Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Maximising follow-up participation rates in a large scale 45 and Up Study in Australia

Authors: Adrian Bauman, Philayrath Phongsavan, Alison Cowle, Emily Banks, Louisa Jorm, Kris Rogers, Bin Jalaludin, Anne Grunseit

Published in: Emerging Themes in Epidemiology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The issue of poor response rates to population surveys has existed for some decades, but few studies have explored methods to improve the response rate in follow-up population cohort studies.

Methods

A sample of 100,000 adults from the 45 and Up Study, a large population cohort in Australia, were followed up 3.5 years after the baseline cohort was assembled. A pilot mail-out of 5000 surveys produced a response rate of only 41.7 %. This study tested methods of enhancing response rate, with three groups of 1000 each allocated to (1) receiving an advance notice postcard followed by a questionnaire, (2) receiving a questionnaire and then follow-up reminder letter, and (3) both these strategies.

Results

The enhanced strategies all produced an improved response rate compared to the pilot, with a resulting mean response rate of 53.7 %. Highest response was found when both the postcard and questionnaire reminder were used (56.4 %) but this was only significantly higher when compared to postcard alone (50.5 %) but not reminder alone (54.1 %). The combined approach was used for recruitment among the remaining 92,000 participants, with a resultant further increased response rate of 61.6 %.

Conclusions

Survey prompting with a postcard and a reminder follow-up questionnaire, applied separately or combined can enhance follow-up rates in large scale survey-based epidemiological studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(9):643–53.CrossRefPubMed Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(9):643–53.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Howe LD, Tilling K, Galobardes B, Lawlor DA. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies bias in estimates of socioeconomic inequalities. Epidemiology. 2013;24:1–9.CrossRefPubMed Howe LD, Tilling K, Galobardes B, Lawlor DA. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies bias in estimates of socioeconomic inequalities. Epidemiology. 2013;24:1–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jousilahti P, Salomaa V, Kuulasmaa K, Niemela M, Vartiainen E. Total and cause specific mortality among participants and non-participants of population based health surveys: a comprehensive follow up of 54,372 Finnish men and women. J Epidemiol Commun. 2005;59:310–5.CrossRef Jousilahti P, Salomaa V, Kuulasmaa K, Niemela M, Vartiainen E. Total and cause specific mortality among participants and non-participants of population based health surveys: a comprehensive follow up of 54,372 Finnish men and women. J Epidemiol Commun. 2005;59:310–5.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kanuk L, Berenson C. Mail surveys and response rates: a literature review. J Market Res. 1975;12:440–53.CrossRef Kanuk L, Berenson C. Mail surveys and response rates: a literature review. J Market Res. 1975;12:440–53.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fox RL, Crask MR, Kim J. Mail survey response rates: a meta analysis of selected techniques. Public Opin Q. 1988;52:467–91.CrossRef Fox RL, Crask MR, Kim J. Mail survey response rates: a meta analysis of selected techniques. Public Opin Q. 1988;52:467–91.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. Br Med J. 2002;324:1183–5.CrossRef Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. Br Med J. 2002;324:1183–5.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Jørstad-Stein EC, Gates S, Lamb SE. Maximising response to postal questionnaires—a systematic review of randomised trials in health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Jørstad-Stein EC, Gates S, Lamb SE. Maximising response to postal questionnaires—a systematic review of randomised trials in health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Glidewell L, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Bonetti D, Johnston M, Eccles MP, et al. Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? Two randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:250.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Glidewell L, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Bonetti D, Johnston M, Eccles MP, et al. Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? Two randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:250.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Baxter J, Vehik K, Bennett Johnson S, Lernmark B, Roth R, Simellg T, the TEDDY Study Group. Differences in recruitment and early retention among ethnic minority participants in a large pediatric cohort: the TEDDY Study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33:633–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Baxter J, Vehik K, Bennett Johnson S, Lernmark B, Roth R, Simellg T, the TEDDY Study Group. Differences in recruitment and early retention among ethnic minority participants in a large pediatric cohort: the TEDDY Study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33:633–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Steffen AD, Kolonel LN, Nomura AM, Nagamine FS, Monroe KR, Wilkensi LR. The effect of multiple mailings on recruitment: the Multiethnic Cohort. Cancer Epid Biomar Prev. 2008;17:447–54.CrossRef Steffen AD, Kolonel LN, Nomura AM, Nagamine FS, Monroe KR, Wilkensi LR. The effect of multiple mailings on recruitment: the Multiethnic Cohort. Cancer Epid Biomar Prev. 2008;17:447–54.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Khosropour CM, Johnson BA, Ricca AV, Sullivan PS. Enhancing retention of an Internet-based cohort study of men who have sex with men (MSM) via text messaging: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khosropour CM, Johnson BA, Ricca AV, Sullivan PS. Enhancing retention of an Internet-based cohort study of men who have sex with men (MSM) via text messaging: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Peterson JC, Pirraglia PA, Wells MT, Charlson ME. Attrition in longitudinal randomized controlled trials: home visits make a difference. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Peterson JC, Pirraglia PA, Wells MT, Charlson ME. Attrition in longitudinal randomized controlled trials: home visits make a difference. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Wakabayashi C, Hayashi K, Nagai K, Sakamoto N, Iwasaki Y. Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5):e001181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wakabayashi C, Hayashi K, Nagai K, Sakamoto N, Iwasaki Y. Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5):e001181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Gates S, Williams MA, Withers E, Williamson E, Mt-Isa S, Lamb SE. Does a monetary incentive improve the response to a postal questionnaire in a randomised controlled trial? The MINT incentive study. Trials. 2009;10:44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gates S, Williams MA, Withers E, Williamson E, Mt-Isa S, Lamb SE. Does a monetary incentive improve the response to a postal questionnaire in a randomised controlled trial? The MINT incentive study. Trials. 2009;10:44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Booker CL, Seeromanie H, Benzeval M. A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Booker CL, Seeromanie H, Benzeval M. A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Mealing NM, Banks E, Jorm LR, Steel DG, Clements MS, Rogers KD. Investigation of relative risk estimates from studies of the same population with contrasting response rates and designs. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:1.CrossRef Mealing NM, Banks E, Jorm LR, Steel DG, Clements MS, Rogers KD. Investigation of relative risk estimates from studies of the same population with contrasting response rates and designs. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:1.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G. Commentary: Should we always deliberately be non-representative? Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1022–6.CrossRefPubMed Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G. Commentary: Should we always deliberately be non-representative? Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1022–6.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® 9.2 User’s Guide. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.; 2008. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® 9.2 User’s Guide. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.; 2008.
23.
go back to reference Thompson ML, Myers J, Kriebel D. Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: What is to be done? Occup Environ Med. 1998;55(4):272–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thompson ML, Myers J, Kriebel D. Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: What is to be done? Occup Environ Med. 1998;55(4):272–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata statistical software, release 13.0. College Station: Stata Corporation; 2013. StataCorp. Stata statistical software, release 13.0. College Station: Stata Corporation; 2013.
25.
go back to reference Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Lamb SE, Gates S, Fisher J. Response and non-response to postal questionnaire follow-up in a clinical trial—a qualitative study of the patient’s perspective. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14:226–35.CrossRefPubMed Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Lamb SE, Gates S, Fisher J. Response and non-response to postal questionnaire follow-up in a clinical trial—a qualitative study of the patient’s perspective. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14:226–35.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Singh-Manoux A, Kivimaki M, Glymour MM, Elbaz A, Berr C, Ebmeier KP, et al. Timing of onset of cognitive decline: results from Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:d7622.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Singh-Manoux A, Kivimaki M, Glymour MM, Elbaz A, Berr C, Ebmeier KP, et al. Timing of onset of cognitive decline: results from Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:d7622.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Maximising follow-up participation rates in a large scale 45 and Up Study in Australia
Authors
Adrian Bauman
Philayrath Phongsavan
Alison Cowle
Emily Banks
Louisa Jorm
Kris Rogers
Bin Jalaludin
Anne Grunseit
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Emerging Themes in Epidemiology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1742-7622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-016-0046-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 1/2016 Go to the issue