramanium B, Rossi F. Hand preference and transcranial magnetic stimulation asymmetry of cortical motor representation. Brain Res. 1999;835(2):324–9.PubMedCrossRef Triggs WJ, Subramanium B, Rossi F. Hand preference and transcranial magnetic stimulation asymmetry of cortical motor representation. Brain Res. 1999;835(2):324–9.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Amunts K, Schlaug G, Schleicher A, Steinmetz H, Dabringhaus A, Roland PE, et al. Asymmetry in the human motor cortex and handedness. Neuroimage. 1996;4(3):216–22.PubMedCrossRef Amunts K, Schlaug G, Schleicher A, Steinmetz H, Dabringhaus A, Roland PE, et al. Asymmetry in the human motor cortex and handedness. Neuroimage. 1996;4(3):216–22.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Proske UWE. What is the role of muscle receptors in proprioception? Muscle. 2005;31(6):780–7.CrossRef Proske UWE. What is the role of muscle receptors in proprioception? Muscle. 2005;31(6):780–7.CrossRef
41.
42.
go back to reference Ansems GE, Allen TJ, Proske U. Position sense at the human forearm in the horizontal plane during loading and vibration of elbow muscles. J Physiol. 2006;576(2):445–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ansems GE, Allen TJ, Proske U. Position sense at the human forearm in the horizontal plane during loading and vibration of elbow muscles. J Physiol. 2006;576(2):445–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Kelso JAS, Holt KG, Rubin P, Kugler PN. Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data. J Mot Behav. 1981;13(4):226–61.PubMedCrossRef Kelso JAS, Holt KG, Rubin P, Kugler PN. Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data. J Mot Behav. 1981;13(4):226–61.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Kelso JAS. Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Physiol Integr Comp Physiol. 1984;246(6):R1000–4.CrossRef Kelso JAS. Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Physiol Integr Comp Physiol. 1984;246(6):R1000–4.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference De Oliveira C. The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models. Acta Psychol. 2002;110:139–59.CrossRef De Oliveira C. The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models. Acta Psychol. 2002;110:139–59.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Ponassi V, Galofaro E, Ballardini G, Carlini G, Pellegrino L, Marini F, et al. The interaction between position sense and force control. In: International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation. Pisa: Springer; 2018. p. 1044–8. Ponassi V, Galofaro E, Ballardini G, Carlini G, Pellegrino L, Marini F, et al. The interaction between position sense and force control. In: International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation. Pisa: Springer; 2018. p. 1044–8.
47.
go back to reference Ballardini G, Ponassi V, Galofaro E, Pellegrino L, Solaro C, Muller M, et al. Bimanual control of position and force in people with multiple sclerosis: preliminary results. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019. p. 1147–52. Ballardini G, Ponassi V, Galofaro E, Pellegrino L, Solaro C, Muller M, et al. Bimanual control of position and force in people with multiple sclerosis: preliminary results. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019. p. 1147–52.
48.
go back to reference Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97–113.PubMedCrossRef Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97–113.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Kelso JAS, Southard DL, Goodman D. On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science. 1979;203(4384):1029–31.PubMedCrossRef Kelso JAS, Southard DL, Goodman D. On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science. 1979;203(4384):1029–31.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Heuer H, Kleinsorge T, Spijkers W, Steglich C. Static and phasic cross-talk effects in discrete bimanual reversal movements. J Mot Behav. 2001;33(1):67–85.PubMedCrossRef Heuer H, Kleinsorge T, Spijkers W, Steglich C. Static and phasic cross-talk effects in discrete bimanual reversal movements. J Mot Behav. 2001;33(1):67–85.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Swinnen SP. Intermanual coordination: from behavioural principles to neural-network interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3(5):348.PubMedCrossRef Swinnen SP. Intermanual coordination: from behavioural principles to neural-network interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3(5):348.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Hu X, Newell KM. Dependence of asymmetrical interference on task demands and hand dominance in bimanual isometric force tasks. Exp Brain Res. 2011;208(4):533–41.PubMedCrossRef Hu X, Newell KM. Dependence of asymmetrical interference on task demands and hand dominance in bimanual isometric force tasks. Exp Brain Res. 2011;208(4):533–41.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Schmidt RA, Zelaznik HN, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT Jr. Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev. 1979;86(5):415.CrossRef Schmidt RA, Zelaznik HN, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT Jr. Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev. 1979;86(5):415.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Kelso JAS, Southard DL, Goodman D. On the coordination of two-handed movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979;5(2):229.PubMedCrossRef Kelso JAS, Southard DL, Goodman D. On the coordination of two-handed movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979;5(2):229.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, McCabe G. Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychol. 1991;77(2):137–51.CrossRef Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, McCabe G. Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychol. 1991;77(2):137–51.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, Siegelbaum SA, Hudspeth AJ. Principles of neural science. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-hill; 2000. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, Siegelbaum SA, Hudspeth AJ. Principles of neural science. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-hill; 2000.
57.
go back to reference Hatzitaki V, McKinley P. Effect of single-limb inertial loading on bilateral reaching: Interlimb interactions. Exp Brain Res. 2001;140(1):34–45.PubMedCrossRef Hatzitaki V, McKinley P. Effect of single-limb inertial loading on bilateral reaching: Interlimb interactions. Exp Brain Res. 2001;140(1):34–45.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Allin S, Matsuoka Y, Klatzky R. Measuring just noticeable differences for haptic force feedback: Implications for rehabilitation. In: Proc - 10th Symp Haptic Interfaces Virtual Environ Teleoperator Syst HAPTICS 2002; 2002. p. 299–302.CrossRef Allin S, Matsuoka Y, Klatzky R. Measuring just noticeable differences for haptic force feedback: Implications for rehabilitation. In: Proc - 10th Symp Haptic Interfaces Virtual Environ Teleoperator Syst HAPTICS 2002; 2002. p. 299–302.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Ross HE, Murray DJ. EH Weber: the sense of touch. Exp Psychol Soc New York. 1978. Ross HE, Murray DJ. EH Weber: the sense of touch. Exp Psychol Soc New York. 1978.
60.
go back to reference Brodie EE, Ross HE. Sensorimotor mechanisms in weight discrimination. Percept Psychophys. 1984;36(5):477–81.PubMedCrossRef Brodie EE, Ross HE. Sensorimotor mechanisms in weight discrimination. Percept Psychophys. 1984;36(5):477–81.PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Goble DJ, Brown SH. Upper limb asymmetries in the matching of proprioceptive versus visual targets. J Neurophysiol. 2008;99(6):3063–74.PubMedCrossRef Goble DJ, Brown SH. Upper limb asymmetries in the matching of proprioceptive versus visual targets. J Neurophysiol. 2008;99(6):3063–74.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Sainburg RL. Handedness: differential specializations for control of trajectory and position. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005;33(4):206–13.PubMedCrossRef Sainburg RL. Handedness: differential specializations for control of trajectory and position. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005;33(4):206–13.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference De Freitas PB, Krishnan V, Jaric S. Force coordination in static manipulation tasks: effects of the change in direction and handedness. Exp Brain Res. 2007;183(4):487–97.PubMedCrossRef De Freitas PB, Krishnan V, Jaric S. Force coordination in static manipulation tasks: effects of the change in direction and handedness. Exp Brain Res. 2007;183(4):487–97.PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Gandevia SC. The perception of motor commands or effort during muscular paralysis. Brain. 1982;105(Pt 1):151–9.PubMedCrossRef Gandevia SC. The perception of motor commands or effort during muscular paralysis. Brain. 1982;105(Pt 1):151–9.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI, Burke D. Kinaesthetic signals and muscle contraction. Trends Neurosci. 1992;15(2):62–5.PubMedCrossRef Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI, Burke D. Kinaesthetic signals and muscle contraction. Trends Neurosci. 1992;15(2):62–5.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Interaction between position sense and force control in bimanual tasks
Authors
Giulia Ballardini
Valentina Ponassi
Elisa Galofaro
Giorgio Carlini
Francesca Marini
Laura Pellegrino
Pietro Morasso
Maura Casadio
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0606-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2019 Go to the issue