Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Editorial

Looking through the lens of reproductive justice: the need for a paradigm shift in sexual and reproductive health and rights research in Canada

Authors: Dina Idriss-Wheeler, Ieman M. El-Mowafi, Karine Coen-Sanchez, Abdiasis Yalahow, Sanni Yaya

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

In order to begin understanding the current context, producing culturally meaningful findings, and creating equitable health outcomes in the sphere of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in Canada, we must first consider how, with whom and by whom research is conducted. As part of a series of commentaries on Reproductive Justice in Canada in BMC Reproductive Health, in this segment, we echo the Research Working Group of the Black Mamas Matter Alliance (BMMA) in emphasizing that SRHR research related to Indigenous, Black and People of Colour (IBPOC) must be rooted in a Reproductive Justice framework that includes social justice and human rights [1]. We call for IBPOC community voices to be heard, information to be accessible, narratives to be representative, and communities to have “control over production, documentation, possession and dissemination of their own data or stories” [2]. The authors of this commentary argue that a paradigm shift is needed in SRHR research, one that considers how Canadian institutions conduct, fund, and disseminate research on Indigenous, Black and racialized populations in Canada and internationally. …
Footnotes
1
Disaggregated data: data that is broken down by demographics such as race, age, gender, and/or location.
 
2
The authors condemn the use of this colonist term, and its use within any legislative Acts. Any use of the term in this commentary refers to specific Acts and designations by the Canadian government.
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Black Mama Matters Alliance (BMMBA). Black maternal health research re-envisioned: best practices for the conduct of research with, for, and by Black Mamas. Harv Law Policy Rev. 2020;14:394–407. Black Mama Matters Alliance (BMMBA). Black maternal health research re-envisioned: best practices for the conduct of research with, for, and by Black Mamas. Harv Law Policy Rev. 2020;14:394–407.
7.
go back to reference Kobayashi A. Now you see them, how you see them: women of colour in Canadian Academia. In: Henry F, Tator C, editors. Racism in the Canadian University: demanding social justice, inclusion, and equity. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press; 2009. p. 60–75.CrossRef Kobayashi A. Now you see them, how you see them: women of colour in Canadian Academia. In: Henry F, Tator C, editors. Racism in the Canadian University: demanding social justice, inclusion, and equity. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press; 2009. p. 60–75.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Henry F, Dua E, Kobayashi A, James C, Li P, Ramos H, et al. Race, racialization and Indigeneity in Canadian universities. Race Ethn Educ. 2017;20(3):300–14.CrossRef Henry F, Dua E, Kobayashi A, James C, Li P, Ramos H, et al. Race, racialization and Indigeneity in Canadian universities. Race Ethn Educ. 2017;20(3):300–14.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Datta G, Siddiqi A, Lofters A. Transforming race-based health research in Canada. CMAJ. 2021;193(3):E99-100.CrossRef Datta G, Siddiqi A, Lofters A. Transforming race-based health research in Canada. CMAJ. 2021;193(3):E99-100.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Burns KEA, Straus SE, Liu K, Rizvi L, Guyatt G. Gender differences in grant and personnel award funding rates at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research based on research content area: a retrospective analysis. PLOS Med. 2019;16(10):e1002935. Burns KEA, Straus SE, Liu K, Rizvi L, Guyatt G. Gender differences in grant and personnel award funding rates at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research based on research content area: a retrospective analysis. PLOS Med. 2019;16(10):e1002935.
13.
go back to reference Farkas L. Analysis and comparative review of Equality Data collection practices in the European Union—Data Collection in the filed of ethnicity. European Commission; 2017 p. 53. (Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers). Farkas L. Analysis and comparative review of Equality Data collection practices in the European Union—Data Collection in the filed of ethnicity. European Commission; 2017 p. 53. (Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers).
15.
go back to reference Canadian Institute for Health Informatopm (CIHI). Proposed standards for race-based and Indigenous identity data collection and health reporting in Canada. Ottawa, ONT: CIHI; 2020 p. 32. Canadian Institute for Health Informatopm (CIHI). Proposed standards for race-based and Indigenous identity data collection and health reporting in Canada. Ottawa, ONT: CIHI; 2020 p. 32.
19.
go back to reference Redwood S, Gill PS. Under-representation of minority ethnic groups in research—call for action. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(612):342–3.CrossRef Redwood S, Gill PS. Under-representation of minority ethnic groups in research—call for action. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(612):342–3.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hunter M. Rethinking epistemology, methodology, and racism: or, is White sociology really dead? Race Soc. 2002;5(2):119–38.CrossRef Hunter M. Rethinking epistemology, methodology, and racism: or, is White sociology really dead? Race Soc. 2002;5(2):119–38.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Crenshaw K. Critical race theory: the key writings that formed the movement. New York: New York Press; 1995. Crenshaw K. Critical race theory: the key writings that formed the movement. New York: New York Press; 1995.
30.
go back to reference Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev. 1991;45(6):1241–99.CrossRef Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev. 1991;45(6):1241–99.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Patterson GR, Wells KC. A social learning approach, vol. 3: Coercive family process. Behav Ther. 1984;15(1):121–7. Patterson GR, Wells KC. A social learning approach, vol. 3: Coercive family process. Behav Ther. 1984;15(1):121–7.
36.
go back to reference Price K. What is reproductive justice? How women of color activists are redefining the pro-choice paradigm. Meridians Middlet Conn. 2010;10(2):42–65.CrossRef Price K. What is reproductive justice? How women of color activists are redefining the pro-choice paradigm. Meridians Middlet Conn. 2010;10(2):42–65.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Looking through the lens of reproductive justice: the need for a paradigm shift in sexual and reproductive health and rights research in Canada
Authors
Dina Idriss-Wheeler
Ieman M. El-Mowafi
Karine Coen-Sanchez
Abdiasis Yalahow
Sanni Yaya
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01169-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Reproductive Health 1/2021 Go to the issue